Russia's next president will make unpopular decisions
10.02.2011 RBC daily
Here is an example of "necessity" to introduce the reader into a stupor, the names of notes. You have already learned that the acting president, as the previous one took only popular decisions?
What, can not remember what the solutions are? Well, nothing, no one can remember, because they simply did not exist.
In the business newspaper, say, need to know. Probably should, but their efficiency, apparently, is manifested in procuring funds prisluzhivaniem financial oligarchy, which confirms the following text. But, be consistent!
"Russia is on the path that was Greece, and if time does not reduce the proportion of social expenditure in the budget, the final will be tragic. So the president, who will be elected in 2012, whoever that was, to make unpopular decisions. This RBC daily said a businessman from the top ten list of Forbes. Until 2013, the budget has been agreed, but then the priority of the authorities will encourage innovation, rather than social costs, confirm the government. "
How many oligarchs in Greece, do not tell me? A pension, which the Greek people? Perhaps, in Greece, as in Russia, citizens propose to live on $ 80 a month? Yes seems to be no! So why the hell did this with the business of Maine has decided that Russia is on the way in Greece? Just, apparently, he was so anxious. And then, and tabloid turned up. The business newspaper consulted with a business man from the list of Forbes, and this gentleman candidly told me that as a way to kill half the country to people from Russia and no. So straight and true cuts womb: it is necessary to cut social spending. The team of correspondents who subscribes under this Article can be seen out of modesty, not asked for an oligarch: he capital is amassed. No way, whether the robbery of the country, which he now so take care of? Or will he set aside the money he's parents on school meals were given, but then it profitable to invest. It all rests with the brackets. How and why in Russia still uses flat rate of taxation, why the selective application of the law, why it's taken away uncontrollably budgets and a host of issues. But correspondents have wondered for a purpose other designated seems to be a very attractive sum.
"I think that after 2012 we are waiting for a big purge of social spending. Until now we have at the elite level was not such a shake-up, understanding the need for dramatic reductions in the social part. Yes, it was in 1991, 1998 st. But then came the monetization. It is reasonable to sotsrashody accounted for approximately 50% of the expenditure side, not only direct sotsrashody, but all circumstantial, "- said a businessman.
He seems, and this seeming abstraction, he hangs with aplomb to the ears of business newspaper correspondents.
Hear ... WE AT ELITE !!!!!!!!!!! Elite all thinking about how people still rob, but to profit at the expense of the budget, which they do not invest. But people had long been thinking, how would the Kolyma region working hands to ensure, but preferably not the common people, and all the business people of the elite, completely innovators and modernizers, considering our nation, just as the source of his wealth.
"At a recent cabinet meeting, some colleagues expressed the view that if we go to the policy to encourage innovation, we need to move to a new level and budget planning - confirms a senior RBC daily in government. - Now the budget is aimed rather at ensuring social security, but it does not fit in with the policy of encouraging innovation. "
They provide social guarantees !!!!!!!! Cut pensions, cut pay and benefits, take away budgets while arrogantly claim that they provide social guarantees, and not parasitic on the body of the people.
Well, did not joined the Russian pensioners, children, people with disabilities so by encouraging innovators for budget money, says a senior source from the government, who also wants to be last in the list of Forbes.
In particular, he said, the increase in financial support to innovative companies can pass through the Russian Fund for Technological Development since 2014. However, he notes, before this period should not be expected to change, because until 2013 year budget priorities are formulated, and he is in a fairly rigid framework. "It makes sense to think about it" - agrees a senior RBC daily in Economic Development.
Do you think that once the business newspaper correspondents on this can not: in whose hands are these innovative companies? Right!! Why others give, when all the relatives entirely innovators and modernizers.
"We must be realistic. After all, we have to leave in 2015 to a zero deficit, - says the chairman of the Duma Committee on Budget and Taxes Yuri Vasiliev. - It is necessary to solve the dilemma - either seek to reduce costs and increase efficiency (which leads to structural changes in the budget, including the obligations of the state), or focus on the tax increase. Some experts favor the first option. But it is most difficult, as we see from the experience of other countries. May be found the best compromise between the first and second way. "
Indeed, we must be realistic and it's time to stop believing all these figures with the parliamentary powers and the so-called expert community that sit in the servants' financial oligarchy and raw magnates. Hundreds of billions of rubles went into the pockets of Russian oligarchy under the most specious pretexts, and the industry to collapse, social sphere in a shelter, agriculture barely drag out its existence.
How much are you still willing to believe?
Budget problems in part otyazhelennosti social payments and large enough component of the power unit is now very urgent, agrees director of the Center of NIU HSE Natalia Akindinova. Innovative same component (for example, as regards science and education) does not yet have a growing path in the current version of the budget until 2013. The current configuration of the budget is more of a pre-election character - especially not to offend the active group of people. The problem of a longer term and strategic development requires a different cost structure. It is therefore logical to assume that the newly elected president (whoever he was) should have some measures taken to reorient the budget, argues Ms. Akindinova.
The budget, of course, need to refocus and first of all we must stop finance from the budget as the HSE and the NIU School of Economics, that will be popular and economically.
Now the federal budget goes to the huge transfers, which each year will only grow. This situation should be reversed, experts believe TsMAKP Elena Penuhina. There are several options, of which the most obvious - raising the retirement age. "This will change the balance of labor-dependency, not reducing the size of pensions", - she said, recalling that innovative activity can be maintained not only through direct fiscal stimulus, but also due to various tax incentives, more intense than now.
And Elena Penuhina of TsMAKP not tell the people: from the federal budget for transfers to take. I can barely tell a few options:
1. Money to help the Americans;
2. Federal officials have left earnings abroad, and these funds allowed the support of the country;
3. Just because printing money;
4. The government has a sponsor.
Well, I think that's enough! There, in fact, in this TsMAKP all tsmaki very competent and conceive themselves. And will for it is not so much need.
But for all this political will is needed, experts say. "Before, it was easier to shift the responsibility on the government to dismiss the prime minister, dismiss the government. So it was under Yeltsin, Putin is practiced. But if the current model of power to separate the association of these reforms from the president or prime minister would be difficult - says the deputy director of the Institute of Social Systems, Dmitry Badovsky. - Power is aware of and willing to assume these costs. "
Dmitry Koptyubenko, Peter Kiryan, Anastasia Litvinova, Olga Zhermeleva
What are we, the readers, want to convince the team of journalists from business newspaper? Yes, that should be all means, as a result of collective work, pay the higher bureaucracy and the financial oligarchy, which will take care of and development of all countries.
Do you believe it? Doubt!
What are they doing this for twenty years, you ask? Yes, the same as now - looted the country, fool the people with the help of corrupt journalists.
That's it!
And that means at their disposal remained more to increase the retirement age. Or it is better not to pay.
What do people interested in YOU?
Very simple! To organize and release all those modernizers and innovators from so heavy and burdensome labor, allowing them to earn a living by their labor.
Ivan Tevrizsky
10.02.2011 RBC daily
Here is an example of "necessity" to introduce the reader into a stupor, the names of notes. You have already learned that the acting president, as the previous one took only popular decisions?
What, can not remember what the solutions are? Well, nothing, no one can remember, because they simply did not exist.
In the business newspaper, say, need to know. Probably should, but their efficiency, apparently, is manifested in procuring funds prisluzhivaniem financial oligarchy, which confirms the following text. But, be consistent!
"Russia is on the path that was Greece, and if time does not reduce the proportion of social expenditure in the budget, the final will be tragic. So the president, who will be elected in 2012, whoever that was, to make unpopular decisions. This RBC daily said a businessman from the top ten list of Forbes. Until 2013, the budget has been agreed, but then the priority of the authorities will encourage innovation, rather than social costs, confirm the government. "
How many oligarchs in Greece, do not tell me? A pension, which the Greek people? Perhaps, in Greece, as in Russia, citizens propose to live on $ 80 a month? Yes seems to be no! So why the hell did this with the business of Maine has decided that Russia is on the way in Greece? Just, apparently, he was so anxious. And then, and tabloid turned up. The business newspaper consulted with a business man from the list of Forbes, and this gentleman candidly told me that as a way to kill half the country to people from Russia and no. So straight and true cuts womb: it is necessary to cut social spending. The team of correspondents who subscribes under this Article can be seen out of modesty, not asked for an oligarch: he capital is amassed. No way, whether the robbery of the country, which he now so take care of? Or will he set aside the money he's parents on school meals were given, but then it profitable to invest. It all rests with the brackets. How and why in Russia still uses flat rate of taxation, why the selective application of the law, why it's taken away uncontrollably budgets and a host of issues. But correspondents have wondered for a purpose other designated seems to be a very attractive sum.
"I think that after 2012 we are waiting for a big purge of social spending. Until now we have at the elite level was not such a shake-up, understanding the need for dramatic reductions in the social part. Yes, it was in 1991, 1998 st. But then came the monetization. It is reasonable to sotsrashody accounted for approximately 50% of the expenditure side, not only direct sotsrashody, but all circumstantial, "- said a businessman.
He seems, and this seeming abstraction, he hangs with aplomb to the ears of business newspaper correspondents.
Hear ... WE AT ELITE !!!!!!!!!!! Elite all thinking about how people still rob, but to profit at the expense of the budget, which they do not invest. But people had long been thinking, how would the Kolyma region working hands to ensure, but preferably not the common people, and all the business people of the elite, completely innovators and modernizers, considering our nation, just as the source of his wealth.
"At a recent cabinet meeting, some colleagues expressed the view that if we go to the policy to encourage innovation, we need to move to a new level and budget planning - confirms a senior RBC daily in government. - Now the budget is aimed rather at ensuring social security, but it does not fit in with the policy of encouraging innovation. "
They provide social guarantees !!!!!!!! Cut pensions, cut pay and benefits, take away budgets while arrogantly claim that they provide social guarantees, and not parasitic on the body of the people.
Well, did not joined the Russian pensioners, children, people with disabilities so by encouraging innovators for budget money, says a senior source from the government, who also wants to be last in the list of Forbes.
In particular, he said, the increase in financial support to innovative companies can pass through the Russian Fund for Technological Development since 2014. However, he notes, before this period should not be expected to change, because until 2013 year budget priorities are formulated, and he is in a fairly rigid framework. "It makes sense to think about it" - agrees a senior RBC daily in Economic Development.
Do you think that once the business newspaper correspondents on this can not: in whose hands are these innovative companies? Right!! Why others give, when all the relatives entirely innovators and modernizers.
"We must be realistic. After all, we have to leave in 2015 to a zero deficit, - says the chairman of the Duma Committee on Budget and Taxes Yuri Vasiliev. - It is necessary to solve the dilemma - either seek to reduce costs and increase efficiency (which leads to structural changes in the budget, including the obligations of the state), or focus on the tax increase. Some experts favor the first option. But it is most difficult, as we see from the experience of other countries. May be found the best compromise between the first and second way. "
Indeed, we must be realistic and it's time to stop believing all these figures with the parliamentary powers and the so-called expert community that sit in the servants' financial oligarchy and raw magnates. Hundreds of billions of rubles went into the pockets of Russian oligarchy under the most specious pretexts, and the industry to collapse, social sphere in a shelter, agriculture barely drag out its existence.
How much are you still willing to believe?
Budget problems in part otyazhelennosti social payments and large enough component of the power unit is now very urgent, agrees director of the Center of NIU HSE Natalia Akindinova. Innovative same component (for example, as regards science and education) does not yet have a growing path in the current version of the budget until 2013. The current configuration of the budget is more of a pre-election character - especially not to offend the active group of people. The problem of a longer term and strategic development requires a different cost structure. It is therefore logical to assume that the newly elected president (whoever he was) should have some measures taken to reorient the budget, argues Ms. Akindinova.
The budget, of course, need to refocus and first of all we must stop finance from the budget as the HSE and the NIU School of Economics, that will be popular and economically.
Now the federal budget goes to the huge transfers, which each year will only grow. This situation should be reversed, experts believe TsMAKP Elena Penuhina. There are several options, of which the most obvious - raising the retirement age. "This will change the balance of labor-dependency, not reducing the size of pensions", - she said, recalling that innovative activity can be maintained not only through direct fiscal stimulus, but also due to various tax incentives, more intense than now.
And Elena Penuhina of TsMAKP not tell the people: from the federal budget for transfers to take. I can barely tell a few options:
1. Money to help the Americans;
2. Federal officials have left earnings abroad, and these funds allowed the support of the country;
3. Just because printing money;
4. The government has a sponsor.
Well, I think that's enough! There, in fact, in this TsMAKP all tsmaki very competent and conceive themselves. And will for it is not so much need.
But for all this political will is needed, experts say. "Before, it was easier to shift the responsibility on the government to dismiss the prime minister, dismiss the government. So it was under Yeltsin, Putin is practiced. But if the current model of power to separate the association of these reforms from the president or prime minister would be difficult - says the deputy director of the Institute of Social Systems, Dmitry Badovsky. - Power is aware of and willing to assume these costs. "
Dmitry Koptyubenko, Peter Kiryan, Anastasia Litvinova, Olga Zhermeleva
What are we, the readers, want to convince the team of journalists from business newspaper? Yes, that should be all means, as a result of collective work, pay the higher bureaucracy and the financial oligarchy, which will take care of and development of all countries.
Do you believe it? Doubt!
What are they doing this for twenty years, you ask? Yes, the same as now - looted the country, fool the people with the help of corrupt journalists.
That's it!
And that means at their disposal remained more to increase the retirement age. Or it is better not to pay.
What do people interested in YOU?
Very simple! To organize and release all those modernizers and innovators from so heavy and burdensome labor, allowing them to earn a living by their labor.
Ivan Tevrizsky
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий