The
media disinformation material appeared telling citizens how to re-elect
President Vladimir Putin and Minister of Economic Development
Nabiullina think about the development of the country and are seeking
ways to success. The
cause of this material is likely to become a critical article in the
Chinese newspaper "Renmin Ribao" belonging to the PDA, where the problem
areas were identified and named Russia's reality six major problems. Not
responding to the criticisms of Chinese friends, it is usually in
modern rulers of the country, the newly elected President Vladimir Putin
and Minister Nabiullina decided to show the country that they are no
worse than the Chinese Communists understand the situation and work to
overcome the existing problems in the country. That is not for nothing that the bread they eat. And that's what they got:
Nabiullina and Putin argued on the problems of the Russian economy5 days ago, 02:01
The Minister of Economic Development diagnosed seven ekonompolitiki pain points, three of which - taxes, fees and pension funds - the prime minister called a desire to debate.If the Chinese comrades have identified six problem areas, the Minister Nabiullina see more of them-seven. That's something! However the problems identified are not the ones that need to be addressed immediately and which could allow Russia to develop. Nabiullina immediately showed that she was concerned primarily about the representatives of capital, rather than Russia as a whole and its citizens.
Russia is at an important turn, opened the Economic Development Board Putin: to adopt solutions that determine the prospects for years to come. The main factor and the growth of the economy, and quality of growth called the prime business climate, "Today is, of course, the nerve of economic policy."Vladimir Putin was not original, and telling the audience that we are at an important turn, complained about the poor business climate that is also attended to the activities of the representatives of capital. But here, specifically, about the causes of poor business climate, Putin chose not to speak, afraid to point out the real causes and perpetrators. Our people are all good, but the system is bad. Nabiullina supported the president and offered to change the situation by changing look at it.Nabiullina, briefly recalling where Russia in the world rankings of business climate, and finding all the positive (eg, finishing 120th out of 183 seats in the ranking of Doing Business, Russia nevertheless entered the top 25 on progress in implementing reforms) , has proposed to use the new status indicators of the investment climate: business security, strengthening the judicial and legal system, corruption. The Minister outlined the seven forks of economic policy: the right choice will help you find sources of growth and quality.Twenty years standing at the fork and all the way to go places we can not, as to not go to these rulers, all lose. Here we stand at the stone in a daze, in the expectation that someone will come to us and ensure development.The most important component of the business climate - the tax burden, the level of which - 35.6% of GDP - is cumbersome, the minister said. The load should be fair: the surplus is larger corporations, while engaged in the modernization of business - less. Effective tax rates should be higher than in countries with which Russia is competing for capital, and nominal - does not change at least five years. In addition, it is necessary to reduce administrative barriers - in some sectors they increase the load by 50-60%, said the minister.The second fork in the road - the price of electricity, gas and rail transport: the minister suggested that the annual indexation by 10%, 15% and the inflation rate. From the rising prices of energy efficiency programs depends on the launch, the minister admitted, but on the other hand, "we can not afford the prices are higher than their neighbors." It is necessary to continue to reduce state involvement in the economy, said a third fork Nabiullina, while privatization should do and regions: they receive subsidies from the budget, while they themselves are sitting on huge assets. The State should lead by example and to privatize the Russian sites, continued the minister about the fourth fork - to strengthen the national financial system. In 2011 two thirds of companies have chosen housed foreign exchange, Russian stocks have provided 21% of the London Stock Exchange turnover than helped to strengthen London as a financial center, Nabiullina lamented: "It is impossible to solve this problem bans - you need a systemic change in the law."Fifth sore point - the pension system. Without reform, it will not be able to enter the no-deficit budget in 2015 or later, and the deficit of the pension system will be 3-4% of GDP, the minister warned. Raising interest rates has already led to an increase in hidden salary to the fund in respect of remuneration from 54.7% in 2010 to 56.1% in 2011 (almost the maximum - 56.2% was in 2006) and to slower growth legal wage, she said. She stressed that if every additional $ 1 in oil prices makes the budget of 50-60 billion rubles., Then an additional 1 percentage point of economic growth - 120-150 billion rubles. The main solutions to the pension system reform minister offered early retirement, increasing the minimum length of service requirements and the development of voluntary savings. Sixth fork - the openness of the economy, especially relevant with the entry into WTO and Customs Union.Seventh - fiscal rule. Nabiullina are reminded once again of disagreements with the Ministry of Finance - to take as the basis of the budget the average price of oil for 10 years, insists that the Ministry of Finance, or for three years, as required by the Ministry of Economic Development - and added the need for "rules of the second key" - to limit the growth of budget expenditures GDP growth .Here is Nabiullina and opened all of whom and what she and her ministry really care. And it turns out, primarily on the state of the financial oligarchy, owners of monopolies and income commodity tycoons. For whom is a good annual price increases for electricity, gas and rail transport? All the excuses about the energy efficiency is an excuse for the poor. They say we raise the price to save!!The tax burden on businesses today is higher than in any European country, but that does have tax diversification Russian specificity, where the parasite pay less taxes than the national producer. But the important fact is Nabiullina down and immediately shows about whom she really cared for. As a minister, who by their status to take care of the welfare state, the budget, it is concerned about the monopoly profits to precisely raised their annual fees. In the same vein, and the proposal Nabiullina to further privatization and reducing state involvement in the economy. The conversation must be conducted on how to stop the abuse of civil servants in the use of state-owned enterprises for personal purposes, that the revenues of state enterprises fell into the state budget, rather than privatization and sale of "chicken" lays the golden eggs in private hands. The Minister should think about replenishment, and not on how to enrich a handful of oligarchs. And the outflow of capital from the country is not because of high taxes, as it tries to present Nabiullina, and because of their criminal nature.As for the pension system and its reform can not say, since all the transformations only led to even more worse off the main part of Russian pensioners. In fact, we do not have the inherent problems of the pension system, and general problems imposed by plutocratic state: the theft of pension money, low wages in manufacturing, for the profit of the capitalists and the two laws on pensions. Here are three devastating effects for the entire pension system, which neither the minister nor the president is not even hinted at.Again Nabiullina offers a simple pensioner deterioration by reducing the yield on the early retirement, increasing the required length of service and voluntary savings. Perhaps Nabiullina, rubbing a chair in the ministry, and does not understand that early retirement is not just given, that in the hot shop, or leave the mine health and work there wasting power, not subservient. But someone must be the lady and explain the real situation.Speaking of voluntary savings time, nullify all the officials themselves and do not even realize that if people must voluntarily and independently to save for retirement, what does all this army of parasites sitting on the neck of retirees, or the existing pension system exists for the sake of the same enrichment of a handful of plutocrats?Finally, regarding the budget rules. Disputes Finance and Economic Development regarding the timing of the cut-off for determining the price of oil lie in the degree of arrogance on the plunder of the state. Finance Ministry wants to establish a virtual price for hydrocarbons in the 10 years that the state has received as little as possible, and the Ministry of Economic Development believes that three years is enough.
If the ministers, getting software from the state, cared about the state budget of the filling, then the question would stand on what percentage of private enterprises should receive for their participation in the production and transportation of oil, and everything else should depart the country's budget, as For example, is made in Norway. But our extraordinary ministers sit on the neck at the state and act against the state. That's the main problem lies, and the country.The tax burden is generally lower if you subtract oil and gas sector, Putin said. "Subtract wrong," - replied Nabiullina, the more so in manufacturing load up to 50%. Yet less than 30% non-oil and gas sector, did not give the prime minister.With regard to the indexation of tariffs, the financial position of the Railways have more modest than in the gas sector, although in the gas industry and 15%, as they say, will not be an incentive for energy efficiency policy, Putin shared "thoughts out loud." And raising the severance tax on natural gas prices in curbing may lead to the fact that the investment programs of state-owned companies will be modest and competitive advantages of Russia's energy sector will be reset. We have attracted investors in the energy sector, many have invested billions of dollars and euros, and then we went and slow growth rates, Putin continued: "But what about the promises?" Do not support it, and a three-year oil price for the budget, inviting all to think and to debate. After all, if the price falls, the "cut" of the investment and the price will have such a mistake - it is nowhere invested state funds and an increase in unfinished projects, Putin said. The economy could work and retirement savings - they are already 4 trillion rubles., And the current rules do not allow to use them, including for infrastructure projects, he said, and ordered the Ministry of Economic Development, Ministry of Finance and EBV have prepared proposals on how the rules change.At a fork until the dispute admitted First Deputy Prime Minister Igor Shuvalov, "You are stubborn, Elvira. But that's okay. " In the creative atmosphere of the government, he added, not to be misunderstood: it is in such disputes are born solutions that promote economic development. When was Alexei Kudrin, it was easier - a deputy prime minister supported the Ministry of Finance, the other - Ministry of Economic Development, and alone to achieve a balance between the two agencies within the economic bloc - not an easy task, complained Shuvalov. A time to lose no more - rising expectations of society, all decisions must be taken in 2012, he said: "In 2018 we will have to present a very different country."The issue with investing pension money monopolies and tariffs - a strategic dilemma, from which the Government will not be able to escape, said the chief economist of FC "Opening" Vladimir Tikhomirov, will have to choose: either to macroeconomic stability and sluggish growth, or structural reforms and macroeconomic risks in the expectation of high growth.
SourceThe whole discussion, if you can call it that, has shown that our leaders do not see the real problems of modern Russia, or do not want them to see and articulate and, therefore, be addressed. But the real problem are the following:
Nabiullina and Putin argued on the problems of the Russian economy5 days ago, 02:01
The Minister of Economic Development diagnosed seven ekonompolitiki pain points, three of which - taxes, fees and pension funds - the prime minister called a desire to debate.If the Chinese comrades have identified six problem areas, the Minister Nabiullina see more of them-seven. That's something! However the problems identified are not the ones that need to be addressed immediately and which could allow Russia to develop. Nabiullina immediately showed that she was concerned primarily about the representatives of capital, rather than Russia as a whole and its citizens.
Russia is at an important turn, opened the Economic Development Board Putin: to adopt solutions that determine the prospects for years to come. The main factor and the growth of the economy, and quality of growth called the prime business climate, "Today is, of course, the nerve of economic policy."Vladimir Putin was not original, and telling the audience that we are at an important turn, complained about the poor business climate that is also attended to the activities of the representatives of capital. But here, specifically, about the causes of poor business climate, Putin chose not to speak, afraid to point out the real causes and perpetrators. Our people are all good, but the system is bad. Nabiullina supported the president and offered to change the situation by changing look at it.Nabiullina, briefly recalling where Russia in the world rankings of business climate, and finding all the positive (eg, finishing 120th out of 183 seats in the ranking of Doing Business, Russia nevertheless entered the top 25 on progress in implementing reforms) , has proposed to use the new status indicators of the investment climate: business security, strengthening the judicial and legal system, corruption. The Minister outlined the seven forks of economic policy: the right choice will help you find sources of growth and quality.Twenty years standing at the fork and all the way to go places we can not, as to not go to these rulers, all lose. Here we stand at the stone in a daze, in the expectation that someone will come to us and ensure development.The most important component of the business climate - the tax burden, the level of which - 35.6% of GDP - is cumbersome, the minister said. The load should be fair: the surplus is larger corporations, while engaged in the modernization of business - less. Effective tax rates should be higher than in countries with which Russia is competing for capital, and nominal - does not change at least five years. In addition, it is necessary to reduce administrative barriers - in some sectors they increase the load by 50-60%, said the minister.The second fork in the road - the price of electricity, gas and rail transport: the minister suggested that the annual indexation by 10%, 15% and the inflation rate. From the rising prices of energy efficiency programs depends on the launch, the minister admitted, but on the other hand, "we can not afford the prices are higher than their neighbors." It is necessary to continue to reduce state involvement in the economy, said a third fork Nabiullina, while privatization should do and regions: they receive subsidies from the budget, while they themselves are sitting on huge assets. The State should lead by example and to privatize the Russian sites, continued the minister about the fourth fork - to strengthen the national financial system. In 2011 two thirds of companies have chosen housed foreign exchange, Russian stocks have provided 21% of the London Stock Exchange turnover than helped to strengthen London as a financial center, Nabiullina lamented: "It is impossible to solve this problem bans - you need a systemic change in the law."Fifth sore point - the pension system. Without reform, it will not be able to enter the no-deficit budget in 2015 or later, and the deficit of the pension system will be 3-4% of GDP, the minister warned. Raising interest rates has already led to an increase in hidden salary to the fund in respect of remuneration from 54.7% in 2010 to 56.1% in 2011 (almost the maximum - 56.2% was in 2006) and to slower growth legal wage, she said. She stressed that if every additional $ 1 in oil prices makes the budget of 50-60 billion rubles., Then an additional 1 percentage point of economic growth - 120-150 billion rubles. The main solutions to the pension system reform minister offered early retirement, increasing the minimum length of service requirements and the development of voluntary savings. Sixth fork - the openness of the economy, especially relevant with the entry into WTO and Customs Union.Seventh - fiscal rule. Nabiullina are reminded once again of disagreements with the Ministry of Finance - to take as the basis of the budget the average price of oil for 10 years, insists that the Ministry of Finance, or for three years, as required by the Ministry of Economic Development - and added the need for "rules of the second key" - to limit the growth of budget expenditures GDP growth .Here is Nabiullina and opened all of whom and what she and her ministry really care. And it turns out, primarily on the state of the financial oligarchy, owners of monopolies and income commodity tycoons. For whom is a good annual price increases for electricity, gas and rail transport? All the excuses about the energy efficiency is an excuse for the poor. They say we raise the price to save!!The tax burden on businesses today is higher than in any European country, but that does have tax diversification Russian specificity, where the parasite pay less taxes than the national producer. But the important fact is Nabiullina down and immediately shows about whom she really cared for. As a minister, who by their status to take care of the welfare state, the budget, it is concerned about the monopoly profits to precisely raised their annual fees. In the same vein, and the proposal Nabiullina to further privatization and reducing state involvement in the economy. The conversation must be conducted on how to stop the abuse of civil servants in the use of state-owned enterprises for personal purposes, that the revenues of state enterprises fell into the state budget, rather than privatization and sale of "chicken" lays the golden eggs in private hands. The Minister should think about replenishment, and not on how to enrich a handful of oligarchs. And the outflow of capital from the country is not because of high taxes, as it tries to present Nabiullina, and because of their criminal nature.As for the pension system and its reform can not say, since all the transformations only led to even more worse off the main part of Russian pensioners. In fact, we do not have the inherent problems of the pension system, and general problems imposed by plutocratic state: the theft of pension money, low wages in manufacturing, for the profit of the capitalists and the two laws on pensions. Here are three devastating effects for the entire pension system, which neither the minister nor the president is not even hinted at.Again Nabiullina offers a simple pensioner deterioration by reducing the yield on the early retirement, increasing the required length of service and voluntary savings. Perhaps Nabiullina, rubbing a chair in the ministry, and does not understand that early retirement is not just given, that in the hot shop, or leave the mine health and work there wasting power, not subservient. But someone must be the lady and explain the real situation.Speaking of voluntary savings time, nullify all the officials themselves and do not even realize that if people must voluntarily and independently to save for retirement, what does all this army of parasites sitting on the neck of retirees, or the existing pension system exists for the sake of the same enrichment of a handful of plutocrats?Finally, regarding the budget rules. Disputes Finance and Economic Development regarding the timing of the cut-off for determining the price of oil lie in the degree of arrogance on the plunder of the state. Finance Ministry wants to establish a virtual price for hydrocarbons in the 10 years that the state has received as little as possible, and the Ministry of Economic Development believes that three years is enough.
If the ministers, getting software from the state, cared about the state budget of the filling, then the question would stand on what percentage of private enterprises should receive for their participation in the production and transportation of oil, and everything else should depart the country's budget, as For example, is made in Norway. But our extraordinary ministers sit on the neck at the state and act against the state. That's the main problem lies, and the country.The tax burden is generally lower if you subtract oil and gas sector, Putin said. "Subtract wrong," - replied Nabiullina, the more so in manufacturing load up to 50%. Yet less than 30% non-oil and gas sector, did not give the prime minister.With regard to the indexation of tariffs, the financial position of the Railways have more modest than in the gas sector, although in the gas industry and 15%, as they say, will not be an incentive for energy efficiency policy, Putin shared "thoughts out loud." And raising the severance tax on natural gas prices in curbing may lead to the fact that the investment programs of state-owned companies will be modest and competitive advantages of Russia's energy sector will be reset. We have attracted investors in the energy sector, many have invested billions of dollars and euros, and then we went and slow growth rates, Putin continued: "But what about the promises?" Do not support it, and a three-year oil price for the budget, inviting all to think and to debate. After all, if the price falls, the "cut" of the investment and the price will have such a mistake - it is nowhere invested state funds and an increase in unfinished projects, Putin said. The economy could work and retirement savings - they are already 4 trillion rubles., And the current rules do not allow to use them, including for infrastructure projects, he said, and ordered the Ministry of Economic Development, Ministry of Finance and EBV have prepared proposals on how the rules change.At a fork until the dispute admitted First Deputy Prime Minister Igor Shuvalov, "You are stubborn, Elvira. But that's okay. " In the creative atmosphere of the government, he added, not to be misunderstood: it is in such disputes are born solutions that promote economic development. When was Alexei Kudrin, it was easier - a deputy prime minister supported the Ministry of Finance, the other - Ministry of Economic Development, and alone to achieve a balance between the two agencies within the economic bloc - not an easy task, complained Shuvalov. A time to lose no more - rising expectations of society, all decisions must be taken in 2012, he said: "In 2018 we will have to present a very different country."The issue with investing pension money monopolies and tariffs - a strategic dilemma, from which the Government will not be able to escape, said the chief economist of FC "Opening" Vladimir Tikhomirov, will have to choose: either to macroeconomic stability and sluggish growth, or structural reforms and macroeconomic risks in the expectation of high growth.
SourceThe whole discussion, if you can call it that, has shown that our leaders do not see the real problems of modern Russia, or do not want them to see and articulate and, therefore, be addressed. But the real problem are the following:
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий