In 60-70 years. education in American and European universities has fallen to the level of schooling, the 30-40 contributed to this creeping positivism and irrationalism philosophy of education, insight into the thinking of the poisonous influence of irratsionalisticheskih theorists such as Hannah Arendt, Heidegger and Jean-Pierre Sartre. However, the most monstrous forms of degradation and humiliation of education of independent thinking students began whipping called "IQ" (Intelligence Quotient), or test for detection of mental endowments. According to this index children are divided into streams and their paths diverge from that moment forever. Poorly designed for gifted education to facilitate the program, and they never reached the level of more gifted peers - they will not be the same age. The Soviet general secondary polytechnic school was based on the principle to all peers the same age. We even produced a special magazine "Same age" and the word was in vogue.
Revalidation in the western school and nothing can change - only the old Soviet school was optimistic setting that each student can catch up with classmates. We have to come home sick Excellent and girls swot ", they hauled laggards as the call of the heart and in the form of a public burden. The same applies to people with disabilities. Western School of proceeds from the fact that the ratio can not rise, he can only fall. Therefore completely inappropriate to the teacher and peers to mess with underachievers, in this case they simply do not support neither parents nor teachers. Pessimistic view of the formation allows the teacher to shamelessly move lagging in a weak class, and so on to infinity. In fact, the coefficient is a reflection of social differences in the pupils' parents, and have the richest children are born, almost gifted and brilliant. Meanwhile, the experience of developed socialism, has shown that children in the nomenclature of "nature rests, and that talent is born" genioty "(genius-idiot in" one bottle "). Western experience is based on the primacy of wealth, which sets the level of mental development. In essence, we are dealing here with the mechanism of class selection, with a way to separate the wheat from the chaff, or children of the elite children of the unemployed and workers. Stamp coefficient print in addition to all his life and wretched individual blame their misfortunes themselves and only themselves, but not the state, not the rich bourgeoisie rob his parents, who as a result and could not give their children a decent education. The situation is quite comfortable for the bourgeois state. A figure factor introduces the principle of individualism in early childhood and separates people on social, racial, territorial principles. All this is not so, as the world's first socialist state, which was sung in the song "For us there is no white or yellow or black, for all of us guys are!". Each with his IQ must break up and take the appropriate niche. Today, when Russia opened gymnasiums and lyceums, there is selection of children for a whole set of classes with different programs, there is indiscriminate testing instead of teaching, and so we were faced with a monster IQ. While the verification is in the form of interviews and in this new form of the Lord of life provide their vital interest is that their children are not taught in one class and school children cattle. Supposed to teach children different ways and in different ways. Future masters supposed to teach master's of science, and future performers - performing skills that are suitable for farm laborers. In 1999 he published in the Ural worker "article" Learn baby, become a banker! "Has caused an alarm and rejection are not readers and not the parents of those children, but the organizers of the school children of special classes in the Training Centre of the Central Bank of Russia, Sverdlovsk region. In other words, the bankers have left a shred of conscience, and they would not want publicity for the preparation of a new elite special fabulous conditions. Log in those conditions, of course, harder than the entrance to the building Shtrilitsa RSHA. And inside the gyms, luxurious furnishings, an abundance of computers and prices in the cafeterias and bars just ridiculous - all as a table of the CC CPSU for a detailed description of M. Voslensky in his masterpiece, "Nomenclature." That is why the slave S. Gerashchenko, who remembers, he gave his hands on the cut-off at the elbow, decided to continue training to keep secrets sacred world business elite. Of course, the Communists have committed "heinous crime": they gave the kids a general and free education regardless of social status of their parents, free textbooks and pioneer camps, uniform school uniforms and school lunches, "prodlenku and sports sections. Today we have nothing, and no leveling of the individual, but there is a monstrous social stratification. Is it really better? Soviet school was accused in that it teaches all one and the same. It is not so - we were talented teachers and teachers' schools, which were special programs for the harmonious development of personality, the programs have been incorporated optimal proportions for individual creativity and the use of force in the economy. Our school is not preparing future candidates for the unemployed and the unemployment office. As a result of the comparison, "he knew John and he did not know Johnny Nash Ivan from the totalitarian school has always prevailed. Better quality of education directly affects the results of economic competition between the two systems. However, in 70 years. there was a scrap of our cultural paradigm shift in classical Western cultural paradigm. Both systems have begun to converge towards the development of consumer non-creative abilities of individuals. The famous novel by Vladimir Kochetov, "What do you want?" Clearly predicted the danger of Soviet society in this way. And later in the Novel Yu Bondarev "Coast" West Germans during the flight to Moscow, warned the former Soviet officer that soon "Your youth zazhretsya" and everyone will forget about ideology. In response to the Party press, we heard the heartfelt poetry bodryacheskie EA Yevtushenko from ideologically aimed poem "Under the skin of the statue of Liberty, as well as answers to his own poem" The Child-villain ": I am alien to Christ and Broadway,
and dissident I am a citizen of the Soviet,
her student! At the beginning of 70 years. Federal Chancellor Willy Brandt reformed the education system. It was a social-democratic reforms, which began with a change in upper secondary school stage of education (1-13 years), which was intended to prepare students for university education. The new system was made bias towards ecological and sociological perspectives of education, and introduced "freedom of choice." As a result, a basic knowledge disappeared from the education system, they have lost not only students but also their professors. Freedom of choice has created students who do not speak their own language. 18 year old students have no idea about what needs to know the normal mature citizen from the scope of history, geography, polity, and philosophy. In Germany, the end of the twentieth century. more and more voices of experts, requiring the restoration of the classical system of education of the sample pre-1972, a return to high school education in classes, according to which students learn in a class of 10 to 13. The core of this education is the German language, mathematics, one foreign language, one of the natural sciences, and by choice - the history, geography and religion. The sixth element involves the history of science, combined with chemistry, physics and philosophy. The reason for such claims appears helpless Western elites who have specialized knowledge in the face of reality. In today's information flow is necessary to return to the standard education, which created the reputation of German schools abroad. Classical German education emerged in the period of the great philosophers, poets and political reformers during the late sixteenth century. before the end of the eighteenth century. Arose while the republican movement led to the creation of the United States. Reform of the Prussian cabinet minister W. von Humboldt in the early H1H in. came from the slogan "The best education for the entire nation." The idea of a classical education based on basic training for all students in the last three years of lower secondary education was developed by von Humboldt and did not change over 150 years until the beginning of 70 years. Twentieth century. The concept itself was aimed at the formation of the republican citizen, who should take part in the completion of an oligarchic era and help the country move to an industrial nation-state. But the collapse of the republican movement in Germany took place on the basis of an agreement between the land-Junker oligarchy and the financial elite, which meant a cessation of educational reform. Preserve the basis of secondary education has been directed against the oligarchy, but used differently: in the imperial era to 1918, during the Weimar Republic, with its emphasis on modernism at the expense of the classics, the Nazi regime in 1933-1945. And then the classical system was basis for the project allies "pereobrazovaniyu Germany." In the British zone of occupation was an attempt to replace German classical British liberalism, and in the Soviet zone of occupation (from 1949 - East Germany) German classic was replaced by pro-communist ideological selection. However, the exodus of teachers from East Germany (before the construction of the Berlin Wall in 1961) neutralized the efforts of the British side of the mass alteration of consciousness of Germans. World cultural paradigm was detonated in the early 70 years. And a generation of young teachers insane, deprived of their targets and the national historical memory, graduates of so-called "new universities" (described in the novel by W. Timm "Hot Summer" and the novel P. Lainé "Irrevolyutsiya ") destroyed the remnants of the classical system, introduced hedonism, environmentalism and the counterculture of sex, rock and drugs. Today, therefore, the restoration of the classical educational paradigm is a gigantic task, but the problem is absolutely necessary.
Nekrasov, SN
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий