Part IV of the favorites

   Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact.Figuring out whether the king was progressive in this case or not.Narochnitskaya honed formulation (which, incidentally, hated the Bolsheviks): Mythology and the Covenant - a means to balance the country was attacked, with a country that was attacked, Stalin and Hitler. And, to add to justify delaying the opening of a second front, and then - taking Helena to serve in NATO, Muller - the CIA, etc.It seems that everything is clear, and the words are no longer required. But Mlechin began yelling that is stamped on his brain-Western agitators propagandists: they say, because it is clear that the Covenant - the wickedness that he hastened the approach of war, that he freed the hands of Hitler to attack Poland, and - listen up! - If not the pact, Hitler would attack France.Some bullshit. How can we say that the Covenant brought Hitler's invasion of Poland, if the Soviet Union did not give Hitler to take it all? And France, that France - the contract with Poland - declared war on Germany. In general, the continuation of the Covenant - cries Mlechin scored ridiculous, not worth attention.12. 10.2010

Covenant-2Narochnitskaya not miss the chance to remember the latches from Nizhny Tagil - "terribly revolutionary Projects." Well, at least to understand the issues. But look at how to run a "fool" Svanidze, when it became clear that the Covenant mlechintsy lost, he said that "the experts can not come to an agreement" and therefore talk about morality. Pact - is immoral. How can you be friends with this monster from next door, yelled Mlechin. And as you can hire the service of Otto Skorzeny? A bomb Kindergartens Belgrade (photos distributed around the world)? After all, what is interesting: the international criminality sure to hang a humanistic bow. Livnoskaya war? Strengthening of the state! The invasion of Iraq? - A chemical weapons! Texas? - Very, very criminal situation without gringos can not do it ... Czechoslovakia? - Poor, poor Sudeten Germans, groaning under the heel and demanding self-determination. Even after the collapse of the USSR has not replaced by the phrase phrases naked force. It's interesting, is not it.In short, Svanidze rasstaralsya crush conversation, swing theme. But where did he sum up, dug up, that the Munich Agreement recognized by the participants as a "mistake" that they should repent, but did not cease to respect themselves, and that this included in school textbooks?1) You may think that Munich - only a few unfortunate spot, and sharks of imperialism and white and fluffy. No, the Americans just have to hire Kurginyan then all their brutality, all the aggression he clearly explains some necessity or prirastaniem something. Why, the whole history of the world - completely barbaric, primeval barbarism, while the Supreme Leader, who headed the barbarity, are called great!Of course, the stories were bright spots: the Paris Commune, Bulavin (until now the whole country is happy singing "As for Black Jaro ..."), Basil Us, Razin, Bolotnikov, the October Revolution. And even in the history of the United States when they abolished slavery in the war, when on the sidelines down fascism in the liberation war.2) In fact, the Munich Agreement topic appeared in the Russian media only after the entire country to the subtleties of the book examined the Mukhina "outrageous villainy."3) Let Svanidze show at least one Western textbook, so it said the word "conspiracy." Why in American textbooks write that the major winners in the 2nd world was the United States. In French - which won the battle of Borodino, Napoleon. And at the time of the Napoleonic invasion and the Berezina was the overwhelming superiority of Russian forces, see, eg., "History of the XIX century. Napoleon's time, "edited by Professors Lavisse and Rambo.By the way, we also try to minimize the role of Kutuzov, even his personality and also lied about the advantage. Nothing Svanidze reservation that it is his opinion. It's not his opinion. This American opinion. As if it was not true, and Svanidze Mlechin be foaming at the mouth to protect him and sputter. Well, they play on the side of a potential enemy, they are pro-American, with all clear, they are citizens of the United States, not Russia, they are foreigners. But here's what.
With the board removed the queen of one player, left his queen potential enemy - Svanidze in place leading! So who holds the power in Russia? More precisely, what country holds power in Russia?So, coming back to Ivan the Terrible, recall Pushkin (or Rozanov, Chaadaev, Lermontov, and others): "I am full of contempt for the nation. But I would be annoyed if the foreigner share with me the feeling. "13/10/2010
Peter IThe Department's own security MIA made a legislative initiative on the introduction of rules, which states that a police officer is a person of integrity, and its requirements - mandatory. Head of Department Yuri Draguntsov believes that resistance to police and rudeness at her not punishable by law. Because article 317 of the Criminal Code protects the policeman only attempt on his life. But there is art. 318 - the responsibility for the use of violence against a government representative. And Art. 319 - responsible for the offense.In respect of other trash - art. 130 of the Criminal Code - all the same responsibility for the offense. Why then art. 319? And how! After all, there is trash, and is - hoo! White people are judged by the standards of ordinary people just not right.In the U.S., too, before the white men were considered above. True, White has been flaws, its disadvantages in the treatment of blacks. But there were advantages - otherwise I would not fly into space.Generally people are divided into those who can be in the elite, and those who are there can not be. Bastard did not have the same rights as legitimate graphite. The count bone white, and blue blood. Science has found that only 10% of people have a habit of taking responsibility, control, etc. Genetics has shown that the world is divided into those who have the right to wealth (also about 10%), and those who are not able to think in a capitalist, is entrepreneurial. There are Aryans, and there are other trash. Patricians and plebeians, lords and masters to slaves. And you remember, nigger can not play the piano.Eighteen months ago, in Perm Lukoil employee killed his wife - did not want to share in a divorce property. Caused multiple injuries, including a cut. Local examination established that he was sane. But the killer worked in Lukoil, he has blue blood, and bone white. Therefore Serbsky Institute reinstalled, that he was in the heat of passion, and at the same time stress. Incidentally came positive response, this killer at work. The court ruled that the killer is innocent. This is understandable - the rules do not apply to such individuals for ordinary plebeian morality.Anyone doubts about genetics? But even in the dog and that static, dynamic stereotypes inherited! From this we can draw two conclusions. One does all there Marxists. And we are doing the other - those with unworthy genetics - into the abyss.Peter I once walked. Walk yourself not done anything wrong. Suddenly sees - people. And Peter walks. Walk yourself. And there is nothing wrong with that! Suitable asks kindly, they say, who are. Order to keep quiet, fools, dumb pretend. So no. Hermits, they say. This one word was enough to Peter pounced on them and - in the heat of passion - pierced them with his sword. But can you blame the killer? He's the king! He's done so much positive. For history - very difficult. Because people standing on, you can not judge a standing yardstick. It is unhistorical - to judge by the general secretaries of the kings and morality of some sort of workers and peasants.But worse than the president? By what right do people crawl with some morals to Truman, Clinton or Bush?Now let's talk about the benefits of Hitler. Put under the control of large corporations (remember the famous 22 points) gave the work the workers - that's right, and will analyze the history, the facts ...
After hearing such talk Mr. Kurginyan comrades Bolivar, Artigas, Cromwell, Robespierre, Danton, Saint Just, Marat and others howled: "We've got!"Apparently Kurginyan unfamiliar with poetry Nekrasov Nekrasov belonged to the kings of it according to the laws of morality. Here rolled up his sleeves King, picked up a pen ..., signed a decree: "Build!" What a fine fellow. What Nekrasov? "Right dorozhenka, narrow embankment, posts, rails, bridges. And on the side, then all seeds Russian, how many of them, Vanya, do you know? "
Now about the "conduct" of top leaders. Eg., Mukhin disagreed with the wording in the Second World War the victorious people. He compares it to the Second World War 1 st world - not in favor of Nicholas II. That, in pieces, it can, and can be measured. But on a human life? "How did you come up to pass Kiev?" And got Kiev cauldron. And two Kharkov boiler? Military technicians can tell you more, I will mention only the episode with a double armor "destroyed, protects. Here is the dialectic "A crackdown on genetics, quantum mechanics, and even the theory of relativity? Much, much depends on the supreme leader.But I was interested in something else: if we study history from the slope, the villainous character traits, policy or management decisions of genius, we must come to the conclusion that the story is always random, depending on the subject. Kurginyan boasted Hegel, but he did not read it. Hegel, man inconsistent, but in this case, doing the right thing, fighting with such an approach to history.
To determine the place of a king in the story, you need to determine the specific age, which dictates its will to kings. Writes Dashkova: Russia human material is ripe for change. Peter I infinitely bad, mediocre cool with this material.By the way, all the reforms for which praised Peter, in the air, and wanted to spend his enemy Golitsyn.
Narochnitsaya good start that story - it's not saying politicians (although exactly understand history for admission to MGIMO - watched TV show?), But finished for the peace, "History - a document."We laughed a student saying that the class struggle - the engine of history, considering it rude objectivist such nonsense "Darwin needed - Darwin was born" (events far-fetched to the scheme). But here's a small example: in the late 60's in the United States was not only a student movement. But powerful strikes against the conveyor lack of personal responsibility, when labor makes man a monkey. During raspredmechivaniya. This will cause the system to implement nekonveyernye - with lots of productive labor. So the story - a history class, not kings or some sort of general secretaries. Therefore, "the Court of Time" - is not historical investigation (even to me, not a historian, it is seen as the facts are wrong "experts"). It is a farce.10/14/2010
Continuation of "hearings" on Peter I.Major reform, which was the dream Gaidar - how to get to work harder and better worker. First of all, in the service industry and light industry. Personification of the USSR for a liberal - drunk mechanic Uncle Kolya.By this time, the plants, in fact, there was a mess. Perm Plant. Lenin on overtime annually loses 25 million rubles. But it was profitable for the administration. And for the workers. In 1990, the first sugar, then Klochkov FITUR (but it has intimidated), then "Russia's Choice" in the spring called for a general strike hours. Reaction - zero. But the workers, yes they r. Lenin said: "Not under whom do not go, we will go on strike for yourself, please drop us an appeal." Factory Leader - Sasha Zelenin, concurrently head of the district livestock society, more than 600 people. We invite them to come out in the afternoon. The workers declared: "Naive, all work is done before lunch." This saves barracks factory system.That is, in 1990, the party-union belts scrolls, the system becomes ineffective enforcement. Factory daministratsiya discredited inability to organize production. By the end of the 60's in a slogan on a tall building "secret" missile institute "Our work is to you, the Motherland" working the word "you" read the opposite.If Gorbachev spoke of economic incentives (incentive from Greek - stick), then according to Gaidar other means of coercion was to be a competition. But not so much between the plants - especially among the workers. That is, should be the labor market. More precisely - the army of unemployed.Sociologists Vladova and Rabkin warned that studies worldwide show that increasing the labor force leads to atrophy of interest in work (one of them defended the dissertation on refuting the "Program 500 days," and applauded those who pushed this program.) Also, when in the back of hot breath, sell themselves for less and less work will be of high quality. Really - today we have disgusting service sector.In the West, by the way, the same problem. French film "Magnificent": electrician waiting plumber plumber - electrician. Shtatovskih film: Locksmiths rest in a manhole on the road, all traffic stopped. Similarly, employers hung over the problem of drunken and insolent "golden hands."Now for the public, but private toilets. This is very important when discussing the history of Russia. In Perm, I knew only one public toilet - in Gorky Park. Go there it was terrible. But very decent, by Western standards, free toilets were in any DC culture. For 20 kopecks. - In cinemas. Paid to non-visitors - yes - the toilets in the cafe, very decent. Worse - in public canteens. Even worse - on the railway and river stations. According to some "experts seem Burovsky, brand label of the USSR - to write by. Not accustomed to. Scoop out what to do. I assure you that in the West - is not snipers. Once in West Germany on the way to Amsterdam went on a smoke break - toilets are the same as in the Permian Gorky Park. (It's funny, when Kurginyan explains pathological inability to hit the target Russian vast expanses of the country.) Just cleaned more often in the West. By the way, a lady of the French Democratic Confederation of Labour (CFDT), being in Perm, wanted the toilet. I said that we should be patient, there is nothing nearby. To which she replied: "I'm a lowly, can from under a bush."But only the Russian off their shoes when entering the apartment. Because usually wash the floor, and his work is respected. And the floor frequently washed, because in Russia more than in Europe, bathed themselves. For Europe, writes compiler Bushkov, destroyed their forests, and in Russia they are in bulk. Zadornov goes to the guests in the car. And we sirye, get on the bus. So what if it had gone to visit Zadornov by ordinary citizens without a car, it would be strangled.
Hmm. The farther into the forest, the more firewood. It might seem that in the studio together not liberals, and the Decembrists with a group of Plekhanov. Not the state is strong, where everything depends on one person (just Prince Troubetzkoy!), And the fact that voluntary Rabotnicki can acquire as many quality cast iron (say, in Russia, it is less and poor), where self-government! - Sang Mlechin - where there is a free labor instead of a serf. Similarly group Liberation of Labor: Plekhanov, Ignatiev, Zasulich, Deutsch, Axelrod (remember the mnemonic).It's a crazy house. Say, Indian fabrics were better English, for the tradition and culture of India ancient England. But England - a strong state, and protectionist measures crushed quality Indian production. In the time of Peter the Decembrists was not there, Kurginyan right conditions for freedom are not ripe. Thank God, the thought of the condition. See how he pokes face into the table, "You want freedom, the peasants? - And the earth? - Nope. - Then let us be yours, but the land in front of us! "In informal newsletter" Sibinform "on the cartoon man standing at the chair, his back to the reader, with a bare bottom, which hides from the audience department, and repeats the words of Nina Andreeva:" I can not sacrifice principles! "When hyperinflation broke out, and in the villages were eating feed, artist Yuri Yakovlev was asked:" What is more important to you - freedom of speech, or a piece of bread? "Ie principle or a walk in the pants. Yakovlev said, "Is not intelligently talk about a piece of bread?" Generally our intelligentsia very peculiar understanding of freedom. She believes that all entirely under Stalin were slaves.Mix well. By Petrine Russia - with modern Newspeak: the free market, you see, Peter is not allowed. And even a favorite word - modernization. Not that she was with Peter, not that. However, under the modernization everyone understands something his sublime. One "expert"-a definition mlechinets bent that it is suitable for just about anything, even iron. Our Permian journalists, I must say, by upgrading to understand not only nanotechnology. But the toilets, improvements in toilets. To each his own.But where Mlechin seen in a monarchy, from one person to be independent is all about? Mlechin felt like with the Stalinists and Trotskyists, the bourgeois revolution can occur in a cave would be king - or party - the Progressive?Serious charge - Peter trampled church, made it an appendage of the state. About the epididymis can not say anything, but the secularization of church lands, demolition of temples, correctly writes Bushkov, doing all the kings, all of Europe. And if the church in general as head of state?Nonsense Mlechin complement Kurginyan stupidity. "Peter I loved his people" - blurted Sergei. Uh-huh.... "