Sociology, as a weapon against the people

Happy life in Russia has increased by as much as three people - the President, Prime Minister and the Department.
 News Newsland: Russians are satisfied with their life has become much bolsheSotsiologi recorded a historical high for the time of measurement indicator of satisfaction with life in Russia, said on Monday the polls CEO Valery Fyodorov."A year ago, there were not very satisfied with their lives - 61 points. Today - 66, there are some positive changes. This historic high for the time of measurement, that is, today life satisfaction score from our people is the best all-time measurement, "- he said.According to him, "all the grumbling that bad," do not correlate with objective measurement data that suggest otherwise.Fedorov said that the Russians are satisfied with their financial situation of families (67 points). "This is a very good indicator. Historical maximum was reached only once for all measurement times and could not resist - it was 68 points, "- he said, RIA" Novosti ".

Speaking about the respondents' assessments of the situation in the country, Fedorov noted that all figures are at quite high levels. "Assessment of the economic situation of the country as a whole: a year ago it was about 53 points, that is located in the positive region, today it is about 52 points," - he said.Assessment of the political situation also has not changed during the year (it was 60 points, was 64). Sociologists also asked Russians to the question in the right or wrong direction, in their view, the situation is developing in the country. The positive evaluation of a year ago was 45 points, now - 48."That is to say, that in spite of the mass of information events, including conflict, noisy, despite the controversy and debate, the assessment of the situation is sufficiently stable," - concluded Fedorov.The last poll was conducted February 19-20 and 28-27 among 1,600 respondents. The margin of error does not exceed 3.4%.Source: vz.ru
 -------------------------------------------------- ---------
 SOCIOLOGY AND NATIONAL GENIUSThere is inescapable dispute these two principles. He pervades him world history, world philosophy as its eidetic Logos relationship between two people, that is, their dialectic and dialogue, finally, the whole drama Sophio-genesis of the individual human personality, namely, man's way to ... himself.Inevitable puzzling question: how is it! Genius was always, and sociology, then there was very, very recently?This question arises on the basis of modern education and is a consequence of the enormous "philosophical" misunderstanding.Let's just say ...: Dantes that killed Pushkin - is one that neither eat, this sociologist!It's been proven yet Lermontov's poem "Death of a Poet." Our problem here they are as follows: The genius and destiny. And here we find her strict categorical architectonics. These are: a) against the fate of genius / "fate has come to pass judgment!", And b) as a killer rock / "thrown to us by the will of fate" / c) as a semantic component a'gnoziz destiny, where the killer is not an act of anti-social / "could not spare it our glory. I could not understand at this moment bloody ... "/ d) members of social legitimacy," canceling "genius as a" non-social "/" You greedy crowd, standing before the throne ... "," this light, envious and stuffy "and / able to positively recognize the genius as only "empty praise unnecessary chorus ...", e) all-pervading theme of "positive" social / "The catch happiness and rank ..." / and finally, e) the center of all the positive myustagogii / "But there is a judgment of God ... "/, where" Rock sociologist "gives himself his own dialectic of course ...Destiny, fate and God is a category of meaning. That is, the all-sheer, comprehensive and all-pervasive reality of unity, where, according to the principle "all in all" born "HAO-Cosmo." And on a "sense - everything, but not all - meaning" born "Cosmos", ie Reality of Being.Being as the reality is - it is the "space ... without Chaos" when and where "all - single, all - well," namely: the form or matter, individual or general, dialectic or metaphysics, logic, or mystical, thinking or being, dialectical idealism and dialectical materialism ...In such a reality, being the transformation being accomplished philosophy sophiology. That is, there is a "coincidence" of Eros and Logos, and for sophistry and (in any of its forms) will not leave any "legal", "justified" the place of being in space.Categorical listed above is familiar to us as a phenomenon of education. This anabasis soul when, finding kalokagatiyu an adult acquires spiritual Byzantium, and the child, being members of a society, held as a mature man. And not "adult" ... instead of a mature, as is always the case, if between "society" and "society" is not conducting any categorical trait.This categorical system of classical sophiology intimately familiar Lermontov. It is from this series taken his favorite category poezisa: soul - the hero - a genius - the demon and "demonic" ... Demonic, according to him, is the product of a false "myustagogii" where the chicanery, the efforts of someone's apology, stealing "topos", under the guise Philosophy, organizes a catastrophic mutation in the "Sophos-sofiume": Luciferic rebellion "meaning" - against the infinite center of Being.Sociology - a sphere of negative, meonalnogo manifestation of this dialectic, its "non-thinking" behavior. Where the ruling principle: in life there are things more important than logic.Substitute genius - demonism and say "well Bulo" - the essence of sociology, apologetics Destiny. That was the verdict ... LermontovGenerally recognized initiator of the "sociology" which he called the first true "social physics", was Auguste Comte, deceased in 1857.In his letter to the successful Anglo-German businessman Friedrich Engels 7 18 July 66 he wrote: "I am now ... shtudiruet Comte, because the English and French so much fuss about this subject. Bribe them it encyclopedic, synthesis. But compared with Hegel is something pathetic ... And this crappy positivism (emphasis mine - VM) appeared in 1832! "/ K. Marx and F. Engels, Soch., V.31, p. 197. /Hegel ... died in 1831. Positivism as sociology was born in 1832, and Pushkin was killed in 1837. In short, sociology and Dantes, "holding hands", came to Russia from France almost at the same time!The conclusion is that if Pushkin had been killed by the laws (by reason) sociology, then each student's soul, having admitted to his sociology as a "textbook of life" and a sample of the knowledge society, is doomed to kill a Pushkin ...Genius is where everyone creates a universal, but as a general ... and not something "other."Should distinguish between genius as a category and the category of genius ... The latter philosophy known as "genius", "being" and as "perfect." And in the all-unity, they appear as a single, separate whole. That is a blessing.History has proven scientific philosophy: logic, as knowledge about the mind, is the knowledge of the good. The blessing is also a unity of "bliss", "good-mind", "well-relationship" and "well-Dachi" which, in turn, accidental connected and "good-addiction", "well-being", "well- honor ", etc. Hao-Cosmo gives us meaning in life is happiness ... instead of the good (for example, drug "high"), then no grace ... bliss ("tuzhit Groin, but does not know for whom") is rather good reason ... ("Why did the Katherine ? "," Madame Bovary ") In short, in all cases of p and t and tical about marketing solution to the issue of when the well-being ... to give and when to take the well-being ...! The conclusion:If Fortunately, with the greatest harmony, it is accessible to man in the thinking for him, and then, thinking it through, the benefit of easier to be in a relationship ... with himself, to observe "universuum good."That is, B N T L!Benefit in ruins - that the real object of sociology. This is particularly evident on the basis of XX-th century. Indeed, "in the philosophy of" being not equal reality. And "in Sociology", on the contrary - they are equal! For sociology is a form of sophistry, its legal institutions ...The reality of the Good - the provision of an individual who is not aware of where he is. Because of this "topos ... unconscious," he - is inadequate and therefore creates disruption.Rather than looking at it as evidence of his failure in being, he, on the contrary, "evidence" to yourself and others about the "failure" of the ... Good. Officially "academic" statement of this state of affairs = sociology, as evidence of the benefits of a ruin, but a ruin ... as good. And, on behalf of the same ... Good!Genesis ... is reality. Only reality. This is the essence of Being! - Says to sociology.- Genesis, of course, is a reality, but the reality is, it does not necessarily have a Genesis. So logic says ... - No, sure! - Objection to her sociology again. And that is why for her genius - hostile ... already being itself. - Genius is not live! - Decides it.- No, Genesis - real reality itself! - Strongly concludes logic. Because "society as society", ie civilization - the punishment for anyone who groundlessly confident that "in life there are things more important than logic," a genius alive even when he died ... as any "civilized people." Then that is the time to think of a Russian proverb folk wisdom: "What time does not hit the idea - hit on the head!" That is, turn the meaning - in fate, and that - in the Rock.If sociology - is the legal sophistry, that journalism is a popular sociology. An account of the symbiosis which now shows a Newspeak as "rating" and "PR" ... the conviction of the great Russian metaphysics Rozanov, journalism is a fundamental antithesis of such a body of national genius, as literature. And, in his fierce opposition to the literature, it generates what is designated as a writer: "Civilization is a tavern."In the construction of this "tavern" outstanding, nothing valuable, the role played by academic opportunism, with its super popular slogan today: sociology - the science of Being! Today, it is statistically evident that this opportunism leads to crime, and it is - the everyday academic looting.In the language of phase conjugation (basic philosophical question), if there is a reduction to the reality of life, its perfect reflection (expression) is sophistry. If reality is held as being - its ideal form the essence of philosophy. If they 'are equivalent, "ie, reality - the "isness" and being - the "real", the ideal form of their acts sophiology.In other words, the existence of "lies" between reality and non-being. And the reality - or "abstract being" or "non-being" ...Even the last great dialectician, metaphysician and sophiologist national, historical, and Soviet Russia AFLosev, in his time (1920 - '25 g) analyzing the phenomenon of meaning, but from the standpoint of classical dialectic, found in him a favorite sociology phenomenon . He described it this way: meonalnye fate eidos and (or) eidetic fate MeOH. And called it Losev ... music. (See: "Music as a matter of logic").In a brilliant insight, stating that music being above Vasily Rozanov (died in 1919) said: "There are actually a secret base to the whole world, universal for mystical womb ...". For this reason, some thought it a pioneer in the future of Russian Sophiology (VV Zenkovsky), and others - "a person in many ways pathological 'reveals the" spark of genius "(Lossky).Meanwhile, the subject is a "diagnosis", or delight, Rozanov idea - the idea of ​​a classic crystal philosophy. And we can find as in Hegel and Plato. "This is - the concept truly universal in its movement, sort of ... This is kind of an absolute spirit," - wrote about the second - the first (see: GWF Hegel, Lectures on the History of Philosophy. Second book. C-P. " Science ", 2001, p. 141.)The whole history of dialectics in general permeated feeling, consciousness, pre-feelings,-consciousness, finally, the realization that the concept - it's living creatures. And what, lyrics, but the children are born in the same logical, as the concept. The conclusion is that if the pregnancy - it is simply a "feminine genius", the genius - nothing like the "male pregnancy".That in relation Universuuma acts as a substitute for reality and existence, in relation to society as a mix of society and sofiuma, the same as in the so-called "academic mind," appears as a tangle of sociology and philosophy. Such confusion in scientific knowledge of being and non-being Plato called opinion and referred to by the Greek word Doksany () Our present society it is known under the guise of so-called "Social philosophy."If scientific knowledge is not allowed to be non-logical, the logic of waiting for an answer to the question: if social philosophy wants to be sure to philosophy, then why should it be called "social"? And if she insists on the predicate of "social", then why would she be called with the "philosophy"?All of the modern higher education is built on a certain political correctness. Namely, on the omission of the fact that this issue exists. And, therefore, on the charge of "misleading" anyone who dares to ask this question.Is social philosophy is essentially one of two things: either "bad philosophy", nominating himself as sociology, or "bad" sociology, conceal this fact behind the guise of "philosophy." Or, finally, and that and the other put together ...Speaking strictly logically, this should be called the sociology of socio-Dox. Its purpose - is exactly the same as that of sophistry as 25 centuries ago, Socrates defined it as follows: under the guise of love for the truth, the hunt for ... "human cattle." Socio - Gogia, in other words ...The human body is the body of good and very good! The modern physician - a hostage's wisdom: if a person is with the body, the body of law "and is" the laws of human existence.This respected authority fallacy maintains a reference to dogs, Pavlov, and especially relied on the authority of the Soviet bureaucratic party committee to mask their ancestral roots witness another metric it "dialectical materialism." After 1991, this fallacy was not only bureaucratic, but "academic" sanction, namely, introduced a course for students of sociology, for example, Sverdlovsk State Medical Institute was renamed ... Ural Medical Academy.Fall to the Academy - is the same thing as falling into the Truth ...However, the actual outcome is known: health care has to be paid, skills, abilities and medical manipulations were profound and chaotic fragmentation, but under the guise of "progressive medical division of labor." Why? To make it as much as possible "operations", suitable for sale as a commodity. A Hippocratic Oath - replaced by "legal contract" between the patient and the former rector of the SHMI, where the responsibility for all the consequences of the good doctor-action (without any proper medical logic) sick ... took over!Following medicine, teaching today also wants to be ... "sociology." The collision is the same.Genuine, pedagogy - is child's genius ... is the child. Education, training and education, provided that they are held, is the ratio of the child - to an adult, as our own human nature. But, at the same time being - the Incarnation. In the individual. Before children's eyes - matches the identity of the "individual" and "family." That is brilliant.Meanwhile, education as a social phenomenon, as before, (before 1991 and today) so riddled immanent inherent qualities such as no-population size, fecundity, and no-no-cavity!Childhood - the all-one. Because it is there: a) as a childhood "in us" and as childhood "beyond us", and b) his childhood as "the children" and their "leaders" - teachers, and c) there is a childhood as children and their children "foreign "d) There is it like children" out of childhood "and his childhood as" out of children ", and e) as childhood" real "and childhood formal," perfect. " Since the perfect ideal - are different, then this fact is based, by the way, education as a social institution.... Just go to any "Board of Education". All that we find there - it's one hundred percent of childhood. But there is absolutely no children! Why not? There they are not needed they are here ... Unnecessary, and even simply bad: it must work! From the point of view of sophiology Socium "Childhood without children" should be institutionalized in order to not be "children without a childhood" ...But, after all, now sociology reigns! Today, however, the picture is very extended: ... children against childhood - Homelessness is an unprecedented scale. And it is, admittedly, very harmoniously completes pedagogy as a social institution. It nourishes and supports it ...Anti-genius pedagogy fully secured fetish "expertise" and "professionalism", namely, the proud title of social worker! And, after the former SHMI, the current SGPI in place recently, scientific communism, today already erected a "Department of Sociology."A "synthesis" of medicine and education, on top of institutionalized childhood, is the so-called abortion - familiar to all of us "Beslan"!That ... and the other, one might say, a kind of "experts": medicine specializes in "organic body" of man, and sociology seems to nominate themselves for the human "inorganic body." And, as we know, they are a "synthesis" within reality, but beyond being. So, they called the synthesis is nothing like them (the soma and society) are pure sophistry connection. Sophistry same organic and inorganic in man stresses good position rebellion against reality for the restoration of Genesis! This fundamental fact is seen as the man in the street is not the fact of the ontology, as well ... as terrorism. In the eyes of the sociologist Logos uprising against sophistry qualifies as radicalism and rebellion. The modern physician, discovered that the human body - not only the body good, but also very good, insists on it, says the whole problem, in the best case as groundless somatic reality or neurosis.Logic genius says, "immanent" and "transcendent" are forming all-Unity.That is, the genius is held unity. A Being is the resolution of the contradiction of any and all of immanence and transcendence - "finite and infinite" first. GENESIS is a dialectic of the finite and the infinite. But infinite, according to Hegel, can be not only true, but also the so-called "Bad infinity." This is where the very infinite "place" as "out" and "close" to the end. Consequently, when the very endless vulgar "okonechivaetsya" for grossly violated his categorical "topos".So who can afford such things clearly impermissible? This makes anyone who, figuratively speaking, is eager to reality on the corpses of Being ..."Everyone" - is the one who, in the language of philosophical competence, "makes" the dialectic - "transfinitivnoy." Transfinitivnaya sophistry - a "dialectic", but ... on the "other side" of things. And, in particular, on the other side of ... nature. Consequently, given here for the transcendent immanent; immanent - a transcendent unity and gives the ... "everything"! Meonalnosti triumph ... (so loves to do, and every climber).Of some of the "members" of the all-pervading, omnipresent and invisible team "masters of non-Being," we called it. Philosophical same name their entire team also known: - "positivism."Only one branch ... "knowledge" insists on the subject so that the output of "being" as the secondary of a "non-existence" as something primary. And it is not only not averse to "Logos", but insists on it. His name - theology. Science also comes to us from the sphere of Meon, "not-being." How God ... But, indeed, it is - not God!So what is sociology, if you take it outside of the same, nothing unreasonable, claims and "academic embellishment"? Answer:1. Fashionable sophistry.2. Yesterday's "scientific communism."3. Society-knowledge as a social science, which promises a "scientific" and do not need this in a very special term "sociology."4. Unresolved contradiction between "society" and the "Logos."5. Science of society, which was held, ie Sophiology.6. Social Philosophy = "bad" philosophy.Martin Heidegger once said that the great philosophers give "spiritual refuge" for their people. In other words, actually directed the construction of the society on a foundation of good, and the good itself, in turn, help people create a "public body".Truly, this is - so. For "the benefit of both the social organism" essentially SOFIUM is. And if, for example, "From" House Losev "disappear book!" (See: Literary Gazette, № 22, 2 - 8 June 2004). That is, if making direct and trivial in relation to the looting of the national genius, is it any wonder that the laws that plunder and ruin itself is susceptible to Russian society? And if someone offends hearing the word "looting", then, turning to the language of classical Russian philosophy, on the lexicon A.F.Loseva as her last classic, you can say so: RUSSIA - in MeOH! After all, these are the laws of sociology, if modern society academically recognized its claim to be the "science of being" ...Valery Molchanov, PhDApril-May 2005Proceedings of the: "Anthropological Readings - 2005", Ekaterinburg.