Topical Archive 2005
Recently, the media simply overwhelmed by various publications in support of Mikhail Khodorkovsky, and passing and the other oligarchs, often presenting them innocent victims of evil officials. And these articles are freely printed, in a decent amount, for a whole printed page, and even more. No, I forbid my god, I'm not against freedom of speech, but just know the situation inside. So this article, you can say with confidence, no major newspapers did not print it.
In the "Arguments and Facts", under number 16, 2005, published a detailed interview with Edvard Radzinsky, where he categorically stated: "We have to cannibalize blood fist razevreit oligarch", "People yearn for a happy time when everyone's doing pretend to work. "
Poor, our people! Who are just labels on him not to hang. Which only myths about him spread. And a little sadness to it that in a long line of detractors of the people there was one. Historian Radzinsky hoaxer, I think, is well aware that the Bolsheviks are still far from the people that raskulachivala power, which was also far from the people, the oligarchs in Russia there, we can say that yesterday, so it can not be in the blood people - razevreit oligarch Khodorkovsky that judges are not people, and the same power with which he was yesterday at the same time. Knows, but for some reason known only to him, prevaricate. Curve, as it can not not know that people even before the adjustment worked, and worked for pennies, rather than pretending to be working. Built nuclear plants, plants that produce millions of cars and tractors, and many other things that were necessary for society. And now, after half a decade of adjustment and reform, we can not go out on the pre-perestroika industrial production. But now and then, at the forefront, is the question of power, not the people. About her then, as time Radzinsky says nothing.
It makes no sense to retell all the verbose and watery, like all his books, interviews Radzinsky, but I consider it necessary to note that Radzinsky, claiming that "new heaven and new shore, where righteousness dwells - to win, just pulling away from the new heaven and new shores, where righteousness dwells.
In contrast to Radzinsky, Simon Figner, in his article "oligarch-governor is still better governor-general" was published in Novaya Gazeta, under number 29, openly express their views and invites the Russians to adopt a system of double standards, because of this, we nowhere no longer hide. But, all in order.
Figner not Julita and immediately declared: "It is foolish to deny that the oligarchic capital in Russia grew by public property", but then he deftly plays with this unpleasant fact: "is it really this is unfair? In general, whether it is appropriate in this situation raise the question of justice? "And then he argues for a long time without giving a single fact, and concludes, based on the assumption that it could have been worse, the oligarchs are the saviors of our economy.
In fact, as noted by the State Duma deputy, deputy of the Committee on Economic Policy, the State Duma Yelena Panina, in an interview with "Arguments and Facts": "In Russia, the fixed assets depreciated by 60-80 percent. In many, but almost all industries, we can not reach the level of production of 80-ies. Wages of employees does not exceed the cost of living. " She echoed Alexander Dugin, saying that the oligarchs not only bled the state, the real economy, the industry, but also medium and small businesses. (The newspaper "Trud" on 23 November 2004) Igor Artemyev, head of the Federal Antimonopoly Service, in a speech at a meeting of the State Duma, said: "The whole reason for gasoline," suffering "in the monopolization of the domestic market, major oil companies. This triggered the country's rapid inflation, which threatens to go over the brink, the government planned for this fiscal year, and has allowed oil producers (the oligarchs) is a part-time in 2004 to pump out of the pockets of Russians tens of billions of rubles. "
Detracting from the individual moments can and should repeat, long known in the political economy of truth, that the nature of capital is determined by its size and that big monopoly capital depletes the society, and the pursuit of profit act boldly and unscrupulously, becomes a hindrance to the development of the whole society. That is why, in all developed countries, there are antitrust laws and structures. And would not like Simon Figner, provide us with the oligarchs and the fluffy white patrons and philanthropists, the oligarchs will not cease to operate as it is dictated to them by their huge capital, and the author acknowledges that, to quote Marx: "there is no crime to which would not have gone capital for the sake of 300% per annum. "
And then he sets out his views on society and the concept of justice.
"To judge of oligarchs in terms of morality - still that blame the lions for what they eat antelope. The oligarchs do not want to display compassion and selflessness. They have different historical mission. (It can be assumed as Figner not say what the mission is apparently to rob the country and destroy Russia) They - the elite of society and therefore should follow other than ordinary people, the principles of ...
Yes, the Russian oligarchs are deprived of moral prejudice. We do not wonder why the most powerful and experienced the lion does not hunt, but, nevertheless, the first eating prey, which he brought members of the pride. That is the law of nature: the stronger take-all.
Human society is by its nature is not unlike the Pride. "
Well, now let someone may be, will see the difference between Nazi racial theories of superiority of "blond beast" over the "subhuman" and fignerovskoy fantasy? Nazi theory in relation to the stretch Figner looks just learned treatise. Compare the modern community of people with wildlife, and the output ratio of one group of people to another, from the relationship between animals absolute nonsense, which is not even evaluated.
That this is so blur the moral foundations of society. Without denying the predatory nature of monopoly capital and its representatives oligarchs Figner, by harping on the old fairy tales about lions and antelope, stretched over a human society, trying to prove that you can not judge by the oligarchs accepted in society, the laws, "it is - the elite, the gold reserve of the country."
It is we, ordinary citizens, we adhere to generally accepted ethical standards, do not kill, Thou shalt not steal, and our oligarchs lack of moral prejudice ", so they allowed it.
What are you then, Mr Khodorkovsky's imprisonment Figner outraged? Everything happens according to your theory. You too, like whether any are defined.
Naturally, all this empty stretch and verbiage, as neither Figner nor notorious oligarchs in the open will not practice this "animal" theory. And as soon as the Figner or to another supporter fignerovskih postulates come armed men, and say: Come on buddy, come across. Need to share. We are ardent supporters of your theory. Yesterday was you're strong and zahapal part of the property, and now we're stronger than you, we have a weapon. What is even not necessary to assume that the same Figner zavereschit about democracy, respecting the laws of human society, of justice and will run to the nearest police station to file a complaint.
Well, we, ordinary citizens are not considered moral prejudice, does not adhere to double standards, it is worth thinking, learning to defend their interests and find ways out of crisis situations in the way of building a new, more equitable society.
Recently, the media simply overwhelmed by various publications in support of Mikhail Khodorkovsky, and passing and the other oligarchs, often presenting them innocent victims of evil officials. And these articles are freely printed, in a decent amount, for a whole printed page, and even more. No, I forbid my god, I'm not against freedom of speech, but just know the situation inside. So this article, you can say with confidence, no major newspapers did not print it.
In the "Arguments and Facts", under number 16, 2005, published a detailed interview with Edvard Radzinsky, where he categorically stated: "We have to cannibalize blood fist razevreit oligarch", "People yearn for a happy time when everyone's doing pretend to work. "
Poor, our people! Who are just labels on him not to hang. Which only myths about him spread. And a little sadness to it that in a long line of detractors of the people there was one. Historian Radzinsky hoaxer, I think, is well aware that the Bolsheviks are still far from the people that raskulachivala power, which was also far from the people, the oligarchs in Russia there, we can say that yesterday, so it can not be in the blood people - razevreit oligarch Khodorkovsky that judges are not people, and the same power with which he was yesterday at the same time. Knows, but for some reason known only to him, prevaricate. Curve, as it can not not know that people even before the adjustment worked, and worked for pennies, rather than pretending to be working. Built nuclear plants, plants that produce millions of cars and tractors, and many other things that were necessary for society. And now, after half a decade of adjustment and reform, we can not go out on the pre-perestroika industrial production. But now and then, at the forefront, is the question of power, not the people. About her then, as time Radzinsky says nothing.
It makes no sense to retell all the verbose and watery, like all his books, interviews Radzinsky, but I consider it necessary to note that Radzinsky, claiming that "new heaven and new shore, where righteousness dwells - to win, just pulling away from the new heaven and new shores, where righteousness dwells.
In contrast to Radzinsky, Simon Figner, in his article "oligarch-governor is still better governor-general" was published in Novaya Gazeta, under number 29, openly express their views and invites the Russians to adopt a system of double standards, because of this, we nowhere no longer hide. But, all in order.
Figner not Julita and immediately declared: "It is foolish to deny that the oligarchic capital in Russia grew by public property", but then he deftly plays with this unpleasant fact: "is it really this is unfair? In general, whether it is appropriate in this situation raise the question of justice? "And then he argues for a long time without giving a single fact, and concludes, based on the assumption that it could have been worse, the oligarchs are the saviors of our economy.
In fact, as noted by the State Duma deputy, deputy of the Committee on Economic Policy, the State Duma Yelena Panina, in an interview with "Arguments and Facts": "In Russia, the fixed assets depreciated by 60-80 percent. In many, but almost all industries, we can not reach the level of production of 80-ies. Wages of employees does not exceed the cost of living. " She echoed Alexander Dugin, saying that the oligarchs not only bled the state, the real economy, the industry, but also medium and small businesses. (The newspaper "Trud" on 23 November 2004) Igor Artemyev, head of the Federal Antimonopoly Service, in a speech at a meeting of the State Duma, said: "The whole reason for gasoline," suffering "in the monopolization of the domestic market, major oil companies. This triggered the country's rapid inflation, which threatens to go over the brink, the government planned for this fiscal year, and has allowed oil producers (the oligarchs) is a part-time in 2004 to pump out of the pockets of Russians tens of billions of rubles. "
Detracting from the individual moments can and should repeat, long known in the political economy of truth, that the nature of capital is determined by its size and that big monopoly capital depletes the society, and the pursuit of profit act boldly and unscrupulously, becomes a hindrance to the development of the whole society. That is why, in all developed countries, there are antitrust laws and structures. And would not like Simon Figner, provide us with the oligarchs and the fluffy white patrons and philanthropists, the oligarchs will not cease to operate as it is dictated to them by their huge capital, and the author acknowledges that, to quote Marx: "there is no crime to which would not have gone capital for the sake of 300% per annum. "
And then he sets out his views on society and the concept of justice.
"To judge of oligarchs in terms of morality - still that blame the lions for what they eat antelope. The oligarchs do not want to display compassion and selflessness. They have different historical mission. (It can be assumed as Figner not say what the mission is apparently to rob the country and destroy Russia) They - the elite of society and therefore should follow other than ordinary people, the principles of ...
Yes, the Russian oligarchs are deprived of moral prejudice. We do not wonder why the most powerful and experienced the lion does not hunt, but, nevertheless, the first eating prey, which he brought members of the pride. That is the law of nature: the stronger take-all.
Human society is by its nature is not unlike the Pride. "
Well, now let someone may be, will see the difference between Nazi racial theories of superiority of "blond beast" over the "subhuman" and fignerovskoy fantasy? Nazi theory in relation to the stretch Figner looks just learned treatise. Compare the modern community of people with wildlife, and the output ratio of one group of people to another, from the relationship between animals absolute nonsense, which is not even evaluated.
That this is so blur the moral foundations of society. Without denying the predatory nature of monopoly capital and its representatives oligarchs Figner, by harping on the old fairy tales about lions and antelope, stretched over a human society, trying to prove that you can not judge by the oligarchs accepted in society, the laws, "it is - the elite, the gold reserve of the country."
It is we, ordinary citizens, we adhere to generally accepted ethical standards, do not kill, Thou shalt not steal, and our oligarchs lack of moral prejudice ", so they allowed it.
What are you then, Mr Khodorkovsky's imprisonment Figner outraged? Everything happens according to your theory. You too, like whether any are defined.
Naturally, all this empty stretch and verbiage, as neither Figner nor notorious oligarchs in the open will not practice this "animal" theory. And as soon as the Figner or to another supporter fignerovskih postulates come armed men, and say: Come on buddy, come across. Need to share. We are ardent supporters of your theory. Yesterday was you're strong and zahapal part of the property, and now we're stronger than you, we have a weapon. What is even not necessary to assume that the same Figner zavereschit about democracy, respecting the laws of human society, of justice and will run to the nearest police station to file a complaint.
Well, we, ordinary citizens are not considered moral prejudice, does not adhere to double standards, it is worth thinking, learning to defend their interests and find ways out of crisis situations in the way of building a new, more equitable society.
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий