RETRO - Philosophy I (4)
Long ago, another 27 Party Congress adopted a correct and timely solution: educate the staff a taste for theory. Since that time the years indicate, however, to the contrary - in the ideological life is not prevailed taste and bad taste. And it makes sense to speculate on the topic: WHY? Translated from the Greek word "theory" means - to consider, investigate, divinely contemplate ... But why not just call it a worthy word! Call them separated from the life of the arguments, nor to non-binding hypothesis, the presence of some information about the way tucked subject for small talk, the arguments about the meaning or the vanity of life, a profound silence, and the importance of bombast; apologetic justification for a higher opinion of their superiors or simply pure and ordinary, "a tip of Shadows." Meanwhile, theorizing - it means simply to think, always and everywhere to speak on the merits. More precisely, correctly and apply their own cultural way of thinking, living in a group, among the people ... In practice, this means the ability of various facts to see the unity of the whole. Behind the words - thoughts. The thoughts - the case, and for business - interests. Do not hesitate when followers say differently. But make no mistake, if people with obviously different interests alike say. Taste of the theory, therefore, is the need and ability to look "at the root." Moral courage in a choice between truth and subjective opinion of the authorities, this truth certainly prefer. Understood in this way, the theory is the era, caught in my thoughts. So respect to the theory, as, indeed, indifferent or negative attitude toward it - it, too, so to speak, a landmark is a fact. One mention of his meeting with Lenin on one Party Congress Gorky wrote: "In the number of times he spoke less of speakers who spoke before him, and by the effect - much more, not one I felt it , behind me whispered enthusiastically: - Gusto said ... So it was, his every argument unfolded by itself - through the power contained in it. Mensheviks do not hesitate to suggest that this Lenin distasteful to them, and he - more than unpleasant. Than convincing, he argued the need for the party to rise to the revolutionary theory in order to thoroughly check the practice, the embittered interrupted his speech. - The Congress is no place for philosophy! - Do not teach us, we - not high-school students!
... It was very strange and sad to see that the hostility to it arouses such a natural idea: only the height of the theory of the party can see the reasons for disagreement among it. " Odd, though, this is nothing. After all, to approach life from the height of the theory - it means to approach it in principle. That is consistent sharpening the contradictions and engaging in principled relationships with other people. For what kind of "humanity" - a lack of principles! That is why the request for a good theory and is usually in the era of growing social struggle. "A good theory" - that is thinking to the challenges of his era, its sharpest conflicts and indigenous issues. Today, like yesterday, it is Marxism-Leninism, unnoticed spoofed apologists for the stalemate in the ideology of the cult of personality the nearest authorities. Taste of the theory grows out of a taste for thinking. In the analysis of social forms of human life "can not use either a microscope or chemical reagents. Both should be replaced by the power of abstraction "- wrote in his Capital, Karl Marx. But for a historical look at the issue becomes clear that, it turns out, and she sort of "force of abstraction, so we urgently need today, in a particular period of social development has its prevalence and its either happy, or, conversely, the bitter fate. ... Just met at one of the city of Sverdlovsk. "The role of working to rebuild - this was a stormy hours of conversation. It is well to remember a few workers - among other things, they stood out hot-tempered, nekriklivoy acuity. We can easily and quickly found a common language. The meeting is over, but people still do not diverge, and then someone touched my arm. Looked back - it was the party secretary. - At a moment ... - he nodded to me. We moved away. - Tell me, why did you come here? - Engage the science, - I replied. - Is not in his chair with the students to engage in it can not? - You can, of course. But science is something we have a special - Marxism-Leninism.
But he is essentially a reflection of the scientific interests of the working class. The department is not out of work is ... - Well, well. And why is it to us at the plant frequented? The other is that it works in Sverdlovsk little? - Plants have been much, but such large-headed workers to me so far managed to meet only with you. - Who! Etih7! "But they no more! - Few, of course ... but that we will have to make them as much as possible? Party secretary made a gesture of annoyance head, then leaned toward me confidentially, and with almost paternal affection, whispered: - Why, if they become much, we with you tomorrow there will be nothing there: we will not need us ... In short, the very thing that we have met once in the New Year's satire of Mikhail Zhvanetsky. Remember? ... Shopping with us for the sellers. Aircraft employees of Aeroflot, a hairdresser for hairdressers. So here, too. Deep, thinking independently working on their work towards the restructuring caused frank confusion. Why? Yes, because sometimes even the ability to think we have seen as a monopoly. Monopoly, this requires appropriate institutionalization, personnel policies, for example. (See: W. Buckshutem "Do I need a philosopher seniority?" Socialist Industry, September 17, 1988) And here too: thinking for ... philosophy, science ... for scientists, for ... ideologues ideology, and scientific socialism for ... Professors scientific communism. Just so ... What would happen if borscht da chops cook would do only for themselves? No coincidence that over the considerable number of so-called "years of stagnation," the reader, picking up a journalistic or scientific article that tells about the life of sharp conflicts of our socialism, certainly met in it a kind of categorical imperative of the author (editor): does not generalize! And, of obeying the authority of the printed word, he naturally does not generalize for many years ... What, however, these things claim actually mean? It can mean only one thing - DO NOT THINK! And let's reflect on what it is we really and inevitably lead to? However, an exhaustive answer to this question is still 120 years ago gave us Karl Marx. "The social relations between people - he said - and perhaps only to the extent to which people think and have this ability to abstract from the sensory details and contingencies." Well, and, consequently, on the contrary: those who do not take an expert in who knows only "special cases", and the trees can not see the forest, they "do not know what human social relations differ from relations between the animals. They themselves - the animals "- Karl Marx concludes. Hence the fundamental importance of the conclusion: in contrast to the private ownership of means of production, private ownership ... the ability to think, that "Generalize" is the most refined, and therefore ubiquitous, and at the same time, historically, the last form of private property. She invariably accompanies all, without exception, are known to us in the history of forms and modes of exploitation of man by man, one class - the other. That's why "for a complete abolition of classes is necessary not only to overthrow the exploiters, the landowners and capitalists, not only to cancel their property, it is necessary to cancel more and all private ownership of means of production, it is necessary to destroy the distinction between town and country, and the distinction between manual and human mental labor "- not by accident warned Lenin. The result of our resistance to this warning is obvious: the declared past decade, "public property" means of production (at the same time cry: not generalize!) - Has led to the fact that they fell into the hands of those from whose lips that cry, and broke: the ideological priests and administrative manager of the property. Widely known in the public mind, the now fashionable term "administrative system" today reflects the historical fact. To put it more correctly, it should be poimenovat particular form of public ownership of means of production. Or, equivalently, the total (collective group), a form of private ownership. Historical prices and the consequences of this fact is well known. This - raskrestyanivanie peasant; rasproletarizatsiya ("atomization") business, making an intellectual - a tradesman with a degree, that being admitted to the authorities, inevitably turns into a bureaucrat, loss of worker status and a sense of ownership, replacing it with the psychology of chore, the substitution of proletarian internationalism - stereotypes ideology of transnational corporations; substitution of Soviet power - absolute power of the administration, and proletarian socialism and communism - the ideology of the cult of personality superiors. SOCIALISM WITHOUT ... WORKING TRAFFIC! Or a mixture of "socialization" and "nationalization" ... More specifically, the formal socialization of socialist property - both in modern scientific language is called a state of affairs. Hence, inevitably grows, and it also corresponds to a quite definite political form of the socialization. This - the nomenclature system of selection and placement of personnel engaged in a collective (= "party company") function of real ownership and control. Nomenclature system has grown more from the practice of "war communism" and by early 1923 was issued in its general outlines. And a one and a half decades she has given birth and the extreme example of "nomenklatura discipline" - so now it is "Stalinism" ... Nomenclature the expression of formal socialization of socialist property now known writer Ivan Vasiliev analyzed as an "administrative elite district of generality" (see True, 2 October 1988 G.) ... The formation of the ideology of the restructuring is largely due today, with the elimination of blind spots in our history. But these spots are the result not of a merely suppressing the facts. In a huge extent, they are the result of the "scientific blindness", which stems from the confusion of nomenclature history of our society with a socialist history of the people. Do not look at the history of socialism, just as the history of socialist bosses! - That's the whole point. Otherwise, exposing and angry could lead to the apologetics that so disturbs us in the day yesterday. Namely: the criticism of the personality cult of the authorities to replace the criticism of Stalin's personality cult. One cult to substitute another. It was a taste for thinking helps us to understand that the very logic of things, just as not everyone who criticizes the formalism of public ownership makes it real for the sake of socialization - and also not everyone who is indignant against Stalin, Lenin, for the sake of doing it. And here's why. The reader, of course, remembers the story of Arkady Vaksberg publicist in the Literary Gazette of the Deputy Procurator-General of the USSR Naidyonov. When the last "out" on pet Secretary Brezhnev of the Krasnodar Regional Committee Medunov and caught him, they say, in the act, the following happened. Medunov quickly flew to Moscow, organized challenge to the Kremlin and the prosecutor struck with a host of angry speech staunch "anti-Stalinist." "Satisfied with the persecution of cadres? It will not work! This is not 1937! "- With false pathos he shouted. Moreover, in today's anti-Stalinist garb, victims of the cult of personality sometimes ryadyatsya and former felons who have had their accounts just with the State. (See Socialist Industry, May 2, 1988) Here is another example. For nearly a decade is extremely bad working Turbomotor Ural Plant. Kliment Voroshilov, more and more losing its former glory. There are serious problems with the party leadership team, and his administration, there are unresolved issues and many others. And what happened? Perhaps the democratic community of the city of Sverdlovsk and ideologues are sounding the alarm? Of course! The local press is full of anxious and angry comments about what the plant is still ... named Voroshilov. "All (or is almost everything) that is associated with Stalin's name, changed its name ... But the names of its" loyal supporters "are still in their original locations," - wrote one reader in the newspaper "Evening Sverdlovsk" (for June 21, 1988 ) Asked the opinion of the workers. One of them said: - Well, the question is of course important. Just shoot something today primarily to those leaders who have driven the company into such a state. And what, really? The question of whom to shoot for the collapse of production and collective substitute for hard question of whether to shoot or not to remove the sign from the factory ... dodgers! In my opinion, if and to remove the sign, then at least not for them, and after them! Such, we have a working answer. And the answer is this a serious reason. If you look closely at the ideological situation of the perestroika period, we can see how, under the false flag of anti-Stalinism is consistent dismantling of the ideology of Leninism, and the last, and Marxism. Because of the distortions and deformations of socialism can be eliminated by two mutually exclusive ways: either to go from Stalinism as a monstrously distorted Leninism - to Leninism undistorted. Either get rid of the distortion of Leninism, by getting rid of Leninism in general. It is this second path, loud and aggressive and skillfully disguises himself in a transparent manner. Moreover, in practice their own affairs he operates practices in 1937: denunciations to the authorities and the hanging of political labels. "Stalinist" - Mark this for the needs of today's invented for them. And it is Yarlykova ideology just will not need to work with the facts. She does not need a man's ability as the ability to think, therefore, to summarize ... V. MOLCHANOV, scientific secretary of the Ural Branch Philosophical Society, USSR Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Teacher of the Sverdlovsk Medical Institute.
"Science of Ural», № 40 (440), October 12, 1989, edition of 8769.
("Taste of the theory of" first column, "On change!", 31 October 1986, circulation 155,000.)
-------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- ----- 620059 Sverdlovsk St. 1922 Party Congress, 3 square. 6.
MOLCHANOVA VA
"Problems of Peace and Socialism"
Editorial.
Dear Valery A.!
Read with interest your letter and the article "A taste for the theory of" ... Unfortunately, we almost have no possibility of the publication of Soviet authors. And we get them very much. Journal "Problems of Peace and Socialism - the Tribune, mainly by authors from other fraternal parties.
Consultant editor
V. Gavrilov.
Prague.
25/04/1989, the
Long ago, another 27 Party Congress adopted a correct and timely solution: educate the staff a taste for theory. Since that time the years indicate, however, to the contrary - in the ideological life is not prevailed taste and bad taste. And it makes sense to speculate on the topic: WHY? Translated from the Greek word "theory" means - to consider, investigate, divinely contemplate ... But why not just call it a worthy word! Call them separated from the life of the arguments, nor to non-binding hypothesis, the presence of some information about the way tucked subject for small talk, the arguments about the meaning or the vanity of life, a profound silence, and the importance of bombast; apologetic justification for a higher opinion of their superiors or simply pure and ordinary, "a tip of Shadows." Meanwhile, theorizing - it means simply to think, always and everywhere to speak on the merits. More precisely, correctly and apply their own cultural way of thinking, living in a group, among the people ... In practice, this means the ability of various facts to see the unity of the whole. Behind the words - thoughts. The thoughts - the case, and for business - interests. Do not hesitate when followers say differently. But make no mistake, if people with obviously different interests alike say. Taste of the theory, therefore, is the need and ability to look "at the root." Moral courage in a choice between truth and subjective opinion of the authorities, this truth certainly prefer. Understood in this way, the theory is the era, caught in my thoughts. So respect to the theory, as, indeed, indifferent or negative attitude toward it - it, too, so to speak, a landmark is a fact. One mention of his meeting with Lenin on one Party Congress Gorky wrote: "In the number of times he spoke less of speakers who spoke before him, and by the effect - much more, not one I felt it , behind me whispered enthusiastically: - Gusto said ... So it was, his every argument unfolded by itself - through the power contained in it. Mensheviks do not hesitate to suggest that this Lenin distasteful to them, and he - more than unpleasant. Than convincing, he argued the need for the party to rise to the revolutionary theory in order to thoroughly check the practice, the embittered interrupted his speech. - The Congress is no place for philosophy! - Do not teach us, we - not high-school students!
... It was very strange and sad to see that the hostility to it arouses such a natural idea: only the height of the theory of the party can see the reasons for disagreement among it. " Odd, though, this is nothing. After all, to approach life from the height of the theory - it means to approach it in principle. That is consistent sharpening the contradictions and engaging in principled relationships with other people. For what kind of "humanity" - a lack of principles! That is why the request for a good theory and is usually in the era of growing social struggle. "A good theory" - that is thinking to the challenges of his era, its sharpest conflicts and indigenous issues. Today, like yesterday, it is Marxism-Leninism, unnoticed spoofed apologists for the stalemate in the ideology of the cult of personality the nearest authorities. Taste of the theory grows out of a taste for thinking. In the analysis of social forms of human life "can not use either a microscope or chemical reagents. Both should be replaced by the power of abstraction "- wrote in his Capital, Karl Marx. But for a historical look at the issue becomes clear that, it turns out, and she sort of "force of abstraction, so we urgently need today, in a particular period of social development has its prevalence and its either happy, or, conversely, the bitter fate. ... Just met at one of the city of Sverdlovsk. "The role of working to rebuild - this was a stormy hours of conversation. It is well to remember a few workers - among other things, they stood out hot-tempered, nekriklivoy acuity. We can easily and quickly found a common language. The meeting is over, but people still do not diverge, and then someone touched my arm. Looked back - it was the party secretary. - At a moment ... - he nodded to me. We moved away. - Tell me, why did you come here? - Engage the science, - I replied. - Is not in his chair with the students to engage in it can not? - You can, of course. But science is something we have a special - Marxism-Leninism.
But he is essentially a reflection of the scientific interests of the working class. The department is not out of work is ... - Well, well. And why is it to us at the plant frequented? The other is that it works in Sverdlovsk little? - Plants have been much, but such large-headed workers to me so far managed to meet only with you. - Who! Etih7! "But they no more! - Few, of course ... but that we will have to make them as much as possible? Party secretary made a gesture of annoyance head, then leaned toward me confidentially, and with almost paternal affection, whispered: - Why, if they become much, we with you tomorrow there will be nothing there: we will not need us ... In short, the very thing that we have met once in the New Year's satire of Mikhail Zhvanetsky. Remember? ... Shopping with us for the sellers. Aircraft employees of Aeroflot, a hairdresser for hairdressers. So here, too. Deep, thinking independently working on their work towards the restructuring caused frank confusion. Why? Yes, because sometimes even the ability to think we have seen as a monopoly. Monopoly, this requires appropriate institutionalization, personnel policies, for example. (See: W. Buckshutem "Do I need a philosopher seniority?" Socialist Industry, September 17, 1988) And here too: thinking for ... philosophy, science ... for scientists, for ... ideologues ideology, and scientific socialism for ... Professors scientific communism. Just so ... What would happen if borscht da chops cook would do only for themselves? No coincidence that over the considerable number of so-called "years of stagnation," the reader, picking up a journalistic or scientific article that tells about the life of sharp conflicts of our socialism, certainly met in it a kind of categorical imperative of the author (editor): does not generalize! And, of obeying the authority of the printed word, he naturally does not generalize for many years ... What, however, these things claim actually mean? It can mean only one thing - DO NOT THINK! And let's reflect on what it is we really and inevitably lead to? However, an exhaustive answer to this question is still 120 years ago gave us Karl Marx. "The social relations between people - he said - and perhaps only to the extent to which people think and have this ability to abstract from the sensory details and contingencies." Well, and, consequently, on the contrary: those who do not take an expert in who knows only "special cases", and the trees can not see the forest, they "do not know what human social relations differ from relations between the animals. They themselves - the animals "- Karl Marx concludes. Hence the fundamental importance of the conclusion: in contrast to the private ownership of means of production, private ownership ... the ability to think, that "Generalize" is the most refined, and therefore ubiquitous, and at the same time, historically, the last form of private property. She invariably accompanies all, without exception, are known to us in the history of forms and modes of exploitation of man by man, one class - the other. That's why "for a complete abolition of classes is necessary not only to overthrow the exploiters, the landowners and capitalists, not only to cancel their property, it is necessary to cancel more and all private ownership of means of production, it is necessary to destroy the distinction between town and country, and the distinction between manual and human mental labor "- not by accident warned Lenin. The result of our resistance to this warning is obvious: the declared past decade, "public property" means of production (at the same time cry: not generalize!) - Has led to the fact that they fell into the hands of those from whose lips that cry, and broke: the ideological priests and administrative manager of the property. Widely known in the public mind, the now fashionable term "administrative system" today reflects the historical fact. To put it more correctly, it should be poimenovat particular form of public ownership of means of production. Or, equivalently, the total (collective group), a form of private ownership. Historical prices and the consequences of this fact is well known. This - raskrestyanivanie peasant; rasproletarizatsiya ("atomization") business, making an intellectual - a tradesman with a degree, that being admitted to the authorities, inevitably turns into a bureaucrat, loss of worker status and a sense of ownership, replacing it with the psychology of chore, the substitution of proletarian internationalism - stereotypes ideology of transnational corporations; substitution of Soviet power - absolute power of the administration, and proletarian socialism and communism - the ideology of the cult of personality superiors. SOCIALISM WITHOUT ... WORKING TRAFFIC! Or a mixture of "socialization" and "nationalization" ... More specifically, the formal socialization of socialist property - both in modern scientific language is called a state of affairs. Hence, inevitably grows, and it also corresponds to a quite definite political form of the socialization. This - the nomenclature system of selection and placement of personnel engaged in a collective (= "party company") function of real ownership and control. Nomenclature system has grown more from the practice of "war communism" and by early 1923 was issued in its general outlines. And a one and a half decades she has given birth and the extreme example of "nomenklatura discipline" - so now it is "Stalinism" ... Nomenclature the expression of formal socialization of socialist property now known writer Ivan Vasiliev analyzed as an "administrative elite district of generality" (see True, 2 October 1988 G.) ... The formation of the ideology of the restructuring is largely due today, with the elimination of blind spots in our history. But these spots are the result not of a merely suppressing the facts. In a huge extent, they are the result of the "scientific blindness", which stems from the confusion of nomenclature history of our society with a socialist history of the people. Do not look at the history of socialism, just as the history of socialist bosses! - That's the whole point. Otherwise, exposing and angry could lead to the apologetics that so disturbs us in the day yesterday. Namely: the criticism of the personality cult of the authorities to replace the criticism of Stalin's personality cult. One cult to substitute another. It was a taste for thinking helps us to understand that the very logic of things, just as not everyone who criticizes the formalism of public ownership makes it real for the sake of socialization - and also not everyone who is indignant against Stalin, Lenin, for the sake of doing it. And here's why. The reader, of course, remembers the story of Arkady Vaksberg publicist in the Literary Gazette of the Deputy Procurator-General of the USSR Naidyonov. When the last "out" on pet Secretary Brezhnev of the Krasnodar Regional Committee Medunov and caught him, they say, in the act, the following happened. Medunov quickly flew to Moscow, organized challenge to the Kremlin and the prosecutor struck with a host of angry speech staunch "anti-Stalinist." "Satisfied with the persecution of cadres? It will not work! This is not 1937! "- With false pathos he shouted. Moreover, in today's anti-Stalinist garb, victims of the cult of personality sometimes ryadyatsya and former felons who have had their accounts just with the State. (See Socialist Industry, May 2, 1988) Here is another example. For nearly a decade is extremely bad working Turbomotor Ural Plant. Kliment Voroshilov, more and more losing its former glory. There are serious problems with the party leadership team, and his administration, there are unresolved issues and many others. And what happened? Perhaps the democratic community of the city of Sverdlovsk and ideologues are sounding the alarm? Of course! The local press is full of anxious and angry comments about what the plant is still ... named Voroshilov. "All (or is almost everything) that is associated with Stalin's name, changed its name ... But the names of its" loyal supporters "are still in their original locations," - wrote one reader in the newspaper "Evening Sverdlovsk" (for June 21, 1988 ) Asked the opinion of the workers. One of them said: - Well, the question is of course important. Just shoot something today primarily to those leaders who have driven the company into such a state. And what, really? The question of whom to shoot for the collapse of production and collective substitute for hard question of whether to shoot or not to remove the sign from the factory ... dodgers! In my opinion, if and to remove the sign, then at least not for them, and after them! Such, we have a working answer. And the answer is this a serious reason. If you look closely at the ideological situation of the perestroika period, we can see how, under the false flag of anti-Stalinism is consistent dismantling of the ideology of Leninism, and the last, and Marxism. Because of the distortions and deformations of socialism can be eliminated by two mutually exclusive ways: either to go from Stalinism as a monstrously distorted Leninism - to Leninism undistorted. Either get rid of the distortion of Leninism, by getting rid of Leninism in general. It is this second path, loud and aggressive and skillfully disguises himself in a transparent manner. Moreover, in practice their own affairs he operates practices in 1937: denunciations to the authorities and the hanging of political labels. "Stalinist" - Mark this for the needs of today's invented for them. And it is Yarlykova ideology just will not need to work with the facts. She does not need a man's ability as the ability to think, therefore, to summarize ... V. MOLCHANOV, scientific secretary of the Ural Branch Philosophical Society, USSR Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Teacher of the Sverdlovsk Medical Institute.
"Science of Ural», № 40 (440), October 12, 1989, edition of 8769.
("Taste of the theory of" first column, "On change!", 31 October 1986, circulation 155,000.)
-------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- ----- 620059 Sverdlovsk St. 1922 Party Congress, 3 square. 6.
MOLCHANOVA VA
"Problems of Peace and Socialism"
Editorial.
Dear Valery A.!
Read with interest your letter and the article "A taste for the theory of" ... Unfortunately, we almost have no possibility of the publication of Soviet authors. And we get them very much. Journal "Problems of Peace and Socialism - the Tribune, mainly by authors from other fraternal parties.
Consultant editor
V. Gavrilov.
Prague.
25/04/1989, the
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий