Поиск по этому блогу

Powered By Blogger

суббота, 14 июля 2012 г.

Like seven years ago

 A lot of thoughts change your mindThe MPs denied his right to control the courts and government officials and banned from slanderFAITH MOSLAKOVAYesterday the State Duma considered the first reading of several high-profile bills. In particular, "the Parliamentary Control in Russia" and "defamation." The discussion touched a lot of pressing issues, for example, what illness disgust at the Russian parliament.Regarding the project on parliamentary control in the hall of the State Duma, as usual, the two factions clashed - "EdRo" and "SR". Each of them came with my choice. The author of the bill from the United Russia Irina Spring offered to conduct anticorruption examination of all the bills and to introduce a mandatory review at the meetings of committees of the materials of the Accounting Chamber. The initiators of the alternative bill, in turn, offered to give members of parliament nearly comprehensive powers to "familiarize themselves with any documents, to enter any rooms, invite any officials, carry out any examination."
The bill "United Russia", according to the head of the faction "Fair Russia" Sergei Mironov, lay in the fact that "as it were, God forbid, too much is not supervised." However, the main opposition to the claim option is that it allows you to interfere in the work of other authorities. "Today we have no powers! - SR indignant Gennady Gudkov. - The fact that today the government imposes on you, and you are taking. It turns out that we carry out the necessary orders to the Kremlin. "What are you going next?" Called - yesterday, have today taken. " The main argument against the Liberal Democratic Party of the bill "EdRa" is that it has a point, which determines that the anti-corruption examination is conducted in a manner that defines the government. "That is, we as legislators give their authority into the hands of the government? - Wondered Liberal Democrat Sergei Ivanov. - Their own hands to beat. Rather than introduce a bill to strengthen accountability for failure, because not respond to the treatment of Deputies, send an unsubscribe, we will deprive ourselves of all. " However, the votes of the three factions was not enough - the first reading was approved version of Irene Spring.Following this, the deputies proceeded to the bill on defamation. At this time a member of "United Russia" Pavel Krasheninnikov, found that the decriminalization of this article and translated it from the Criminal Code, the Administrative proved harmful to society. And therefore proposed to return the libel in the Criminal Code. MPs do not want to move this issue in the fall, although such proposals were heard. In particular, the deputies pointed out that the President after meeting with human rights defenders sent to the State Duma, on Tuesday evening of the 19th amendment, printed on 35 sheets. The MPs insisted that during the night can not be thoroughly familiar with all the documents.Under the new bill under the concept of defamation in addition to well-established values ​​- information discrediting honor and dignity of another person, is now subject to libel, using his official position, slander of the disease that causes disgust, and slander of a sexual nature. Sergei Ivanov, the deputy of the Liberal Democratic Party asked the author - chairman of the Committee on Civil, Criminal, Arbitration and Procedural Legislation - what kind of diseases are considered abhorrent. "I have, for example, disgust, diseases such as narcissism or fear of their superiors. You have specified a list of diseases? "- Taunted Ivanov. Communist Boris Kashin not miss the opportunity to remind the United Russia Krasheninnikov, that in December he and his committee have argued that the law is "libel" is not needed. SR Oleg Nilov offered to complement the introduction of a bill criminalizing the lie about the outcome of elections. The discussions now and then came down to the fact that this bill - the struggle against dissent.Once the document was adopted, members of opposition factions promised to prepare a sufficiently large number of amendments. Note that according to the presidential initiative of the document proposed that the penalty of imprisonment and forced labor. 
Source
  
The current archive 2005
 The State Duma in the service of gosoligarhii 
Spring Session 2005 of the State Duma of the fourth convocation and the deputies departed to rest. One of the deputies had already drove off to overseas resorts, as did Georgy Boos, someone intends to carry out political work in the districts, but the majority of the deputies are going to rest and relax patriotic - in Russia. That we all just ordinary people, and we choose to rest in its capabilities and especially do not think that is our patriotic holidays or not, and even members of patriotic rest. For them, it is important, because, in any way they should look like patriots in Russia. And, at first glance, seems to be right, as human beings. Worked hard and now have the full right nice to relax or go to the voters and to account for work done in good faith.Only many MPs, it seems, and there is no need to go to the voters for the report, because they have not worked in the interests of ordinary citizens, and waited for those who really helped them get into the Duma. Otherwise, for whatever reasons they have to pass such laws as the abolition of gubernatorial elections, the abolition of privileges, draconian housing code? Who would have forced them to block such bills as an increase in child allowances, the abolition of secret information on the income of officials, granting the right to a second pension for the dead children, the introduction of progressive income tax, an increase in benefits for newborns, support to victims of radiation preservation of northerners increased pensions, inclusion in the length of time child care?Well, what is asked, it was worth, "United Russia" to support the bill to increase benefits for children from 70 to 300 rubles? After all, in fact, not such a big amount of expenditures for the budget, especially since the money is, and the finance minister does not know what to do with the money. So no, it is better to invest in U.S. securities, a paltry interest rate half a percentage for inflation. Apparently the owner did not order. Of course, in our democracy can be curtailed and block much-needed legislation to the people, and then, in any deceitful telecast intelligently discuss the development of society and morality. Would be a headache at the deputy is not controlled by the voter who receives a salary of two thousand dollars, plus medical, plus holiday pay, free housing and still has many different benefits for the poor pensioners, the hungry and homeless children? Of course not. It is time to recognize the obvious truth, and no illusions. Who pays, who takes off and puts on a post, and that dictates the rules of the game.So what and whom is concerned, most State Duma today, so take anti-people laws, is not a mystery to people who know what laws were adopted, and which are blocked. Take, for example, a bill establishing a progressive scale of tax on personal income, which called for reducing the tax rate from 13 percent to 6 percent for the categories of people whose income does not exceed 60,000 rubles a year, and increase the tax on the citizens receive significant revenues to 30 percent. The progressive scale of income tax act in most foreign countries, in particular - the U.S., where tax rates range from 10 to 36 percent. In some Western countries, the size of the income tax for the rich up to 50 percent.The adoption of this law would help to evenly redistribute the tax burden, improve the financial situation of most citizens, the completion of budget revenues. But it seems that many MPs are more concerned with not filling the budget, and filling the pockets of oligarchs. And the right to care for members of the development of industrial production, the capitalization, the creation of additional jobs, but in this case is not, and so is senseless hoarding, a demonstration of wealth and the export of capital from the country.No less clearly characterizes the position of the majority of Duma deputies and the precocious adoption of the law on the abolition of inheritance tax. What was the saliva and loud phrases about the law in the media. MPs thought that at last the poor citizens. But, in fact, the "United Russia" and their supporters have taken care of themselves and of oligarchs who seek to hide the ends of the privatization process as well as a very frightened by revolutionary movements in neighboring countries, and the revision of privatization in Ukraine. If the deputies took the law in the interests of ordinary citizens, the law would have provided property threshold, as set out in the world, when the tax is taken only from a certain quantity of inheritable. In the U.S., this threshold is 675,000 dollars, in England - 480 thousand dollars, in Italy - 180 thousand dollars, and in Russia today, the MPs have just canceled and the estate tax at all. After all, our state does not need the money. Our teachers and doctors are "decent" wages, and students and retirees, according to deputies, just do not know what to do with money.True citizens will not have to be happy for a long time, since the tax is reinstated. Once privatized fraudulent property will raspihat oligarchs relatives, or transferred to the ownership of foreign firms, and law of inheritance will be reviewed.About what, I ask, thinking leadership of the "United Russia", taking such anti-people laws and supporting unpopular reforms? Indeed, when democratic elections, they doom themselves to failure. And in the next elections to the Duma, the party could remain in the minority. But it was not there. In order to save himself and his position in the State Duma and adopted amendments to the electoral law that infringes on the rights of citizens and will significantly reduce the unwanted passage of the Parliament for the government members. This is the introduction of electronic voting, allowing to falsify the elections, as the control of electronic security services are located on the content of the state, and an increase in the amount of deposit to 60 million rubles for the party wishing to register for elections, and the decrease to 5% of the discarded signatures and removal from the ballot boxes "against all", and raising entry barriers from 5 to 7%, and the exclusion of journalists from the vote count, and resolution of election commissions be re-protocol and change the status of observer, and the prohibition of electoral blocs. In general, members of "United Russia" and their supporters have done that in Russia ceased to exist free and fair elections, and the State Duma continued to serve the interests of gosoligarhii. That's just us ordinary citizens, why such the State Duma?It seems that the story is really one and nothing teaches. After all, we have already passed, and in Russia's history there have been times when the tsarist monarchy Parliament sent down to the petty servant, when the nation was deprived of the opportunity to express and defend their interests through parliament, and as a result - the revolution and civil war. So who, I ask, in our society today is an extremist, encouraging the society to radical actions - those who demand the democratization of society, or those who strongly hinders the development of democracy?Vitaly Glukhov18.10. 2005

Комментариев нет:

Отправить комментарий