Criminal voucher nationwide paid off

 Modest anniversary: ​​voucher privatization in Russia is 20 years old
August 14 marks the twentieth anniversary of the start of the so-called "voucher privatization" in RussiaIn 1992, the first Russian President Boris Yeltsin signed a decree that all citizens of Russia - from infants to the elderly - have become owners of a voucher of 10,000 rublesHowever, the large number of Russians (34%), according to the statistics, preferred to sell their vouchers, 25% invested in mutual funds checks (MMM, "Hopper", Albee and others), and in general all lostAugust 14 marks the twentieth anniversary of the start of the so-called "voucher privatization" in Russia, reminds RIA "New Region". On this day in 1992 the first President of Russia Boris Yeltsin signed a decree that all citizens of Russia - from infants to the elderly - have become owners of a voucher of 10 thousand rubles.

It was assumed that these checks citizens will buy shares of companies or attach them to check funds intermediary for the purpose of further investment in the production of various kinds.20 years later, the citizens of the Russian Federation almost do not buy Russian stocks and almost do not trust the financial markets and mutual funds. How did this happen?Published in the autumn of last year the book 'fork Russia's recent history "is considered the" father of the voucher "Anatoly Chubais said that privatization was primarily interested officials, that is the nomenclature. "This social group is the first to realize the prospects and benefits of private property. And since it was her real levers of control, it has to use them to master the property", - stated in the book.
Began writing the book, the late Yegor Gaidar and Anatoly Chubais finished and released it in collaboration with the former Finance Minister Alexei Kudrin.The government, claim Chubais and Kudrin after late Gaidar was the urgent task is going to enter the illegal and uncontrolled privatization in a civilized manner. Therefore, according to the reformers, it was necessary not to issue decrees and regulations that are true in substance, but will not run, and build a realizable concept of privatization, without losing the main goal - the formation of the institution of private property in Russia. "This means that a real window of opportunity privatization options were extremely narrow," - stated Chubais.Thus, the beginning of the 1990s, the government decided to reformers in one fell swoop all the state property to divide between the citizens of the country. The nominal value of the voucher set at 10 thousand, and the entire post-Soviet economy was estimated in this way is only 100 billion. Most Russians vouchers did not bring any money - at best, they were sold for cash.According to economists, strategic privatization was carried out is absolutely correct. The best form of distribution of state property between the population of the Russian Federation to think it was impossible, but the project turned into a delusion of the population.
The state had to explain to the public the nature of privatization and the possibilities for accommodation vouchers with the prospect of later investment income. However, since this explanation has not been made, the best option to use vouchers to hit upon a very few people. Only a few, all of which are now known as the oligarchs, having bought the population of vouchers purchased them plants, creating large industrial empire.Only 15% of countries have invested their vouchers in Russian enterprises and became their small shareholders. For example, a very good profit could get those who purchased shares of "Gazprom".However, the large number of Russians (34%), according to the statistics, preferred to sell their vouchers, 25% invested in mutual funds checks (MMM, "Hopper", Albee and others) and everything lost. About 11% of the population prefer to give vouchers and a further six per cent and did not remember what happened to their securities.By the way, remind Russians experts, if you do put money directly into the current is still the company, you can learn about the next steps in his department for shareholders. Golden mountains will not, but maybe you own shares of a few thousand.(That's how it turns out! Intentions of the organizers of the divestiture were noble, but here the people were not prepared for such events and, therefore, did not work! The result: the people left in the cold, and the organizers are ready to recognize a fool, if only they were not judged as criminals. But a reasonable question: why are these idiots still run the country?)
 Philosophical anxiety.
Bribes are smoothEngine tuning are "driving force" of stagnation.Sober people and honest citizens understood this long ago. Even when, instead of living prohindeev contemporaries newspapers began kick dead Stalin ...But who are they, these driving forces of stagnation?This force - our old friend the master of life, all the familiar bureaucracy (not to be confused with the employees and workers of state administrative apparatus!). It is all pervasive evil demon, changes appearance, clears old, served as her political skin, napyalivaya over another.Here are her seven "wardrobe": at first it was a "communist" on the basis of anti-democrats and anti-patriotism in the Soviet Union. Then - "Democrat" on the basis of anti-communism and anti-patriotism in its collapse. Now bureaucracy has become suddenly "patriot" with a touch of democratic rhetoric and violent anti-communism in the new framework of "sovereign states."The apt definition of writer Boris Oleinik, such people - a "commutator". That is, not people, and a species ...The people, if he did not "ohlos" always respected state, without which people will inevitably turn into monkeys.Since the beginning of the announced restructuring of people expected that the state property, which is literally "clung" bureaucracy, recruited from the ranks of the "Soviet intelligentsia" would actually be transferred to its legal owner. Who is he? Yes, a farmer who has raised grain crop country, work that does not make the marriage, and intellectual who does not lie, and thinks with the workers and peasants.For a monopoly on thinking - no one else!Q: What, to justify these expectations of the people, should have been done? Face it.From personal experience, each knows that very often in the workplace is not to punish people for the fact that it does not work, and it is for the fact that it works (or eager to work) is good. Getting rid of a good employee for what he very existence reveals the actual idleness of his superiors, the bureaucracy would punish him by the state. It - labor laws, job descriptions, the Party Committee and the trade union committee. Helpfully "public opinion" group often brought under this administrative conduct, so to speak, a "moral basis": for pugnaciousness principal cast!What was supposed to make our society more in 1985?First, to "revive" and sharply increase is still dead * Article 139 of the Criminal Code of the RSFSR (prosecution for criticism). This would help to significantly and reliably even the odds against winning a fundamental worker (= member of society!), Generally honest person with "administrative bullying" its chief bureaucrat. Honest State - against the "disgraceful state", in other words ...Second, it was necessary to "flip" the most important industrial and legal attitudes in the workplace, ie, in public ownership. Namely, instead of hiring employees (they - the citizens of the State) administration move to hire administration - the labor collective, ie direct labor employees.And these persistent attempts workers prosabotirovannye, however, the Party committees of the CPSU were.Oh, yes! They wanted to take my private property in the state? Here's to you all! - Promised ... the state bureaucracy and the Soviet Union destroyed, dooming us all to transform into monkeys.- Ape to "Western-style" - advised its ideologues, local and foreign - and you will enter the civilized space.As if the "civilized space" does not include a psychiatric hospital, a public toilet, rural landfill or ... prison.The Council, however, was adopted. And now - the voucher.What are they? This is - the characters instead of the property ownership.Voucher - it's a receipt, which the bureaucracy and the commutator should give people that they have for the destroyed state, its people will not be judged.Took the voucher - and bribes smooth!And no more claims to present not Mogi ...Kazakov, a member of the working philosophy of the clubthem. Joseph Dietzgen.Yekaterinburg.
 "RITM», № 108 (11751), Saturday, October 3, 1992. Circulation 5460."Publicity», № 6 (132), 11 - 17 February 1993 Circulation 132,000."URAL NEWSPAPER», № 30, October 1993 Circulation 13,000.