What kind of government, and a budget

 Wrecking budget: economic treason
 Deputy Chairman of the State Duma Committee on Budget Oksana Dmitrieva why not taken the main financial document of the country and the error of the government. The updated budget law to enter into force in just a week and a half - April 1st. This is a requirement of the government. But he has not even considered by the relevant committee, meeting postponed again and again. At this time - from Friday, March 20, on Monday, March 23.
 This means that the State Duma will have to take the main financial document of the year in a hurry, not having it properly analyze and discuss. Why is this happening? How viable revised budget? This is the "MK" asked First Deputy Chairman- Why is not going to budget committee? - (After a pause) ...

FNS prefers to collect taxes from the poor

In the FTS refused to introduce a separate luxury taxMarch 14, 2012The Federal Tax Service (FTS) has criticized plans to introduce a separate luxury tax, and proposed instead to improve the transportation tax, and enter the anticipated property taxes. According to the newspaper "Izvestia", stated in a letter to the Federal Tax Service, sent to the Russian Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs (RSPP).Additional tax on wealthy Russians are discussed in the government for many years, this idea was maintained in the Communist Party, the Liberal Democratic Party and the "Fair Russia", but criticized the "United Russia". However, the February 7, 2012, Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin (who also heads the "United Russia"), said at the Congress of Entrepreneurs, which introduce a tax on luxuries is still necessary. According to him, the new fee should raise a huge house and land, supercars and other vehicles.

Political Economy of Marx

   The Forum Site "political indoctrination" Anatoly Ponemasov asks: "Why is political economy, in which time has become impossible, and disappeared from the list of disciplines for higher education on humanitarian and socio-economic cycle of the RF Ministry of Education?". And why, in a textbook for high schools, gives a ludicrous interpretation of profit: "... any particular market situation is characterized by a certain vagueness, and it is this uncertainty and generates profits from individual entrepreneurs as an additional, excess income, the excess of total revenue over the full costs. Causes of this additional income can be varied: a monopoly firm in the market, technical innovation, the innovative activities of entrepreneurs associated with foresight, originality of thought, courage, and so on. This definition is absurd, not only in fact but also in regard to the authors, as well as making themselves redundant in the process of teaching. If the profit arises from the uncertainty, then there is nothing to teach. You can not teach a person to uncertainty, but also the money for it to take. But take! If the same approach to the assessment of reality, from the standpoint of classical political economy, from the standpoint of Marxism, there is no uncertainty and does not occur, and observed a strict relationship and the laws of value. After all, Marx did not invent the various uncertainties, did not refer to innovation and original thinking entrepreneurs (stupider than anything you can imagine), and clearly indicates that there is profit, from which it is formed, and how to be transformed.

"Profit capitalist - he wrote in Volume III of Capital Marx - turns out because he can sell something that he did not pay. Surplus value, profit is just from an excess of cost of goods over the cost of production, ie excess of the total amount of work contained in the product, it contains over the amount paid for labor. " (T. 3 Part 1, p. 49.)