ANO
"The Committee for the Protection of the rights of owners of premises of apartment buildings in Yekaterinburg "
620014 , Moscow , ul. Radyshcheva 28 , Phone 9292161658 8 gluhov61@mail.ru
Public organization "Ekaterinburg Development Council territorial self-government"
620000 , Ekaterinburg, Patrice Lumumba, 87 - 3, Phone 8904548 23 58 , Publicstriv@bk.ru
An algorithm for solving issues overhaul , for owners of apartment buildings , as follows:
Meeting of owners , gives consent to the interdepartmental commission for the home inspection to be overhaul , which makes a decision , including that the house is not a monument of culture , architecture, that he was not physically and morally outdated and its overhaul or refurbishing feasible and financially justified.
Based on this decision and calculated estimates agreed with the owners of the scope of work and the proportion of their participation, and already on the basis of this judgment is a separate agreement under which opens a special personal expense of the contractor who won the contest to raise funds .
Personal account opened by no more than 2 years since technical characteristics of the house , which means conditions estimates , according to technical regulations change.
Based on the certificate of completion , " overhaul ", Interdepartmental Commission shall record the technical condition of an apartment building in the technical passport, produces its revaluation , which is reflected in the statistics holders and owners documents .
If all these conditions were not met , and held odd jobs , issued for " overhaul" , but not changes in product data , with the owners was not to renew the contract management of the apartment house with a view of the changed parameters and conditions, and repairs carried out "current , cosmetic , " the means " of maintaining a home . " At the same time the authority of the Management Company have been exceeded .
"Overhaul " performed by the contractor on the basis of estimates and paid from the account of the contractor on the basis of certificates, approved by the Commission , with the participation of owners, recording data sheet . Withdraw funds from the account is permissible only if the act of receiving the interdepartmental commission .
Massive fundraiser to " overhaul" with owners
is in the nature of the advance payment , and not for the actual calculation , a job, or a debt obligation arising from a single , fixed-term ( 2-year ) contracts and estimates.
Funds that are collected from property owners forced to flock to an unknown account balance are not " payment for services " are not refund the financial costs of the Criminal Code , and are legal characteristics of the investment in the property owner .
Management Company is the executor of overhaul , but only mediate if it is provided in a separate agreement .
Collected, forcibly means "Overhaul "
not fixed, do not expire , the host controller , estimates, objectives , schedule , tax reporting , statistics, destination, documentary support . These amounts are not " obschedomovoy property" and inaccessible to the payer.
In Russian law, no rule of law to conduct such fees. They do not participate in the financial and economic activities of the Management Company , the current period are not reflected in the tax report and can not be included in the ledger - a receipt for payment of services rendered on the basis of a management contract . Especially, there are no grounds for charging and human penalties.
For refusing to pay these fees owners severely punished by fines, default interest and deprivation of federal benefits . No judgments held shares deprivation utilities. At the same time , orders for these sanctions are absent.
Acting in a given period
Federal Law № 185, dated 21.07.2007 "On the fund assistance and Housing Reform " Article 15.
Regional targeted program for the overhaul of the MCD should contain:
1 ) A list of apartment buildings, which are subject to overhaul ,
2) calculated in the manner prescribed by this Federal Law , the amount of equity financing of capital repairs of apartment buildings ,
3 ) The rationale for the amount of funds ;
4) planned performance indicators specified address regional programs ;
5 ) the size of the marginal cost of major repairs to 1Q m of floor space in the MCD ...
This means that all programs and calculations - ONLY targeted under specific estimates and specific runtime.
"Overhaul " - the area of responsibility of the Administration of the Sverdlovsk region , and not the Management Company. Fund Annual Report to the President of the Russian Federation , in GDumu Federal Assembly , the Federation Council of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation , the Government of the Russian Federation , the Public Chamber of the Russian Federation until June 1 following the reporting year , and posted on the official web-site of the network " Internet " before July 1 next year .
Thus, used only in the Sverdlovsk region scheme to collect cash on the article " Repair " is not relevant legislation of the Russian Federation , is a compelling owners to participate in financial fraud. Brings , taking into account the long-term nature of the charges and mass , multi-billion dollar damage as owners and budget of the Sverdlovsk region , and income is not set mnogomillardny account.
Property - legal and economic concept .
Through the efforts of the team Chernetskii AM acts housing privatization scheme , in which the Management Company and the owners of property in apartment buildings are not subject to a contractual relationship , because contracts , as prescribed by law , the order in respect of a particular property, concrete house , with a list of the essential conditions - does not exist.
The landlord of an apartment building is forced to pay him unknown services and responsibility for the upkeep of the property is not issued .
CC itself assume its responsibilities for economic management of an apartment house ; these duties is an act of goodwill , unilateral transaction in another's interest , not arising from a contract of agency or contract to provide paid services ;
CC received personal information about the owner of the apartment and who live in it by third parties directly to the owners and residents in the apartment with any suggestions (including competitive ) , did not apply ;
The owner of "Models of Yekaterinburg" : evidence of self- owned square footage and a receipt for payment of encrypted services. Does not know the technical characteristics of the house and related , technological cycle of works on its content. As we see in practice , multi-million dollar property homeowners this "content" and not receiving . In this area the janitor more information , rights and duties.
The owner does not know the object relations , has no rights , no contract terms. "His" territory may appear at the connivance of organized government, even foreign nationals , with commercial enterprises that do not have neither registered nor legal obligations to the State and the owner of this powerless . ( Stalls, parking , construction , casino, " brothels ", " rubber " apartments, shooting galleries , ... the contents of which is contained in an encrypted rate ....)
Transferring ownership of the housing stock in the residents - privatization, in accordance with law , with% wear and promising program to further the content of this property, specially created for this purpose teams of professionals - did not happen .
Statistics and workflow in the housing sector is absent or is a " fantasy on the theme of accountability ." Realistic assessment of the state of the housing stock is not. Charging for housing maintenance goes on false data and pipe flows of water 100 times greater than it flowed that artificially generates a " debt owners" to suppliers of utility resources and pumping budgetary infusions .
" Overhaul" are not bound to the quality of the concrete house and city development plan .
Sverdlovsk Region Government , by not fulfilling their obligations imposed on them by the Government of the Russian Federation in terms of performance on the transfer of common property owners of apartment buildings and the program for the organization of management companies GD RF № 75 dated 06.02.06 . Actually withdrew from the Housing Fund under its responsibility and did not allow him to control owners.
Remaining in the " draw " a gray area , the property was in the general management of criminal financial schemes that angers top Russian officials , but that proved powerless against the will commands privatizator Sverdlovsk region.
Governor of the Sverdlovsk region ,
Kuyvashevu Eugene V.
620031 , Ekaterinburg, pl. October 1 ,
Chairman of the Government of Sverdlovsk region .
Pasler Denis
Yakov Silin
from _______________________________
Individual account _________________________
Adres____________________________
Tel. _____________________________
STATEMENT
I , the owner of the dwelling at _____________________________________ ,
Is not subject to a contractual relationship with the Management Company , in the absence of common property management agreement provided forms , with significant conditions - applications such as :
List the common property of a particular house, in quality and quantity , its cadastral registration ;
Datasheet of this house , control acts inspections list and schedule of works and services , and subsequent to a particular period of time;
Estimates , quotations , and the fare " housing maintenance " on the basis of specific services , this house - Current pricing of financial and economic activities of the Management organization.
Information about utilities provider , intermediary firms , legal and other persons who somehow receiving payment for services unknown to me , means " the maintenance of housing ."
I removed ( a) of property management , the lack of information : the contract , under the legislation , the lack of the financial report , the fixed form.
I have no information about the status of the General part of the property of an apartment building and planned for its preservation and continued operation.
I have no information about the prisoners in my name and on my money contracts with unknown to me legal and other persons.
Actually forced to ( a) fulfill all the financial requirements of the Management Company ( with the support of the Administration and regulatory authorities ) that I did not presented, and for me is a third party entity.
Pay , without recourse , unknown to me services, the rate of " housing maintenance " established for community housing ( which indirectly confirms the absence of pricing policy , management, on this , the particular house )
Workflow management in house data including nominal financial document - on receipt of payment, decorated with gross violations of financial discipline. Contain false information , the amounts have not been confirmed by calculations .
Financial report prescribed form on payment of funds for the maintenance of the house , I was not provided .
Housing fund Yekaterinburg all forms of property is unattended and uncontrolled management of " influential founders of " persons who provide their own interests , while remaining incognito in closed circuits and insure safe robbery of the population under the guise of providing services. I'm not familiar ( a) the articles of association , its objectives and strategy.
Currently applied mass forced to raise funds to " overhaul" with the owners , not the relevant law of the Russian Federation . These funds , indisputably , were introduced into the ledger - a receipt for payment of services rendered. Although they are not refunding the financial costs of the Criminal Code , and are legal characteristics of investing my money in my property , but information on their fate and future use, is not available for me .
For refusing to pay these fees have severely punished with fines , default interest and deprivation of federal benefits .
Even less clarity and information about changes in the Housing Code , provides for the collection of funds for " Repair " in the absence of :
Common property of the house , as an object of contractual relations and in the cadastral registration service of the Russian Federation .
Management company , as the subject of contractual relations , in accordance with the law and prescribed manner .
Management company , as businesses , to prove to me the financial solvency and integrity , openness , its viability to provide adequate, professional services , enterprise having a sufficient number of specialists required for the scope of work . (the company at all times , evades providing constituent documents , financial statements , contracts, scheduling , hiding their cost. Quantity square meters of housing , provided standards for 12 operating companies, and belongs to one , so I can only rely on the provision of emergency assistance )
Control list , quality, cost of services, safe and comfortable accommodation in this house.
Adequate and fair evaluation of the technical condition of this home.
Development Plan in the Sverdlovsk region , including detailed and address .
Guaranteed security investment funds and ensure accountability prospective operator .
In the absence of implementation of my constitutional rights of the owner , provided for me by the Constitution and the Civil Code of the Russian Federation .
Finally ,
Merely the absence of law administered as Document prorated specialists detail , professionally and with respect to me as a citizen of the Russian Federation , not Pinocchio , who are on the field of Miracles.
In these circumstances , the requirements on the choice of operator for Regional MY transfer of funds to the mythical " overhaul" nonexistent object - General Property Multifamily Housing , consider unacceptable . Strongly object to retract me financial pyramid with lots of unknowns, even with the assistance of a very dubious and inefficient business executive - Government of Sverdlovsk region ..
Government of Sverdlovsk region , during privatization of housing stock owners evaded registration and inventory , technical control , duly executed relations that led to such indiscriminate theft in the housing sector , which can not handle the President of the Russian State , with all its ministries and regulatory authorities.
Already , forcibly collected from me means under " Repair " believe fraudulent scheme and ask immediately return as unreasonably withheld , with items of income businesses as unjustified enrichment.
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий