President - one term/
/ Teachers Higher School of Economics wrote a draft of a new
KonstitutsiiOdin of the drafters of the Constitution of Russia, Mikhail
Krasnov, and Associate Professor of Graduate School of Economics (HSE),
Svetlana Vasilyeva, together with a group of students prepared a new
draft of the Basic Law. The
document, in particular, proposes to strengthen the role of parliament,
to establish the electoral census, fully upgrade the judiciary and to
prohibit all public employees to engage in any gainful activity. Experts
note that the project was designed "not based on his acceptance," and
asked to treat him "like a yuridizirovannoy an appeal to Russian
society."open the material ...
Exemplary anti-Soviet institution of HSE, sinking budget, all pulling the country into a wilderness, and before history, trying for a handful of "chosen" to provide benefits in the form of educational qualification, which is so successfully used all sorts of usurpers and parasites. However previously denied suffrage illiterate, and figures from the HSE decided that anyone not acting in the socialization of the last school childless and has no right to vote.
Judges, by the way, is always selected, but chosen by the oligarchy and bureaucracy, or, as now, and people. When the change simply offer an awl to the soap, without changing the essence, it means, or know nothing about or deliberately disingenuous.In general, according to the publications and suggestions of representatives of HSE, we can conclude that the institution has a very low level of scientific and pseudoscientific ideas operates, so that they can be safely deprived of suffrage, as poorly educated citizens, according to them is the proposed draft constitution.----------------------------------------
Something about the supervisor HSE. After all, what is the scientific leader is such a school.Russian state to YasinModern Russian rulers and their ideologues today prefer not to dwell on what kind of government we have, and whose interests it is more talking about GDP, exchange currency, national projects, roads, debt, taxes and so forth, trying to touch as little of this important question. Recorded in the Constitution that Russia - a democratic federal law-governed state with a republican form of government, and that's it.
The last one was marked by an attempt to approach the question of the state, from a cohort of leaders of the CPSU and the post-perestroika era, was Mikhail Gorbachev. Then this figure, nothing new has failed to come up, pulled out into the daylight worn concept of "people's state", and he was always trump card, making it appear that he has mastered and understood the modern state. In the end, this "people's state" somehow got into a crisis, people did not want to defend "their" state, and it is no problem, thanks to the same figures of the Communist Party, has become a bourgeois, so even with an oligarchic form of government. After these transformations do not fit in the narrow-minded view of the state, our professors and politicians have decided not to raise more than this issue, lest the people laugh.But then suddenly, Yevgeny Yasin, scientific director of the Higher School of Economics and active participant in the privatization of the newspaper "Kommersant» № 145, raised the issue and shared his delusions about the state, passing them off as scientific understanding than has once again confirmed the well-known statement by Engels that the professor is not a scientist and scholar, Professor.So what is in Russia for the state, according to Yassin? "Professional discussion (Professor of advance preparing a defense in an attempt to limit the scope of the discussion of its terminology, and their views on the state) requires the recognition of certain parcels of all who are not in dispute, and its base.There are only four. First, the state of the economy is always present, and no one argues that it should go at all. Second, differences of opinion are those functions that are recognized by the state. The main ones - the rule of law and order, macroeconomic stability, defense and security, the formation of the necessary public institutions, provision of public services (health, education, etc.), social protection, environmental safety, promoting economic development (which is just called structural and industrial policy), eliminating "defects of the market" (including through the direct control of prices, wages, etc.), public enterprise (production of goods and services that can be done by private companies).Third, in life are the circumstances that make the appropriate application of the State of any of these functions in a given volume. Sometimes increasing the state's role should be and brings a positive effect. But the government is better cope with their tasks, the better the understanding on which of the areas should focus on. And finally, fourthly, the choice of the optimal level of government involvement in the economy should take into account the conditions and stage of development, its position relative to other countries, particularly the national culture and institutions. "That's how much slandered professor of public places of the state, and in fact said nothing significant. But what begins! "First, the state of the economy is always present, and no one argues that it should go at all." This statement can be added that the Volga flows into the Caspian Sea, that the moon revolves around the Earth and the Earth around the Sun, etc. And not only begins but also throughout his article, Professor gives many obvious and meaningless statements: "Capitalism has passed the stage of industrial and entered the post-industrial era", "large corporations have crossed national boundaries," and the like.But then, when the professor is taken to talk about the features that are recognized by the State, even more interesting. The main problem, which, according to Yassin, does the state - is "the rule of law and order." Indeed so. But most importantly, in the definition and understanding of the state, not what the state provides the rule of law and order, and then, in whose interests the laws are written, and how to maintain order. I must admit that not only in Russia but in Germany, and France, and in Mexico there are republican form of government, but the results of this board are very different. Today in Russia we see that the existing laws, time and again, provide enriching a small part of the population and the poverty of the majority of the people. To understand this do not need to specifically go into the theory. It is enough to estimate the bias current events.
Whose interests, one wonders, to protect members of the prosecution of Surgut, trying to influence the trade union chairman of the independent trade union "Surgutneftegaz" Alexander Zakharkin, demanding better pay? No less vividly describes the modern Russian state and the ratio of power to the hunger strike of workers of the Voronezh excavator plant, which the management of the plant owes a huge amount of salary. And the thousands of protests, the workers of other enterprises.
Pay in most cases, education and health care, miserable pensions and benefits, along with extremely high-income individual oligarchs, do not talk about whose interests defends the State? For social services, health and education authorities allocate a penny, and the lion's share of revenue it spends on maintenance of their rule. And in another way, if this system of government, can not be.Yevgeny Yasin would cost, before talking about the rule of law and order, to look at what our laws are passed by the Duma, and what a wave of protest these laws cause the people. Get at least, the new Housing Code. Yes, and the social composition of the Duma already says a lot. Yes, it would not hurt to ask about the legality of ownership, individual oligarchs and bureaucrats, a huge complex of property and finances of the country.Arguments about the professor, "the provision of public services (health, education, etc.), social protection, environmental safety, not worth a penny, as it does not show the relations costs, the share of social spending in the total product of the nation.According to the expert INDEM, the annual bribe Russian officials more than 316 billion dollars And a sharp increase (13 times) occurred in the past five years. You just wait for it - 316 billion dollars! Three budget! One budget goes to maintenance of the army, paid civil servants and "the provision of public services", and three sinks in the pockets of officials. If we add the income of big capitalist monopolies, then all the arguments Yassin, the state, as representatives of society, the state acting as a "night watchman" in approving the rule of law, burst like a bubble.As for the "promotion of economic development", there can be only one thing to note, that the modern Russian state, and contributes to the economy. But it helps in accordance with its oligarchic nature, raising tariffs for monopolies, and providing them, and including myself, huge profits.The last two comments of Professor Yasin, on the basic assumptions for the determination of the state, can be regarded as the top demagoguery. Professor informs readers that: "... in life are the circumstances that make the appropriate application of the State of any of these functions in a given volume." Uncertain circumstances of which readers must have guessed, do seem somehow uncertain and indefinite extent, but it is advisable, the performance of any function. But in order to achieve the result uncertain, Yasin continues, we must "take into account the conditions and stage of development, its position relative to other countries, particularly the national culture and institutions." That's it! Science has to do - it will not turn the thimble.In their testimonies, Professor Yasin, has once again repeated the old bourgeois pacifier, trying to convince readers that the state - this is not a class institution, which provides power to the ruling class, and universal institution designed to ensure "law and order." Apparently assuming that there are eternal laws that stand above the interests of certain people, compliance with which the state should provide. One word stood at the point of the Progressives, who claim that there is always potential for development, the existing state. Just what is meant by the development of the state, if it rests on the development of exploitation, that is not the development of the majority of the people.
Preached his views on the state has long been disproved, the most recognized human minds proved the inadequacy of the bourgeois view of the state, and by the history of social development. But as we see, today's ideologues of the Russian state, ready to use any old rubbish, in order to strengthen the power of the bourgeois state, led by liberal bureaucrats who wish to present Yassin as a whole people.Acquainted with the opus Yevgeny Yasin, who did not explain who is not involuntarily ask yourself: why Professor Yasin, suddenly began to write on the state and what is the purpose of this article? And on closer viewing is an answer that concluded just a few sentences.
It turns out that under current conditions to strengthen the state when the power, for fear of being overthrown, and in anticipation of the upcoming presidential election, is forced to limit the appetite of the oligarchs and the big monopolies, Yasin was important to state that "the state - a bad businessman." "In the past three years, the real strengthening of the role of the state to modernize the economy did not happen." "The state did not achieve notable success in the main function of a" night watchman "in approving the rule of law." "Obvious tendency to weaken the macroeconomic policy. - Continues to escalate the negative assessment of the state, Professor Yasin. - Institutional reforms largely frozen. At the same time promoting economic development, structural change is beneficial to the extent insufficient, particularly because of shortcomings of the state apparatus.But growing public sector, public enterprise takes precedence. During this time, according to conservative estimates, the state has acquired the assets of approximately $ 35-40 billion, including "Yuganskneftegaz", "Sibneft", "Power Machines". Therefore, it is clearly not doing that. "All this shows that Professor Yassin is not no economist and ideologue of oligarchic capital. His statements, he tries to hammer into the heads of the readers thought that today the state and its leaders do not come true, not what they do. That of the state apparatus many drawbacks. With the modernization of the economy did not happen. That those non-oligarchs, sucking up resources of the country, there have been more correct and limit them to predatory interests of the state is not the case. The state, in the words of an ideologue, should act as a "night watchman", that is to make a chamber pot for Abramovich and Vekselberg, and not to interfere in their affairs.
Such a state Yassin and his companions and built. Only here's a little flash in the pan out, as some government officials have not agreed on the role of night workers, the oligarchs. Once it is absolutely improper to serve the oligarchs, whose property was stolen completely. And why should serve them, when in the hands of a real power? Let them serve as Yassin and other leaders from science, and true citizens, and these scientists do not need it.
Vitaly Glukhov
Exemplary anti-Soviet institution of HSE, sinking budget, all pulling the country into a wilderness, and before history, trying for a handful of "chosen" to provide benefits in the form of educational qualification, which is so successfully used all sorts of usurpers and parasites. However previously denied suffrage illiterate, and figures from the HSE decided that anyone not acting in the socialization of the last school childless and has no right to vote.
Judges, by the way, is always selected, but chosen by the oligarchy and bureaucracy, or, as now, and people. When the change simply offer an awl to the soap, without changing the essence, it means, or know nothing about or deliberately disingenuous.In general, according to the publications and suggestions of representatives of HSE, we can conclude that the institution has a very low level of scientific and pseudoscientific ideas operates, so that they can be safely deprived of suffrage, as poorly educated citizens, according to them is the proposed draft constitution.----------------------------------------
Something about the supervisor HSE. After all, what is the scientific leader is such a school.Russian state to YasinModern Russian rulers and their ideologues today prefer not to dwell on what kind of government we have, and whose interests it is more talking about GDP, exchange currency, national projects, roads, debt, taxes and so forth, trying to touch as little of this important question. Recorded in the Constitution that Russia - a democratic federal law-governed state with a republican form of government, and that's it.
The last one was marked by an attempt to approach the question of the state, from a cohort of leaders of the CPSU and the post-perestroika era, was Mikhail Gorbachev. Then this figure, nothing new has failed to come up, pulled out into the daylight worn concept of "people's state", and he was always trump card, making it appear that he has mastered and understood the modern state. In the end, this "people's state" somehow got into a crisis, people did not want to defend "their" state, and it is no problem, thanks to the same figures of the Communist Party, has become a bourgeois, so even with an oligarchic form of government. After these transformations do not fit in the narrow-minded view of the state, our professors and politicians have decided not to raise more than this issue, lest the people laugh.But then suddenly, Yevgeny Yasin, scientific director of the Higher School of Economics and active participant in the privatization of the newspaper "Kommersant» № 145, raised the issue and shared his delusions about the state, passing them off as scientific understanding than has once again confirmed the well-known statement by Engels that the professor is not a scientist and scholar, Professor.So what is in Russia for the state, according to Yassin? "Professional discussion (Professor of advance preparing a defense in an attempt to limit the scope of the discussion of its terminology, and their views on the state) requires the recognition of certain parcels of all who are not in dispute, and its base.There are only four. First, the state of the economy is always present, and no one argues that it should go at all. Second, differences of opinion are those functions that are recognized by the state. The main ones - the rule of law and order, macroeconomic stability, defense and security, the formation of the necessary public institutions, provision of public services (health, education, etc.), social protection, environmental safety, promoting economic development (which is just called structural and industrial policy), eliminating "defects of the market" (including through the direct control of prices, wages, etc.), public enterprise (production of goods and services that can be done by private companies).Third, in life are the circumstances that make the appropriate application of the State of any of these functions in a given volume. Sometimes increasing the state's role should be and brings a positive effect. But the government is better cope with their tasks, the better the understanding on which of the areas should focus on. And finally, fourthly, the choice of the optimal level of government involvement in the economy should take into account the conditions and stage of development, its position relative to other countries, particularly the national culture and institutions. "That's how much slandered professor of public places of the state, and in fact said nothing significant. But what begins! "First, the state of the economy is always present, and no one argues that it should go at all." This statement can be added that the Volga flows into the Caspian Sea, that the moon revolves around the Earth and the Earth around the Sun, etc. And not only begins but also throughout his article, Professor gives many obvious and meaningless statements: "Capitalism has passed the stage of industrial and entered the post-industrial era", "large corporations have crossed national boundaries," and the like.But then, when the professor is taken to talk about the features that are recognized by the State, even more interesting. The main problem, which, according to Yassin, does the state - is "the rule of law and order." Indeed so. But most importantly, in the definition and understanding of the state, not what the state provides the rule of law and order, and then, in whose interests the laws are written, and how to maintain order. I must admit that not only in Russia but in Germany, and France, and in Mexico there are republican form of government, but the results of this board are very different. Today in Russia we see that the existing laws, time and again, provide enriching a small part of the population and the poverty of the majority of the people. To understand this do not need to specifically go into the theory. It is enough to estimate the bias current events.
Whose interests, one wonders, to protect members of the prosecution of Surgut, trying to influence the trade union chairman of the independent trade union "Surgutneftegaz" Alexander Zakharkin, demanding better pay? No less vividly describes the modern Russian state and the ratio of power to the hunger strike of workers of the Voronezh excavator plant, which the management of the plant owes a huge amount of salary. And the thousands of protests, the workers of other enterprises.
Pay in most cases, education and health care, miserable pensions and benefits, along with extremely high-income individual oligarchs, do not talk about whose interests defends the State? For social services, health and education authorities allocate a penny, and the lion's share of revenue it spends on maintenance of their rule. And in another way, if this system of government, can not be.Yevgeny Yasin would cost, before talking about the rule of law and order, to look at what our laws are passed by the Duma, and what a wave of protest these laws cause the people. Get at least, the new Housing Code. Yes, and the social composition of the Duma already says a lot. Yes, it would not hurt to ask about the legality of ownership, individual oligarchs and bureaucrats, a huge complex of property and finances of the country.Arguments about the professor, "the provision of public services (health, education, etc.), social protection, environmental safety, not worth a penny, as it does not show the relations costs, the share of social spending in the total product of the nation.According to the expert INDEM, the annual bribe Russian officials more than 316 billion dollars And a sharp increase (13 times) occurred in the past five years. You just wait for it - 316 billion dollars! Three budget! One budget goes to maintenance of the army, paid civil servants and "the provision of public services", and three sinks in the pockets of officials. If we add the income of big capitalist monopolies, then all the arguments Yassin, the state, as representatives of society, the state acting as a "night watchman" in approving the rule of law, burst like a bubble.As for the "promotion of economic development", there can be only one thing to note, that the modern Russian state, and contributes to the economy. But it helps in accordance with its oligarchic nature, raising tariffs for monopolies, and providing them, and including myself, huge profits.The last two comments of Professor Yasin, on the basic assumptions for the determination of the state, can be regarded as the top demagoguery. Professor informs readers that: "... in life are the circumstances that make the appropriate application of the State of any of these functions in a given volume." Uncertain circumstances of which readers must have guessed, do seem somehow uncertain and indefinite extent, but it is advisable, the performance of any function. But in order to achieve the result uncertain, Yasin continues, we must "take into account the conditions and stage of development, its position relative to other countries, particularly the national culture and institutions." That's it! Science has to do - it will not turn the thimble.In their testimonies, Professor Yasin, has once again repeated the old bourgeois pacifier, trying to convince readers that the state - this is not a class institution, which provides power to the ruling class, and universal institution designed to ensure "law and order." Apparently assuming that there are eternal laws that stand above the interests of certain people, compliance with which the state should provide. One word stood at the point of the Progressives, who claim that there is always potential for development, the existing state. Just what is meant by the development of the state, if it rests on the development of exploitation, that is not the development of the majority of the people.
Preached his views on the state has long been disproved, the most recognized human minds proved the inadequacy of the bourgeois view of the state, and by the history of social development. But as we see, today's ideologues of the Russian state, ready to use any old rubbish, in order to strengthen the power of the bourgeois state, led by liberal bureaucrats who wish to present Yassin as a whole people.Acquainted with the opus Yevgeny Yasin, who did not explain who is not involuntarily ask yourself: why Professor Yasin, suddenly began to write on the state and what is the purpose of this article? And on closer viewing is an answer that concluded just a few sentences.
It turns out that under current conditions to strengthen the state when the power, for fear of being overthrown, and in anticipation of the upcoming presidential election, is forced to limit the appetite of the oligarchs and the big monopolies, Yasin was important to state that "the state - a bad businessman." "In the past three years, the real strengthening of the role of the state to modernize the economy did not happen." "The state did not achieve notable success in the main function of a" night watchman "in approving the rule of law." "Obvious tendency to weaken the macroeconomic policy. - Continues to escalate the negative assessment of the state, Professor Yasin. - Institutional reforms largely frozen. At the same time promoting economic development, structural change is beneficial to the extent insufficient, particularly because of shortcomings of the state apparatus.But growing public sector, public enterprise takes precedence. During this time, according to conservative estimates, the state has acquired the assets of approximately $ 35-40 billion, including "Yuganskneftegaz", "Sibneft", "Power Machines". Therefore, it is clearly not doing that. "All this shows that Professor Yassin is not no economist and ideologue of oligarchic capital. His statements, he tries to hammer into the heads of the readers thought that today the state and its leaders do not come true, not what they do. That of the state apparatus many drawbacks. With the modernization of the economy did not happen. That those non-oligarchs, sucking up resources of the country, there have been more correct and limit them to predatory interests of the state is not the case. The state, in the words of an ideologue, should act as a "night watchman", that is to make a chamber pot for Abramovich and Vekselberg, and not to interfere in their affairs.
Such a state Yassin and his companions and built. Only here's a little flash in the pan out, as some government officials have not agreed on the role of night workers, the oligarchs. Once it is absolutely improper to serve the oligarchs, whose property was stolen completely. And why should serve them, when in the hands of a real power? Let them serve as Yassin and other leaders from science, and true citizens, and these scientists do not need it.
Vitaly Glukhov
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий