Who is to blame for everything in Russia is so bad? 31.07.12 07:42
MOSCOW, July 31 (New Region, Olga Radko) - Russia has become almost the main bone of contention for the Western economists this summer. On the one hand, Russia still has growth, and its numbers appear, at least, no worse than the indicators fellow BRIC. On the other, the country adopted repressive laws against the opposition and the structural problems of the economy, such as the dependence on oil prices, corruption and the high proportion of critical state, not decided by the government and the Kremlin. In the end, the great economist and investment banks themselves hoarse arguing about the future of Russia, as if they have other important things, says "Finmarket."The group headed by well-known critics of the world, "Dr. Rock" - a predictor of crises Nouriel Roubini, who has called in May business community to ignore Russia. Roubini believes that Russia lagged behind and from the Group of Seven countries, and even from the BRICs. A recent article by article in The Economist tossed wood on the fire of discussion: Russian industry, according to the authors, just not competitive and soon after Russia's accession to the WTO will die a natural death.The ranks of the defenders of Russia signed several prominent economists and journalists, including chief strategist "Renaissance Capital" Charles Robertson and Mark Adomanis of Forbes. Adomanis explains why the Russian economy did not need to be discounted, as advised by Nouriel Roubini.The article Adomanisa are some good reasons for that with Russia, it is worth while to deal with, but its future is not as bleak as suggested by "Dr. Rock."After the chaos and the 1998 crisis, the Russian economy has been growing quite rapidly, outpacing the growth of the "Big Seven". Russia is unlikely to lag behind the U.S. and other developed countries, on the contrary, it outperforms them in terms of growth.Of course, Russia is much poorer than the United States, so it is natural that it should grow faster. Achieve growth of 4% to the GDP per capita of $ 16 thousand is much easier than achieving the same 4% to the GDP per capita of $ 45 thousandMany prominent economists somehow believe that this is enough to ignore fairly steady and significant growth in Russia. They often say that it is in decline, its economy shrinking and it is increasingly lagging behind the West. In fact, even when differences in income Russia compared to developed countries is booming.© 2012, NR2.Ru, «New Region", 2.0
------------------------------------------------------------------
Contemporary ArchiveWHO IS round dance?
Shares "MMM" I do not got. As, however, and the amusing "voucher" is not received. For interest me not "dividends", and Truth. That's why no false shyness guess my opinion is to be objective (= elementary truth condition) may qualify.Long time ... and we noticed: the people wise. What does this mean? So it is that when he frantically impose first so-called "communism", he calmly and slowly, converts it into your life-adjusted values and shrines, such as raising children, a victory in the Great Patriotic War, access to space, better health care and social security. Conversely, when he was just as frantically and quickly re-imposed, but this time the so-called "capitalism", he again, groaning and cursing softly, adapts another freak bosses to their arduous and smysloobilnoy historical destiny.Recent years have shown clear these fussy, nosy and always "vanguard benefactors" of the people are usually one and the same people. For them, that capitalism that socialism - all the same. Just not smoothly and arbitrarily, and under the strict eye of his superiors (which is "warm" is better than sun!) Was is our one and only life.
It is this simple, but infinitely important truth and exposed, in my opinion, the universal buzz around "MMM".And in fact, when the simple Russian peasants in the city, in the country, began to stretch their calloused hands, so that by the "steer" the so-called "developed socialism" (as noted by the official political economy clumsy expression - "the fall in capital productivity" !), the guide's watchful immediately gave them a "restructuring." When the same men took for "action", so that means that now is "capitalism" without a guide to steer, they give back to the horns ...If sotsblaga yesterday was not for everyone, and it is a bourgeois enterprise, too, it turns out, is not for everyone!The question is: where does the spirit go naproshennoy custody of the people? Custody at any and all times.Thoughtful ... and remember!Several years ago, in the romantic period of the current "reform" on one of the TV show journalist Gennady Burbulis Vl.Pozner asked a reasonable question:- So, what company you are going to build for us, socialism or capitalism?This question proved to be a political genius very uncomfortable.- Neither one nor the other - remember, he managed himself out.Well, what of it? - You ask.And that G.Burbulis - is the "mercury ball" that cleverly "re-ticking" with the department of scientific communism in the chair of State and back, tracing the trajectory of the "oscillatory motion" of the entire liberal intelligentsia. Because he - it recognized idol. And as a social orientation to the latest Burbulis is the leader of all the current and mladobyurokratii mladoburzhuazii. (Except for the big-eared owls, part-households bureaucracy that tells him "Fee-and-and.", But at the same time, his back-to-front obediently lagging behind in all socially important matters ... However, more recently, for that part that it is "the directors", he begins to "rush" and himself).I remember ... in July 1993 G.Burbulis visited his "democratic activists" in Ekaterinburg. With him was Assistant - Director of the Institute of economic conditions in the Russian government. YMUrinson. When (after the "narrow party") on the extended meeting of the City Council has a population that "explain" sverdlovchanam where inflation creeps "dance" of salaries and prices, to fool the lives of ordinary laborer, then the room was speechless at first, and then literally choking .It turns out, are doing something in that, instead of investing salary in shares, bonds and "Mercedes", people plucked up our nerve and began to spend money ... for food! Hall buzzed relentlessly.As part of the narrow circle of the more peaceful citizens Yankev I asked two questions. The first is whether it is adherent G.Burbulisa and that it proposed to Yeltsin government candidates Gaidar, Chubais, and some other? - Yes, it is! - Said the director-assistant. And the second question: - Tell me, please, Yankev, what, in your opinion, is the "national treasure"?Hearing in this matter for some obscure trick himself, he tried just in case leave him. But the witnesses questions perked up noticeably and inexorably expected him to answer.- Well, you-oo-oo ... National ... wealth-oh, it's ... It's - the property! - With desperate determination student who wants at all costs to pass "pass", the challenge just blurted out.- Excuse me, but if so, it turns out that, for example, "table" - this wealth and carpenter - no? And, say, 25 million compatriots caught after 1991 "abroad" of Russia, to our national wealth you do not belong? Because they - not property! And in "dollars" are not like ...YMUrinson began nervously looking around, looking for intellectual help. And not finding any nearby bluff to call disguised as leniency, said: - Well, it's kind of philosophy! - (Say, my friend, not a serious issue ...).- Well wrong philosophy? So your friend Burbulis - also PhD. Even Adam Smith, speaking of "the wealth of nations", also dabbled in metaphysics ...It was too much. Adopting a fighting stance for a decisive breakthrough, director of economic conditions furiously swept squeezes his circle of well-intentioned "democrats", and rushed to the other side gorsovetovskoy halls, where, fortunately, Burbulis already waving invitingly our hero hand.As you can see, the truth is, alas, was prosaic, banal and simple, "as moo": senior state specialist prices, promotions and salaries ... simply does not know what it is all there is? And that is why this whole "dust-democratic" reforms ostensibly, Adam Smith was not to blame.So how do you call those who tends to "build" a socialism in Sverdlovsk, capitalism in Moscow, and it does not build either the one or the other? Right! This - PSEVDOPROFESSIONALY. Ural their idol - he frustrated pros. And that is why his imitators, having met in my life something professional and artisan necessarily crush it in the bud.So it is the "spirit Burbulis" alone can explain to us the stunning paradox: tax authority cap. State presses its mass social base - the shareholders "MMM".Alexey Kazakov,member of the working philosophy of the clubthem. Joseph Dietzgen."RITM», № 132 (12060), Wednesday, November 23, 1994 Issue 918.
MOSCOW, July 31 (New Region, Olga Radko) - Russia has become almost the main bone of contention for the Western economists this summer. On the one hand, Russia still has growth, and its numbers appear, at least, no worse than the indicators fellow BRIC. On the other, the country adopted repressive laws against the opposition and the structural problems of the economy, such as the dependence on oil prices, corruption and the high proportion of critical state, not decided by the government and the Kremlin. In the end, the great economist and investment banks themselves hoarse arguing about the future of Russia, as if they have other important things, says "Finmarket."The group headed by well-known critics of the world, "Dr. Rock" - a predictor of crises Nouriel Roubini, who has called in May business community to ignore Russia. Roubini believes that Russia lagged behind and from the Group of Seven countries, and even from the BRICs. A recent article by article in The Economist tossed wood on the fire of discussion: Russian industry, according to the authors, just not competitive and soon after Russia's accession to the WTO will die a natural death.The ranks of the defenders of Russia signed several prominent economists and journalists, including chief strategist "Renaissance Capital" Charles Robertson and Mark Adomanis of Forbes. Adomanis explains why the Russian economy did not need to be discounted, as advised by Nouriel Roubini.The article Adomanisa are some good reasons for that with Russia, it is worth while to deal with, but its future is not as bleak as suggested by "Dr. Rock."After the chaos and the 1998 crisis, the Russian economy has been growing quite rapidly, outpacing the growth of the "Big Seven". Russia is unlikely to lag behind the U.S. and other developed countries, on the contrary, it outperforms them in terms of growth.Of course, Russia is much poorer than the United States, so it is natural that it should grow faster. Achieve growth of 4% to the GDP per capita of $ 16 thousand is much easier than achieving the same 4% to the GDP per capita of $ 45 thousandMany prominent economists somehow believe that this is enough to ignore fairly steady and significant growth in Russia. They often say that it is in decline, its economy shrinking and it is increasingly lagging behind the West. In fact, even when differences in income Russia compared to developed countries is booming.© 2012, NR2.Ru, «New Region", 2.0
------------------------------------------------------------------
Contemporary ArchiveWHO IS round dance?
Shares "MMM" I do not got. As, however, and the amusing "voucher" is not received. For interest me not "dividends", and Truth. That's why no false shyness guess my opinion is to be objective (= elementary truth condition) may qualify.Long time ... and we noticed: the people wise. What does this mean? So it is that when he frantically impose first so-called "communism", he calmly and slowly, converts it into your life-adjusted values and shrines, such as raising children, a victory in the Great Patriotic War, access to space, better health care and social security. Conversely, when he was just as frantically and quickly re-imposed, but this time the so-called "capitalism", he again, groaning and cursing softly, adapts another freak bosses to their arduous and smysloobilnoy historical destiny.Recent years have shown clear these fussy, nosy and always "vanguard benefactors" of the people are usually one and the same people. For them, that capitalism that socialism - all the same. Just not smoothly and arbitrarily, and under the strict eye of his superiors (which is "warm" is better than sun!) Was is our one and only life.
It is this simple, but infinitely important truth and exposed, in my opinion, the universal buzz around "MMM".And in fact, when the simple Russian peasants in the city, in the country, began to stretch their calloused hands, so that by the "steer" the so-called "developed socialism" (as noted by the official political economy clumsy expression - "the fall in capital productivity" !), the guide's watchful immediately gave them a "restructuring." When the same men took for "action", so that means that now is "capitalism" without a guide to steer, they give back to the horns ...If sotsblaga yesterday was not for everyone, and it is a bourgeois enterprise, too, it turns out, is not for everyone!The question is: where does the spirit go naproshennoy custody of the people? Custody at any and all times.Thoughtful ... and remember!Several years ago, in the romantic period of the current "reform" on one of the TV show journalist Gennady Burbulis Vl.Pozner asked a reasonable question:- So, what company you are going to build for us, socialism or capitalism?This question proved to be a political genius very uncomfortable.- Neither one nor the other - remember, he managed himself out.Well, what of it? - You ask.And that G.Burbulis - is the "mercury ball" that cleverly "re-ticking" with the department of scientific communism in the chair of State and back, tracing the trajectory of the "oscillatory motion" of the entire liberal intelligentsia. Because he - it recognized idol. And as a social orientation to the latest Burbulis is the leader of all the current and mladobyurokratii mladoburzhuazii. (Except for the big-eared owls, part-households bureaucracy that tells him "Fee-and-and.", But at the same time, his back-to-front obediently lagging behind in all socially important matters ... However, more recently, for that part that it is "the directors", he begins to "rush" and himself).I remember ... in July 1993 G.Burbulis visited his "democratic activists" in Ekaterinburg. With him was Assistant - Director of the Institute of economic conditions in the Russian government. YMUrinson. When (after the "narrow party") on the extended meeting of the City Council has a population that "explain" sverdlovchanam where inflation creeps "dance" of salaries and prices, to fool the lives of ordinary laborer, then the room was speechless at first, and then literally choking .It turns out, are doing something in that, instead of investing salary in shares, bonds and "Mercedes", people plucked up our nerve and began to spend money ... for food! Hall buzzed relentlessly.As part of the narrow circle of the more peaceful citizens Yankev I asked two questions. The first is whether it is adherent G.Burbulisa and that it proposed to Yeltsin government candidates Gaidar, Chubais, and some other? - Yes, it is! - Said the director-assistant. And the second question: - Tell me, please, Yankev, what, in your opinion, is the "national treasure"?Hearing in this matter for some obscure trick himself, he tried just in case leave him. But the witnesses questions perked up noticeably and inexorably expected him to answer.- Well, you-oo-oo ... National ... wealth-oh, it's ... It's - the property! - With desperate determination student who wants at all costs to pass "pass", the challenge just blurted out.- Excuse me, but if so, it turns out that, for example, "table" - this wealth and carpenter - no? And, say, 25 million compatriots caught after 1991 "abroad" of Russia, to our national wealth you do not belong? Because they - not property! And in "dollars" are not like ...YMUrinson began nervously looking around, looking for intellectual help. And not finding any nearby bluff to call disguised as leniency, said: - Well, it's kind of philosophy! - (Say, my friend, not a serious issue ...).- Well wrong philosophy? So your friend Burbulis - also PhD. Even Adam Smith, speaking of "the wealth of nations", also dabbled in metaphysics ...It was too much. Adopting a fighting stance for a decisive breakthrough, director of economic conditions furiously swept squeezes his circle of well-intentioned "democrats", and rushed to the other side gorsovetovskoy halls, where, fortunately, Burbulis already waving invitingly our hero hand.As you can see, the truth is, alas, was prosaic, banal and simple, "as moo": senior state specialist prices, promotions and salaries ... simply does not know what it is all there is? And that is why this whole "dust-democratic" reforms ostensibly, Adam Smith was not to blame.So how do you call those who tends to "build" a socialism in Sverdlovsk, capitalism in Moscow, and it does not build either the one or the other? Right! This - PSEVDOPROFESSIONALY. Ural their idol - he frustrated pros. And that is why his imitators, having met in my life something professional and artisan necessarily crush it in the bud.So it is the "spirit Burbulis" alone can explain to us the stunning paradox: tax authority cap. State presses its mass social base - the shareholders "MMM".Alexey Kazakov,member of the working philosophy of the clubthem. Joseph Dietzgen."RITM», № 132 (12060), Wednesday, November 23, 1994 Issue 918.
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий