Professor, Doctor of Philosophy Nekrasov, SN Tales of the Club of Rome and the crisis of postmodern thinking. What do we offer the leaders and masterminds of international terrorism in return heyday? Pathetic "sustainable development". In "An Agenda for HH1 Century instrument agenda in each country are national sustainable development strategies. Their meaning - "tighten the belt more tightly." The report of the Club of Rome "Factor Four" offered a new formula for sustainable development, the wording - "At half the cost of resources to get products twice. It is assumed that the new millennium will create some "sverhnauku" and the new millennium of wars, destruction and violence. It will be a millennium of searches and the efforts of mankind to preserve and enrich the harmony of life on Earth. Such an illusion and a utopia of the worst properties. It is often said that in HH1. will be the century of bitter struggle for resources, that the gap between technological progress and spirituality have broken all the powers of hell, but in a world increasingly adopted a kind of metaphysics of evil, according to which the logic of history is unknowable. Refer to the tradition of Russian philosophy, under which the future is a necessary evil. Representation of the point of view may be called agnosticism, but because it has nothing to do with science. Links to postmodern science untenable. They reflect the state of mind dying industrial society, in optics, which is an evil demiurge is the technique, all nations are at war because of lack of resources, overpopulated planet. But the Earth nedonaselena. All forecasts mid-twentieth century. agree on the fact that at the turn of HH1. on the planet will be 10-12 billion people - where is the required billions? They have disappeared, died, not born - they killed the oligarchy through wars, the distribution of condoms and AIDS, the formation of inter-state "washing machines" for drugs, the neo-liberal market economy, anti-culture, the prohibition of toxic chemicals, etc. At the present level of development of productive forces of the planet able to sustain human impacts in the 25 billion people. It's all about, therefore, in the imperfect relations of production.
The collapse of post-industrialism and the possibility of revolution.
In the pessimistic logic of justification of the world's evil and barbarization world we see the manifestation of mechanistic thinking, worthy of physicists, mathematicians, as representatives of natural sciences, as well as metaphysical consciousness, characteristic of bourgeois intellectuals. It is clear that there are immature forms of materialism in the understanding of society - the geographic and demographic. Above them - the historical materialism that recognizes the dialectic of productive forces and production relations. Historical materialism provides an optimistic outlook advanced classes and the country's messiah-Russia. In line with socialism after a temporary rollback back winner in the modern world after the passage of post-modern stage of mutation and degradation. If in the twentieth century. Russia has exhausted a limit on the revolution, the new in HH1. opens the credit world for the world revolution. Instead of post-industrial development and the associated period of wars and conflicts the world is entering a period of socialist revolutions. The collapse of the post-industrial utopia involves creating forms of false consciousness, in the light of which there is technophobia and environmental pessimism, leading to environmental fascism. The scientific outlook requires a change in the form of consciousness towards the formation of scientific optimism, based on increases in population density, use of basic scientific discoveries.
The crisis of postmodern thinking.
In the "brave new world" of global cheloveynika was blurry idea of philosophy as a special type of rational cognitive activity ("theoretical practice" from L. Altyusera), while in poststructuralists in a wide range of Michel Foucault to Jacques Derrida and G. Deleuze formed neonitssheanskoe vision of philosophy as a product of the relationship of power and knowledge. Revealed that philosophy no longer serves as a special study of certain areas of scientific knowledge, an epistemological critique and a general theory of historical process. Philosophy has moved to the position of an awesome reflection on the future of science and philosophers have been increasingly speak of the need to introduce "science police" to ban research in the fields of nanotechnology, cloning and genetic engineering, artificial intelligence - emerged calls for jihad against science. These paradoxical statements against the backdrop of concerns ekologofashistov state of the Earth allowed to reject the former vneistoricheskoe opposition of science and ideology in general, as well as their opposition to the structure of philosophical knowledge, in particular. Philosophers prefer to scare the reading public, and she hurried to get scared, because under the influence of television and the Internet began to think conceptually and not categorical, but figuratively - the picture in the spirit of the practice of "brainwashing" of W. Lippmann. It became apparent that the philosophy in the last third of the twentieth century. finally turned to the introduction of policies in science and scientific politics - as a result of a scientific spirit began to be understood all kinds of cognitive abilities and knowledge in the spirit of "methodological anarchy" in the style of P. Feyerbanda thesis «anything goes». Philosophy, losing the ideological function of the scientific concept of construction, finally turned into an ideology. She became the ideology of the unscientific understanding of the world and man - the ideology of ending the cycle of civilization proclaimed the "end of history".
Against the philosophy of market fundamentalism.
