Topical Archive
Speaking at a meeting of the club on Nov. 4, on the topic: "The new configuration of the party space in Russia. The danger of the left shift", the chairman of the State Duma Committee on Constitutional Legislation and State Building Vladimir Pligin, set off in children's thinking, and offering the audience to share his fantasies . Vladimir Pligin told that "over the past decade, the principles of the inviolability of private property, freedom of speech, human rights have become an integral part of our worldview, worldview of the majority of citizens."
Our citizens have always been supporters of freedom of speech and protection capacities, human rights, but not in words, as did Soviet officials and the modern Russian, but in deeds. Yes here it is, just, do not allow. They were forced to work for pennies on the Soviet bureaucracy, and now on Russia and their offspring - the oligarchs. But Pligin seems to prefer no real history of the country, and the fictional. Is predatory privatization and devaluation of the contributions were not a violation of civil rights and confiscation of their private property, which is now, according to Pligin, unshakable? But, for all those lovers of witty, such issues do not exist. They only say what you want from them today, and nobody listens. And therefore, constantly repeated tale about a good market, which will settle everything. Well, who is an agent of the market, and in what capacity, is a question, they do not pick up. Do not pick up because the thought the property owners, the means of production, or power, and all other citizens, cheap labor, humbly bending back before the new masters of life.
Yes, people were against the all-embracing public ownership and the usurpation of power, and he did not want to be in the guise of market reforms robbed. And then, also stated that the people he wanted to be stripped, deprived of social guarantees. Proposed to change the old clothes and flayed.
"Left" want to come to the economic prosperity through the implementation of the policy of subsidies - continued to fantasize Pligin, representing the Left, apparently as a deputy in the Duma, and based on their rhetoric - compensation, denying people for independence, including the most able-bodied and active part population, which is capable of creating surplus product and enable the State to fulfill its social obligations. (It should be understood as meaning the surplus value, though, in general, before embarking on a similar argument.) Began to develop the technology that we call technology requests. This technology is detrimental, because the population generates an internal constraint, lack of initiative, leading to a denial of responsibility and shifting it to the state, strengthens the role of government, or rather, bureaucratic component of the government, represents an opportunity to manipulate the citizens, driving them into a state of unfreedom. "
Real left, not opportunists who advocate for the liberation of the working class from exploitation, for the transfer of the means of production into public ownership, and the government - in the hands of the people, not some fictitious policy of subsidies, according to Pligin.
In his speech, criticizes Pligin not left ideology and actions in the Soviet Union a system of relationships, when all the means of production owned by the state and the state party committee, although it does not understand this. And in that system, the behavior of the people was clear and understandable. In circumstances where government officials have usurped power and property, why should the common man to take responsibility? No need to assume that people stupid bosses, then illusions about his behavior would not be what shows us Pligin, in his speech.
"This technology creates a vector of eternal requests for help ... It seems that social justice and equality should not be determined by the desire to equalize incomes and the need to receive state aid.
The meaning of these categories, the validity of the law, equality of opportunity for the implementation of freedom of choice. Here it should provide a state in which power remembers that she hired to work there in the society and its interests, not vice versa. The state's role is not to compel its citizens to ask for help, which allows to increase the size of the state apparatus and maintenance costs, and to create conditions and a legal framework in which each person is able to shape their own destiny, make their own decisions, financially provide for themselves and their loved ones. Society, the state should not do what a man can do for yourself, for your family, for your municipality. Conceptual approach to the development of the country, from our point of view, must involve a fundamental change in the Russian people. Be held on the transition from a certain stereotype, passively waiting for assistance from the state in a full participant in the process of nation building, the effective owner, responsible citizen and a taxpayer. "
Old songs! "Conceptual approach to the development of the country, from our point of view, must involve a fundamental change in Russia's rights."
How is it tiring! The same for several centuries. Those who can not come to power, suddenly find the need to "radically change the Russian people." Russian man does not want to turn into a docile skotinku in a "responsible" citizen and taxpayer in the hands of various "converters." And it is certainly necessary. That fuss, climb to the summit of power, to once again crowed about the need for radical changes in the Russian people.
Following the approval of the need radical change of the Russian people, Pligin launched into tales of American advertising on equal opportunities, preferring to crawl as far as possible our reality. Where no equal opportunities did not exist and not exist. Where the state only looks as if to serve a major owner in squeezing profits, but to participate in its division.
But surprisingly not that Vladimir Pligin demonstrates narrow-minded view of the state and its role, and that he is the chairman of the State Duma Committee on Constitutional Legislation and State Building.
It really does not fit the officials to think about the remaking of the Russian people, and people on the radical change of government, but how quickly get rid of such converters.
Speaking at a meeting of the club on Nov. 4, on the topic: "The new configuration of the party space in Russia. The danger of the left shift", the chairman of the State Duma Committee on Constitutional Legislation and State Building Vladimir Pligin, set off in children's thinking, and offering the audience to share his fantasies . Vladimir Pligin told that "over the past decade, the principles of the inviolability of private property, freedom of speech, human rights have become an integral part of our worldview, worldview of the majority of citizens."
Our citizens have always been supporters of freedom of speech and protection capacities, human rights, but not in words, as did Soviet officials and the modern Russian, but in deeds. Yes here it is, just, do not allow. They were forced to work for pennies on the Soviet bureaucracy, and now on Russia and their offspring - the oligarchs. But Pligin seems to prefer no real history of the country, and the fictional. Is predatory privatization and devaluation of the contributions were not a violation of civil rights and confiscation of their private property, which is now, according to Pligin, unshakable? But, for all those lovers of witty, such issues do not exist. They only say what you want from them today, and nobody listens. And therefore, constantly repeated tale about a good market, which will settle everything. Well, who is an agent of the market, and in what capacity, is a question, they do not pick up. Do not pick up because the thought the property owners, the means of production, or power, and all other citizens, cheap labor, humbly bending back before the new masters of life.
Yes, people were against the all-embracing public ownership and the usurpation of power, and he did not want to be in the guise of market reforms robbed. And then, also stated that the people he wanted to be stripped, deprived of social guarantees. Proposed to change the old clothes and flayed.
"Left" want to come to the economic prosperity through the implementation of the policy of subsidies - continued to fantasize Pligin, representing the Left, apparently as a deputy in the Duma, and based on their rhetoric - compensation, denying people for independence, including the most able-bodied and active part population, which is capable of creating surplus product and enable the State to fulfill its social obligations. (It should be understood as meaning the surplus value, though, in general, before embarking on a similar argument.) Began to develop the technology that we call technology requests. This technology is detrimental, because the population generates an internal constraint, lack of initiative, leading to a denial of responsibility and shifting it to the state, strengthens the role of government, or rather, bureaucratic component of the government, represents an opportunity to manipulate the citizens, driving them into a state of unfreedom. "
Real left, not opportunists who advocate for the liberation of the working class from exploitation, for the transfer of the means of production into public ownership, and the government - in the hands of the people, not some fictitious policy of subsidies, according to Pligin.
In his speech, criticizes Pligin not left ideology and actions in the Soviet Union a system of relationships, when all the means of production owned by the state and the state party committee, although it does not understand this. And in that system, the behavior of the people was clear and understandable. In circumstances where government officials have usurped power and property, why should the common man to take responsibility? No need to assume that people stupid bosses, then illusions about his behavior would not be what shows us Pligin, in his speech.
"This technology creates a vector of eternal requests for help ... It seems that social justice and equality should not be determined by the desire to equalize incomes and the need to receive state aid.
The meaning of these categories, the validity of the law, equality of opportunity for the implementation of freedom of choice. Here it should provide a state in which power remembers that she hired to work there in the society and its interests, not vice versa. The state's role is not to compel its citizens to ask for help, which allows to increase the size of the state apparatus and maintenance costs, and to create conditions and a legal framework in which each person is able to shape their own destiny, make their own decisions, financially provide for themselves and their loved ones. Society, the state should not do what a man can do for yourself, for your family, for your municipality. Conceptual approach to the development of the country, from our point of view, must involve a fundamental change in the Russian people. Be held on the transition from a certain stereotype, passively waiting for assistance from the state in a full participant in the process of nation building, the effective owner, responsible citizen and a taxpayer. "
Old songs! "Conceptual approach to the development of the country, from our point of view, must involve a fundamental change in Russia's rights."
How is it tiring! The same for several centuries. Those who can not come to power, suddenly find the need to "radically change the Russian people." Russian man does not want to turn into a docile skotinku in a "responsible" citizen and taxpayer in the hands of various "converters." And it is certainly necessary. That fuss, climb to the summit of power, to once again crowed about the need for radical changes in the Russian people.
Following the approval of the need radical change of the Russian people, Pligin launched into tales of American advertising on equal opportunities, preferring to crawl as far as possible our reality. Where no equal opportunities did not exist and not exist. Where the state only looks as if to serve a major owner in squeezing profits, but to participate in its division.
But surprisingly not that Vladimir Pligin demonstrates narrow-minded view of the state and its role, and that he is the chairman of the State Duma Committee on Constitutional Legislation and State Building.
It really does not fit the officials to think about the remaking of the Russian people, and people on the radical change of government, but how quickly get rid of such converters.
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий