Adventures anniversary: 10 years ago, the U.S. invaded IraqToday - the anniversary of the most controversial and bloody military adventure of the 21st century. March 19, 2003 the Allied forces under the banner of the United States and Britain invaded Iraq. Then it was explained by weapons of mass destruction that Saddam Hussein could be used against anyone. True, no one listened to people who are sent to Iraq to search for weapons, or at least his tracks.UN mission led by Hans Blix, the chief weapons inspector, worked in the country for over a year. He is now in an article for CNN company recalls: "After the war I was told that in my office in New York was set weight" bugs. "Well, it probably is.'s A pity that the people who listened to me, not take into account all the things that I said then. "
Hans Blix called war a terrible mistake and a violation of the UN Charter. 10 years later, Iraq - this is one of the most dangerous points on the planet, a country torn apart by extremist gangs, gripped by ethnic and religious strife. For 10 years, the loss of the international coalition in Iraq were about five thousand men. How many civilians were killed, no one even thought to establish precisely, called different numbers, from 700 thousand to half a million.
Hans Blix said he feared for his employees. After all, they go to a country that in Western public opinion pictured as a closed and dark tyranny. And - surprise: before the inspectors opened the doors, they were allowed to any facilities. In general, says Blix, "Iraqis largely helped in that time." As we know, no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq was not. "Suspicion - is one thing, but the reality is - is quite another - says Hans Blix. - We did not find any weapons or evidence. And report back. But then-Pentagon chief Donald Rumsfeld, and did not want to listen. He told us:" The lack of proof - is not evidence of absence. "Then, at a meeting of the Security Council on Iraq, the same Donald Rumsfeld showed everyone some satellite photos and talked about the movement of goods with a deadly weapon. Inspectors were checked and the data. "On February 11, about a month before the invasion, I went to Rice, who was then the national security adviser, and told her that we have checked all the objects pointed to U.S. intelligence, but found nothing there - Blix says. - Her response was: "We are here to understand not with intelligence, and with Iraq."America needs a war, concludes Hans Blix. After the September 11 attacks the Bush administration was to turn its power and rage at any of the Axis of Evil. Saddam was a suitable target. The only justification for the invasion of Iraq was the testimony of prisoners of war. According to them, Saddam allegedly planned to resume the program of weapons of mass destruction. Blix raises some doubts: "I can not judge how sincere were these people who were captured and are being interrogated. Quite possible that they said what they wanted to hear no more."Be that as it may, the U.S. and its allies would not only find and destroy stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction. Hans Blix describes their other goals, as well as the fact that in the end result: "The goal - to eliminate the" Al Qaeda "in Iraq. But in Iraq, and have not heard of" al-Qaeda ", there is not yet invaded. More one goal - to create there exemplary democracy. Instead tyranny Iraqis have anarchy, and America has compromised acts that violate the laws of war. Another goal - to turn Iraq into a user-friendly site for a possible operation against Iran. But eventually, the opposite happened - Iran received a strong ally. "After already existing cases of Afghanistan and Vietnam in Iraq worked "principle supermarket", "broke - so I bought". Perhaps because of this purely economic issue U.S. is not so belligerent with Libya and Syria, suggests Blix.Elena Kopylova What is behind the adventure of the U.S. invasion of Iraq?Source: vesti.ru-------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------Contemporary ArchivePolitical Fiasco"One of the authors of the plan of the military campaign in Iraq, U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney, now publicly admitted his mistake.This ... Cheney said that the strategic plan decision to go to war in Iraq was right and that he would have done the same thing, even knowing in advance about all the implications. "NTV News / World. 01. 08. 2007.
VP Dick Cheney seems to hold the answer ... To whom? Apparently, before the international community.
This - the results peacekeeping mission in his country in Iraq.
But the U.S., in addition to their military and economic gigantism also ACADEMIC enormous power.
It's not just that she has a huge body of teachers, experts, graduate students and professors. Business - in this case a real hegemony in world diplomacy, world journalism, global communications and international public opinion.
In this hegemony has its own architectonics. On top of which officially reigns, so-called political science.
"To fall into a political science" does not need to know the history and logic, to have a "King" in his own head. You just have some appropriate "set of symptoms" of his opinion, and, now, you - POLITICIAN!
So much for "the civilized world" ...
Here, in "Russian law," political science - it is but yesterday ... In one case - yesterday's "historians of the CPSU." And in the other - yesterday "ismatchiki" and "scientific communists."
Received, prior to 1991, his "degrees" (= degrees) for the same thing that they are now the same as Rogue Nails and "ideology", "scoop", "Stalinism", "accursed past" or "totalitarianism", his next "degree" they added to his biography without repentance, or, at least, embarrassment. Say, Associate Scientific Communism (nomenclature of "candidate of philosophical sciences") problem-free flows into professor of sociology and political science (the nomenclature of "Doctor of Philosophy"). A rector of his university and the College yesterday (generally, the recent Secretary of the Party Committee of the CPSU, the secretary of the party bureau, or a member of the Party Committee) satisfaction rubbing his hands, shaking his head at the "approval over": - Say, "WAC is approved!"
Moreover, today, to "protect" his doctorate, does not have to have even a basic philosophical education.
So live ...
However, all of us today still very well remember how in the process of conquering Iraq kaolitsiey, our political science (and its public faction - journalism) aggressively and relentlessly "surrender" to the marginalized anyone who did at least a half-hearted attempt to conflict Bush and Saddam apply ... only common sense.
Well, at least the good old British common sense.
The result is known. Conquered Iraq turned a virtual "base" Osama bin Laden - in a real database. (That is, to carry out institutional imagination of U.S. intelligence!). Old Europe shrank to Russia, not sparing hopes Goebbels - Hitler era spring of 1945. Eastern Europe, by contrast, fell into the arms of the United States, but ... with pro-Hitler and anti-Soviet cries on their lips. A 400000th regular army of Saddam Hussein retained elite cadre of Iraqi state under occupation polufalsifitsirovannoy his "kaolitsiey" governments, whose officials successfully Political Science, at the time, 'pass' ...
The Taliban in Afghanistan (and Pakistan, nuclear) has a new, hard pereotsenimuyu, moral sanction on the transition from the anti-Sovietism of anti-Americanism. And the Iranian Empire was a world-historic opportunity for the rough resuscitation and grand revival. (At the same inducing flashes resuscitation imperial "Byzantine" and "Arab-Muslim"!)
The conclusion is obvious: Assyria victory of world political scientist! (Saddam - Assyrian).
This means that the real political science (global diplomacy West-ego, anti-Stalinism and anti) and formal political science (Anglo-American Academic Building and its satellites in the former "socialist bloc" and the CIS) have the "topos" beyond the state of wisdom! A penalty of Saddam Hussein - an act of desperation, "Losers", which, confusing one - with the other, in the eyes of the world, failed in his state exam.
In other words, the world public opinion on the merits does not know what a state! And now, his undisputed hero - Dick Cheney - at last, it is publicly acknowledged.
But this is not, for us, the main thing. Importantly, the U.S. vice-president revealed and announced who clings old Soviet privilege, all his discomfiture - "innocent" Silence! After all, "the Iraqi embarrassment" Anglo-American military-diplomatic machine - it's a fiasco and clearest Assistant Professor Scientific Communism (professor at us - is "Associate with the claims"). Which is the official authority of the American academic, the last 20 years to justify, in the eyes of all the people, and its past affiliation with the Soviet party committee. And his subsequent betrayal. (Incidentally, the "non-party" is now based, extorting money for "higher education" to our children).
Today ... World ideological machine, in terms of its personnel and the public officialdom, consists of two pillars of their academic, "scientific communist" from USU-UPI Gennady Burbulis and scientific anti-communist from the University of Denver, Condoleezza Rice. First the current world order laid under Yeltsin. Second secures it with George Bush. Both - Secretary of State (1991 and 2005). One - Thesis on "scientific communism". And the other - on the subject of political science. One born in the Soviet Union and the collapse of Eastern Europe has fixed, and the other on the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe to specialize. One instructed in life, Madeleine Albright, and the other - Elena Bonner (both "mentor" showed ingratitude to Marshal Zhukov!) And, finally, both of them - love the inaugural speech of U.S. presidents ...
The findings, which, unfortunately, in public, is clear: political scientists do not know what the state is. But here's statesmanship - even very well could we explain: WHAT IS POLITICAL SCIENCE? This is - an embarrassment of the Soviet Party Committee, on behalf of his former official ideological mentors - "scientific communists" and "historians of the CPSU" - discredited, now also in Iraq, their spiritual patron Dick Cheney ...
"Political Science arrival" world civilization on Saddam Assyria was carried out at the cost of that "left out" of political science was not only the "State" of Plato, "Politics" Aristotle, "The Philosophy of Law" Hegel, the Persian campaign of Alexander the Great, etc., but and ... the good old British common sense. And what happened? And the fact that "together with political science," in this case, and its satellites were: anti-Sovietism and anti-Stalinism, boundless "tolerance", "lonely" internationalism, and Russophobia rusofagiya.
To which, it is organically connected and "academic anti-Stalinism" of the Party Committee of the Soviet Communist Party yesterday, as part of its "golden reserve": dotsentury (and professors) of scientific communism, "historical materialism", "dialectical materialism", "scientific atheism", "Marxist-Leninist aesthetics, "canceled today political economy and" History of the CPSU. "
(Congratulations allowed to do - because they are "successfully passed" WAC! Both Soviet and anti-Soviet ...)
And now ... a very funny and instructive to see how these same people, on the screens of TV, with a learned connoisseur, discuss "Bush - in Iraq," pretending that all this is - "not about them."
So clumsy, bitter and self-contradictory recognition of Dick Cheney have an answer and another question. Namely, so what social system and political regime in the CIS and the current Russian Federation?
With inexorable logic of Plato, Aristotle and Hegel, the answer is obvious: "Legal Russia" - is nothing like the Soviet Communist Party committee of the CPSU, ... which, by chance, today "went berserk." (Let's hope only, that is temporary. And not for long ...).
Here it is - emergency and subject to all sorts of "Society for the Protection of Consumer Rights" - both institutionalized and "informal" ... Why were they created? What, so far, involved?
We note, with some painful feeling cornered man, Cheney acknowledged around the world is that the mistake made by them, it would in all other circumstances, would still be accomplished! It was then, with all the simplicity of "real politics", he described: what is entered into and the "grain" and "stem" and "ear" of the world's fields, which in the language of formal academic and is the generally accepted name - political science.
That's the same hopeless contradiction, gnawing today and Russian childhood and the rest of the world, with all his "tolerance", where there are still mysterious, "alchemical transformation" of the former Soviet "candidates" - in today's post-Soviet sociology and doctors Political Science.
What does this mean?
This means that then, and hid the very "Koshcheeva egg," the same "academic topos", which is the fatal and plundering of the historical, social and economic times of the Company.
How?
And at the national and state level society.
In terms of academic architectonics of modern Russia, this national landmark Anatomy "mismanagement" looks approximately like this: a) political and logical "trap" of Dick Cheney (essentially "political doxa" for "political gogii!") B ) Soviet "party committee" which left us his "precious" and "disciplined" frames, in their previous relationships and in their place, "invisible" went through in 1991, and c) the post-Soviet WAC, which is "slightly tidied up", only This, supposedly, "not notice", and d) their general pervasive "ethos", which sounds like a victorious battle cry - "In life there are things more important than logic!"; Finally, academic looting taken, the world (and "domestic") public opinion is not discussed status quo ...
Why is it inevitably?
From the point of view of the theory of knowledge (which is the only political knowledge as Science!), It is inevitable and always leads to the substitution of the logical - legal. That is, to the very state of affairs of the cat, nationally famous lawyer of Russia, once said: "The form is correct, but in essence - an insult!"
"Political science" exists among us just because there is a "legal Russia." But it is political science, at the height of official academic pyramid, daily and hourly "losing" all of us! Because it is - is not science "On RUSSIA."
So, where is it exactly?
It delivers us all to the marginalized?
As a fringe of their own history (Russian national historical). And in the fringe of contemporary international life.
Alex sophiology.
1 - August 13, 2007
"Tree grove" Pitiunt,
The Republic of Abkhazia.
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий