Aggravation of the socio-economic situation in the country, and the explicit power crisis, exacerbated the public's attention not only to the issues of the day, but also to the period of formation of government, to the 90-th years of last century. Therefore, the cohort of politicians who are the heirs of the reformers of the time, and they Ministering writers today and try to imagine the historical event as a heroic struggle for a bright future of Russia. A stripping of state property, as the only possible way out of crisis.
Here's how to light the events columnist for Izvestia, Alexander Archangel, defend Gaidar and his supporters: "... if not the economic determination young reformers, impoverished countries would have died an agonizing death of starvation, would be ravaged by itself."
And further, to present the horror end of the Soviet Union, Archangel quotes from the lecture Gaidar, read about the release of his book, "The Death of Empire:" The lecture interesting, with quotations from the minutes of the meetings of the Politburo, with graphs and charts. The story itself even more interesting: how the Soviet Union had forgotten how to grow corn for its procurement "hooked on oil needle, but was unable to get off, with the collapse of the oil market in 1986 is not prepared and was very surprised when the collapse still occurred. Along the way the Soviet Union got into the maze of oil and gas pricing, use anyone, even terrorists to maintain high prices. "
Who can deny the power crisis the party and economic nomenklatura in the Soviet Union? But, because it is not about how to strive to provide Archangel and Gaidar. Bringing the country to collapse, the top Communist Party sought to retain power and to preserve it at any price. Here is when warning in advance young reformers who proposed to give the party-economic range of state property, and people give meaningless piece of paper - vouchers. Accumulated same people money to depreciate, making him a beggar, and thereby make it work for new owners.
Not forgotten how farmers grow wheat, as it wished to submit Gaidar and his ilk, and the grain mafia when the Communist Party, as wrote in his memoirs, and Yakovlev, put the country in such conditions. Purchasing wheat in Canada, at fantastic prices, and they got to this trade is enormous fat. They did everything possible to grow corn in his country was not favorable. But young reformers to justify themselves, to submit all so that it farms were unable to provide the country with grain.
"And then - dead-end political economy - continues to impose its interpretation of the history of Arkhangelsk. - Dvadtsatimilliardnaya hole in the budget to buy grain than that, to maintain artificially low prices for raw materials within the Eastern bloc is impossible, and that change whatsoever in the device of the system fails: the ruling class is decidedly not ready. "
You can tell by listening to the Archangel, a hopeless situation. Hopeless, in the sense that an exit was not satisfied with the very power, because it was necessary to share power with the people and property, and that they did not want to. And therefore attracted Gaidar, Chubais and others to help reformat relationship with conservation authorities in the same kpeesesovskih brokers.
Today, they argue that saved the country, but in reality only pushed the crash, drove the disease even further. That today and found out.
"To argue so unfashionable today - flirtatious says Archangel. - Agreed today to date the collapse of the Soviet Union on Dec. 8, 1991, to call it in the best case Byelovezhskaya collusion, at worst, a major geopolitical disaster of the 20 th century, to yearn for the days of equitable distribution, (Again, a lie! "There is no equitable distribution in the USSR and was not ...) to talk about unsolved advantages of socialist system, the lost delayed restructuring. But the story has little interest in fashion (although the fashion, including intellectual, our own history). She is interested in facts and estimates made on the basis of knowledge of the facts. "
Therefore, the Archangel and Gaidar and juggling of the facts involved, wanting to present them in a favorable form for ourselves. Therefore, to pile one lie to another, being in her captivity. Therefore, even today's crisis oligarchs bureaucratic power Archangel wants to submit, not as a result of the conversion of 90-ies, when the current government was formed, and as a result of high oil prices.
"Today, political power, is again on top of the pyramid of oil, behave much smarter than acted their communist predecessors. Economic lessons from the collapse of the Soviet Union, undoubtedly made, and there is stabilization fund, there is a market, is the ability to refuse unreasonable requests for social - even if today is extra money available. "
The main achievement of the past reforms, the Arkhangelsk - is the presence of the Stabilization Fund and the market, and that during this period, Russia's population declined by 15 million, which many lives Porush, that the country has experienced not one war that has not yet reached the pre-reform level of production and life, it does not matter.
They are important, as becomes clear from all the arguments of Arkhangelsk, the people did not understand the whole essence of what happened, and asked the young reformers, for crimes against the people.
"Well as life, lurching to the right, swing to the left? Then what? "- With obvious dismay, asks Archangel.
Then ask.
Vitaly Glukhov
28.09.2006, the
Here's how to light the events columnist for Izvestia, Alexander Archangel, defend Gaidar and his supporters: "... if not the economic determination young reformers, impoverished countries would have died an agonizing death of starvation, would be ravaged by itself."
And further, to present the horror end of the Soviet Union, Archangel quotes from the lecture Gaidar, read about the release of his book, "The Death of Empire:" The lecture interesting, with quotations from the minutes of the meetings of the Politburo, with graphs and charts. The story itself even more interesting: how the Soviet Union had forgotten how to grow corn for its procurement "hooked on oil needle, but was unable to get off, with the collapse of the oil market in 1986 is not prepared and was very surprised when the collapse still occurred. Along the way the Soviet Union got into the maze of oil and gas pricing, use anyone, even terrorists to maintain high prices. "
Who can deny the power crisis the party and economic nomenklatura in the Soviet Union? But, because it is not about how to strive to provide Archangel and Gaidar. Bringing the country to collapse, the top Communist Party sought to retain power and to preserve it at any price. Here is when warning in advance young reformers who proposed to give the party-economic range of state property, and people give meaningless piece of paper - vouchers. Accumulated same people money to depreciate, making him a beggar, and thereby make it work for new owners.
Not forgotten how farmers grow wheat, as it wished to submit Gaidar and his ilk, and the grain mafia when the Communist Party, as wrote in his memoirs, and Yakovlev, put the country in such conditions. Purchasing wheat in Canada, at fantastic prices, and they got to this trade is enormous fat. They did everything possible to grow corn in his country was not favorable. But young reformers to justify themselves, to submit all so that it farms were unable to provide the country with grain.
"And then - dead-end political economy - continues to impose its interpretation of the history of Arkhangelsk. - Dvadtsatimilliardnaya hole in the budget to buy grain than that, to maintain artificially low prices for raw materials within the Eastern bloc is impossible, and that change whatsoever in the device of the system fails: the ruling class is decidedly not ready. "
You can tell by listening to the Archangel, a hopeless situation. Hopeless, in the sense that an exit was not satisfied with the very power, because it was necessary to share power with the people and property, and that they did not want to. And therefore attracted Gaidar, Chubais and others to help reformat relationship with conservation authorities in the same kpeesesovskih brokers.
Today, they argue that saved the country, but in reality only pushed the crash, drove the disease even further. That today and found out.
"To argue so unfashionable today - flirtatious says Archangel. - Agreed today to date the collapse of the Soviet Union on Dec. 8, 1991, to call it in the best case Byelovezhskaya collusion, at worst, a major geopolitical disaster of the 20 th century, to yearn for the days of equitable distribution, (Again, a lie! "There is no equitable distribution in the USSR and was not ...) to talk about unsolved advantages of socialist system, the lost delayed restructuring. But the story has little interest in fashion (although the fashion, including intellectual, our own history). She is interested in facts and estimates made on the basis of knowledge of the facts. "
Therefore, the Archangel and Gaidar and juggling of the facts involved, wanting to present them in a favorable form for ourselves. Therefore, to pile one lie to another, being in her captivity. Therefore, even today's crisis oligarchs bureaucratic power Archangel wants to submit, not as a result of the conversion of 90-ies, when the current government was formed, and as a result of high oil prices.
"Today, political power, is again on top of the pyramid of oil, behave much smarter than acted their communist predecessors. Economic lessons from the collapse of the Soviet Union, undoubtedly made, and there is stabilization fund, there is a market, is the ability to refuse unreasonable requests for social - even if today is extra money available. "
The main achievement of the past reforms, the Arkhangelsk - is the presence of the Stabilization Fund and the market, and that during this period, Russia's population declined by 15 million, which many lives Porush, that the country has experienced not one war that has not yet reached the pre-reform level of production and life, it does not matter.
They are important, as becomes clear from all the arguments of Arkhangelsk, the people did not understand the whole essence of what happened, and asked the young reformers, for crimes against the people.
"Well as life, lurching to the right, swing to the left? Then what? "- With obvious dismay, asks Archangel.
Then ask.
Vitaly Glukhov
28.09.2006, the
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий