We are always more or less clearly and definitely can say about the history of our country. About then, through which government formation was Russia. But few people are firmly and convincingly be explained by the modern state system of the country.
Today, even the Internet encyclopedia Wikipedia, let alone ordinary citizens, there is no clear definition of the form of government in Russia, although technically we have a federal presidential republic. The authors of material on Russia simply can not come to a definite opinion. Some argue that Russia semi-republic, while others argue that the super. But no matter how ryadili Russian authors of the text on the state system, it can be said - an inefficient form of government, and it is difficult to imagine.
In a single state can not be many states, because today we are witnessing in Russia. Every bureaucrat's own state. One state we are in the form of the federal center, the second state in the state - a region that is governors, and the third - it's the municipalities where mayors and choose, and the Duma.
This system of government can be defined as the monarchy for anarchy, because whatever the federal government reform program has not started, the people must be the loser, because local officials must all turn out so that only they will grace from this reform. And this government continues to exist, although we all know that if you want to fill up the case, you should assign some responsibility for it, and then the business end. As the proverb: "too many cooks spoil the broth."
In a single state and the law must be the same for all. Therefore, the vertical of executive power should be completed to its logical conclusion - the president, governor, mayor, that this law was implemented. Responsibility should not be split between levels of government. Both the president and governors, and mayors must take responsibility for the situation in the territories.
At a time when the federal government can not ensure democratic elections in the municipalities can not establish intergovernmental relations, can not allow the rapid economic development must take full responsibility for the condition of the territories, and not blame everything on the voters, saying that since have chosen of the Mayor, then to disentangle themselves.
Through the vertical of executive power, in my opinion, can and should be combined with local government, which is able to perform the functions of feedback and in no way contradicts the democratic principles of a society. If we proceed from the understanding that democracy - a government by the people.
Legislature, democratically elected, the body passes laws for the country, and the executive, vozglavlyaemy President, holds it in life, and monitors compliance with the law. The president appoints the heads of executive power, the people elect members of parliament and civil society organizations and the CBT, in conjunction with the members, supervise the performance of executive power. And if the mayor usurping power and policy in the interests of its nearest environment, trampling the interests of citizens, and ask you to not only him, but appointed him governor, and then with the president. In this case, there will be failures of specific culprits, as the president and his team will be responsible for the quality of life in the field, and thus to question the heads of regions and cities. And before you ask it will be necessary to carry out the relevant policies of intergovernmental relations and provide the means, that is to build a proper administrative system, stimulating the local economy.
Today, we see that the executive authority in the field below stifled all initiative and local self-government does not develop. In self-organizing non-governmental organizations, and TOC, everywhere are under pressure from the executive branch. NGOs themselves can not reach or only to the mayor, but also to the central government, where it is reasonable to respond that you have elected mayors, which must decide all questions. But the mayor, every year, try not to solve the problems of citizens, and to increase its influence, to put the society under its control, to the local Duma, its people, to subdue the media and local government to develop. This is confirmed by the desire of the executive authorities in the field to take the maximum tax on the population when there is a fork, making it possible relief, and the inability to recall the mayor, at the request of the voters, and the inability to solve any minor problem without taking into account the interests of the citizens of municipal officials. And no one asks the question: why is the people want to tear itself to the maximum? Why limit myself to influence the government, but officials are developing their business and rebuilt itself and the approximate elite settlements? Why shadow structures controlled by mayors and governors to earn billions of rubles, and working effectively, and budgets are not growing towns, cities do not change people's living standard is not growing?
Over the years, I am increasingly convinced that in Russia today, when society is disorganized and disoriented, quickly and efficiently to restore law and embark on a stable and sustainable development is possible only through the formation of a single state, with the establishment of a cross-cutting vertical of executive power and a democratic parliament .
The current state is separated from the interests of the people and almost completely paralyzed in their activities. Today in Russia, unprotected no one - neither the child nor a worker, or an honest businessman or a teacher. The State does not fulfill its most important purpose - to protect the interests of the people. Protection, in this case, must be understood in a broad sense: it's protection against an external enemy, and the murderers, and the embezzler, and the pedophile, and the thief, and from disease or old age.
Under these conditions, at ease, just as, thieves, swindlers, embezzlers, who contrive in the murky waters of the Russian statehood, playing on the contradictions embedded their interests and obtain the maximum benefit. And examples of this mass. Even monopolized and controlled media can not keep the shaft revealing information. Every day we hear about fraud in the financial activities of the crimes in all areas of economic life, the seizure of enterprises, the murders and abduction of children, violence in the army, etc. And the shaft of crime continues unabated.
Many people are already so used to it, and do not believe that the widespread lawlessness and violence against the person, even a flaw that needs to be eradicated in the strongest terms. But the fight against lawlessness and violence is necessary because no other way we have not. And you can only defeat the evils in the way of restoring the Russian state, which is based on the sovereignty of the people, legally expressed democratically elected parliament, and clearly held accountable and subject to recall the executive branch throughout the country.
Igor Zjatev, Honored Worker of housing in Russia, Academician of the Marais, a knight of the Order of "The Star of Creation."
Today, even the Internet encyclopedia Wikipedia, let alone ordinary citizens, there is no clear definition of the form of government in Russia, although technically we have a federal presidential republic. The authors of material on Russia simply can not come to a definite opinion. Some argue that Russia semi-republic, while others argue that the super. But no matter how ryadili Russian authors of the text on the state system, it can be said - an inefficient form of government, and it is difficult to imagine.
In a single state can not be many states, because today we are witnessing in Russia. Every bureaucrat's own state. One state we are in the form of the federal center, the second state in the state - a region that is governors, and the third - it's the municipalities where mayors and choose, and the Duma.
This system of government can be defined as the monarchy for anarchy, because whatever the federal government reform program has not started, the people must be the loser, because local officials must all turn out so that only they will grace from this reform. And this government continues to exist, although we all know that if you want to fill up the case, you should assign some responsibility for it, and then the business end. As the proverb: "too many cooks spoil the broth."
In a single state and the law must be the same for all. Therefore, the vertical of executive power should be completed to its logical conclusion - the president, governor, mayor, that this law was implemented. Responsibility should not be split between levels of government. Both the president and governors, and mayors must take responsibility for the situation in the territories.
At a time when the federal government can not ensure democratic elections in the municipalities can not establish intergovernmental relations, can not allow the rapid economic development must take full responsibility for the condition of the territories, and not blame everything on the voters, saying that since have chosen of the Mayor, then to disentangle themselves.
Through the vertical of executive power, in my opinion, can and should be combined with local government, which is able to perform the functions of feedback and in no way contradicts the democratic principles of a society. If we proceed from the understanding that democracy - a government by the people.
Legislature, democratically elected, the body passes laws for the country, and the executive, vozglavlyaemy President, holds it in life, and monitors compliance with the law. The president appoints the heads of executive power, the people elect members of parliament and civil society organizations and the CBT, in conjunction with the members, supervise the performance of executive power. And if the mayor usurping power and policy in the interests of its nearest environment, trampling the interests of citizens, and ask you to not only him, but appointed him governor, and then with the president. In this case, there will be failures of specific culprits, as the president and his team will be responsible for the quality of life in the field, and thus to question the heads of regions and cities. And before you ask it will be necessary to carry out the relevant policies of intergovernmental relations and provide the means, that is to build a proper administrative system, stimulating the local economy.
Today, we see that the executive authority in the field below stifled all initiative and local self-government does not develop. In self-organizing non-governmental organizations, and TOC, everywhere are under pressure from the executive branch. NGOs themselves can not reach or only to the mayor, but also to the central government, where it is reasonable to respond that you have elected mayors, which must decide all questions. But the mayor, every year, try not to solve the problems of citizens, and to increase its influence, to put the society under its control, to the local Duma, its people, to subdue the media and local government to develop. This is confirmed by the desire of the executive authorities in the field to take the maximum tax on the population when there is a fork, making it possible relief, and the inability to recall the mayor, at the request of the voters, and the inability to solve any minor problem without taking into account the interests of the citizens of municipal officials. And no one asks the question: why is the people want to tear itself to the maximum? Why limit myself to influence the government, but officials are developing their business and rebuilt itself and the approximate elite settlements? Why shadow structures controlled by mayors and governors to earn billions of rubles, and working effectively, and budgets are not growing towns, cities do not change people's living standard is not growing?
Over the years, I am increasingly convinced that in Russia today, when society is disorganized and disoriented, quickly and efficiently to restore law and embark on a stable and sustainable development is possible only through the formation of a single state, with the establishment of a cross-cutting vertical of executive power and a democratic parliament .
The current state is separated from the interests of the people and almost completely paralyzed in their activities. Today in Russia, unprotected no one - neither the child nor a worker, or an honest businessman or a teacher. The State does not fulfill its most important purpose - to protect the interests of the people. Protection, in this case, must be understood in a broad sense: it's protection against an external enemy, and the murderers, and the embezzler, and the pedophile, and the thief, and from disease or old age.
Under these conditions, at ease, just as, thieves, swindlers, embezzlers, who contrive in the murky waters of the Russian statehood, playing on the contradictions embedded their interests and obtain the maximum benefit. And examples of this mass. Even monopolized and controlled media can not keep the shaft revealing information. Every day we hear about fraud in the financial activities of the crimes in all areas of economic life, the seizure of enterprises, the murders and abduction of children, violence in the army, etc. And the shaft of crime continues unabated.
Many people are already so used to it, and do not believe that the widespread lawlessness and violence against the person, even a flaw that needs to be eradicated in the strongest terms. But the fight against lawlessness and violence is necessary because no other way we have not. And you can only defeat the evils in the way of restoring the Russian state, which is based on the sovereignty of the people, legally expressed democratically elected parliament, and clearly held accountable and subject to recall the executive branch throughout the country.
Igor Zjatev, Honored Worker of housing in Russia, Academician of the Marais, a knight of the Order of "The Star of Creation."
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий