... And collectively reduce!

Topical Archive
  After reading the article by Burtnika "A political party - the collective sovereign" (see "... MOD» № 4, 2000.) Can / should / be concluded: The Communist Party - a "history of the Party," plus all of its members. And all of them, their party activists, as well as all the "party bosses" of the history of this wholly owned. What these things mean? This means that party members to choose their destiny, deciding who or what is more important to them - the story of the party itself, "or, for example, the current" view of the authorities. " In other words "opinion" or "Knowledge" ... From the standpoint of the theory of knowledge "opinion" - a "random thought". The fact is that even if the views of "many", then here is the knowledge / thinking themselves knowing or knowing himself thought / need - on a n about. " Once there is knowledge, then there is the view. But not vice versa: if in the presence of the view that knowledge while there is not necessarily and not always. The view can be either a form of expressing knowledge as it exists in the mirror / Spinoza would have said: in the mode / "many". Or form of its negation. Opinion for the sake of knowledge or opinion rather than knowledge, in other words ... Opinion is non-knowledge that accident could turn out to be ... knowledge! - About this important fact turns the whole history of the party, because it revolves around the same and all human life! And therefore "the opinion of the authorities" - is a verse where it is not necessary, but, so to speak, "foolish" knowledge of fact can be accidentally "be" Already the child knows that the great affair of life is made up of "Znayka", "Dunno" and "his friends". ... Known fact. In 1918 the great Russian philosopher Ivan Il'in published a monograph entitled "Hegel's philosophy as the doctrine of the specificity of God and man." Ilin - political enemy of Bolshevism. The enemy is an honest, principled and open. And because employees Cheka fixing in his speeches, another "contra", knocked at doors Lenin once insistent request: to allow the arrest.

    You can not! - Answered Vladimir Ilyich. - He is the author of the best books on Hegel.
Why then teaches us all this history - Party / he is historical - philosophical / fact? Lenin's prohibition arrest of Hegel scholar Ivan Ilyin could only mean one thing: the Communist Party and Soviet government strongly KNOWLEDGE g of a n d a t a a y e r a non-knowledge. And no way! At first, become the same smart, and only then is arrested - believed Lenin. It is necessary to pick up the 29-second volume of the complete works, to imagine the Leninist reason. On the pages of his "Philosophical Notebooks reader will find the following idea: to know Hegel - is like a king in the head! The king in his head - is when the "absolute" is not confused with the "abstract". When One directs the "many", the opinion is subject knowledge. When the "truth" is told to place and time, instead of "anyhow"! Then it is - the truth, and she is the force that can challenge the very "boss". When knowledge is primary and non-knowledge is secondary. A well-known "specific" is not just another party "conspiracy" against the alleged "bourgeois Absolute", and she is the Absolute Truth is. This often causes Leninism within the Party a terrible headache, a quiet sadness and anger Losers bummer, and then the party members can afford to do without "Philosophical Notebooks" at all. However, Lenin was adamant: it is impossible to understand Marx's Capital is not thoroughly studied in a e R "Logic" of Hegel. And so - his dour conclusion: 50 years after Marx's almost none of the "Marxists" have not figured it out! After all, stupidity in general is deeply bourgeois. And for this reason, Lenin's clever political enemy is nearer and dearer to each other party, especially if the latter - a fool. Both agreed in Russian history "two Ilyina. Ivan Ilyin and AN IL / pen name of Lenin, believing that if the party of friends and a lot, that's true, then - one. However, as soon as knowledge of one, but many believe that not-knowing has never abandoned their attempts to gain the upper hand. -Knowledge - it's just "one of the" opinions. A "right opinion" to have everyone, is not it? - As a "party democracy", it insisted. That is not-knowing. Lenin was always around a lot of fellow members, whose head was crammed with philosophical positivism okroshka / ie, anti-Hegelianism /, but he endured and appreciated them for their working ability and diligence. "The party property" - he styled them then. But as soon Ilyich turn, as a reserve of personal loyalty faded away and the zealots of party discipline forget that unity in the party exists p and q and knowledge, not instead of him. And then, on behalf of the party makes an attempt to have the most truth. A final criterion is the opinion partnachalstva, ie arbitrariness. After all, "according to the ordinance" is what you want? " What a clever anti-Communist, much kommunistichnee stupid partkommunista Party says if it contradicts with life turns into a contradiction with the very other. A crisis occurs. If it proclaims the care of "discipline" and "unity" is not for the sake of truth, but instead, it was then and there so-called "Communist multiparty system." Her motto is: give unity, and the theory then! Instead, there is another successful party-building intrigue "Dunno and his friends." It is known, for example, as a perpetual passion Menshevism ride party. Pitting one another that the freedom of opinion and discipline, partdistsiplinu and truth. After all, the Mensheviks - this is the "non-partisanship znaek! Special kind of party non-znaek - is Trotskyism. Demand from the Communist Party Unity / ie obedience / "on the other side" of truth - his favorite technique. Say, the difference between truth and error - this is your hour and a t n e of the case and you are my friend, Nute ka orders from a superior without talking poispolnyayte, yes partdistsiplinu we all demonstrate ... Head of Trotskyism is sometimes so strong that it sometimes happened conceded even by Lenin. So in 1922 he was in favor of "party members instead of the truth" has consented to the shipment from Russia of the famous "philosophical steamer. On board was congenial, and VI Lenin, Ivan Ilyin ... Even earlier, a bloodbath took place at the Don and Kuban, known today as "Cossacks which. In January 1919 it was launched in the absence of Lenin, Sverdlov. And in April this year terminated by Lenin in the absence of Sverdlov. Trotskyism has its own specific epistemology that provides him with no party building in the King's Head. Her name - sociology. Sociology instead of socialism is conceptually provided a substitute for the so-called dialectical logic sociology, said that, and V. Burtnik. He categorically (Trotskyism) truth substitute "universal significance". Correctness rather than truth - its motto is victorious! Leninism in the party have to struggle not only against those who deny the King in the head, but also those who recognize it. Monarchism, for example. Here we touch completely misunderstood fact of biography, which is called: "Lenin and the Tsar. For Lenin - Bolshevik / as, indeed, to Pushkin! / Wicked king is not for reasons of "tsarist", but because the powers of the monarchy / mono and archai means "unity of the One," ie, perfect unity, a unity without flaws / used in the mode of Evil-use. / With such a position is consistent and monarchist Ivan Ilyin. Mont arhiya promises truth in its unity, and the monarch gives his misuse of unity for a single truth. Truth for all. Knowledge of the misuse of knowledge - is the essence of Bolshevism in its historical dispute with tsarism. Tsarism itself / ie as a principle of epistemology! / Lenin not repelled. Do not want a king over them - Have the king in his head. If the same without you-head - a common tolerance king over themselves. Incidentally, the Mensheviks epistemologically equally alien and hostile to both Leninism and the tsarist government. In tsarist times irritated him the idea of ​​autocracy and of Bolshevism, he is angry at the autocracy of thought. Since the turn of the issue certainly agree Marx and Hegel, Plato and Lenin, Aristotle and Engels, Stalin, and Socrates, Plekhanov and Spinoza. Why not? Yes, because "the history of the Party" and "History of Philosophy" - are not two "different things, but essentially on a n a. Her name in the language of science - Sophio-Gonia and Sophio-genesis. That is, the movement of world wisdom in world history. Only once taken as "a thinking thing", and other times - as a "mental activity". Epistemological argument to the party's history, as well as partargument in the theory of knowledge is so important, they reach the full identity, turning often to the "same". Why? And because the very Communist Party of Lenin, there are people gathered around common for them / and because of that single / thoughts. And the credibility of this idea turned into a force of party discipline. Physical force, in other words. That is why the party chief, holding command on behalf of the Truth is a thought / theory, and leaves "for later", is a bitter laugh. Or tragedy. It is similar to that monkey that climbs higher, the more visible its red ... shame. ... Referring to the realities of the present day, we must admit: a sharp clash in the party press and Shenin Bindyukova is not elucidate the relationship between error and truth. This - the clash between illusion and delusion. If true, all of the time of the dispute "in brackets. Such is the "algebra" ... Did not establish the cause of the contradiction between the Communist Party and the life of one of them offers: you've porukovodil no-life party - let me now. -Who are you? - Meet him. - From which it follows that your "Leninism" is better than mine? Modest ought to be! From a note: in fact, change the anemic one to another, instead of opening all the shutters of the party at home for living life - not reason. Concluding the analysis, we note: on the way to overcome the private ownership of the party's "party bosses" orthodox Marxism indicates one antidote - the working class itself. Reason is clear: Body class can not make the class - in your own body differently, as having the advantage of Theories in front of him. Indeed, from the standpoint of the ancient Greek language, "theory" and "Theos" - this is stuff that related to its very-very close ... But if classical Marxism could be called "orthodox", here is an orthodox Marxism "true" is not necessarily and not always! So, on a b u e m for them the path of life (to the truth and the working class in their unity), Marx and Engels concluded: WORKING - discord! It is one thing - Joseph Dietzgen and quite another - Wilhelm Weitling, for example. If the first lived on the principle: the truth - the working class - the truth ... here's the second - on the contrary: the working class - the truth - the working class with her favorite, headed ... Not accidentally Dietzgen admired both of them (and Lenin in particular!) As a proletarian classic of world philosophy. And about Weitling Marx, as we know, with anger said: ignorance has never helped nobody!
*** *** *** ***
Article V. Burtnika called "political party - a collective sovereign." Our own response to it - "... And the collective Socrates!". And here's why. "Sovereign" party styled by Antonio Gramsci in his famous Prison Notebooks. About collectively reduce, as a way of organizing society, Micah. Lifshitz, wrote in his book "In the world of aesthetics." The fact that it - the same thing we said as we could. It remains to add that Gramsci and Lifshitz - both outstanding Marxist thinkers of the XX century. The members of the party group, which is the golden fund of world worker, communist and national - liberation movement. The members of the partyacheyki which, according to the covenant Illich, formed by the autocracy of Thought, in the fight against under-think. Anyone! Including the "favorite", "general common", "prescribed" and "authorization." Including with stupidity ... with about a and m Life is eloquent testimony: While we are there with you all n and m of n e r a e a t! But why? And because this cell is not only a "party funds", "Charter" and "party bosses. Partyacheyka this even after all ... with the King in the head!
2000 Valery Molchanov, PhD
First published. (To refuse to publish: A / Chief Editor Well. "... Ism" VF Gryzlov, B / Glavred newspaper "Echo of the day" GF Viktorov.) TOTAL - news! To a question about the consequences, please see "POLITUCHEBA:

    Kazakov. "Lament for Engels.
    VA Molchanov, "How can we revive the pioneer movement in contemporary Russia:" The mind - your leader! "