Contemporary Archive 1993
Democratization - the redistribution of power from the top down. Hence the redistribution of money from the top down. Yeltsin promised that form the budget will be the lower classes, and performance - tops. However, as usual, any promises made by President should take the exact opposite. Rate of contributions from enterprises surpassed Pavlovian.
Than have a local "tips"? 10th percent of production companies - notorious barter fund. Actually deducted from the third position of strength. Business income, the illegality of which has already forgotten everything (for example, p and s p e w a t e I commit to a barter deal to supply sugar to Perm to 140 p / kg, and sold it in shops for 320 p / kg ). Plus local taxes. Minus taxes Republican, the largest of which Perm is one of the leading places in the country, and less provincial taxes.
Not long ago, Perm regional administration transferred (reallocated, came back) city 24 billion rubles. Last year's contributions are 80 billion to reduce the budget three times to add inflation. Adding the head of the city administration V.Fil filed for regional court.
So, the music is still bought the tops and bottoms of her performing. It - the people, Yeltsin promised. Ie power over the people.
Neither the companies nor the relevant authorities do not have the opportunities for economic maneuver, for example, to upgrade production technologies or to build a kindergarten. Not to mention the contents of houses, provision of basic research. Human Rights guarantees the right of Moscow on foreign trade. It's over, is not without material interest of the local authorities in this law. Thus, under Gorbachev signed an agreement with the company, "De Beers' monopoly on the sale of the company Vishersky diamonds. How much of this is a resident of the Perm region? And with oil exports, electricity? But can the local authorities to defend the interests of the region? Walking in Motovilikhinsky and Ordzhonikidze District Council showed that the authorities 1) does not even have the information about what they command, no economic or sociological cards, 2) do not realize that there is a problem of tax optimization attachments.
Attempts to offer a computerized optimization program of the regional council (particularly V.Cherepanovu) met with objections like: "That you have all the old plan, and we have now the market."
On the other hand, informal people regularly put to the authorities the issue of equalization Permian taxes with taxes other areas of the center of pressure to change the law, politobedinenie "Worker" was singing his favorite song on the formation of the budget (national programs) below. What a great economist, Deputy. obl.glavy Eugene Shapiro said, "Nah, it's not the market ..." What comes down, in this case, the work of MPs? To perform the "Instructions" voters. Which mandates? Put the phone booth on the corner, asphalt track to a stall and ... everything. Then - to answer voters' questions. Give me an apartment, give financial assistance, protection and preservation. As a rule, do not save and do not give. But as you have somewhere. The rest of their problem - do not know what, but to all of us is better lived. They, too, do not.
More deputies busy ordeal: collecting taxes and penalties, which are installed without the knowledge of the lower classes, are used to rank and file and robbery getting your pocket the deputy, and the invention of local taxes.
For example, consulted and came to deduct tax on the needs of the Ministry of Interior. Why? To enlarge the old charge of the police, more lower income, thus increasing crime, and then hire new police officers to calm.
At present, all the deputies, without exception, are occupied by privatization, which voters also did not order. In this regard, the Government, in addition to directors of state enterprises, and includes local "government."In turn, "Tips" cover-handedness and self-seeking directors. On the role of the "Soviet" power is exhausted.
Now take it one step: the Supreme Council - a copy of the local. Task Forces - is a balanced budget. Collect as much tax, and then the validity of (a favorite word Sapiro, here, he says, could be without socialism dispense ...) to each enough to distribute. But this formulation is illogical. It means that the first enterprise and regions need to undress to take away any independence, and then each task and specify imperatively gave it a pittance. It turns out that no Politburo, no Armed Forces are unable to keep track of multiple tasks, problems are much more than people in the Congress, all begging for money, and the budget is not dimensionless ... Why beg? No to first decide in about th problem, and only after this transfer tax money. After saving it!
Along the way, the Russian Armed Forces, together with the government of millions of dollars of profit covers various dealers and receives a Thanksgiving.
So, not voters determine what is good for them or bad, and the state imposes its will as a program. Not regions and businesses bought the work for public servants, and the servants make the "owners" to execute the plan and tax (to serve human values).But Soviet power - is a performer, not the customer. Differs from Parliament. Soviet power - is coordinating the interests of labor collectives and neighborhood councils at regional level, information on the level of these relations of Russia and the definition of money for the Armed Forces for solving common problems.
Then and only then can the planning, because only in this case, the objectives of the plan are accepted as self-interest, rather than as an infinitely distant in space and time, like the defender-emperor. Only if labor groups understand that they themselves need to do in the performance of a program, not just to some Council or any party.
The next step is to divide the central government executive and legislative. Social composition and the one and the other is about the same - or the director, or the Communist Party nomenklatura. So talking about the difference of positions is not necessary, and the same slogans as those and others - patriots, and they both want the people's welfare, etc. razn6itsa only banners: some like as for socialism, while others seem to be as in favor of capitalism.The basis for their disagreement is a structural crisis - running too one part of the economic mechanism forward, rather, behind the other, including - MIC. This means, in particular, the orientation of certain areas of the MIC to foreign industry. Then there is the question of sharing out the property: land, energy, defense industry. Naturally, some will ask the top section with help from abroad against their former colleagues in the elite, but it will appeal to all the people ... Scientific and Industrial Union (directorships-technocratic elite) begins to act against the inertia, to nothing of a layer of regional Directors.
The sticking point in sharing the pie is MIC: to formulate a military doctrine, which is not able to do neither Yeltsin nor the Armed Forces. While military doctrine has not changed for decades: conversion cold war against the people in a civil war against their governments ... Both the authorities and the same for domestic policy - is the formation in the center of the estate of the province. Apparent differences between capitalism and "socialism" means only that part of elected representatives want to suppress legal workers, and some (conservatives) want to cover up their power socialist phrase. What to do? First of all, to eliminate false tips. Then on the cleared site workers can build their own tips. There will be no hope that the good lord will perform the work that needs to be done by the workers.
Bourgeois Democratic Union calls for the Constituent Assembly, the organization type EIF require new elections to the Soviets. It is one and the same, because in the absence of control organizations working in the engineering and Soviets, and the Constituent Assembly has again come under the influence of money bags, directors, etc.Do I need to maintain in this case Yeltsin against the Supreme Council? No. Let Yeltsin will do the work of destruction of anti-Soviet power alone ...Boris Ikhlov 04/12/1993
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий