Alexander Frolov has analyzed the Communist Party (see "Soviet Russia", May 25, 2006). And Vitaly Glukhov analyzed Frolov (see call or to be? "Politucheba ...) Why? Yes, because relentlessly, continuously and vigilantly CPRF "analyzes" all of us, at least the past 15 years (since the CP RSFSR, counting). Remind me about this in the interest of scientific analysis - a task one. To pretend that this circumstance is immaterial, and "Science attacking socialism" today only prevents - that is the sincere goal Frolov. And all this against the background of obvious result of the party, state and social disaster. Result, with whom he can not argue now ... Showdown with opponents took place, so what else? There is not enough then there's one character. Or rather, two. According to Valentin Chikin "in a recent meeting of our editorial board participated ... Gennady Zyuganov. ... He himself was much changed my mind, to re-evaluate and invites ... "dig deeper", to propose and discuss the most pressing issues of the left. The newspaper strongly supports this approach ... "concluded Glavred. What can I say? Great, of course ... I remember, however, well known to the reader Catherine Polgueva, which "SovRossii», № 7, already wrote: "... Communists talked a lot that people ... have not yet matured ... it now appears that we underestimated ... Many people are ready to ... Is the Communist Party ... ? ", referring to the winter campaign of the people in 2005. Dug, that is. And what happened? And as always: elders of "correct" and then she is already "well attested" sympathetic to her readers that ... it is de people awake, finally, under the leadership of the Communist Party headed by Gennady Andreyevich something and worth it! Well, yeah, okay. She was not the first, not her last. But here's opponent Vitali Glukhova - is another matter. Alexander Frolov - usual publicist "Sov.Rossii. The official "designer" of tactical and strategic direction. Walking Academy of Social Sciences at the Central Communist Party .... What's there: it was he - "Demiurge", known to all of us Zyuganov is! If someone does not know what the famous "Open Letter" Zyuganov - Yakovlev ... "Architect of the ruins" (Soviet Russia, May 7, 1991) was written by him. It was then, as a result, Zyuganov on a national scale and place, ie became known. (Of what does and does not imply that one of them - just a "speechwriter" another). So in the remark of W. Glukhova Frolov, he de "is not the last person in the Communist Party ..." too much leniency to the opponent. Condescension bordering on distortion as the real history of the Communist Party in general, and the last years of Soviet history, the history of real state in the country (ie Russia), the history of the Communist Party itself, and finally, lying in front of our eyes a fresh, current "faktazha" . After all, if, in the interest of truth, not to exercise "clemency" from the whole truth, it should be with all the scientific validity of state: from the "guard" fixing Yakauleuski ruins of the Communist Party - to the creation of their own fork of the Communist Party! This - the way the last 15 years, passed them by two. Glaring evidence of this path was witnessed by their common "party Beslan - Tenth Congress Communist Party in the summer of 2004 ... From the outraged public (both the party and nonpartisan) saved them then personally Chikin, turning at the time of his newspaper in the center of the real party leaders across the Communist Party. (This case - a very instructive, if we take into account exactly how it was done and, in particular, what is this consummate party technique "anti-Leninist Leninism led all ...) Now V. Chikin "leases back" party power Zyuganov, but this power - as before the red-hot griddle - unbearably hot! With bare hands is it will not take ... So there was another article by A. Frolov. The latter, once again, found guilty on the side. " The fact that the Communist Party self-destruction is well underway by Frolov, guilty of: a) GV Plekhanov, and b) old-voter, and c) people who really counted, under the leadership of the Soviet authorities built just Communism ... To this "party pan" re-mastered, need a special "gauntlet", which, in Party parlance, is called Marxism-Leninism. It is noteworthy, as it holds it Frolov. Namely: he always pretends today's enemies of the people did not come from the Communist Party, but from somewhere else from the outside. "We Zyuganov and near here is not lying!" - As if he constantly alludes to the reader. That's why, and "attacking quotes Lenin's taken them, usually from a part of the history of the CPSU, where Russian communism has historically struggled with the" external "to the party itself an enemy, that is, when it is not yet in power, was ... -Marxism-Leninism, of course, but ... without any of our personal responsibility! - This is the credo of Zyuganov, Vladimir Chikina and Frolov. That is why the history of the Communist Party, which "literally" coincides with the personal careers of all three - a "zone beyond criticism", the figure of silence, for which today, in extreme cases, will answer the very old ... - There is nothing here and look! - Insist they waved the party, "the Charter". Meanwhile, the Communist Party in general (and therefore itself the Communist Party!) Is designed so that 90% of it is from our own history of his own party, to 9% - of the party members and only 1% is made up of his party bosses. Therefore, any ordinary member of the party arm in arm with the Party history - it is a real "party bosses" at the moment, there is! Based on the foregoing, it is necessary to refer to document the same "party history" which, with the innocence of newborn babies, once again "play" today aforementioned opponents Vitaly Glukhova.
(Of the actual ARCHIVES 2001.)
VALUE OF SCIENTIFIC AND PRACTICAL CONFERENCE
Communist Party and the Marxist-Leninist concept of modern socialism March 24, 2001 in Yessentuki held regional scientific-practical conference "The Russian Communist Party and the Marxist-Leninist concept of modern socialism." For its implementation was created by the organizing committee led by the First Secretary of the Stavropol Regional Committee of the Communist Party VI Pisarenko. Active participation in the committee took the first secretaries Essentuki and Piatigorsky City Party Umnyakova SA and GA Sushko. The conference was attended by delegations from the party of Karachay-Cherkessia, Kalmyk Republic, the Government of Stavropol Territory Deputy Prime N. Finger, head of the city Essentuki Igor Stoyanov. Edition of the magazine "... ISM, together with scientists, who came from Penza, Voronezh, Yekaterinburg, Stavropol, Kalmykia, has presented scientific papers on the concept of light brown, published in the magazine" Dialogue »№ 1 in January 2001. It is with great interest the reports were presented professors IM Manuilova, VL Ochkin, AN Shimin, AH Kirgueva and VV Burtnika - chief editor of the magazine "... ISM. Range of methodological approaches from the speakers was wide enough. Delegates responded to it and enter into a dialogue. Very interesting from this point of view there were performances YO Oglaeva - Chief Editor of "Lenin's way" Kalmyk republican committee Communist Party, and IA Biryukov - Chairman of the Board of Veterans Pyatigorsk, L. Levitsky - a member of the Communist Party Essentuki, DA Zaharyasheva and VA Molchanov - Scientific Advisor magazine "... ISM. Scientific-practical conference allowed the communists to address issues of socio-economic revival of Russia and conclude that only the socialist revival can save the country from complete destruction. Socialism in Russia, there is no alternative. Socialism, but from a historical perspective and communism - the future of the entire human civilization, the natural result of its historical development. Problem boils down to the Communists in order to avoid mistakes of the Soviet period, at the service of the people all the current and future possibilities of the socialist construction. Past experience is invaluable, but not comprehensive. Future generations will consider him, but will make a decisive contribution to the content, form and process of socialist construction. The main thing - to look forward, not backward. A "round table" on which the exchanged views on a scientific and practical conferences, developed proposals and resolutions adopted, and appeal to the public, which will be published in the newspaper, "Homeland."
Rodina, 30 March 2001
R E W O R U C and I
Scientific-Practical Conference "Russian Communist Party and the Marxist-Leninist concept of modern socialism" Yessentuki 24 - March 25, 2001 Organized by the Stavropol Regional Committee Communist Party, the All-Russian edition of the magazine "... ISM, the Communist faction in the Duma of Stavropol Territory, Pyatigorsk and Essentuki CC CPRF Conference notes: Alienation Theories of Life is expressed as a hopeless contradiction of the theory with him herself. This is evident on the surface in the form of competition between two opposing theories about the same ... and in the form of eclecticism, which is presented as a holistic concept. What happened to the concept of socio-economic recovery and development in Russia, entitled "Socialism in Russia, there is no alternative", which was developed by a team of Rousseau and proposed the Communist Party as official party doctrine. As evidenced by the publication of this document to number 1 magazine "Dialogue", this doctrine right there in front of the whole Party and most authors of the "One" - to spread "sodium". By joining together in long-standing and ongoing controversy, which shows that all those who requested the Bureau of Rousseau to write for the party concept, did not understand the society in which they lived until 1991. Do not understand it now, giving a "concept" external descriptions and reflections, which are suitable only for understanding the issues themselves. "Zaedinstvo" This forces them to seek the causes of their disputes in violation of the norms of scientific ethics, and, consequently, democracy! Hence it is clear that the scientific collectivism Ruso members can not serve as a prototype of the perfect forms and party democracy in particular. Firstly, after ten years the members of Rousseau must be clear who was a communist, but he slipped to a "socialist orientation" ... Without this concept of them as a collective creation, "God no candle, no hell rabble", ie e. eclecticism. Secondly, the group F. Klotsvorga on the one hand, and a group B. Budarin and B. Kochneva from another resolutely refuse to talk (and learn!) Such a subject of a public and interest-Party as "Soviet socialism." The study, which will inevitably pose a great challenge their former scientific status. Therefore, one manages to circumvent this by using the term "development" and "mature" socialism, while others are using the term "early socialism." This terminological competition simulates the act and process of theoretical thinking, leaving the authors and readers outside the brackets of the subject. And the object itself, leaving a captive of the ideological and historical elements that prevailed until 1991, - Dominates today. Third, with rare unanimity in stating the existence of the Soviet social science "dogmatism", "scholasticism", "eclectic" and "abstractions, they are resolutely silent, as with all of this is the case in the Company, Ruso and the party now, only hinting at the possibility such defects from each other as competing entities of one party and the academic community. Fourthly, the withdrawal of Soviet socialism in parentheses their temperamental debate, the authors sometimes remember a long work of VI Lenin, Two Tactics of Social Democracy in the Democratic Revolution, by applying its major categories at random. Thus, the tactics of the Communist Party for them, if it is a revolutionary, then certainly a "democratic". If democracy, then, of course, and "socialist." And if a socialist, then by no means "revolutionary" ... In some cases, it is "too early", in others - is already "too late", but never just right! Finding himself in "knowledge of the laws of social development" and "creative application of Marxist-Leninist theory to the study of contemporary reality," the authors of official national party doctrine demonstrated a complete inability to connect the theory of knowledge (dialectical logic) - with scientific socialism, the history of the Communist Party - a political economy and all that - with the movement of the working class of Soviet society and modern Russia. But if, in Lenin, dialectical logic is the living soul of Marxism, then, in the words of Engels, communism is a theoretical expression of the conditions for the emancipation of the working class. And no other way! Our authors found in their professional arsenal complete absence of the Leninist concept of socialism as a living art of the masses themselves. Misunderstanding of the nature and essence of private property appears in the confusion of the state, and nation-wide public ownership of means of production, forcing them to accept socialism without the working class movement, but with the category of labor, and political economy analysis of property relations substitute for analysis of its legal definitions and external relationships. Misunderstanding of the dialectical relationship of individual and general labor, through and through scientific and technological progress, leads to a complete misunderstanding of Marx's claim that communism is, for the most part, the economic movement, when the exchange value ceases to be a measure of use value. And finally, there is no understanding of what socialism into communism is nothing more than a bourgeois society ... without the bourgeoisie. F. Klotsvorg, in concept, provides the Communist Party simply bourgeois socialism, Russian bottling. Therefore, as a result, they confuse the "stratification" and the variety of forms of property do not realize that councils of labor collectives (STK) - is higher, which completes the link of the Soviet, that is, government, and not "one of the" forms of social control hooligan current administration. Summing up, the Communists Stavropol, Kalmykia, Karachay-Cherkessia and the Caucasian Mineral Waters (CMS) said that social scientists call Ruso, focusing his vision on "all progressive-minded citizens, mindful of a viable means of popular resistance and communist construction. Rousseau comes from lack of conflict and the contemporary reality of the ready availability of a national entity that is just waiting for when he finally this very "concept" and offer podnesut ... But today even the Patriarch Alexy II, after the Archbishop of St. Petersburg and Ladoga Ioann, said: "We must realize that against our people is a well-planned bloodless war, with the aim of its destruction." And calls to "fight for the salvation of our people, to organize national resistance." The Conference invites the Bureau of the Central Committee of our party to make a statement about the following. 1. Acknowledge that a presidential-parliamentary form of government in Russia finally and irrevocably discredited in the eyes of the working population and has been unable to solve any burning issues of our society. 2. Therefore, for the organization, development and consolidation of the society of no confidence in the regime as a whole, the Communist Party of May 1, 2001 begins to open public agitation for the restoration of Soviet power from the bottom up, legally, through a referendum. 3. In response to a bourgeois government of genocide and the psychological war against his own people, the party begins to psychological terror against the fools and grabbers-heads; 4. Against betrayed Marxism-Leninism, social scientists have anything good (and even for money!) Will not be able to teach the youth and our children; 5. Against corrupt journalists who seek the truth instead of "information" for sale. It should be "psychological war" being waged against working people (= a form of "Cold War"), wrap the psychological terror and civil disobedience against the organizers of this war. 6. Throw all efforts to revive the child of the communist movement - updated pioneer movement. 7. A referendum in support of the peasantry against the sale of land. 8. Implement a national act demythologization Vladimir Putin. 9. Given the weight the same mistakes of the Soviet and post-Soviet era, the scale of the Communist Party to decide on the correct combination of processes of the party and the academic building. For this purpose, a South Russian academic library of the Governor of the Stavropol Territory. 10. Support the initiative of the Stavropol Communist establishing a general party Medal. Herman Lopatin "For success in an academically-party building."
Leninsky WAY ", NEWSPAPER Kalmyk republican committee CPRF № 5 (60), May 2001.
EXPLANATION OF INEVITABLE. The history of the party - a good thing! The main thing is that she was, firstly, not faked, and, secondly, the most complete. It was then, inevitably, and brought all exclusively in the true light of truth itself, if you look through this "crystal ball". ... When the Party press suddenly again heard cries zapoloshnye about the benefits of the theory: "It is necessary to consult with the party!" "Raise the level of party science," "Learn from the Lenin!" "Dig deeper", etc. etc. - Know that this is a sure sign of a new regular sharpening of the struggle within the party leadership ... about the "general" of the party coffers. Now have all the (necessary and sufficient), historical-party reason to believe: the famous cry Kozma Minin - Homeland expensive purse! - Is not akin to the psychology of the party leadership the Communist Party. Moreover, it should be stated that the party that there is a real "conspiracy" against the scientific theory. Talk theory - that the principle and method, and the ritual and the fact. The above document shows five years ago, perhaps the key points throughout the "voodoo" in the history of the Communist Party. In very general terms, from the standpoint of the Party of sociology, it can describe, roughly, as follows. The community of "scientific communism" of professors and social scientists MSU dotsentskoy Corporation, using the remnants of his former influence in the Soviet Vake, once again "anchoring" Zyuganov. Of course, in the best tradition of Soviet times, she did it "for good" party and benefit for all of us ... The result, however, is well known: instead, under the direction of his philosophical Highly Skilled Leader, one by one, win their "Granik "," Issa "and" gavgamelly "- (in fact, in one person," Alexander and Aristotle! "), the party and all hirela hirela, providing along the way tolerable welfare of the party Secretariat, but does not" gold party brain. " And then the last reasonably concluded: you can not return the former academic load and nomenclature salary from the state budget - have got to today's party coffers! The degree you have received from us ... A mechanism for the division perfectly BLAGOVIDOV and is well known: we want you to "Concept" - you are our treasure. But, though the basic philosophy of education, "the doctor" Zyuganov and no common sense to it, however, can not refuse. In fact: who needs, and even for nairealneyshy financial resources, "pig in a poke"? And the diploma has already in his pocket. A brand of the Communist Party, we, with Valentin Kuptsov, and without you will find how to use ... Do not hesitate - do everything "just right". Us, probably not the first time! ... Naive comrades from Moscow State University for some reason, "not understand" that the "theory" in the Communist Party - is a special "Chinese ceremony, demonstrating and confirming the right of the acronym and the" brand ". And done it, so in the strictest partkomovskogo protocol. "Communist", "party organizer", "deputy of ideology" or "theorist" - is a function delegated to the party "party dad" and not calling in life a person or his actual qualifications. Because some real support scientific and theoretical ability, indeed demanded the party inevitably exposed to the so-called marginalization. Formula is well known: "Communist, then -" zyuganovets. What-oh! Anti-zyuganovets? Means. antipartiets. and, of course, anti-Communist. " - Private ownership of the Party, the personality cult of the party bosses, inner-anti-communism - strictly, scientifically speaking. Their common basic foundation serves exactly what is the pervasive phenomenon of modern "burbulisovskoy statehood in Russia, namely: a fierce private property ... as much as the mind itself! And because of that "syndrome of Beslan" powerfully extends itself as the souls of the dear Russians ", and the CP of the Russian Federation and in the Russian Federation. For the so-called "Logical obstruction" - their common, fundamental essence and generic features. Donkey skin "marginalization of the party" in front of all of us consistently trying on themselves and R. Kosolapov, and A. Makashov and A. Prokhanov and many others. It still awaits everyone who seriously accept the last ritual sobbing "in theory" from the lips of today's opponents Vitaly Glukhova. Meanwhile, the child cries "like a fool, but not stupid!" If this new "attack late gnoseologizma" on this new "aggravation" of the party bosses look at the eye of the party's history as an academic discipline, it becomes clear: this is, after all, they by Friedrich Engels sob! More precisely, we mourn the utter lack thereof in their own ranks. After all, "our Fred" could be a businessman is to the benefit of communism, and not at his expense. For it is all of us and love!. Party coffers - this in him, not agents of the bourgeoisie in the Communist camp. And vice versa: the bourgeoisie has been taken away from a sharp weapon, quite like a bourgeois party company working on its grave-diggers ("all - as one!"), And so on Communism. Met in their ranks talent theorist? - Give him your last! - Rather than the "superfluous", something ... That's right, all the example of his own life, he explained. Anti-bourgeois money! - This is the principle of the present without fail (and not zyuganoobraznoy) party coffers. Communist Party - is not the place where the wisdom of running for the money. On the contrary, this is the place in modern human society, where money is running ... for the mind. In the language of dialectical logic of Lenin, Hegel and Marx, it is: not "one" is subject to a lot, but "the unity of the moon" - only it provides a true order of things (and in my soul, and in the party, and at school. And in the State , and "order in armor"), at the root of suppressing "any Beslan." The language as their common teacher of Plato, the place is in human life, the clever Greek language, has long been called - "topos noetos ... That's it, (but not brand the Communist Party!) Is that "party's monopoly" and that "the party's exclusive" where INEVITABLE queue of people. For a place in life! And not a "diploma" and "Party tickets," Zyuganov, who in his opinion, people only wants (to choose, how to make!?) Come and see .. lick. Therefore, be clear. Do not get me wrong: Zyuganov, V. Chikin and Frolov - not against Marxism-Leninism. Not at all! On the contrary, they always were, are and will be solely and only for him. " The whole nuance, however, that is Marxism-Leninism ... for Engels. But is Marxism-Leninism - instead of "Dear Fred" and even against him. - My wallet belongs to the Party! - Says one of them. - No, it should belong to the party ... my purse! - Silently but effectively opposed him another. That's, my friends - the whole point. First, Marxism-Leninism and defends journalist Vitaly GLUKHOV, in controversy with its "full-time luminaries," the Communist Party Central Committee. But, silently, breathing heavily, and persisting in a fierce fight for the party second, "bezengelsovsky Marxism-Leninism" and spent the last 15 years of his vivid life of its above-named opponents from, we are deeply revered, the Communist Party. The most recent, trumpet their party-regimental, marching pipe and represents a new "human resource kit" for her ("struggle") for further continuation and expansion. In short, once again we are called "uhglubit and expand, in other words ... I remember it was already! Yes, in fact, even with the advent of Zyuganov, so to this day, and never ceased to be never.
P. S. Assume that the Friedrich Engels took. and even appeared on the contemporary political scene in our country. Foolishness, of course ... But let's just assume it's in your mind at some five minutes. Once in Russia, that he sees with all legs running towards him from two opposite sides of the main political party and personnel officers. From the "United Russia", for example, Volodin - hear his reason: "It is, of course, arrant commies, the Engels. But denzhisch something denzhisch him! Sure. Our frame ". And here is from the "Soviet Russia" HR, suppose Chikin:: "Though Bourgeois is famous, yes, the author of The Development of Socialism from Utopia to Science" after all. Yes, and the Manifesto with Marx wrote. Will issue a membership card! Be sure to give out. " For one of them in Engels important money, but for another - partprinadlezhnost to "Old Communist Party." Everyone needs an old Friedrich! Here are just that, in our imaginary experiment, say at this himself? An old communist, equally versed in theory and in the money, used to connect them with each other "on science, not anyhow, he said about both. - Between Russia, the "United" and Russia, "Soviet" substantial difference no. And that and other equally indifferent to the theory and science. And the competition between them took place and goes to the very, very different plane. And fight they are completely behind the other, equally unscientific interest! What is it? Yes, the one that "beyond" RUSSIAN REAL is located. Because it is about her (and not any of the foregoing), we with Marx and Life, and the Theory of Science and conversations only lead (... In short, a fantasy - not a hindrance when it applied the theory to the actual subject matter helps. Much worse, if "under the guise of" theory, we are imposing their own fantasies Party tickets in their hands.) Understand the political swaying rhythms of the party "body" of the Communist Party, as we see, is not difficult. Having met in its ranks another "Engels-theorist" and strangled him safely into the arms of "the Charter", Zyuganov, Vladimir Chikin, V. Merchant and Frolov are sent to the Duma next businessman who, after all, "also" ... to Engels looks like! And as he was, as expected on the Stock Exchange begins to pull partbiznes to himself, heard zapoloshnye cries: "Help!". Followed by the indispensable "search theory" for her alleged subsequent "rebirth" ... That, in the long term light of the party "tomorrow", there are different "unaccounted for" and "supernumerary" lovers of Lenin, Marx and Engels, or prevents the staffing management "use" the party's coffers today, and it is now.
Just like the proverb known: "BEAR fights, and he yells!"
Alexey Kazakov, a member of the working philosophy of the club them. Joseph Dietzgen. (Since 1989)
(Of the actual ARCHIVES 2001.)
VALUE OF SCIENTIFIC AND PRACTICAL CONFERENCE
Communist Party and the Marxist-Leninist concept of modern socialism March 24, 2001 in Yessentuki held regional scientific-practical conference "The Russian Communist Party and the Marxist-Leninist concept of modern socialism." For its implementation was created by the organizing committee led by the First Secretary of the Stavropol Regional Committee of the Communist Party VI Pisarenko. Active participation in the committee took the first secretaries Essentuki and Piatigorsky City Party Umnyakova SA and GA Sushko. The conference was attended by delegations from the party of Karachay-Cherkessia, Kalmyk Republic, the Government of Stavropol Territory Deputy Prime N. Finger, head of the city Essentuki Igor Stoyanov. Edition of the magazine "... ISM, together with scientists, who came from Penza, Voronezh, Yekaterinburg, Stavropol, Kalmykia, has presented scientific papers on the concept of light brown, published in the magazine" Dialogue »№ 1 in January 2001. It is with great interest the reports were presented professors IM Manuilova, VL Ochkin, AN Shimin, AH Kirgueva and VV Burtnika - chief editor of the magazine "... ISM. Range of methodological approaches from the speakers was wide enough. Delegates responded to it and enter into a dialogue. Very interesting from this point of view there were performances YO Oglaeva - Chief Editor of "Lenin's way" Kalmyk republican committee Communist Party, and IA Biryukov - Chairman of the Board of Veterans Pyatigorsk, L. Levitsky - a member of the Communist Party Essentuki, DA Zaharyasheva and VA Molchanov - Scientific Advisor magazine "... ISM. Scientific-practical conference allowed the communists to address issues of socio-economic revival of Russia and conclude that only the socialist revival can save the country from complete destruction. Socialism in Russia, there is no alternative. Socialism, but from a historical perspective and communism - the future of the entire human civilization, the natural result of its historical development. Problem boils down to the Communists in order to avoid mistakes of the Soviet period, at the service of the people all the current and future possibilities of the socialist construction. Past experience is invaluable, but not comprehensive. Future generations will consider him, but will make a decisive contribution to the content, form and process of socialist construction. The main thing - to look forward, not backward. A "round table" on which the exchanged views on a scientific and practical conferences, developed proposals and resolutions adopted, and appeal to the public, which will be published in the newspaper, "Homeland."
Rodina, 30 March 2001
R E W O R U C and I
Scientific-Practical Conference "Russian Communist Party and the Marxist-Leninist concept of modern socialism" Yessentuki 24 - March 25, 2001 Organized by the Stavropol Regional Committee Communist Party, the All-Russian edition of the magazine "... ISM, the Communist faction in the Duma of Stavropol Territory, Pyatigorsk and Essentuki CC CPRF Conference notes: Alienation Theories of Life is expressed as a hopeless contradiction of the theory with him herself. This is evident on the surface in the form of competition between two opposing theories about the same ... and in the form of eclecticism, which is presented as a holistic concept. What happened to the concept of socio-economic recovery and development in Russia, entitled "Socialism in Russia, there is no alternative", which was developed by a team of Rousseau and proposed the Communist Party as official party doctrine. As evidenced by the publication of this document to number 1 magazine "Dialogue", this doctrine right there in front of the whole Party and most authors of the "One" - to spread "sodium". By joining together in long-standing and ongoing controversy, which shows that all those who requested the Bureau of Rousseau to write for the party concept, did not understand the society in which they lived until 1991. Do not understand it now, giving a "concept" external descriptions and reflections, which are suitable only for understanding the issues themselves. "Zaedinstvo" This forces them to seek the causes of their disputes in violation of the norms of scientific ethics, and, consequently, democracy! Hence it is clear that the scientific collectivism Ruso members can not serve as a prototype of the perfect forms and party democracy in particular. Firstly, after ten years the members of Rousseau must be clear who was a communist, but he slipped to a "socialist orientation" ... Without this concept of them as a collective creation, "God no candle, no hell rabble", ie e. eclecticism. Secondly, the group F. Klotsvorga on the one hand, and a group B. Budarin and B. Kochneva from another resolutely refuse to talk (and learn!) Such a subject of a public and interest-Party as "Soviet socialism." The study, which will inevitably pose a great challenge their former scientific status. Therefore, one manages to circumvent this by using the term "development" and "mature" socialism, while others are using the term "early socialism." This terminological competition simulates the act and process of theoretical thinking, leaving the authors and readers outside the brackets of the subject. And the object itself, leaving a captive of the ideological and historical elements that prevailed until 1991, - Dominates today. Third, with rare unanimity in stating the existence of the Soviet social science "dogmatism", "scholasticism", "eclectic" and "abstractions, they are resolutely silent, as with all of this is the case in the Company, Ruso and the party now, only hinting at the possibility such defects from each other as competing entities of one party and the academic community. Fourthly, the withdrawal of Soviet socialism in parentheses their temperamental debate, the authors sometimes remember a long work of VI Lenin, Two Tactics of Social Democracy in the Democratic Revolution, by applying its major categories at random. Thus, the tactics of the Communist Party for them, if it is a revolutionary, then certainly a "democratic". If democracy, then, of course, and "socialist." And if a socialist, then by no means "revolutionary" ... In some cases, it is "too early", in others - is already "too late", but never just right! Finding himself in "knowledge of the laws of social development" and "creative application of Marxist-Leninist theory to the study of contemporary reality," the authors of official national party doctrine demonstrated a complete inability to connect the theory of knowledge (dialectical logic) - with scientific socialism, the history of the Communist Party - a political economy and all that - with the movement of the working class of Soviet society and modern Russia. But if, in Lenin, dialectical logic is the living soul of Marxism, then, in the words of Engels, communism is a theoretical expression of the conditions for the emancipation of the working class. And no other way! Our authors found in their professional arsenal complete absence of the Leninist concept of socialism as a living art of the masses themselves. Misunderstanding of the nature and essence of private property appears in the confusion of the state, and nation-wide public ownership of means of production, forcing them to accept socialism without the working class movement, but with the category of labor, and political economy analysis of property relations substitute for analysis of its legal definitions and external relationships. Misunderstanding of the dialectical relationship of individual and general labor, through and through scientific and technological progress, leads to a complete misunderstanding of Marx's claim that communism is, for the most part, the economic movement, when the exchange value ceases to be a measure of use value. And finally, there is no understanding of what socialism into communism is nothing more than a bourgeois society ... without the bourgeoisie. F. Klotsvorg, in concept, provides the Communist Party simply bourgeois socialism, Russian bottling. Therefore, as a result, they confuse the "stratification" and the variety of forms of property do not realize that councils of labor collectives (STK) - is higher, which completes the link of the Soviet, that is, government, and not "one of the" forms of social control hooligan current administration. Summing up, the Communists Stavropol, Kalmykia, Karachay-Cherkessia and the Caucasian Mineral Waters (CMS) said that social scientists call Ruso, focusing his vision on "all progressive-minded citizens, mindful of a viable means of popular resistance and communist construction. Rousseau comes from lack of conflict and the contemporary reality of the ready availability of a national entity that is just waiting for when he finally this very "concept" and offer podnesut ... But today even the Patriarch Alexy II, after the Archbishop of St. Petersburg and Ladoga Ioann, said: "We must realize that against our people is a well-planned bloodless war, with the aim of its destruction." And calls to "fight for the salvation of our people, to organize national resistance." The Conference invites the Bureau of the Central Committee of our party to make a statement about the following. 1. Acknowledge that a presidential-parliamentary form of government in Russia finally and irrevocably discredited in the eyes of the working population and has been unable to solve any burning issues of our society. 2. Therefore, for the organization, development and consolidation of the society of no confidence in the regime as a whole, the Communist Party of May 1, 2001 begins to open public agitation for the restoration of Soviet power from the bottom up, legally, through a referendum. 3. In response to a bourgeois government of genocide and the psychological war against his own people, the party begins to psychological terror against the fools and grabbers-heads; 4. Against betrayed Marxism-Leninism, social scientists have anything good (and even for money!) Will not be able to teach the youth and our children; 5. Against corrupt journalists who seek the truth instead of "information" for sale. It should be "psychological war" being waged against working people (= a form of "Cold War"), wrap the psychological terror and civil disobedience against the organizers of this war. 6. Throw all efforts to revive the child of the communist movement - updated pioneer movement. 7. A referendum in support of the peasantry against the sale of land. 8. Implement a national act demythologization Vladimir Putin. 9. Given the weight the same mistakes of the Soviet and post-Soviet era, the scale of the Communist Party to decide on the correct combination of processes of the party and the academic building. For this purpose, a South Russian academic library of the Governor of the Stavropol Territory. 10. Support the initiative of the Stavropol Communist establishing a general party Medal. Herman Lopatin "For success in an academically-party building."
Leninsky WAY ", NEWSPAPER Kalmyk republican committee CPRF № 5 (60), May 2001.
EXPLANATION OF INEVITABLE. The history of the party - a good thing! The main thing is that she was, firstly, not faked, and, secondly, the most complete. It was then, inevitably, and brought all exclusively in the true light of truth itself, if you look through this "crystal ball". ... When the Party press suddenly again heard cries zapoloshnye about the benefits of the theory: "It is necessary to consult with the party!" "Raise the level of party science," "Learn from the Lenin!" "Dig deeper", etc. etc. - Know that this is a sure sign of a new regular sharpening of the struggle within the party leadership ... about the "general" of the party coffers. Now have all the (necessary and sufficient), historical-party reason to believe: the famous cry Kozma Minin - Homeland expensive purse! - Is not akin to the psychology of the party leadership the Communist Party. Moreover, it should be stated that the party that there is a real "conspiracy" against the scientific theory. Talk theory - that the principle and method, and the ritual and the fact. The above document shows five years ago, perhaps the key points throughout the "voodoo" in the history of the Communist Party. In very general terms, from the standpoint of the Party of sociology, it can describe, roughly, as follows. The community of "scientific communism" of professors and social scientists MSU dotsentskoy Corporation, using the remnants of his former influence in the Soviet Vake, once again "anchoring" Zyuganov. Of course, in the best tradition of Soviet times, she did it "for good" party and benefit for all of us ... The result, however, is well known: instead, under the direction of his philosophical Highly Skilled Leader, one by one, win their "Granik "," Issa "and" gavgamelly "- (in fact, in one person," Alexander and Aristotle! "), the party and all hirela hirela, providing along the way tolerable welfare of the party Secretariat, but does not" gold party brain. " And then the last reasonably concluded: you can not return the former academic load and nomenclature salary from the state budget - have got to today's party coffers! The degree you have received from us ... A mechanism for the division perfectly BLAGOVIDOV and is well known: we want you to "Concept" - you are our treasure. But, though the basic philosophy of education, "the doctor" Zyuganov and no common sense to it, however, can not refuse. In fact: who needs, and even for nairealneyshy financial resources, "pig in a poke"? And the diploma has already in his pocket. A brand of the Communist Party, we, with Valentin Kuptsov, and without you will find how to use ... Do not hesitate - do everything "just right". Us, probably not the first time! ... Naive comrades from Moscow State University for some reason, "not understand" that the "theory" in the Communist Party - is a special "Chinese ceremony, demonstrating and confirming the right of the acronym and the" brand ". And done it, so in the strictest partkomovskogo protocol. "Communist", "party organizer", "deputy of ideology" or "theorist" - is a function delegated to the party "party dad" and not calling in life a person or his actual qualifications. Because some real support scientific and theoretical ability, indeed demanded the party inevitably exposed to the so-called marginalization. Formula is well known: "Communist, then -" zyuganovets. What-oh! Anti-zyuganovets? Means. antipartiets. and, of course, anti-Communist. " - Private ownership of the Party, the personality cult of the party bosses, inner-anti-communism - strictly, scientifically speaking. Their common basic foundation serves exactly what is the pervasive phenomenon of modern "burbulisovskoy statehood in Russia, namely: a fierce private property ... as much as the mind itself! And because of that "syndrome of Beslan" powerfully extends itself as the souls of the dear Russians ", and the CP of the Russian Federation and in the Russian Federation. For the so-called "Logical obstruction" - their common, fundamental essence and generic features. Donkey skin "marginalization of the party" in front of all of us consistently trying on themselves and R. Kosolapov, and A. Makashov and A. Prokhanov and many others. It still awaits everyone who seriously accept the last ritual sobbing "in theory" from the lips of today's opponents Vitaly Glukhova. Meanwhile, the child cries "like a fool, but not stupid!" If this new "attack late gnoseologizma" on this new "aggravation" of the party bosses look at the eye of the party's history as an academic discipline, it becomes clear: this is, after all, they by Friedrich Engels sob! More precisely, we mourn the utter lack thereof in their own ranks. After all, "our Fred" could be a businessman is to the benefit of communism, and not at his expense. For it is all of us and love!. Party coffers - this in him, not agents of the bourgeoisie in the Communist camp. And vice versa: the bourgeoisie has been taken away from a sharp weapon, quite like a bourgeois party company working on its grave-diggers ("all - as one!"), And so on Communism. Met in their ranks talent theorist? - Give him your last! - Rather than the "superfluous", something ... That's right, all the example of his own life, he explained. Anti-bourgeois money! - This is the principle of the present without fail (and not zyuganoobraznoy) party coffers. Communist Party - is not the place where the wisdom of running for the money. On the contrary, this is the place in modern human society, where money is running ... for the mind. In the language of dialectical logic of Lenin, Hegel and Marx, it is: not "one" is subject to a lot, but "the unity of the moon" - only it provides a true order of things (and in my soul, and in the party, and at school. And in the State , and "order in armor"), at the root of suppressing "any Beslan." The language as their common teacher of Plato, the place is in human life, the clever Greek language, has long been called - "topos noetos ... That's it, (but not brand the Communist Party!) Is that "party's monopoly" and that "the party's exclusive" where INEVITABLE queue of people. For a place in life! And not a "diploma" and "Party tickets," Zyuganov, who in his opinion, people only wants (to choose, how to make!?) Come and see .. lick. Therefore, be clear. Do not get me wrong: Zyuganov, V. Chikin and Frolov - not against Marxism-Leninism. Not at all! On the contrary, they always were, are and will be solely and only for him. " The whole nuance, however, that is Marxism-Leninism ... for Engels. But is Marxism-Leninism - instead of "Dear Fred" and even against him. - My wallet belongs to the Party! - Says one of them. - No, it should belong to the party ... my purse! - Silently but effectively opposed him another. That's, my friends - the whole point. First, Marxism-Leninism and defends journalist Vitaly GLUKHOV, in controversy with its "full-time luminaries," the Communist Party Central Committee. But, silently, breathing heavily, and persisting in a fierce fight for the party second, "bezengelsovsky Marxism-Leninism" and spent the last 15 years of his vivid life of its above-named opponents from, we are deeply revered, the Communist Party. The most recent, trumpet their party-regimental, marching pipe and represents a new "human resource kit" for her ("struggle") for further continuation and expansion. In short, once again we are called "uhglubit and expand, in other words ... I remember it was already! Yes, in fact, even with the advent of Zyuganov, so to this day, and never ceased to be never.
P. S. Assume that the Friedrich Engels took. and even appeared on the contemporary political scene in our country. Foolishness, of course ... But let's just assume it's in your mind at some five minutes. Once in Russia, that he sees with all legs running towards him from two opposite sides of the main political party and personnel officers. From the "United Russia", for example, Volodin - hear his reason: "It is, of course, arrant commies, the Engels. But denzhisch something denzhisch him! Sure. Our frame ". And here is from the "Soviet Russia" HR, suppose Chikin:: "Though Bourgeois is famous, yes, the author of The Development of Socialism from Utopia to Science" after all. Yes, and the Manifesto with Marx wrote. Will issue a membership card! Be sure to give out. " For one of them in Engels important money, but for another - partprinadlezhnost to "Old Communist Party." Everyone needs an old Friedrich! Here are just that, in our imaginary experiment, say at this himself? An old communist, equally versed in theory and in the money, used to connect them with each other "on science, not anyhow, he said about both. - Between Russia, the "United" and Russia, "Soviet" substantial difference no. And that and other equally indifferent to the theory and science. And the competition between them took place and goes to the very, very different plane. And fight they are completely behind the other, equally unscientific interest! What is it? Yes, the one that "beyond" RUSSIAN REAL is located. Because it is about her (and not any of the foregoing), we with Marx and Life, and the Theory of Science and conversations only lead (... In short, a fantasy - not a hindrance when it applied the theory to the actual subject matter helps. Much worse, if "under the guise of" theory, we are imposing their own fantasies Party tickets in their hands.) Understand the political swaying rhythms of the party "body" of the Communist Party, as we see, is not difficult. Having met in its ranks another "Engels-theorist" and strangled him safely into the arms of "the Charter", Zyuganov, Vladimir Chikin, V. Merchant and Frolov are sent to the Duma next businessman who, after all, "also" ... to Engels looks like! And as he was, as expected on the Stock Exchange begins to pull partbiznes to himself, heard zapoloshnye cries: "Help!". Followed by the indispensable "search theory" for her alleged subsequent "rebirth" ... That, in the long term light of the party "tomorrow", there are different "unaccounted for" and "supernumerary" lovers of Lenin, Marx and Engels, or prevents the staffing management "use" the party's coffers today, and it is now.
Just like the proverb known: "BEAR fights, and he yells!"
Alexey Kazakov, a member of the working philosophy of the club them. Joseph Dietzgen. (Since 1989)
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий