Dialogue with the skeptic

 Klark | 05.01.2010 This is some M such "RUSSIA" ...? 2010 16:36 Moscow. Minsk considers senseless involvement in TS while maintaining export duties on oil www.k2kapital.com 02.01.2010 Minsk considers meaningless participation of Belarus in the Customs Union (CU) "troika" (Belarus, Russia and Kazakhstan) in the case of preservation of the Russian oil export duties to the republic, told Interfax news agency on Saturday, a government representative of Belarus, close to the course of the oil negotiations.
Conclusion oil trade outside the configuration of the customs union creates a dangerous precedent. This could follow the desire to do likewise with gas, electricity, and, possibly, with others, not commodities, goods, "- said the agency interlocutor.
The result of this policy exceptions commodity groups will be "strain and lameness" of the Customs Union, the official said.
Recall afternoon Russia and Belarus continue negotiations on oil supplies. According to the vice-president of Transneft, "Mikhail Barkov they are conducted in Moscow at a high level.
"Composition of the serious level of government," - said earlier today Barkov Petroleum Information Agency (ANI). Moscow. Russia cut off oil supplies to Belarus (supplement) www.k2kapital.com 03.01.2010
Russia cut off oil supplies to Belarus, Reuters reported citing two unnamed traders of Russian oil companies.
According to the agency, the oil transit to Europe this has no impact.
The two sides Reuters said that the two processing facilities in Belarus - Refinery Naftan and refinery Mozyr - oil reserves for about a week. According to one source, the reaction of the official Minsk will not follow until 4 January, when Belarus will end holidays. President Alexander Lukashenko, then "come back and decide what to do," the source explained.
Earlier today, referring to the Assistant Secretary of Energy of Russia Irina Yesipova reported that negotiations on supplies and transit of oil through Belarus to continue.

However, writes Reuters, stop deliveries occurred after Russia and Belarus have failed to agree a new contract. According to the agency, in response to a requirement for 100 percent payment of customs duties Minsk has threatened to raise the fee for transit of Russian oil to $ 45 per ton. Recall, on the eve of Russia and Belarus after the collapse of talks to resume dialogue on oil supplies. XXX XXX XXX REPLY. So what does such, I may say, "Russia" may cut RUSSIAN OIL - Belarus? After all, a purely semantic "BELARUS" means "white" Russia. That is "clean", "best". And speaking of logical and philosophically - the "best" and is "ideal". Under the laws of the same theory of knowledge (and it is - the science of sciences, "royal science") is a special case of a real ideal. And therefore it belongs to he same subject ... So, according to the laws of epistemology, the Russian oil (= real), in the first place belongs to WHITE-Rousseau (= ideal), and only then, as a residual, and other "Russians", which is still, apparently, "is not enough clean "... Michael Kazarin. Accountant from Perm, in absentia listeners City Seminar in Russian, German and Greek philosophy "Russian LOGO. Klark | 05.01.2010 17:12 Re (3): this is some M such "RUSSIA" ...? Reply to: Skeptic (Re (2): this is some M such "RUSSIA" ...?) Our oil - is whose?
Skeptic | 05.01.2010 17:20 Re (4): this is some M such "RUSSIA" ...? Reply to: Klark (Re (3): this is some M such "RUSSIA" ...?) "Our" is a Russian, Mr Clarke. Is the same, the export duty from the sale of which will go into the Russian budget. And not in Belarus, no matter how good the peasant was not dad.
Klark | 05.01.2010 17:58 Re (5): this is some M such "RUSSIA" ...? Reply to: Skeptic (Re (4): this is some M such "RUSSIA" ...?) You're right! But only if you do not distinguish between legal and historical Russia, ie, real. We live in the real Russia, and Russia because the budget law is not ours, as well as export duties on Russian oil.

  Skeptic | 05.01.2010 18:09 Re (6): this is some M such "RUSSIA" ...? Reply to: Klark (Re (5): this is some M such "RUSSIA" ...?) "We live in Russia, we are real, and because the budget law Russia does not belong to us" -? 124
  Klark | 06.01.2010 19:03 Re (7): this is some M such "RUSSIA" ...? Reply to: Local (Re (6): this is some M such "RUSSIA" ...?) Question for the Skeptic, Davydova, infirmary, etc.: You do not agree that White Russia - RUSSIA THE BEST? Or is this something you disagree, but believe that he personally "Dad Lukashenko" not worthy to be representative of such RUSSIA? ... By the way, "old man" - is none other than the state status .. Anyone else from your beloved president is calling the people as well?
   Skeptic | 06.01.2010 21:14 Re (8): this is some M such "RUSSIA" ...? Reply to: Klark (Re (7): this is some M such "RUSSIA" ...?) "You do not agree that White Russia - RUSSIA THE BEST? - Is that the formulation of the question? In football we have played better.
   Klark | 07.01.2010 11:02 Re (9): this is some M such "RUSSIA" ...? Reply to: Skeptic (Re (8): this is some M such "RUSSIA" ...?) Skeptic wrote: "You do not agree that White Russia - RUSSIA THE BEST? - Is that the formulation of the question? In football we have played better. What is the question formulation? Does not the question raised in the basic publication of this forum and in its original comments? And who is "we" are better? Who are these "we"? And someone - YOU? You yourself, from whose "We" are you? Or for you "meaning" and "football" - synonyms? This is the principle of well-known: If FOOTBALL makes sense, then ... a sense - this is FOOTBALL! And that's not football - is nonsense. And nothing else.
Is it too much you "SILENCING", without clarifying that "the commentator" comment on anything you can not? Simply has no right ...
   Skeptic | 07.01.2010 11:37 Re (10): this is some M such "RUSSIA" ...? Reply to: Klark (Re (9): this is some M such "RUSSIA" ...?) "The laws of the same theory of knowledge (and it is - the science of sciences," royal science ") is a real special case of the ideal." - Yes? Kant to Hegel reread? More careful with them. These things - not an axiom. To begin with the interpretation of the concept of "perfect" deal would be good. With this for a couple of thousand years of torment. "Purely semantic" BELARUS "means" white "Russia. That is "clean", "best". " - A purely semantic Tatarstan and Bashkortostan - Russia does not. And oil is extracted. And how should we? Maybe it is better not to engage in semantic byssmyslennoy balancing act, and the legal aspects of the issue to continue to consider? A "Michael Kazarin. accountant from Perm, in absentia listener City Seminar in Russian, German and Greek philosophy "Russian LOGO" you may want to switch to full-time department and work as an accountant in absentia. Then do not be such parodies of syllogisms for third grade: "If there is a sense in Soccer, then ... a sense - this is FOOTBALL! And that's not football - is nonsense. And nothing else. "
  Skeptic | 07.01.2010 11:42 Re (11): this is some M such "RUSSIA" ...? Reply to: Skeptic (Re (10): this is some M such "RUSSIA" ...?) Correction: "syllogisms" = sophistry
  Skeptic | 07.01.2010 11:57 Re (12): this is some M such "RUSSIA" ...? Reply to: MBK (Re (11): this is some M such "RUSSIA" ...?) "Russia does not produce a single gram of aluminum is done in its territory by foreign companies." - About us - our, Russian. The owners of these companies - foreign. This is just in the good "zero" so took shape
    Skeptic | 07.01.2010 13:44 Re (14): this is some M such "RUSSIA" ...? Reply to: MBK (Re (13): this is some M such "RUSSIA" ...?) "If the island of Jersey became the Russian, the aluminum - the Russian." - A Volkswagen, was released in China, whose? All ALUMINIUM plants in Russia - the Russian company. Registered in Russia, operating under Russian law and paying taxes in Russia. In t.ch and dividend payments to foreign owners. The company may be Russian, even at 100-percent foreign ownership. How Vsevolozhsk Ford, for example.

   Skeptic | 07.01.2010 13:55 Re (16): this is some M such "RUSSIA" ...? Reply to: MBK (Re (15): this is some M such "RUSSIA" ...?) "You report an annual or quarterly seen this mythical" Musa Rusal or so ... " - And why do I? Rusal - Russian holding. A report of Aluminium Plants published regularly. Skeptic | 07.01.2010 13:55 Re (17): this is some M such "RUSSIA" ...? Reply to: Skeptic (Re (16): this is some M such "RUSSIA" ...?) Rusal - not a Russian holding amendment.

  Skeptic | 07.01.2010 14:20 Re (18): this is some M such "RUSSIA" ...? Reply to: MBK (Re (17): this is some M such "RUSSIA" ...?) "No such holding company in Russia" - Well, I already corrected above. Incidentally, in Rusal includes not only the Russian companies. Its a raw material for aluminum production in Russia - not enough to swear by.
   Klark | 07.01.2010 19:08 Re (11): this is some M such "RUSSIA" ...? Reply to: Skeptic (Re (10): this is some M such "RUSSIA" ...?) Skeptic WROTE Clark: "A" Michael Kazarin. Accountant from Perm, in absentia listener City Seminar on Russian, German and Greek philosophy "Russian LOGO" might upgrade to full-time department " ... I think that the normal "associate" learning philosophy will be better than to study Hegel? After all, we are all very, very recently, a grand experiment set: the Communist Party General Secretary Gorbachev, MS trusted assistant professor Raisa Maksimovna, PhD. A perseka Sverdlovsk OK CPSU trusted associate professor Gennady E. Burbulis, also PhD. What came out of it, remember? So go there Kazarin to the department for the mind-mind, on the advice of yours? Or both?
  Skeptic | 08.01.2010 11:36 Re (12): this is some M such "RUSSIA" ...? Reply to: Klark (Re (11): this is some M such "RUSSIA" ...?) "We are all very, very recently, a grand experiment set: the Communist Party General Secretary Gorbachev, MS trusted assistant professor Raisa Maksimovna, PhD .... perseka Sverdlovsk OK CPSU trusted associate professor Burbulis Gennady E., also a candidate of philosophical sciences. " - Clark mileyschy and who is "we" trust "? You trust? Your signature on the proxy is it? And yet. Apparently you believe that all candidates Philosophy Soviet bottling - goats. In principle, prepared to agree with you, but the objective is glad I should note that two given you an example, proof of this hypothesis are not. They could be a rebuttal to another hypothesis, such as: "All candidates Philosophy - Well done and clever." Value of general and specific criteria and the significance of a correspondence course until you have passed?
Klark | 08.01.2010 14:26 Re (13): this is some M such "RUSSIA" ...? Reply to: Skeptic (Re (12): this is some M such "RUSSIA" ...?) Skeptic WROTE Clark:
"- Clark, my dear, and who is" we "trust"? ... Value of general and specific criteria and the significance of a correspondence course until you have passed? "
I welcome your tone, too, since I can not stand skygazer. ... The logic suggests that the "general" is the opposite of "identity". A "private" (the category of "part") is opposed to the whole. Match the same "general and particular - is the same as with the learned air of a connoisseur," pairing "between themselves" leftist "... ear and the" right "... the heel. Not that CATEGORY!
But since you (as I), assistant professor of philosophy appreciate much more than the same Hegel, then you probably do not know (professors are silent on this persistently and maliciously!) That, according to the Science of Logic, the single is the most universal forms of same universal.
Go ahead.
His anti-Hegelian view you carry to a question about your personal responsibility for what Yeltsin's "taxied" Associate Burbulis and Gorbachev - Associate Professor Raisa. In this case, his irony feel weird, hinting at an intimate relationship with the World logical culture of humanity ...
Meanwhile, the real logical authority of the world of education, for example, AF Losev, in his book "Critique of Platonism in Aristotle", state: - According to Plato: If there are universal, then the IS and the unit! - By Aristotle: If a unit, then there are UNIVERSAL!
None of them - not a fool! And in the fierce battle logical agreed ... Why? That's life! And you, dear skeptic, for some reason all the fools are looking for. And that, instead of a strictly logical thinking ...
  Skeptic | 08.01.2010 14:49 Re (14): this is some M such "RUSSIA" ...? Reply to: Klark (Re (13): this is some M such "RUSSIA" ...?) "Logic suggests that the" general "is the opposite of" identity "." - Whose logic? mine, for example, says that the unit - part of the total.
A "private" (the category of "part") is opposed to the whole. "-
-? 124Dialekticheskoe unity, in my opinion, again.
"But since you (as I), assistant professor of philosophy appreciate much more than the same Hegel" - wrong, you seemed
"His anti-Hegelian view You transfer to a question about your personal responsibility for the fact that Yeltsin" taxied "Associate Burbulis and Gorbachev - Associate Professor Raisa." - ????? 124Eto who wrote: / / We are all very, very recently, a grand experiment set: the Communist Party General Secretary Gorbachev, MS trusted assistant professor Raisa Maksimovna, PhD. A perseka Sverdlovsk OK CPSU trusted associate professor Gennady E. Burbulis, also PhD. / / -? None of my personal responsibility. I am on myself did not take anything anyone does not trust. That you assume she was taken. I - smoke and smoke to one side.
"You, dear skeptic, for some reason all the fools are looking for." - No, I have a difficult task. I'm looking for smart. Klark | 08.01.2010 15:47 Re (15): this is some M such "RUSSIA" ...? Reply to: Skeptic (Re (14): this is some M such "RUSSIA" ...?) Skeptic Clark wrote: "No my personal responsibility. I am on myself did not take anything anyone does not trust. That you assume she was taken. I - smoking and smoking in a corner. " ... Dear Skeptical, the fact that "personal responsibility" is possible only where there is a personality. A person, in classical philosophy, this is nothing more than an isolated, which coincided with the universal. That is, the "universal person", "the reflected universality", ie GENERAL as a unit. And vice versa. That is why "all" want "to be," like "," having, "" believes ", etc. personality ... This means that "no take" LIABILITY - means to show NO-RISK. And she (irresponsibility, that is) solely and purely personal. And no other! In our case with you: You, dear, acted especially irresponsible, CONFIDENCE Yeltsin and Gorbachev, as a synonym of the State, not a state of wisdom, and ... Assistant Professor of Marxism-Leninism. How? A "smoking on the sidelines." And still smoke? Logically, this can not be explained, but not logical - it is possible. How? And this: "Whose logic? mine, for example, says that the unit - part of a general. "
  Skeptic | 08.01.2010 17:37 Re (16): this is some M such "RUSSIA" ...? Reply to: Klark (Re (15): this is some M such "RUSSIA" ...?) "You, dear, acted especially irresponsible, CONFIDENCE Yeltsin and Gorbachev, as a synonym of the State, not a state of wisdom, and ... Assistant Professor of Marxism-Leninism." - Again: I did not trust anyone anything "And this:" Whose logic? Mine, for example, says that the unit - part of a general. " - And this despite a general way. On what grounds. I am a former "socialist" general have always tried to have as less "common." And in general with the state trying to cross to a minimum.
  Klark | 12.01.2010 07:13 Re (17): this is some M such "RUSSIA" ...? Reply to: Skeptic (Re (16): this is some M such "RUSSIA" ...?) Skeptic - Clark: - "but it is looking with some general. On what grounds. I am a former "socialist" general have always tried to have as less "common." And in general with the state trying to cross to a minimum. " Ah-ah-ah ... Well, then everything is clear. "Your logic" (as distinct from Hegel's logic - Aristotle) - It's just rhetoric, your private life's position. A battle cry: "The opponent, the logic!" - Simply means: "Do as I and less talk!" And somehow, in this context, comes to mind:
I do not understand what they want? I live and live, not bothering anyone. At the service - everything was doing exactly Go - this way. Tremble before the authorities in advance, Not arguing, I'm willing to try. If you want to - go to a meeting If you want - at the demonstration. Rules of honor. I respect the police. In the tumult I had never noticed. If I drink - I do not climb in ambition. Age is not pleaded and was not a witness. At the feast, not away podzanyatsya kartishki. I love movies with a fateful moment. Honestly, I have a spouse with children And over strangers laugh alimony. What's stopping them - my mockers? What they want - my detractors? I say: - I am ashamed to be philistine! Be an active creator and builder! I - like wax for any government. I - somehow just change my beliefs. But - sorry! - On the part of the building There is a special institution!
(Vasily Lebedev-Kumach. Philistine. 1935) Edited by Vitaly Glukhov (07/12/2010 14:06:52)