Поиск по этому блогу

Powered By Blogger

понедельник, 14 января 2013 г.

Khrushchev's policy - rescue or bomb


Part C of the favorites
Footage: "Khrushchev without debunking the cult would have felt uncomfortable - because Stalin - the winner in the Second World War. "Kurginyan: "What actually happened? Regeneration of society life? And it did not exist before? Or is it really so revived? Let's do better beam there to correct, where bad and then this beam will collapse on our heads. Khrushchev must not be approached from the standpoint of "good - bad" - his actions created a situation, then to the ceiling collapsed. Is it possible to treat the beams in the common house? So should not happen again.
Mlechin: Ernst Neizvestny nobody better not say about Khrushchev - he made a monument to him in the Novodevichy half of white marble, half black. Khrushchev took the country in which the bread is lacking, but it started to increase life expectancy. Single of Appeal did not posleleninskogo cynic tried socialist ideals to realize.


Kurginyan: since Avtorkhanov to Schlesinger mechanics Soviet elite - a struggle of clans: the army, the Council of Ministers with the party apparatus. Khrushchev became the host of the party machine, he protege partner unit, expressed his interest. First, Lenin led the CPC, and then moved the party apparatus master Stalin. Kurginyan shows something similar to the waveform (radio physics or something), which is not shown, contrary to Kurginyan cyclic change of power.
Yuri Zhukov, a historian: Small, chairman of the Council of Ministers, a fighter with the party apparatus, canceled envelopes and other privileges zavozmuschalis When Khrushchev paid extra that was underpaid.Mlechin: Malenkov life spent in the Party apparatus ...Beetles in 1944, Malenkov and Molotov given project, where the party retained only political role, while the economy - under the leadership of the Council of Ministers. Stalin approved, but the project is crossed out.Zubkov, historian: The last years of Stalin tailors the system of checks and balances ...Svanidze: how Khrushchev beat Beria, Molotov, Malenkov?Zhukov: he bought the party apparatus. Defense industry supported Khrushchev, Khrushchev wanted the arms race.Svanidze: Khrushchev insisted on de-Stalinization, but he became the Stalinist.Zubkov: the de-Stalinization insisted Molotov, Malenkov, and there was no opposition to change, Khrushchev's role here is secondary.Economy rests on forced labor, the workers can not leave the business, people run out of the village, agricultural disaster. Gulag - is unprofitable, 460 thousand political prisoners, who are sitting, for some unknown reason. This had to be changed.Kurginyan: Why Dan Mon Syaon not denounced the cult of Mao?Zubkov - Russia - China is not just another nation.Kurginyan: why Stalin changed the Leninist course, and people gleefully accepted this change, it was the other people? Everything was done very differently, not a Leninist, and done effectively.Zubkov: Khrushchev made sure that their beloved leader already could not be.Kurginyan: Do you understand that 150% proven that the thesis about the historical invariant wrong?
Emelyanov, historian: Khrushchev - an ardent Stalinist, was punishing himself, he could not be the expression of broad aspirations, he expressed hopes desks. apparatus. Mikoyan: I had to convince him that the most important question - condemnation of the Stalinist regime, otherwise we will be responsible for his crimes.Xenia Myalo, historian - he radically ruined opportunities that were then.Beetles thaw began not under Khrushchev, and in 1962, with a book Panova, which describes the mafia, which turned out to party officials, who became the head obltorga. Conversely, Khrushchev denounced by Twardowski removed for reading "Vasily Terkin in the world."Mlechin: you deny the element of sincerity Khrushchev?Xenia Myalo: his actions - to deflect suspicion of complicity. Sevenfold wrote that - little was repressive documents signed by Khrushchev, the debunking of worship - it is his defense ..Mlechin: if Khrushchev wanted reprisals, they would not have stopped.Svanidze: aspirations is no object, this is the subject? When she went to de-Stalinization, people riding the roof, does the thaw aspirations?Zubkov: thaw - the answer to the challenges of time, GUM opened thaw - the road to GUM country started to thaw.Svanidze: Khrushchev was involved in the persecution, his hands in the blood - why, of all the blood. Khrushchev expressed his sentiments party apparatus who is tired of repression. Mood apparatus coincided with the needs of society.Xenia Myalo: there is no evidence that people were prepared to pay for the GUM symbols of the life that he lived.]
Comment.Some Impressionist circle. "I Kaa atsya it corrected beam ..." I Kaa atsya that the country went crazy ... "" I Kaa atsya the country thawed ... "In general bedlam, thoughts jumping, speakers contradict themselves. If people drove roof, as de-Stalinization could meet the expectations? If latent aspirations, then Svanidze not say nothing, because he had to explain why the time is ripe to the limit of what is supposedly overdue. Location dug that in the USSR under Brezhnev was forced labor? That's when Lenin wrote about the development of capitalism in Russia, it clearly points to the contradiction between the impoverishment of the population and the need to expand the domestic market through sales. Resolution of the conflict - is the emergence of the poor peasant laborers and workers, a new product that produces pribyvochnuyu cost. A Svanidze? Worse mlechintsy speak only about the end of the Gulag, thaw and then tightening the nuts. Khrushchev's reforms in the discussion bury.
Paradox: on the class positions appear to Mlechin Svanidze it from their team about the Gulag rushes scientific formulation, born stupid Plekhanov most productive labor - free. Exactly say that the rural disaster, the people running from the village, people fall into a faint from hunger at railway rails, getting to the city - the first time in the history of the village Khrushchev introduced a passport. That Svanidze said that Khrushchev in his actions is not independent, he represented the interests of the party apparatus. At the next meeting Kurginyan suddenly, very much unexpected confirm that Khrushchev moved the class interests of the party apparatus, which implies that, and Stalin - too!But this seems to be quite correct thesis - wrong! It is true that the debunking of the cult - the way to fight for power. Khrushchev was to eliminate the hostile factions within the Communist Party. And does not stretch to the army, the Council of Ministers and other party chief was both economic and military, and union leaders. Tips do not matter, so a formality. Ministers so appointed generals with the same ease as shooting.
Same Makar acted Gorbachev, saying in an interview with the newspaper "L'Humanité", it is time, they say, to return to the principles of the Paris Commune (the control of the labor groups, rotation state officials, their modest pay as skilled workers). AI just like Khrushchev, Gorbachev, immediately to the principle, buys the party apparatus, increasing wages executive staff of the CPSU. And as for work?And, by the way, the time difference - shattering. No wonder, very good reason behind Emelyanov Mukhin advances the theory that Stalin at the end of the life of the party wanted to limit the political functions, and the Council of Ministers to pass housekeeping (at Mukhina - Soviets). Version itself is questionable. If Malenkov associates with the proposed transfer, and Stalin approved, this one would not face any obstacles. Second, Stalin still studied Marxism, he could not understand that the situation for such a transfer is not ripe. A helpless Nesvedov Soviets generally transmit power would be a crime.Situation under Gorbachev: Party secretary at the plant have slipped to the level of ideological six. Chapter - CEO. The head of the regional committee - in a subordinate and - ministry. Ie management - the party - Add hangs over already established industry base. First - the party committees - out to businesses, and CEO applauded. Then it turns out that the building of the regional committee in 1 st Secretary of the missing documents. And get out of the place of the owners - Gazprom, Rosneft, Atommash ... without any transfer of power. Of course. the second echelon of the party of power, as well as the elite of the Komsomol, left after the collapse of the winner. Who can not climb to the top? The defense industry. For the tank to replace candy. For a state monopoly on foreign trade. For it is only for the Communist Party, and the Communist Party collapsed. For the conversion of power into money took place against the background of delivery positions - and markets - overseas.So if even a version Mukhin-Emelyanov is correct, it is nothing in itself does not contain all the same proverbial legalization of capitalist relations. Under Stalin, Khrushchev, it could not happen. Economy has not grown up.What claims Kurginyan? He, however, acts from a position of Khrushchev, as then he was accused - voluntaristic. And overall Kurginyan thinks like serial Stalinist, who take all the credit or failure stories attributed to the kings and the Secretary General, which is why he was lying, that in history there are no laws, no invariants - lying contrary to Kant, Hegel, Marx. And in this, he thinks, as a consistent liberal: for government, Marx wrote about it in terms of a liberal, not true, since the rules can only select those that "hear underground rumble of history", the Order of the Sword, the supreme mullah finally clans Ford, Chrysler, Volkswagen, etc.Which proves Sergei? That China was simply a clever guide, nothing objective for Chinese hruschevshiny not. What ever they do kings and general secretaries, and laws (invariants) stories not found in nature. However, it is the position of the Stalinists, who insists that under feudalism can spend a socialist revolution, it would be like Stalin leadership.
Kurginyan ridiculous argument that the people who followed Lenin, Stalin suddenly followed, which dramatically changed the "course." And supposedly did everything efficiently. And it was the same people, not Chinese.The fact is that the people who followed Lenin, suddenly in 1921, after the Tenth Congress saw the NEP - but he believed Lenin. And do not you rejoice! When the NEP, designed for long term, was suddenly collapsed, then maybe stir some part of society. But when Stalin despite the Decree on the ground, in spite of Lenin's position towards the middle peasant spent landslide collectivization, when sharply reduced the number of livestock, when in 1927 Stalin allowed to sell the land, and during the year 60% of the land in the hands of 6% of the peasants, when again started dekulakize those who bought the land when in 1931 Stalin to shift his blame on the head associates in the article "Dizzy with success", then no national rejoicing or efficiency does not. And the people were quite different than the one that followed Lenin: the people, tired of meetings, the armed struggle, from the devastation. The difference between the "two is one and those peoples' well studied by different authors.Second, nothing special, Stalin did not change and could not be changed. Lenin held a progressive bourgeois reforms - nationalization of the basic means of production, the introduction of a state monopoly on foreign trade, etc., which are then carried out Hitler, Peron, Castro.But that's what saved: as strengthening the position of Stalin changed the media: circulation plummets "News" and jumps circulation Party "Truth." Historical invariant is that in the alienation of man from the product of his labor, the means of production real social bonds are easily replaced by newspaper fetishes.Glee is coming Yeltsin was met! People say, "What are you doing? Yeltsin - a lie! "But people do not want to listen. 200000th crazy crowd flowed to playpens, some progress embryo yelled in the subway: "Gorbachev - the enemy, Gorbachev - the ravine! Yeltsin - though Yeltsin - yes! "Ie Some media have ceased to operate, and in vogue self-published media, TV shows Congress repeatedly reinforced the Soviet Armed Forces. And people are like sheep ... and listened as illiterate Gaidar Perm State University! Holding my breath, if anyone says a word, researchers strictly broke off: "Do not bother to listen!"
To understand the pattern of the most cruel events, and more haphazard, subjective happened with the Soviet Union, we will begin to dance on the stove. The socialist revolution, Marx writes, occurs only when the end will develop all the forces that capitalism gives scope. To the growth of productive forces fatally began to slow production relations. A finish - after discussion of Khrushchev.

Комментариев нет:

Отправить комментарий