Recently, I was denied the right to place material in a community politiks.ru, where I have a lot of productive and post content from his blog and website "Derbent Wall." And not only the post content, but also make comments, as I discovered trying to comment on some notes.Refused bluntly and boldly, without any explanation for it: you do not like us all.Granted, the community itself, in contrast to the moderators, is positioning itself as a free platform for political expression and lighting events. But, in reality, it is increasingly becoming a mouthpiece of some political forces. And it is not better, as you can see the quality.
All this made me pay attention to the materials that are placed in this community and this is what I found: The principles of the new democratic movement, signed by the publishers Learn constant, television, radio and newspapers, Valeria Novodvorskaya and Konstantin Borovoy.
The principles of the new democratic movementA. We choose freedom. Our priorities are: property rights, rule of law,individualism and humanism are based on it.Two. We stand on guard for the Constitution, is it as it was adopted in 1993, and will fight against any attempts to change it.Three. Russia must make a choice of Western capitalism and buildan accelerated method.4. Russia - not Asia, and Europe. Our way lies in the European Union and NATO.Five. Russia should abandon its Soviet past and to recognize the beneficencereforms 90s.6. Communist and fascist activities in Russia should beprohibited, and the symbols of the Soviet past - are destroyed. Communists andFascists are not allowed to participate in the elected bodies, to work inJustice of the field of education. The same lustration should be applied toKGB officers and security officers present, stained a crime against humanity.7. Can not be free if it oppresses other nations.Eight. Russia must withdraw from Chechnya from Georgia, from Transnistria and provide a solution to their fate the western world community. For our freedom and yours!9. Putin's regime - recurrence of totalitarianism. We will fight politically against the Russian government until such time until it is guided by European values.10. Maximum of political and economic rights and freedoms, the required minimum of social protection of citizens.11. We do not compromise with the authorities and did not seek his companions among the Communists and the Nazis.
Valeria Novodvorskaya, Konstantin BorovoyThese are the materials seem to be desirable and appropriate for the community and to influence the minds of readers and users of social networks, as well as represent the interests of the ruling plutocracy.But let's not get ahead of ourselves, and all look in order.Thesis One: We choose freedom. Our priorities are: property rights, rule of law, individualism and humanism are based on it.Oh, that sweet word - freedom! The authors use it, apparently, only because it is "sweet," the average man caressing his ear, as silent on freedom of people they are writing. Empty abstraction, and no one came to nothing and no binding, and neither of which did not explain.In this case, we observe a typical approach fans of cheap PR, when just to be witty and not spare his father.In the second part of the thesis, the authors stuffed concepts without understanding their true meaning, and even in contradiction with the first part. After all, where the priority placed the property, there is no freedom and individuality, the laws of time and again written to the owners of capital, and therefore the freedom of capitalist unfreedom turns working, which it operates inhumane. Or in understanding Novodvorskaya Borovoy and planter, who kills the slave, is the most that neither is a pure humanist?Property - solemnly pronounced, Chubais, Dvorkovich Novodvorsky, Ryzhkov, bor, and bulging eyes, look at the audience, hoping to see in his eyes awe. But there is no thrill, and no understanding of what the audience wants to bring the entity that gets utters a screeching halt, as he himself does not understand why he had so solemnly uttered a word.
When it comes to all the same explanation it appears that the speaker just wanted to say all I grabbed, and now no one dares me away.Another sacred and often used word in the vocabulary of the plutocracy - a humanism, which has found its place in the above-mentioned principles.
No need to guess what the data mean "thinkers" by the word humanity, but the protection of property, and presumably not for personal consumption, but in the form of capital, is anti-humanism, since capital antichelovechen and inhumane, in fact.
And only when you read the eleventh paragraph of these principles, which speaks of "a minimum of social protection of citizens", it becomes clear that humanism, understanding and Novodvorskaya Borovoy, an opportunity to owners of capital with impunity plunder the people who should have only the most necessary for physical survival. In their understanding of humanity - is repressed when the communists and fascists, because they can not stand them, or even someone who does not like Novodvorskaya.Not better things from the authors PRINCIPLES and understanding of individualism, which they were proclaimed the pillars of society living according to their principles.
"Private property alienates not only the individuality of people and things" - Karl Marx wrote and explained in detail below, this assertion, which is difficult to disagree. (Collected Works., T.25 Part 1, Art. 431-432.)
But it seems that Novodvorskaya and Borovoy had time and opportunity to get acquainted with the achievements of the world of thought in this area and, therefore, argue at the level of the hero of the comedy Fonvizin DI "Oaf".Further, the signatories, claiming to be the spiritual hegemony, as it does not go out of their TV screens, showing a complete ignorance of the processes taking place in the world, or do not wish to accept them, and called: "Russia must make a choice of Western capitalism and to build an accelerated method."
The last global crisis of the capitalist mode of production for them a lesson, due to the fact that learning can be only one who thinks. Capitalism long ago entered its decaying stage - the imperialist domination of the financial oligarchy, which is detrimental not only acts against the production, but against the man himself, unleashing a war in different parts of the world, and Novodvorskaya and Borovoy urged to build capitalism! In European and American corridors of power are discussing ways to limit financial speculators, that is, gain control by society over the activities of banks and large companies, and pass laws restricting the freedom of capital, and half-baked free-market ideologues in Russia read the sermon on the unrestricted freedom of capital, as if Only people in the world.But look, the proponents of free market capitalism, and so we have built, and built just the way he conceived Borovoy, Novodvorskaya, Nemtsov, Burbulis and their other allies, although under the Constitution, the charge that they are willing to stand, no they are not entitled to change of political system. So why and to whom these calls - to build capitalism? And for ourselves, and call to make its appearance is not involved in the looting going on. That they have a way to shift the responsibility from the blame on others.I think that it is not necessary to disassemble all the nonsense these figures, but some moments worth staying. For example, paragraph five, which clearly identified the interests of authors, as defenders of plutocracy, robbed the people and the country: Russia should renounce the Soviet past and to recognize the beneficence of reforms 90s.At the same time, the signatories, as it is already forgotten about his first point, where present themselves as defenders of property, as the depreciation of deposits and mass robbery of the people - this is an attempt on private property. But for these people's property is nothing but the plutocrats plunder - a sacred cow.
The fact that the reform of the 90s are good for the country and its peoples must recognize Russia. This is how! Instead of having to prove it, the authors decided to just say to not bother to excessive speculation.
Drove people into poverty, and he must admit that this is good!?And if the first point, we saw that at the stupidity of these authors do not hold, then the fifth one can say that and arrogance they also suffice.Or a Place: Russia must withdraw from Chechnya from Georgia, from Transnistria and provide a solution to their fate the western world community.
All is good, but we have seen and know as "the Western community," settled the question of Kosovo and the problems of Yugoslavia as a whole. And therefore it is not clear, if we do not take into account that Novodvorskaya Borovoy and Russia want the same fate that has survived of Yugoslavia, which they both rely on the Western community.The fact that Novodvorskaya Borovoy and subservient to the financial oligarchy and bureaucracy, can be clearly seen from the eleventh paragraph: Most political and economic rights and freedoms, the bare minimum of social protection of citizens.Minimum and maximum social security income for all sorts of predators - here is the basic urge and wishes that they throw in to the masses, supposedly as a source of general development. In fact, these signatories do not understand the principles of social development, as a growing controversy. The domination of the representatives of capital, in alliance with the bureaucracy to ensure high profits, it is not the source of the country, and the terms of a robbery and impoverishment of its people. But ultimately the collapse of the country.
And how to understand such a combination: the sixth paragraph - "Communist and fascist activities in Russia should be banned, and the symbols of the Soviet past - are destroyed. Communists and Fascists are not allowed to participate in the elected bodies, to work in the field of justice to education, and eleventh - "maximum political and economic rights and freedoms."
This or symptoms of schizophrenia, the authors have all, or this blatant fascism, wants to pass himself off as democracy, both in their time, they pretended to be communists, Marxists, repressing authentic. See "Case Morozov» http://rpr.ur.ru/klub/temy/2010/5/30/1226/
Naturally, Novodvorskaya and Borovoy, and, of course, they looted property, seeking to ban the communist ideology, as the integrity and harmony is completely false and exposes frivolous chatter lackeys of big business and their true owners. What we are again and again can be sure.The only thing I have not found the "principle" is the explanation of what - why they called her scribble "the principles of the new democratic movement", in fact, nothing new, they were not told? Neither kind of democracy in this material, but there is Hitlerism, are directed against the workers, against democracy, against Marxism, against humanity and truth, who grew up on the basis of Russophobia and anti-Stalinism, and cannibalistic allegations that both the liking of the community moderators politiks.ru.
Vitaly GlukhovLinks: Yevgeny Yasin PROGRAM "90-E - TIME HOPE" FOR "Echo of Moscow"PROPERTY AS A CRIME
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий