NEWS January 2007. / From the newspapers.
1. Sverdlovsk region: in the village of Nave Shaitansky killed forty priest, Fr Oleg and icons stolen from the church of Peter and Paul. After the tragedy left a widow and four children. Detained two suspects from ALAPAEVSKIE.
2. Metropolitan of Warsaw has resigned because of accusations of collaboration with the secret services of socialist Poland.
3. ACTUAL ARCHIVES - 1995.
Privatizer.
For the latest information about the "Aum Shinrikyo" now hear the same constant as the weather forecast. And its meaning is one: in our lives finalized some hostile man "power", which adopted its final rule of up to what is already simply chooses for itself for our children. The fact that children - the last and most important, that we can take a conquered people - well aware of all Caesars of Rome.
While our people were losing state or its symbols, losing social benefits or job; economy or party committees, have lost their own health or the country, conscience, or 25 million compatriots "abroad", the contributions to a savings bank or something else - it was more tolerant was "all right". But here "for a voucher, so to speak, began to take away from the family and children. And the humility not to resist, apparently, comes a natural end.
... A few days ago we were tipped on the document: "humble Nikon, Bishop of Ekaterinburg and Verkhotursk, the message of our beloved flock," he said. In it the local Orthodox hierarch, drawing a truly catastrophic picture of our "Ural spirituality, among other things, talking and such are the words:" I had asked to publish it's my word to the regional newspaper "Ural worker" and "regional newspaper" The former "For Power to the Soviets "- approx. Editor. /, But under different pretexts, refused me. These publications have a different political orientation ... but the editor and the Ural worker "and" Regional newspapers were unanimous in their refusal. They did not print this message to my congregation even on the Rights of paid advertisements.
And in fact that's the fact, in our view, explains much more sense than even the most terrible fact "Aum Shinrikyo"!
And, in fact, why is it so different newspapers have shown a stubborn unanimity in the same? What a strange "solidarity"? Finally, in general, who are they?
There will be no great stretch, seems to say that the journalistic and managerial personnel of both publications, razlichestvuya now out of the same occupational cohorts: from ideological asset very, very recently, Sverdlovsk HA and QA Committee.
- Well, what of it? - The question may arise. - Previously, many of them on the way to party headquarters, received their diplomas journalism at USU!
Yes, strictly speaking, nothing. Is it just that the "party ideology" of the Middle Urals wore, in essence, shrill, duplicitous and provocative. What, you say, very, very distinguished it from similar bodies, for example, in Penza, Chelyabinsk, Tyumen and Tver.
Today, it is noticeable particularly well.
... So, in the Journal of Ural »№ 4 in 1994 published a book of Spanish journalist Pilar Bonet. This author - without any so-called "Western bias" and it is documented to the reader just follows. Firstly, that the Soviet Union destroyed the Sverdlovsk Regional Party Committee. Secondly, that led their party in the brains of this grand business PhD Gennady Burbulis. Third, that the latter was a graduate of USU and the teachers and mentors Burbulis was Dean of the Philosophical Faculty, MN Rutkevich and KN Lyubutin, whose grasping hands, over the past 30 years, was all local party ideological ASSETS . Journalistic asset - including.
Spirit and method of their management - is a fierce monopoly in science and ideology. When an honest worker in the party apparatus suppressed by a professor with the department, as a true scientist in the department pressured by "their" trainers from the party apparatus. The degree of ferocity was such that, in disagreement with the "faculty" sectionalism, without embarrassment, gave to "mental health" mercy even formally own (See: XX Century and the world. № 5, 1990; Ural », № 2, 1990 G.)
Long arm of the rabid zealots of the party "of academic and academic" party "to reach for as much of Moscow, where Mikhail Rutkevich, with VAK USSR, the party attempted to noose dodushit greatest Orthodox philosopher of the twentieth century Alexei Losev. (Most of which he LM Kaganovich, in 1930, oven loss on the White Sea-Baltic Canal.) And the last 20 years, his successor, K. Lyubutin savaged in Sverdlovsk student Losev BAKSHUTOVA VK
By the way, that the co-participation in such matters - was a prerequisite of almost any "held" an academic career at the Faculty of USU. (Of course, in full agreement with this fact and its rector!)
All this - has gone nowhere! All this - not "yesterday" in the Urals and not with ancient. All of this still lives with us all, in the rehabilitated city of Yekaterinburg, then: and in our souls untidy, and heaven knows Where are the chairs of "dialectical materialism", "historical materialism" and "scientific communism" and in the offices of our local newspapers ...
In fact, let's ask a simple question: what is a monopoly in ideology? Answer: yes it is, in essence, sectarianism is!
The result marked the same way in the "Message ..." arhipastyrja: implementation in half of schools of Yekaterinburg sectarian curriculum "My World and Me".
How did this happen?
Yesterday's "scientific Communists emerged today as a" political scientists "," cultural studies "," social scientists ", etc. and, forgetting the pre-"repent", rushed to the grassroots units of public education "to teach" our teachers.
What to teach?
A spiritual blindness in relation to sectarianism. What else can teach a perpetual "privatizer Truth": yesterday "communist", today - the "democratic", but always anti-folk, ready, from careerist motives, paternal sell for any inozemnuyu tinsel ...
That is why the two old-party newspapers, which are now challenged each other only "label" for its monopoly on the public minds of our countrymen, he immediately found common ground in silence between them when the letter of Bishop Nikon sensed a mortal danger from the Church for sectarianism , voruyuschego children's souls.
What is surprising? The difference - just in sight. Everything else is essentially - in common. Up to membership in the same regional journalistic organization of their employees and their editors.
Theophilus Bogolyubov.
Ekaterinburg. June 12, 1995
1. Sverdlovsk region: in the village of Nave Shaitansky killed forty priest, Fr Oleg and icons stolen from the church of Peter and Paul. After the tragedy left a widow and four children. Detained two suspects from ALAPAEVSKIE.
2. Metropolitan of Warsaw has resigned because of accusations of collaboration with the secret services of socialist Poland.
3. ACTUAL ARCHIVES - 1995.
Privatizer.
For the latest information about the "Aum Shinrikyo" now hear the same constant as the weather forecast. And its meaning is one: in our lives finalized some hostile man "power", which adopted its final rule of up to what is already simply chooses for itself for our children. The fact that children - the last and most important, that we can take a conquered people - well aware of all Caesars of Rome.
While our people were losing state or its symbols, losing social benefits or job; economy or party committees, have lost their own health or the country, conscience, or 25 million compatriots "abroad", the contributions to a savings bank or something else - it was more tolerant was "all right". But here "for a voucher, so to speak, began to take away from the family and children. And the humility not to resist, apparently, comes a natural end.
... A few days ago we were tipped on the document: "humble Nikon, Bishop of Ekaterinburg and Verkhotursk, the message of our beloved flock," he said. In it the local Orthodox hierarch, drawing a truly catastrophic picture of our "Ural spirituality, among other things, talking and such are the words:" I had asked to publish it's my word to the regional newspaper "Ural worker" and "regional newspaper" The former "For Power to the Soviets "- approx. Editor. /, But under different pretexts, refused me. These publications have a different political orientation ... but the editor and the Ural worker "and" Regional newspapers were unanimous in their refusal. They did not print this message to my congregation even on the Rights of paid advertisements.
And in fact that's the fact, in our view, explains much more sense than even the most terrible fact "Aum Shinrikyo"!
And, in fact, why is it so different newspapers have shown a stubborn unanimity in the same? What a strange "solidarity"? Finally, in general, who are they?
There will be no great stretch, seems to say that the journalistic and managerial personnel of both publications, razlichestvuya now out of the same occupational cohorts: from ideological asset very, very recently, Sverdlovsk HA and QA Committee.
- Well, what of it? - The question may arise. - Previously, many of them on the way to party headquarters, received their diplomas journalism at USU!
Yes, strictly speaking, nothing. Is it just that the "party ideology" of the Middle Urals wore, in essence, shrill, duplicitous and provocative. What, you say, very, very distinguished it from similar bodies, for example, in Penza, Chelyabinsk, Tyumen and Tver.
Today, it is noticeable particularly well.
... So, in the Journal of Ural »№ 4 in 1994 published a book of Spanish journalist Pilar Bonet. This author - without any so-called "Western bias" and it is documented to the reader just follows. Firstly, that the Soviet Union destroyed the Sverdlovsk Regional Party Committee. Secondly, that led their party in the brains of this grand business PhD Gennady Burbulis. Third, that the latter was a graduate of USU and the teachers and mentors Burbulis was Dean of the Philosophical Faculty, MN Rutkevich and KN Lyubutin, whose grasping hands, over the past 30 years, was all local party ideological ASSETS . Journalistic asset - including.
Spirit and method of their management - is a fierce monopoly in science and ideology. When an honest worker in the party apparatus suppressed by a professor with the department, as a true scientist in the department pressured by "their" trainers from the party apparatus. The degree of ferocity was such that, in disagreement with the "faculty" sectionalism, without embarrassment, gave to "mental health" mercy even formally own (See: XX Century and the world. № 5, 1990; Ural », № 2, 1990 G.)
Long arm of the rabid zealots of the party "of academic and academic" party "to reach for as much of Moscow, where Mikhail Rutkevich, with VAK USSR, the party attempted to noose dodushit greatest Orthodox philosopher of the twentieth century Alexei Losev. (Most of which he LM Kaganovich, in 1930, oven loss on the White Sea-Baltic Canal.) And the last 20 years, his successor, K. Lyubutin savaged in Sverdlovsk student Losev BAKSHUTOVA VK
By the way, that the co-participation in such matters - was a prerequisite of almost any "held" an academic career at the Faculty of USU. (Of course, in full agreement with this fact and its rector!)
All this - has gone nowhere! All this - not "yesterday" in the Urals and not with ancient. All of this still lives with us all, in the rehabilitated city of Yekaterinburg, then: and in our souls untidy, and heaven knows Where are the chairs of "dialectical materialism", "historical materialism" and "scientific communism" and in the offices of our local newspapers ...
In fact, let's ask a simple question: what is a monopoly in ideology? Answer: yes it is, in essence, sectarianism is!
The result marked the same way in the "Message ..." arhipastyrja: implementation in half of schools of Yekaterinburg sectarian curriculum "My World and Me".
How did this happen?
Yesterday's "scientific Communists emerged today as a" political scientists "," cultural studies "," social scientists ", etc. and, forgetting the pre-"repent", rushed to the grassroots units of public education "to teach" our teachers.
What to teach?
A spiritual blindness in relation to sectarianism. What else can teach a perpetual "privatizer Truth": yesterday "communist", today - the "democratic", but always anti-folk, ready, from careerist motives, paternal sell for any inozemnuyu tinsel ...
That is why the two old-party newspapers, which are now challenged each other only "label" for its monopoly on the public minds of our countrymen, he immediately found common ground in silence between them when the letter of Bishop Nikon sensed a mortal danger from the Church for sectarianism , voruyuschego children's souls.
What is surprising? The difference - just in sight. Everything else is essentially - in common. Up to membership in the same regional journalistic organization of their employees and their editors.
Theophilus Bogolyubov.
Ekaterinburg. June 12, 1995
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий