That's how it turns out Petrovich!

In suburban ministry disclosed sliding scheme
Photo by: Dmitry Dukhanin / KommersantEmployees of the TFR in the Moscow region opened a criminal case against the deputy head of the department of state support of small and medium-sized businesses control the development of small and medium enterprises of the Ministry of Economy of the Moscow Oblast Yuri Letovaltseva, head of the department Alexei Poluyanova, as well as director of the Municipal Fund for Support of Small Business Klin district Andrei Koshelev. They are suspected of receiving large kickbacks.

As a spokesman Vladimir Markin TFR in respect of officials and Andrei Koshelev, which is part-time member of the Board of Deputies of the town of Klin, criminal proceedings for offenses under Part 3. 30, Part 3. 159 of the Criminal Code (attempt at fraud committed through abuse of office).
 According to investigators, the suspects entered into an agreement aimed at stealing money entrepreneurs and legal entities of Klin, Moscow Region, receiving grants under the action of long-term target program "Development of small and medium enterprises in the Moscow region in 2009-2012", under the guise of reward for what they are supposed to provide the above will provide subsidies. At the same time making a decision on the conclusion of contracts with small and medium-sized businesses to provide targeted budget of the Moscow region in the form of subsidies to their powers are not included.According to the distributed roles, in July 2011, Mr. Koshelev misled the directors of a commercial organization as to whether the agreements with the competent officials of the Ministry of Economy of the Moscow region, which allegedly provide subsidies in the case of transfer of monetary compensation equal to 20% of the amount of subsidy. The businessman agreed and after the decision to grant him a target of budget funds transferred 100 thousand rubles. at the expense of the Municipal Fund for Support of Small Business Klin district, which Mr. Koshelev subsequently received in cash. June 14, 2012, Mr. Koshelev, placing these funds, as well as 250 thousand rubles. Obtained fraudulently from other entrepreneurs, gave Mr. Letovaltsevu accomplices owed a share in the amount of 350 thousand rubles., After which the latter was arrested by the Research Affairs of Russia the Moscow region and the FSB.Later arrested Letovaltsev agreed to participate in the operational-search activities and under the supervision of operatives gave that amount to Mr. Poluyanova, which upon receipt of the money had been detained by the police.Now, as noted in the TFR, the question on the election of the suspect measure. In addition, the investigation reveals the other episodes in the actions of the suspects.Nikolai Sergeyev
 Of the state and small business support
  Small Business of the Omsk region received over 2 billion rubles per yearTwo billion rubles of credit for the development of the business entrepreneurs of the region were under the sponsorship of the Omsk regional fund for the support and development of small business in 2011. 40% of this amount accounts for small businesses in rural areas. Formalized microloans worth about 35 million rubles, REGNUM correspondent was informed in the regional government.In the competition for grant support to small and medium-sized businesses and individuals to organize their own business was attended by nearly 2.9 thousand people, 695 business-funded projects worth over 136 million rubles. As a result of competition for grant support for the creation of innovative companies funded projects are 18 innovative companies.______________________________________________________________________________,
In post-Soviet Russian officials have come up with a legal method of stripping the budget, which is called - SUPPORT FOR SMALL BUSINESSES!- And what do YOU ​​against the support - ask any bureaucrat or a cunning ideologue, putting me in the uest unreasonable.
  - Oh no! I am for the support, but against the theft of budgetary funds, under the guise of supporting small businesses, state collapse and destruction of small businesses as such.
 So what is it like to support small businesses through soft loans, loans and grants? And this is legal theft of folk remedies, anti-state and anti-market phenomenon, in support of related companies and all sorts of bureaucratic feeders. And as a way to bait the regional and local officials.And that is typical - the worse things are with small businesses in the region, the more there is money on support for small businesses.
What supports the bureaucracy, in this case, a small business - money. And you do any official will say that small businesses hard without money up. and especially without working capital.
In falsified representation of the interests of the people when government officials nearly always appointed, not difficult to understand that every now and grantees relatives.Why give a stranger when you can give her, - something like an official says, planted a small business much good. - Yes, and a spare "airfield" in the event of a failure to build a career.And so all over the country we see that no relative of the high official, make sure a successful businessman. I hope that the examples of this are obvious to all and do not require evidence.
If the state, represented by the State Duma, Federation Council, the President and the Government was willing to support small business, and not only small, it could make all this simple action - to make loans available to all.And then anyone who wants to do business, would go to the bank and took a cheap loan.But with this power plutocrats is impossible, because the chain is broken interdependence. Violated the order of distribution of sinecures.If today the central government for a bit off the proceeds of the sale of hydrocarbons, the government budget, customs, energy monopolies and finance, the regional officials she has given regional governments and small businesses. And therefore support small businesses in the region - a fiefdom of regional officials, as a way of keeping them in the system of governance.After all, we all know that success in business, for example, the son of Arkady Chernetsky Matvienko, or is the result of Matvienko and Chernetsky as head of the city.We know, of course, this oversight bodies. Yes, that's the command to investigate violations in the field of finance they were never given or will give, as it can not today, the President or the Prime Minister to take this and make a low-cost loans for all. They just will not allow the financial oligarchy, as will lose huge profits on a percentage of loans. Yes, and all put in the difficult conditions too dangerous for the center. Who then will maintain the central authority in the field, where only the evil of it coming from? In addition, equal access to credit, they also do not with your hand, because then the move will start in the business of talented and intelligent, and not their own. Therefore, it does not say, but at a high cost of borrowing all that is necessary as air, to mongrelTherefore, a blind eye to support small business, knowing that it is a guarantee of loyalty to the center. Just do not think that this form of unity and have countersigned the state power as a means of preserving the unity, preservation of the state. These policies combine plutocracy in a single organism, destroys the economy and contrasts it to the people and the state.The fact that such a policy is at odds with the Constitution speak and do not have to, because there is no article in the Constitution, which would not have violated the current government. But still it is worth noting that support for small businesses with the help of grants, subsidies and interest-free loans violates Art. 8, Clause 1 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, where no ambiguity is stated: "The Russian Federation guarantees the unity of economic space, free movement of goods, services and financial resources, support of competition, freedom of economic action."The support of small business just breaks the unity of economic space and undermine competition. The violation of the unity of economic space leads to the collapse of the state, as anti-state activities. Preferential and concessional loans for the elite is anti-market phenomenon and lead to the undermining of competition, the destruction of a healthy economic environment, the destruction of small businesses, higher prices for goods and services.That is the phenomenon in our lives, we face today, when ardent advocates of the market on the words do everything to the market as little as possible, in fact, as they have, money and rights, as much as possible.
  Vitaly Glukhov