Ivan the TerribleMeaning - tie oprichnina KGB. Mlechin drags all dissidentschinu that forty times failed. Just like in the 80's of a musty chest agitator, propagandist (in a modern PR man) pulled the film "Ivan the Terrible"? Then whispered as dissidents. Like, Stalin gave to remove the second series, as too gloomy look Malyuta Skuratov and dancing oprichnina.In Perm, the Interior Ministry building on Leninsky district - poster with three guardsmen with axes and the inscription: "The quality, time-tested." And our FSC-Schnick claim that their stories Dzerzhinsky had little to do, and it began with Theodore Yurevich Romodanovsky. Oho-ho ...But there was another movie. There's Ivan the Terrible passes fool crown. Sense - is it possible to give edit Nizam? They can only be approximated to the faithful servants like guardsmen. How can you trust the power of those who "say no, no step" can not? After man there, the machine sees only a detail, and the emperor sees the situation as a whole, argues from a higher point of view, of the state. "The king can not think of each, he has to think about important things." And shut up, if you do not think so, because God works in mysterious ways.
That professor of PSU historian MG Suslov, a former member of the Communist Party, said: "How can we talk about the power of the working class in 30 years, look at it today it represents!" As in the joke about the drunk in a stuffy bus 'Ha, a pig, you are on yourself! "Suslov, of course. said "shortcomings" of the CPSU, but the collapse of the economy accuses bourgeoisified working class, reaching for the western rags (liberal Fukuyama agrees with "Marxist" Suslov, he writes about the "victory VCR"). Ie poor people are caught, they are slow to true communist matter. Can not be done on the principle of the Paris Commune of control from below, says Suslov, because the work is illiterate, without your favorite party as he eyed dog and not step to step. While in this position, it follows that at least four of Lenin ("April Theses", "The Immediate Tasks of the Soviet Government", "The Proletarian Revolution and the Renegade Kautsky," "State and Revolution") will announce Suslov wrong, he still considers himself a Marxist (In "The Immediate Tasks," Lenin wrote, "Everyone after working his 8-hour lesson should do government business, this is a guarantee of victory of socialism." In "Renegade Kautsky", "should not the government, coming to meet the proletariat, and the government of the proletariat" , ie, the slave workers. Or: "We reduce the role of government officials to the role of simply carrying out the will of the working people!")
Mlechin team: 40-50-ies. were flourishing, the mass of reforms, then came Ivan the Terrible, the reform-then, of course, have been, but the Russian barbarous cruelty. Also lost some land.Kurginyan: Russia is no different from the others, all of Europe - continuous atrocities, any reform - is cruelty. (Prior to joining CMEA countries to the European Union gave the example Kurginyan morality of Europe in the heart of Europe (he did not specify where) in fashion necklaces from children's little fingers. Heinrich Mann describes as a kind of environment lytsar Henry of Navarre made a union with the peasant, then ripped her stomach and warmed it up. Many atrocities were in Russia, but this never came zvezdanutosti. However, it could be a naturalistic fiction author.) said that the reign of Ivan the Terrible - a common phenomenon in the world, all the brutality, all the aggressive policy. Kurginyan absolutely right.Of course, the question of whether it is possible to carry out reforms without blood (combat missions, to build capital, to lay railroads, to industrialize, modernize, and so not because of the large loss of life), was, alas, no response. The main thing. Why Kurginyanu needed to protect Ivan the Terrible?Because when Stalin began making films about Ivan the Terrible. For Stalin - unlike Lenin - not some mischievous destroyer empire, he had her creator. He - the continuation of the history of Russia, he - the king. Cruel, but fair. And no class approach, comrades, Churchill and Roosevelt, do not worry.
"The story of the political economy", the answer to the book MG Suslov "reasons for the collapse of the USSR", "What is different from the non-scientific research? The fact that the non-scientific study completely absent class approach. However, in the Soviet historiography, which somehow claims to be a Marxist, has developed a striking trend recorded in the national heroes of the class enemies. Thus, during the Stalin was filmed about a wise and just Ivan the Terrible. While Ivan the Terrible - a king, a class enemy.A characteristic detail of the film: Ivan the Terrible imperial crown on his head trying fool, silly, they say, let alone you, then things of national importance. Fool and silly - it's people.What is the basis of the bourgeois glorification of the supreme ruler? In the logical substitution in zaretushirovanii materialistic choice in the historical social movement, namely, the primacy of the upper and lower classes, respectively, the party ("Team") over a class. True, the party ideologues refer to the dialectic relationship "party-class." But the materialist is unambiguous choice, in the dialectical pair party - especially secondary, class - is primary. However, all of the Trotskyist organization and "communist" parties make the substitution of secondary primary, sakralizuya party.What do we see? General Alexander Suvorov also enlisted in the national heroes. But he suppressed the revolt of Pugachev, which Soviet historians also consider a national hero. Moreover, among the heroes of Pugachev is a class position, although the nature of the hero is very bad. But this is how people treated him, as Pushkin, describing atrocities Pugacheva, gathering material for "History of the Pugachev rebellion (riot)" among the common people. No wonder he has written and "The Captain's Daughter", where Pugachev - hero. The result was the Pugachev rebellion salary increase in the Ural factories. This, together with the great fact of the lower classes against the upper performance is grounds for transfer of Pugachev in the national and international heroes. Consequently, the general Alexander Suvorov - the class enemy, the royal lackey, attitude should be as an enemy. What was he doing in the Alps? Pushed Russian soldiers to their deaths. And only.Soviet war in the 80's, too inveterate Marxists argued that Suvorov though suppressed, but did much to "fatherland" and contributed to the art of war. We have just seen that this is not an abstract of the fatherland, ie for the lower classes, and not for the elite, many did just Pugachev, and Suvorov did not do anything, on the contrary, prevented. As to the contribution to the art of war, the fascist Guderian made more Suvorov.If the historian wants to see the hero of the conqueror of the proletariat of the country, the historian of the conquered country shall be considered an enemy of the foreign character of the proletariat of the conquered country, and the heroes who fought against the conqueror. Just not in that, of course, if the "hero" is fought on the side of another conqueror, as the Estonian SS. Is that clear? No? Well, because the Soviet historians claim to be Marxists, and Marxists, in turn, is known to be internationalists, they must consider Alexander Suvorov international criminal. Like Alexander the Great, the great criminal.Napoleon can not be a national hero for the French workers. For them, it class enemy. As Admiral Nelson - for British workers.Quite to the contrary comes to bourgeois ideology. So, Thomas Jefferson, author of the Declaration of Independence, the president and founder of the United States, stated: "Slavery, despite the cost, objectively, was the economic growth of America." Sticker emblazoned with the statement in the slavery museum in Liverpool.Want to ask a question of Soviet historians: why, for some important reason, the class enemy Ivan the Terrible was appointed by Stalin in national heroes? "
In the Kuzbass to "reform" the rules Aman Tuleyev. Local people laugh at him. Then the miners supported Yeltsin. When the successor to the Communist Party, the Liberal sheep Tuleyev Kisluk of NPG (Independent Trade Union of Miners) defeated Kemerovo, miners rushed out of the frying pan into the fire - voted en masse for the old Tuleyev, a member of the Communist Party. Nothing better could not come up with. Because PNH represented Utkin and bring them up in such a manner that "you can not deal with all trade union affairs, need a well paid otvlechenka" can not simultaneously work in the mine and think, therefore NPG even took Charter, which prohibits review of Representatives. Like, do not put your own nose, we see the situation as a whole!The late Permian journalist Polovodov accurately noted this duality of soul mining labor collectives, "This product requires a hutorka-mine and then ask for more soap and new gloves."So I was a little concerned about the experience of those who, after listening to the liberals and navidalisya ruined factories, villages, and cities, ran out of the frying pan into the fire - to Stalin. The fact that Kurginyan noted that "the majority of the country supports Stalin" (as shown by a survey on the program "court time"). The majority - the majority, I do not know, the poll - not the entire population. This is to say Kurginyan why cut Mlechin. And Kurginyan absolutely right. I am anti-Stalinist, but bryaknut the whole country, "Stalin - bastard," as did Mlechin - top idiocy. The point is not that the alleged identity of Stalin can not be measured not by historical, and by the standards of morality. Can be measured. Not young supporters of Stalin I care, and retirees who have seen species mechanical engineers. This Dostoyevsky in "Crime and Punishment" shoddy Lebezyatnikov man said, "Ah, if my parents were alive, how would I have them struck the protest! A Belinsky would like rolled up! "Due to our ignorance of the wild population of the liberals did not really know anything about the Revolution, or of Lenin or of Stalin. Kurginyan clearly shows that the bourgeoisie, which give the Liberal Democrats have no right to criticize Stalin. The tears they shed for the victims in the camps - crocodile. So fear not, as the "Fair Russia", "just cause" or "The Other Russia" screaming about the troubles of ordinary citizens come a second time on the same rake. The difference between the master and the "United Russia" is not.The result of Stalin was that the workers who for decades taldychite "Do not stick your nose" when roasted rooster pecked in the ass, could not take control of the factories (despite the brilliant, heroic examples of Soviet, pike, Yasnogorsk, Tutaeva). The current state of the working class, which is now even really can not go on strike, afraid to go on strike - that the main result of Stalin.Not to mention the fact that collectivization, according to Stalin, contrary to the Decree on the ground, due to the industrialization of the village according to Trotsky, Stalin destroyed the political alliance between the working class and the peasantry, who in an agrarian country should be long-term.10/12/2010
Continuing the theme of "Ivan the Terrible."I told you: the Kurginyan - lack of a scientific approach. Therefore, and looked on it Mlechin to continue the discussion of Ivan the Terrible. Mlechin brought everything I could on the personality of the king. And rightly Kurginyanu. You know, something to boast Kurginyan? That Ivan the Terrible chop Kazan and Astrakhan. Tell us about the greatness of Ivan the Terrible, the Tatars. And 25 years the Livonian War. Dorubat window to Europe left to Peter I. And James K. Polk, who chop off Mexico Texas and California, too great?Boasted Kurginyan increase in Russia almost doubled. But by what? Including through the development of Siberia. And it did not begin with the Terrible, but with "ski battle" Seeds Kurbsky tubs and Peter in 1499, Ivan the Terrible was born in '31. During the reign of Ivan the Terrible, Russia's population has surged. Still, after he became king at three years old. But Kurginyan good ... Because if the area is increasing, and the population too. Well ... you better imagine the king, who would have reigned, lying on his side and not a damn thing to do to strengthen their power. That's why the brother killing brother, and the army betrayed the kings, and the interests of the "state." Here Talleyrand - take and slicker, rare crook, a triple agent. Kurginyanu but was not under force to separate the two concepts: the state and the homeland. So do not talk nonsense, that the kings take care of the people, that they are generally considered to be with him. Say, Hegel believed that public opinion - is bullshit, and nigger can not play the piano. In short, was a Democrat. Spit kings and courtiers like the people. So to answer them the same! Surprisingly only that Nicholas II Blood for Mlechin positive hero, and Ivan the Terrible - negative. What about "We need a little victorious war"? Japanese with Mlechin agree!
Hitler, on Kurginyanu, the bully, the bastard. Because wool Jews already in 1938, at the time of the Munich Agreement. And before saying that the historical figures are not applicable canons of morality. And also said that the need to reform the country with an iron hand, otherwise there will be more victims. And Novgorod, Torzhok, Wedge - all in order to reduce the number of victims? Just like in college song: "At first he executed forty thousand to avoid big massacre, and the rest he ordered to carve, and then take all the punishment. And admiration Zulfar itself came to his tent, he ripped off her trousers ... "No, really, Mlechin should be advised to read poetry, too, why only Kurginyan reads? For example. "We live under him without feeling the country, our speeches ten steps are not heard, and as sufficient for polrazgovortsa because commemorate Kremlin mountaineer. His thick fingers like worms, fat, and words like pood weights are correct, cockroach laugh usischa and shine ... and it tops around rabble thin-necked leaders, he is half-human services as forges a horseshoe decree decree, who in his forehead, who hits the mark who in the groin, who in the eyes, that no punishment from him, he raspberry ... "(Mandelstam) Or:" In our days, and the air smells of death, open - that open the veins. "(Pasternak) And again:" ... shelves were already convicted and innocent ... writhed under the bloody boots and black under the tires 'Marias.' "(Tsvetaeva) and for the believers (Kurginyan spoke fondly as Ivan the Terrible built temples):" We all went under God, God beneath the side ... He was wiser, meaner, the other, the other by the name of Jehovah, he it cast, wasted, turned to coal, and then pulled out of the abyss and gave him a desk and a corner. "(Slutsky)But the moral of the other tyrants ... or about the same? "My namesake, boot, Caligula ... and dug into school tonsils hand with shimmering medals, where pale profile angry frowns as bedplate of my ability! You ..., thin-necked, thought hussy, all the Romans to one's neck? - Scum. Genius caliber. "(Ascension)You can not talk about abstract Russia. In assessing the kings always need to know the positions of what social class you stand. Otherwise the debate will win Mlechin.
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий