Поиск по этому блогу

Powered By Blogger

суббота, 14 июля 2012 г.

Bender in the role of legislators


"It's the law for adults, which the government perceives as a child"The head of the Russian Wikipedia said "Gazeta.ru" about to strike
Russian Wikipedia on strike against the creation of the registry of banned sites and IP-addresses. Stanislav Kozlovsky, Executive Director explained Wikimedia.ru "Gazeta.ru" meaning and purpose of the protest. Under the new rules will be possible to close the site by uploading a prescription gargle potassium permanganate or reproduction of pictures of naked angels of the XVII century, is afraid of him.- Agreed you with other social resources to jointly protest? In LiveJournal, for example, about the same explanation in an official statement about the changes in the law "On protection of children from information harmful to their health and development" and some legislative acts of the Russian Federation.



- We specially with no one agreed. This issue was discussed at the forum yesterday, Wikipedia, a survey was conducted, and the community - participants of Wikipedia - decided to call a strike. This urgency stems from the fact that making changes to the State Duma in a hurry. This Friday they held a first reading, a second reading tomorrow. And at first it was written that it is now supposed to be, and second, they could immediately combine with the third. Therefore, we decided that he who hesitates is lost, and went on strike today.- Have you applied to Mark Zuckerberg to support your position and to suspend the Russian-language Facebook, or microblogging service Twitter, or other sotsresursam and if there is not, will you do it?- We are concerned above all Wikipedia, so we can only speak for myself. I think the other resources in the course of what was happening. If they want to join - we'll be happy. Specifically, we are not agitating, some special letters we sent out to anyone. But if someone wants to, why not? It would be great.- What might be the effect of the statements the deputy Yelena Mizulina, who made a statement today that the appeal to the U.S. Justice Department to investigate the strike of the Russian-speaking segment of the encyclopedia Wikipedia?- This community has solved the Russian Wikipedia. These are the people who write Wikipedia, mostly Russian nationals. It is not controlled by neither the U.S. nor anyone else. Those who wrote it, the authors have decided to close it at night, because the laws that came up with Ms. Mizulina and other deputies, unfortunately, are written in such a way that, in fact, introduce censorship of the Internet. And we are against. All participants Wikipedia, was a large survey, an overwhelming majority - 80% - supported the strike today.- How many participants in the discussion?- A few hundred. This was due to the fact that the survey was conducted in a short time, because unfortunately our MPs too fast trying to make all these laws without any discussion, not realizing how the Internet works. Ms. Mizulina, instead contact the Ministry of Justice, should appeal to many online organizations - for example, the Russian Association of Electronic Communication, Coordination Center for TLD. Is the Internet community, where she would be popularly explained how the Internet works. Unfortunately, some are just ideas which do not involve work on the Internet. For example, she stated that 85% of Internet-based business is built on the dissemination of pornography, including child. What more can you say?Instead of creating a black list to deal with such sites at the national level, for example, a system of "parental control" - a perfect system, as well at school can put servers filter "dangerous content". But they want to put filters on the level of access providers. We will create a technological base, as in China.- What would be your reaction?- You can not take the law in such a hurry. Child Protection Act can still be fixed, but the second part - it changes to the law on information, there are no children there. It is the law for adults, which the government perceives as a reason children. For example, will be prohibited information on how to commit suicide, and the novel "Anna Karenina" will automatically be outlawed. And if the site refuses to remove it, then it can be blocked on the network address.- You are not the first time putting on such a protest, for example, when in America, discussed the law of SOPA and PIPA, «Wikipedia» was also closed for the day. Which countries have similar actions take effect when the law was actually revised and sent back for revision?- Laws of SOPA and PIPA in the end were not accepted by the U.S. Congress because members have read that they take, and many were horrified. Many MPs vote out there, like us, hurrying to go on vacation and not reading the bill. There was a story about a strike in Italy, where he was made a law that if a person writes about some negative information, it has the right to demand that it was removed during the day. If the information is not removed, the site is closed. It does not matter what kind of information, with links to the source, open or public, for example, the biography of a famous serial killer - it is clear that she was defamed. And we'd have all the facts with verifiable sources from the Italian Wikipedia to remove. Accordingly, all biographical article would have been lopsided. Adoption of the law was postponed, and we hope that its drawbacks.
- A founder of Wikipedia Jimmy Wales is aware of what is happening with the Russian subsidiary?- Yes, he is aware of and supports our position. In his own Twitter, he wrote that the Russian Wikipedia on strike.- What are the specific rules of the bill can contribute to blocking the resource?- The federal bodies of executive power, based on criteria that are not written in the law, chooses some non-profit organization, will continue to work it. The organization will create a registry, which is the subject of the information that is considered a negative, harmful, etc. First of all, there will be child pornography, and more drugs, psychotropic substances, precursors of narcotic substances, such as manganese, acetic acid, acetone. And if we write, how to use potassium permanganate mouthwash, it is technically breaking the law. Information harmful to the health of children, without decoding, what is meant by this. Further, the organization is a "dangerous content", says host, which should provide for a day the owner of the site, the site owner to remove the entire page, if it was not done, then the register is made IP-address and the site is blocked, and this register to monitor all network operators around the clock, and block access to that resource, not taking into account the fact that a huge number of websites that are hosted in one place can have the same IP address. Most sites are created by users, the same as Wikipedia, YouTube, any comments on blogs, blogs themselves. That is, anyone can write in the comments anything, and if this comment did not see the site owner, or have not received the letter in time, for example, is put in junk or, for example, was the weekend when no one checked the mail - everything. Site in the "black list", and it is locked, and no Russian citizen access to it does not get it.- The real threat of closure of Wikipedia what is?- First, we can make any content that violates this law, including specifically - to provocation. Secondly, all the criteria that made the maximum fuzzy. The same article about suicide, if it is in our classification is given, which in general they are - this is a violation. If we refuse to remove such an article - the whole site is blocked.
For example, we have an article about such drugs, like marijuana. Science has not yet determined with respect to harm the plant, for example, the article presents a study about its dangers and information with reference to authoritative sources, which provide data on the possible positive effects. If desired, this can be interpreted as promoting drinking. We either have to remove, and under this law, we must remove not only this information, and the entire page. That is, if we have a controversial paragraph, delete the entire the entire page.- You shut down for a day resource. What is the real effect of this is already in Russia, you see and expect?- Well Mizulina complains in the U.S. (laughs). I still hope that we have MPs who understand how the Internet works, even if they read the law and understand that it does not need to do in such a hurry, it will be delayed at least until November - December, and with the involvement and Internet community, and independent organizations, and representatives of the Internet industry, and operators, hosting companies, registrars, the law will be finalized. To protect children, does not require a censor at the telecom operators.- Today we saw the reaction of the Minister of Communications, who have expressed a position that may be non-public? Is there a movement around this theme except in the media? Maybe you are afraid, already tested for the presence of child porn?- It's hard to say. You know, we always can get special child porn and then he"Suddenly" find. There was a story where one offended Americans on Wikipedia wrote a letter to the FBI that on Wikipedia a lot of child porn. They found a picture of the XVII century with naked angels in the corners. Children? Children. Naked? Naked. That child porn.-------------------------------------------------- ---------------
 
The purpose of the saint. Everywhere we hear groans. We must ... pull children from the clutches of the street, and we tear them out. Help the Children! Let us remember that the children - the flowers of life. (Twelve Chairs).

Hypocritical concern for child pornography is a terrible network, it's pornography on the matter. How can we evaluate the care of members of my childhood, when closed, schools, hospitals, kindergartens, and spending on social support to a child?More dangerous for our children than the vulgar, stupid, corrupting and stultifying contemporary Russian television, which expresses the essence of our government, it is difficult to think of something.
 
State Duma deputies have to look into the Russian Constitution and read Article 29, paragraphs 4 and 5, which is clearly defined: p.4 Everyone has the right to freely seek, receive, transmit, produce and disseminate information by any lawful means.n5. Guaranteed freedom of the media. Censorship is prohibited.All, regardless of the position of those who infringe on the Constitution of the Russian Federation is the criminals who are subject to the court.For all citizens who understand the real threat and infringement of our rights.If you really want to protect their constitutional rights, the lawsuits filed in courts by those who drafted the law, and those who will apply.

Комментариев нет:

Отправить комментарий