If the first major contemporary philosophical doctrine advocated Marxist fundamentalism and revisionist attempts to dedogmatizatsii and softening, in the end of the millennium the most important philosophical doctrine that threatens the peace and human freedom was liberal market fundamentalism. Thesis about the future as evil integrates right and left intellectuals and directly formulates the basic problem of applied geo-political and prognostic studies, with all the heuristic function of philosophy is reduced to the justification of inter-state conflicts due to lack of natural resources. Reliance on the "invisible hand of the market, going from D. Locke, Bentham remarks II -" My dream is that the percentages were as free as love, testify to the agnostic infestation of classical Western philosophy. Here, philosophy acts as a protector of the two variants of capitalist accumulation: the old fiziokraticheskogo, acting on behalf of the feudal landlords, when the growth of wealth comes from the land and the people are likened to graze cattle, and usury, when the growth of wealth is realized in a certain year-round casino global financial markets, where profit merely shifted from one pocket to another, and the physical producing economy to be destroyed. This global casino has already led to post-modern world into the "golden billion" and the other five billion.
Two facets of postmodern philosophy, and ten questions of philosophy.
On the one hand (from the left mondialism style «West against the rest»), there psevdofilosofskaya avant-garde terminology plurality of truths, deconstruction, and schizoanalysis deseksualizatsii humanity rizomatiki as antidrevesnosti, tolerance, human values, supplemented by the rhetoric of punishment of terrorists in the name of civilization. On the other hand (from the right avtarkizma in the spirit of «The rest against the West»), develops a specific image of the world's evil, apostate Orthodox Christianity, the will to fight, postmodern science. These are two sides of one coin - mondialists left and right-wing nationalists can not live without each other as the police and terrorists. The total of these - faith in the postmodern science, which needs no truth in the spirit of science of Newton. To ask ten questions of philosophy. This will be the issues the World philosophical community. A positive answer to these questions will return to the philosophy of social reality, negative responses will determine the extent of the fall of the philosophical community in the zero state. We call this level of BGH in the range of 1 to 10:1. Recognizes whether the WSF basic division of monistic philosophies on materialism and idealism? 2. Recognizes whether the WSF, that the average fluctuating line between materialism and idealism - agnosticism on the basis of solipsism or subjective idealism, a version of neo (including sociology, phenomenological sociology of knowledge) - a kind of agnosticism? 3. Recognizes whether the WSF, that the existing external world is reflected in the human brain, and the correctness of this reflection is checked and is achieved through social and historical practice? 4. Recognizes whether the WSF, that the world is fundamentally knowable to man and mankind, and there are only differences between what is known and what is not yet known? 5. Recognizes whether the WSF, that the real unity of the world consists in its materiality and there is something supranaturalisticheskogo and therefore can not be called "artificial intelligence"? 6. Recognizes whether the WSF that matter without motion so as inconceivable as motion without matter, but space and time are attributes of matter? 7. Recognizes whether the WSF, that truth is the conformity of the scientific knowledge of an object by reflection in people's minds and in the public consciousness of the laws of nature and the real world? 8. Recognizes whether the WSF, that the social fabric or objective social relations, determines social consciousness, or vice versa, social perceptions determine the metric of social heterology? 9. Recognizes whether the WSF, that there are classes and class interests shape human cognition and, consequently, the doctrine of pluralism and tolerance, idealism and religion are the reactionary character and mask the interests of leaving in the past classes. 10. Recognizes whether the WSF, that the theory of post-industrialism is conceptually and practically untenable, as they require reducing the world population, sustainable development, income generation from nature and degree of redistribution in favor of rich countries and international financial oligarchy, and not from science and social production? These are only some relevant questions that can be answered by philosophers in the world. Otherwise - with full "Silence of the Lambs" - should be free to give philosophical level all interested doctors and mechanics, pharmacists and foresters, naturalists and artists. That is, instead of the principle of "to each according to his work" to implement the principle of post-industrial - each according to Ph (D) and make it freely convertible degree!
The last crash of the "kingdom of reason", organized by the Western post-industrial society in the late twentieth century. Turned out to not actually "doomsday" end of human prehistory. The very occurrence of mankind in the degradation cycle of involution-modernity - a return to savagery technological pessimism and pathological misanthropy - led pozdneburzhuaznyh thinkers to abandon his ideals of progress, reason and truth. As a result, quietly changed view of philosophy itself, which no longer has the role of meta-crowned the new millennium. Found that once philosophy is a collection of some leading to nowhere, "Forest Path" (M. Heidegger), it is no longer studying the most general laws of nature, society and thinking and, consequently, does not favor the systematization of these laws as a meta. Such a basic understanding of philosophy as a "philosophy of practice" (Antonio Gramsci) to temporarily remain in the past. Philosophy of this mutation contributed to an infernal atmosphere of humanity in the occurrence of postmodernity in the form of terrorist globalization.
Neoliberal globalization after global provocation of the West against the West September 11, 2001 has turned into its alter ego - a terrorist globalization. Capitalism has resorted to fascism as their last refuge in the time of the greatest difficulties and dangers for the most hypocritical in the world society. The introduction of registration in the traditionally liberal U.S., identity and empathy in the western world have traditionally anti-Western Western Europe Western. The process has started - the process of globalization, the introduction of a terrorist under the guise of fighting international terrorism. British elite continually grows terrorists and destroyers - market "voodoo economics" galaxy Gaidar, Chubais, Balcerowicz, Fujimori, de Soto, de Cavallo. Members of the British elite imagine themselves izrailitami - the descendants of one of the lost tribes of Israel. Prince Philip, patron of the "WWF" is not just reported that after his death, he dreams of reinkartirovat a deadly bacteria in order to destroy humanity in the name of conservation. Slogans of a front patronized their organizations (Geysky Front, the Animal Liberation Front) are simple and crazy: "Thanks for what not to reproduce," "Learn to masturbate," "Kill yourself. Save the Planet! ".
Neoliberal globalization after global provocation of the West against the West September 11, 2001 has turned into its alter ego - a terrorist globalization. Capitalism has resorted to fascism as their last refuge in the time of the greatest difficulties and dangers for the most hypocritical in the world society. The introduction of registration in the traditionally liberal U.S., identity and empathy in the western world have traditionally anti-Western Western Europe Western. The process has started - the process of globalization, the introduction of a terrorist under the guise of fighting international terrorism. British elite continually grows terrorists and destroyers - market "voodoo economics" galaxy Gaidar, Chubais, Balcerowicz, Fujimori, de Soto, de Cavallo. Members of the British elite imagine themselves izrailitami - the descendants of one of the lost tribes of Israel. Prince Philip, patron of the "WWF" is not just reported that after his death, he dreams of reinkartirovat a deadly bacteria in order to destroy humanity in the name of conservation. Slogans of a front patronized their organizations (Geysky Front, the Animal Liberation Front) are simple and crazy: "Thanks for what not to reproduce," "Learn to masturbate," "Kill yourself. Save the Planet! ".
The collapse of post-industrialism and the possibility of revolution.
In the pessimistic logic of justification of the world's evil and barbarization world we see the manifestation of mechanistic thinking, worthy of physicists, mathematicians, as representatives of natural sciences, as well as metaphysical consciousness, characteristic of bourgeois intellectuals. It is clear that there are immature forms of materialism in the understanding of society - the geographic and demographic. Above them - the historical materialism that recognizes the dialectic of productive forces and production relations. Historical materialism provides an optimistic outlook advanced classes and the country's messiah-Russia. In line with socialism after a temporary rollback back winner in the modern world after the passage of post-modern stage of mutation and degradation. If in the twentieth century. Russia has exhausted a limit on the revolution, the new in HH1. opens the credit world for the world revolution. Instead of post-industrial development and the associated period of wars and conflicts the world is entering a period of socialist revolutions. The collapse of the post-industrial utopia involves creating forms of false consciousness, in the light of which there is technophobia and environmental pessimism, leading to environmental fascism. The scientific outlook requires a change in the form of consciousness towards the formation of scientific optimism, based on increases in population density, use of basic scientific discoveries.
The crisis of postmodern thinking.
In the "brave new world" of global cheloveynika was blurry idea of philosophy as a special type of rational cognitive activity ("theoretical practice" from L. Altyusera), while in poststructuralists in a wide range of Michel Foucault to Jacques Derrida and G. Deleuze formed neonitssheanskoe vision of philosophy as a product of the relationship of power and knowledge. Revealed that philosophy no longer serves as a special study of certain areas of scientific knowledge, an epistemological critique and a general theory of historical process. Philosophy has moved to the position of an awesome reflection on the future of science and philosophers have been increasingly speak of the need to introduce "science police" to ban research in the fields of nanotechnology, cloning and genetic engineering, artificial intelligence - emerged calls for jihad against science. These paradoxical statements against the backdrop of concerns ekologofashistov state of the Earth allowed to reject the former vneistoricheskoe opposition of science and ideology in general, as well as their opposition to the structure of philosophical knowledge, in particular. Philosophers prefer to scare the reading public, and she hurried to get scared, because under the influence of television and the Internet began to think conceptually and not categorical, but figuratively - the picture in the spirit of the practice of "brainwashing" of W. Lippmann. It became apparent that the philosophy in the last third of the twentieth century. finally turned to the introduction of policies in science and scientific politics - as a result of a scientific spirit began to be understood all kinds of cognitive abilities and knowledge in the spirit of "methodological anarchy" in the style of P. Feyerbanda thesis «anything goes». Philosophy, losing the ideological function of the scientific concept of construction, finally turned into an ideology. She became the ideology of the unscientific understanding of the world and man - the ideology of ending the cycle of civilization proclaimed the "end of history".
Against the philosophy of market fundamentalism.
If the first major contemporary philosophical doctrine advocated Marxist fundamentalism and revisionist attempts to dedogmatizatsii and softening, in the end of the millennium the most important philosophical doctrine that threatens the peace and human freedom was liberal market fundamentalism. Thesis about the future as evil integrates right and left intellectuals and directly formulates the basic problem of applied geo-political and prognostic studies, with all the heuristic function of philosophy is reduced to the justification of inter-state conflicts due to lack of natural resources. Reliance on the "invisible hand of the market, going from D. Locke, Bentham remarks II -" My dream is that the percentages were as free as love, testify to the agnostic infestation of classical Western philosophy. Here, philosophy acts as a protector of the two variants of capitalist accumulation: the old fiziokraticheskogo, acting on behalf of the feudal landlords, when the growth of wealth comes from the land and the people are likened to graze cattle, and usury, when the growth of wealth is realized in a certain year-round casino global financial markets, where profit merely shifted from one pocket to another, and the physical producing economy to be destroyed. This global casino has already led to post-modern world into the "golden billion" and the other five billion.
Two facets of postmodern philosophy, and ten questions of philosophy.
On the one hand (from the left mondialism style «West against the rest»), there psevdofilosofskaya avant-garde terminology plurality of truths, deconstruction, and schizoanalysis deseksualizatsii humanity rizomatiki as antidrevesnosti, tolerance, human values, supplemented by the rhetoric of punishment of terrorists in the name of civilization. On the other hand (from the right avtarkizma in the spirit of «The rest against the West»), develops a specific image of the world's evil, apostate Orthodox Christianity, the will to fight, postmodern science. These are two sides of one coin - mondialists left and right-wing nationalists can not live without each other as the police and terrorists. The total of these - faith in the postmodern science, which needs no truth in the spirit of science of Newton. To ask ten questions of philosophy. This will be the issues the World philosophical community. A positive answer to these questions will return to the philosophy of social reality, negative responses will determine the extent of the fall of the philosophical community in the zero state. We call this level of BGH in the range of 1 to 10:1. Recognizes whether the WSF basic division of monistic philosophies on materialism and idealism? 2. Recognizes whether the WSF, that the average fluctuating line between materialism and idealism - agnosticism on the basis of solipsism or subjective idealism, a version of neo (including sociology, phenomenological sociology of knowledge) - a kind of agnosticism? 3. Recognizes whether the WSF, that the existing external world is reflected in the human brain, and the correctness of this reflection is checked and is achieved through social and historical practice? 4. Recognizes whether the WSF, that the world is fundamentally knowable to man and mankind, and there are only differences between what is known and what is not yet known? 5. Recognizes whether the WSF, that the real unity of the world consists in its materiality and there is something supranaturalisticheskogo and therefore can not be called "artificial intelligence"? 6. Recognizes whether the WSF that matter without motion so as inconceivable as motion without matter, but space and time are attributes of matter? 7. Recognizes whether the WSF, that truth is the conformity of the scientific knowledge of an object by reflection in people's minds and in the public consciousness of the laws of nature and the real world? 8. Recognizes whether the WSF, that the social fabric or objective social relations, determines social consciousness, or vice versa, social perceptions determine the metric of social heterology? 9. Recognizes whether the WSF, that there are classes and class interests shape human cognition and, consequently, the doctrine of pluralism and tolerance, idealism and religion are the reactionary character and mask the interests of leaving in the past classes. 10. Recognizes whether the WSF, that the theory of post-industrialism is conceptually and practically untenable, as they require reducing the world population, sustainable development, income generation from nature and degree of redistribution in favor of rich countries and international financial oligarchy, and not from science and social production? These are only some relevant questions that can be answered by philosophers in the world. Otherwise - with full "Silence of the Lambs" - should be free to give philosophical level all interested doctors and mechanics, pharmacists and foresters, naturalists and artists. That is, instead of the principle of "to each according to his work" to implement the principle of post-industrial - each according to Ph (D) and make it freely convertible degree!
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий