Casual workers Part II

   AfghanistanKurginyan rightly indignant when some "expert" said that in 1999, prior to entering NATO troops to Afghanistan produced 4,500 tons there narkoshi, and today 6,200 tons.Math. In Perm is brought 10 tons annually narkoshi. Ie Russia accounts for roughly 1,000 tons. 1 billion people on the planet roughly - 10 000 tonnes. Where will deliver narkoshi Colombia Medellin cartel, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan, and all those who are driving the world synthetic narkoshi? In China? After all, Russia is ahead of Europe and, especially, Africa narkoshi consumption at times (with the exception of Amsterdam, of course). Ie "Expert" turned down again in the times? But he did not say what kind of drugs produces Afgan. We can assume that opium. And if you make him heroin, it turns out I do not remember, not that 1 kg, then 10 kg from 100 kg.

In addition, after the troops of NATO narkoshi production in Afghanistan has increased again at times, and the delivery was refocused the U.S. secret services, with a focus on Russia.But even if we accept the view Mlechin Soviet invasion in no way affected the import narkoshi to Russia. This entry is 100% due to the fact, explains one of the leaders of the Society of sobriety (I know, as now called former VDOBT) Zhdanov, in Russia are freely traded dollar. Who strenuously advocated Mlechin and others. Dollars in the world does not need, we need dollars.But how sputtered Mlechin suffering for 30 thousand die each year from narkoshi. Not that two, not six million drug addicts in Russia, the poor, the poor, exclaiming liberal Democrat. In fact - twice, it's just registered. But where was Leon when antiprohibitionist Novodvorskaya and Debrianskaia rustled freedom narkoshi consumption? And who was making the minimum dose allowed for storage? Such as Mlechin. (Thanks Mikhailov, she canceled.)And sprinkled Mlechin righteous saliva when he denounced the USSR invaded "by force" barbaric to trample poor Afghans.I do not know, I do not know. You see. Kurginyan pulled into the light version of an Islamic invasion. Extends this version is not a pan-Turkism, and from Khartoum to Islaminterna. Growth spurt Islam did not begin with the entry of Soviet troops to Afghanistan, and with the collapse of the Soviet Union. Helped by such figures as Mlechin.Actually there is, and has long, very different version of events - that the CIA into an invasion of the USSR, creating the myth that Amin inclined break it off with the Soviet Union and make friends with the U.S.. And then - the base in Afghanistan, reducing flight time cruise missile and, accordingly, a sharp increase in spending on defense of the USSR.
But the poignancy of the situation is that the accused Soviet defense resents the invasion many years after those troops withdrawn. And now in Afghanistan - NATO troops. To barbaric force to invade Iraq, the Yankees used the myth of the Chemical Weapons Convention. To invade an independent Yugoslavia, came up with the myth of ethnic cleansing. And who remembers what they come to invade Afgan? So just took, invaded. Bin Laden allegedly hiding there. Hussein found Bin Laden - no! And, as reported by the TV, the American soldiers killed Afghan civilians. For fun.
One here is helpful to understand: the Yankees are trying to impose liberal democracy in underdeveloped Muslim countries. Have not yet passed certain stages of development. Our "communist" parties also believe that backward Russia could "build" socialism. Striking similarities.
In general, "the Court Time" on Channel 5 - some ignorant, talentless orgy, powdered exclaim.The more Kurginyan showing off its intelligence, the less his faith. Then allow to approach Hegel and Kant, bryaknet that predicted the collapse of the USSR, and for six years before him, the great, did Countess Panin. Looks like countess was both a sociologist, economist, historian, in one person, to make such forecasts. I recall that the Soviet collapse was a surprise even for the CIA. While it predicted by Leon Trotsky - on the basis of international relations, developed because of Stalin's policies. And in the 50's did the same thing a few Soviet political economy, based on economic reasons.In fact Kurginyan made no predictions. He only repeated what was contained in the propaganda of the West for the dismemberment of the USSR and drummed into the mass consciousness of every mouth "agents of influence." In 1988, a member of the Democratic Union of the Permian Sergei Bychenkov before traveling to the United States told me his own "forecast", "The Soviet Union will break up."But Kurginyan, wiser about how is this population could be attributed to Mikhail Gorbachev's anti-alcohol campaign, was simply not able to see those springs that pushed the last General Secretary for such an unpopular step. And it's so easy.
Sounded even from some "expert" that a third of the budget of the USSR were proceeds from the sale of alcohol. Well, well. First, it was necessary to change the means of money shovels machines, tractors on the aircraft, and consumer goods were estimated based on the fact that the work, say, in Perm received only 7 - 13 kopecks. the ruble value produced. Second, imagine that if the budget was just out of the money received from the sale of consumer goods, the average Soviet citizen would have to spend a third of earnings on vodka. But he also put off by the book! Ie the "expert" is a clear lime.
Go ahead, laugh at the "logic" of Leni Mlechin when it is not in the subject keeps saying that, well, how could it be taken in the Soviet system, a positive decision, they say, even a positive decision or is doomed to failure, or will cause a large negative - something like that. It is clear that the task of Lenny - as often as possible to say that by self-latches of Nizhny Tagil. But the point is that the denial of this system - modern Russia broken, and there is still much devastation. Mlechin its achieved. Still, like a broken record, is still firmly of the "system." And if so, for what he did to somehow justify the devastation, so who are in such a "justification" believe. So, it is natural that the United States criticized the "system" in the USSR - Mlechin mouth. Quite naturally, the Soviet system in the U.S. scolds - Kurginyan mouth. Nothing personal, they are absolutely equal. Almost. Mlechin little more human. For even if a woman takes a positive decision - to give birth, and it happens in a terrible system in the USSR, the required extremely negative consequences. On the example Mlechin is clearly visible. As to the United States - similar case excluded. Quoting Tocqueville, in the U.S. - complete freedom of speech! Its absence leads to absolute despotism. Even the Spanish Inquisition was not possible to ensure that the country has not published the book, accuse the official religion. U.S. authorities have more to destroy the very idea of ​​society is to print them. Oho-ho ...
Now about Svanidze. I think that Alexander Ostrovsky - Orwell is Alexandrovsk-Nicholas of Russia. In the play "The Wise Man Stumbles" tells the tale of the hanger Manefa barynke stupid. One of them was a dystopia! There is a country, says Manefa where all the judges - the unrighteous. And say: "Judge me, unjust judge!" Svanidze arranged as arranged all the Russian court. And there is a country where people - with dogs' heads. That's it.No, there are Svanidze enlightenment. October 9 he "discovered" the sixties, who found a dramatic difference in the positions of Lenin and Stalin in the first place - on agriculture, collectivization, etc. Hmm ... With these dramatic differences, as well as clarify the Marxist position of Stalin and began our union and More Prorva small Marxist organizations in the country. Some Andrei Sakharov, who was invited to the transfer, reported that the group of the CPSU-ovskih intellectuals, Yegor Gaidar, Otto Latsis, Fedor Burlatsky, Len Karpinsky conceived to produce underground Leninist journal, however, a way out, though with some deviations from officialdom, but were "sterile."Imagine that such a Committee, if it involved intellectuals Yegor Gaidar and Otto Latsis.At the time I was a graduate student at Moscow State University, and then in 1985, not in 1986, we, the Moscow branch of the Communist League, a law student brought Gaidar articles mentioned by the transfer of sugars. He offered to work together - in the direction of the collapse of the Communist Party from the inside. The articles were not that sterile - from them exuded old-fashioned Communist Party, and most importantly, they lacked and Leninism and Marxism. They were primitive. We refused and got rid of the meetings with the law student. It is significant that the student was able to do something to get us, because we were underground, to our actual legalization in an election year in local government was still far away, and about our existence is known only KGB (one of our, Sergei Mazein called in interrogations in Perm, Moscow - Korableva). This means that all of Gaidar and liberal democracy were already in the elite of the Communist Party, and planted for the elite of the CPSU.
Mlechin Party bases its assertion on the fact that his campaign Gorbachev 1) saved the lives of 1.2 million people., 2) alcohol - first cause high mortality.Here Mlechin simultaneously trying to solve the problem of justification of the Yeltsin-Putin-Medvedev, during the rule where mortality is three times the birth rate. Like, not their fault, and the thrust of the Russian peasant to vodka.Actually cause high mortality in the mid 90's and to this day - the so-called reforms, to be exact - in the collapse of the economy, which encouraged those like Mlechin. This is only an idiot would not be clear.Second, any alteration, either today alcoholism is not on the first place in the list of causes of death. At the 1st - cardiovascular disease, alcoholism - somewhere on the 6th place. Therefore, no millions Gorby could save his campaign. The calculation of an "expert" - lime. By the way, a shot of brandy can save you from a heart attack, and the vodka cleans the blood vessels and intestines. But the fact that the ban has increased the number of criminal groups that growth brewing, the use of surrogates (toothpaste, shoe polish, counterfeit vodka, etc.) have taken the lives of many, the very idea of ​​fighting alcoholism was vulgarized - this is undoubtedly the merit of the hump. But it was not a "public relations" or a political mistake! Especially, some "first nail", about who cried Kurginyan.
So, about the springs. In the USSR, the General Secretary is not changing the president anywhere. It is always informative underground explosion, it calls out to the Kremlin in conversations in the kitchen, and from there just to talk on the squares. When Andropov came to power, the first thing he said he came to these conversations. Like, there appeared any talkers, who give their personal opinion for the opinion of the people. Therefore - the window seal, blindfolded, on the battle with the dragon only to learn from the messages dragon government. For no one has the right to tell the truth, the ruling elite. Supreme mullah can be only one!Anti-alcohol campaign began not Gorbachev. History passed Kurginyan and Mlechin, and all those who pose as experts. The first - in the early 80s - were "non-drinkers": surgeon Corners, Novosibirsk Merzlyakov mathematician, physicist, Zhdanov and others in Perm temperance society created brother NSU Rector biologist Alexey Nakoryakov. These people - ten goals higher than the agitators and propagandists of the CPSU under Stalin - Gorbachev. When Zhdanov lectured in factories, workers, standing, after the change, listened with bated breath. He gave the information obtained from the analysis of national publications. But not only - more on that below.Lectures Uglova, Zhdanov Merzlyakov and printed local computer - it was the country's first mass samizdat. Clear why Permian Party Committee banned Zhdanov speak publicly - to a lecture on alcoholism put tupenkih obkomovtsev Kopysova and Sobolev spaces. Even "non-drinkers" of the mid 80's competent, above the head of all those gathered in the studio of Channel 5, with some sort of kurginyanov Mlechin.By "non-drinkers" belonged writer Astafyev. Another writer, Nathan Adelman, did, to say the least, unethical, publishing - in samizdat same - his correspondence with him. In correspondence Astafiev - to the position of Russian chauvinist, anti-Semitic, and Adelman otschelkivaet his nose. In the anti-Semitic vein wrote Merzlyakov. In 1986 was published the 1st collection of materials underground GPA - "all-day" (1986 with the League of Communists in 1990 - politobedineniya "Work"). In addition to articles on the topic of the Soviets, the program and others in the book under the pseudonym - two of my articles on the subject of alcohol with criticism-Union Voluntary Society for the struggle for sobriety (VDOBT), including "How to Novosibirsk explains drunkenness." Materials distributed in Arkhangelsk, Murmansk, Tomsk, Leningrad, Ordzhonikidze, Naberezhnye Chelny and other cities. In Dobryanka Perm region discussed them at a meeting of the labor collective power plant. Resolved: to approve the ... In Moscow, our materials were, perhaps, only Sasha Shubin.In particular, the article pointed out that the prohibition in the Soviet Union lifted gradually, first in 1923, when Lenin could not argue - have allowed 30-degree drinks. Then Stalin explained resolution 40-degree vodka like this: one could take a loan from the bourgeoisie. But in doing so put the country dependent on foreign capital. We'll have to take this step, how to take his own people.But after that, there was a set temperance fanatics, who successfully prevented replenish the budget, and that Stalin had not yet entered into force, to strangle them.
In the 80's the source of anti-Semitism "abstainers" were - including - books CIA Klimov. Remember Kurginyan KEEP conspirological something there that, well, the CIA in awe watching the anti-alcohol campaign?But the reaction to the opus Klimov Permian geographer and journalist Vitaly Alexandrov: "After reading Klimova I began to see the world through different eyes." Perm chemist, writer and monarchist Alexander Lavrinsky "Klimov - CIA? Well, what he says is the truth, because there is in the nature of female witches. "That is, the effect was noticeable Klimov. This is - for intellectuals, and for people easier - Andrew Wild and others.Note: and Lavrinsky and Nakoryakov - monarchists, both anti-Semites "by Klimov," both hate Lenin, Stalin worship and hate the Yankees. All VDOBT - for Stalin: "Stalin passed a sober country.". Russophiles Vasiliev, Shafarevich, Kunyaev, Glazunov, everyone gathered around the company "Memory" - not "from Klimov," homegrown, too, can not stand the Yankees and adored Stalin. "Memory" is supported by the KGB. Does it not seem strange to the reader that the interests of the KGB (the Communist Party elite) coincide with the interests of the CIA?Curiously, as I have a relationship to the anti-Semite Astafyev among dissidents, and then the Liberal Democrats. In the 80's, they took up arms against him, but when he began to blacken the feat of the Red Army in World War II, we loved it. The wife of one of the leaders of the Permian Memorial Tatiana Kursina immediately dug in the region some unsold dachku Astafieva and severe frost in Siberia went to the funeral, "countryman."
The ratio of "temperance" to "Memory" cool. Nakoryakov says: "Went once to Vasilyev. Not impressed me. Something about the "memory" is not right ... "You bet, you bet ...
But "non-drinkers, and have become the spring that pushed Gorbachev to anti-alcohol campaign. For the first commandment of any authority states: "In order to suppress the need to lead." Although the performance of "good intentions sobering population" was disgusting (besides natural restrictive measures did not prevent the occurrence of crime and gave vodka promotion at the mercy of the All-corrupt unions, certain Akimov) , VDOBT up to now disappeared from the political scene, although Zhdanov still travels to cities, and cities are still going to numerically small "non-drinkers."Gorbachev today, when the situation changed completely, can say anything, but due to market conditions - for Gorby natural to talk about the error.
Trotsky as an alternative to Stalin.Position Kurginyan Trotsky would be "worse", although Stalin borrowed the industrialization program was Trotsky - top logic. While Trotsky supposedly fuck with British intelligence (adherent Klimov would add that to the Gestapo).Position Mlechin Trotsky would have been better.Imagine Tusneem left Moscow - on the side of the liberals on the side Mlechin! Here and Misha Voeikov, and Serebryakov, and Kurenyshev. Well, among liberals - a decent place for them.And you know what made our "socialist" in the arms of Mlechin? Objective factor: they do not appear on TV. There is a subjective factor.In Russia, there are not only rich in oil and gas. Not just being gay. There are scientists gay. Ruso. Russian scientists - listen to the name! - Socialist orientation. Voeikov, Kurenyshev near them gone. They hang around the magazine "Alternative" Buzgalin consider themselves socialists. So: there kurginyanskaya get-together, but there is buzgalinskaya, they do not digest each other.
MGO views, granddaughter of the outstanding party leader, destroyed by Stalin and Serebryakova Kurenysheva close to the views Buzgalin, mutant socialist and former member of the Communist Party Marxist platform. Buzgalin believed that the Soviet Union was still-socialism, but mutated. What - is unknown, with two heads, or something, or with fused legs? (In Perm there philosopher Orlov, a member of the Communist Party. He says similar words: in the Soviet Union was a deformed socialism. But if a little warped - so why call names, do not be ideal, the standard of socialism. And if a lot - so this is not socialism. How such a simple idea can not get to the head of the Socialist deformed?) Kurenyshev once told me that the factory where he worked, working once been telling the director, as well as what to do. Here, they Kurenyshev it is the dictatorship of the proletariat! Kurenyshev not agree that the USSR was socialism. He believes that socialism in the USSR was not (a power of the party), but it was the dictatorship of the proletariat. In the form of the dictatorship of the party.EIF also believes that was a dictatorship, but it was not the Soviet government. And there was socialism. Trotskyists believe that there was neither the first nor the second nor the third, and was a "degenerated workers' state." How degenerated. A lot of you, you never know what degenerated (mutated strain), Trotskyists silent as guerrillas. Kurenyshev had also thought that the Soviet Union was a degenerated workers' state. Voeikov, professor of the Institute of Economics, it seems, was not deformed, not mutated socialist. In any case, once in Moscow, he Spartacists (most stupid Trotskyists from the U.S.) poured soul: "I have learned that Trotsky was not only a great politician, but also a great political economist!"All invitees were noisy, "What do you mean socialism!" Mlechin they assented: "Of course, of course, no socialism ..." But he did not forget to kick the dead lion.Great is the power of Russian language. Powerful or great. Lenin said that Russia - a weak link in the chain of imperialism, break it - and will break the world revolution. Mlechin said almost the same thing, just a little different: all the activities of Lenin - to foment world revolution, all of Russia should lay down his life to blossom world revolution. Hmm, so they say - blood and milk, but just try to say, "milk with blood." But almost the same! And again Mlechin fervently screaming off topic transmission: yes, latches, latches by self ...
With MGO we understand, but what made liberal Mlechin sigh about the Bolshevik Trotsky? And what made Svanidze remember the sixties, is opposed Lenin to Stalin?Two objective factors: 1) the reaction of the population to the Liberal leadership, the deaf, arrogant, power thieves. As shown by the vote, the hatred of the population is so large that we had to podpryagat culinary college student, who announced the transfer of all just a TV show, they say, everything, as usual, do not pay attention, all bullshit. 2) Support people Stalinism was so great, so Stalin wins against current geeks that liberal Svanidze was forced to pull out weak left opposition power, and when she was not able mumbled, remembered Lenin, who wanted to remove Stalin from the post of general secretary.And the most important task of all Trotskyists crowd called for self-determination first in Bosnia and then in Kosovo and thus cleared the way for NATO. All together - against the self-determination of Abkhazia, South Ossetia and Transnistria. Even the most close to the French workers' Lute Ouvriere "(" Workers Struggle "), does not position itself as an" international "against Transnistria, they say, is in the interests of Russia. All Trotskyists crowd rejoiced when the Ukraine was the "orange revolution" orchestrated by the U.S. State Department money.10/10/2010