Government celebrates Pyotr Stolypin, as unsurpassed reformer, with which we must take an example, and even preparing for the events of the centennial of Stolypin reforms. As stated by First Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev, many of the ideas of the reformers remain relevant and are used by the current government - for example, the national project in agriculture. According to the same Dmitry Medvedev, currently Russia faces challenges in many respects similar to those faced government a hundred years ago. "Stolypin was able to propose and implement a comprehensive program of modernization of our country. First of all, is known for its agrarian reform, but it was not all. It was about the restructuring of industry, the rearmament of the army, strengthening the Russian state as a whole" According to the Prime Minister, "the main thing that showed Stolypin reforms, this is how the huge creative potential has the people of Russia, because the rate when their conduct was made primarily for those who want to work for those with initiative and enterprise . But not only Dmitry Medvedev is admired Peter Stolypin and his reforms. They admires and Agriculture Minister Alexei Gordeev, who told that our country only in 2002 was to repeat the record levels of grain exports, which were recorded in 1912 due to land reform Stolypin. "Historical parallels between the reforms of Stolypin and national projects are obvious," - says Gordeev. What is the true reason for such a radical turning power, from condemnation to the adoration of Peter Stolypin and his reforms? But let's not get ahead of ourselves, and shall understand in order, starting from the time of the Stolypin. Stolypin had headed the government from 1906 to 1911 his career a little, unlike the career of any other officer of the tsarist government. University, served in the Ministry of State Property (and in modern Russia, many officials began their careers with service in the State Property), a district leader of the nobility, the governorship in the Saratov province, where he distinguished himself against the repression of desperate farmers, arranging whippings, demonstrations and carrying out arrests, Interior Minister, Chairman of the Council of Ministers.
The legacy of his father he inherited an estate Kolnoberzhe, near Kaunas, which Arkady Dmitrievich Stolypin won at cards, and which for many years remained the main residence of the family of Peter Stolypin. As Minister of the Interior Stolypin went a step further and initiated a decree on martial courts, which decide cases "rebels", rebellious peasants, the sentences which were performed within 24 hours. Executions of peasants continued even after the Duma rejected II decree on martial courts because the military continued to operate the district courts.
Introduction Stolypin courts-martial has outraged not only the Social Democrats, but the entire liberal part of society. Member of the Kadet party Fedor Rodichev, denouncing the Stolypin, called a rope around their necks hung "Stolypin necktie." But it did not bother Stolypin. "First, calm - and then reform" - a strategy carried out Stolypin. The only sure way to calm the peasants Stolypin saw the widespread use of repression in the military field courts in demonstration killings. This reformer preaching Malthusian theory to the Russian manner: first, hang, and then, for those who remain, improve life. Researchers' calculations, only eight months (from August 1906 to April 1907) courts-martial in 1100 carried the death penalty. Writer Vladimir Korolenko noted that during the period of the Stolypin "executions were everyday occurrence".
Board of Stolypin, as head of government, had a period after the revolutionary reforms. Themselves were the product of the reform of the Russian bourgeois revolution of 1905, and not the result of "brilliant" insights Stolypin, when the tsarist monarchy and landlords throughout the government, it became clear that without land reform, without elimination of feudal obligations and peasant bondage, without reforming the state, authority does not hold.
Development of capitalism in agrarian relations, constrained by the old feudal relations, medieval allotment land tenure and community relations. Social class community, the attachment of peasants to the land, the presence of large landed estates, along with a miniscule plots of the peasants, did not contribute to raising commodity production did not meet the requirements of capitalist methods of farming. Impoverishment and obezzemelivaniya peasantry, as a result of ruthless exploitation by landowners and officials, caused a storm of protest, spurring more and more peasant revolts, to the requirements of the landed estates. Fearing the arbitrary seizure landed estates by peasants, the government and decided to hold Stolypin agrarian reform, displacing some of the peasants in remote areas of Russia, part - giving Redemption lands, and thus bring down the revolutionary wave. But Stolypin, coupled with the Romanovs and other large landowners, sought to agrarian reform is not in the interests of millions of peasants, and in the interests of 30,000 landowners, owning 70 million acres of land. The peasants fought against landlordism, and they, according to the plan Stolypin, was driven into the distant and uninhabited margins and financial bondage. The landowners received from the state huge sums of redemption, it probably is, according to Medvedev those who wanted to work, who had the initiative and enterprise, and farmers - the sand, long uninhabited border regions of Russia and huge debts. Here is the result of Stolypin agrarian vaunted reforms. The Agrarian Question, acute problems during the 1905 revolution, thanks to the Stolypin reforms resolved in favor of large landed estates, and not to the peasants, which led to unprecedented famine in 1911, 30 million poor and the oppressed farmers. Landowners exported corn, and farmers eat carrion and dung ash-bread, which is demonstrated at a meeting of the State Duma. In addition to land reform Stolypin, was featured in the June Third coup, which, apparently, Dmitry Medvedev, and calls to strengthen the Russian state as a whole. June 3, 1907 issued a manifesto to dissolve the Duma and the change in the Electoral Regulations prepared by the Government of Stolypin, which reduces the representation of workers and peasants. Did not like him deputy from the peasants and workers who sought to protect the interests of their constituents. Themselves the drafters of the Electoral called this reform of the electoral law "shameless." But the king, having heard the report of the Stolypin reform of electoral law, adopted it, and smiled and said: "I am also a shameless". As a result of this coup III Duma has become more reactionary and more docile in the hands of the Romanovs and Stolypin, which enabled to carry out agrarian reform in the interests of landlords, got every right to plunder the peasants. Returning to the days of today, you can really note the similarities of the reforms with the reforms of Stolypin. First, the same shameless cuts voting rights of the people, and, secondly, the privatization of state property in the interest of the party and economic nomenklatura, modern landowners. If we compare the reform Stolypin and contemporary transformations of the last fifteen years on the content, the Stolypin reforms seem to be preferred. Stolypin broke the feudal restrictions, clearing the way to the capitalist mode of economic management, and this was their progressiveness. But our reformers, reactionaries entirely, since moved from the developed monopoly capital (monopoly, forced to serve the people - that is socialism), to the wild and unrestrained capitalism, and thus pulled out all the evils of the capitalist economy, not creating anything positive.
Vitaly Glukhov
The legacy of his father he inherited an estate Kolnoberzhe, near Kaunas, which Arkady Dmitrievich Stolypin won at cards, and which for many years remained the main residence of the family of Peter Stolypin. As Minister of the Interior Stolypin went a step further and initiated a decree on martial courts, which decide cases "rebels", rebellious peasants, the sentences which were performed within 24 hours. Executions of peasants continued even after the Duma rejected II decree on martial courts because the military continued to operate the district courts.
Introduction Stolypin courts-martial has outraged not only the Social Democrats, but the entire liberal part of society. Member of the Kadet party Fedor Rodichev, denouncing the Stolypin, called a rope around their necks hung "Stolypin necktie." But it did not bother Stolypin. "First, calm - and then reform" - a strategy carried out Stolypin. The only sure way to calm the peasants Stolypin saw the widespread use of repression in the military field courts in demonstration killings. This reformer preaching Malthusian theory to the Russian manner: first, hang, and then, for those who remain, improve life. Researchers' calculations, only eight months (from August 1906 to April 1907) courts-martial in 1100 carried the death penalty. Writer Vladimir Korolenko noted that during the period of the Stolypin "executions were everyday occurrence".
Board of Stolypin, as head of government, had a period after the revolutionary reforms. Themselves were the product of the reform of the Russian bourgeois revolution of 1905, and not the result of "brilliant" insights Stolypin, when the tsarist monarchy and landlords throughout the government, it became clear that without land reform, without elimination of feudal obligations and peasant bondage, without reforming the state, authority does not hold.
Development of capitalism in agrarian relations, constrained by the old feudal relations, medieval allotment land tenure and community relations. Social class community, the attachment of peasants to the land, the presence of large landed estates, along with a miniscule plots of the peasants, did not contribute to raising commodity production did not meet the requirements of capitalist methods of farming. Impoverishment and obezzemelivaniya peasantry, as a result of ruthless exploitation by landowners and officials, caused a storm of protest, spurring more and more peasant revolts, to the requirements of the landed estates. Fearing the arbitrary seizure landed estates by peasants, the government and decided to hold Stolypin agrarian reform, displacing some of the peasants in remote areas of Russia, part - giving Redemption lands, and thus bring down the revolutionary wave. But Stolypin, coupled with the Romanovs and other large landowners, sought to agrarian reform is not in the interests of millions of peasants, and in the interests of 30,000 landowners, owning 70 million acres of land. The peasants fought against landlordism, and they, according to the plan Stolypin, was driven into the distant and uninhabited margins and financial bondage. The landowners received from the state huge sums of redemption, it probably is, according to Medvedev those who wanted to work, who had the initiative and enterprise, and farmers - the sand, long uninhabited border regions of Russia and huge debts. Here is the result of Stolypin agrarian vaunted reforms. The Agrarian Question, acute problems during the 1905 revolution, thanks to the Stolypin reforms resolved in favor of large landed estates, and not to the peasants, which led to unprecedented famine in 1911, 30 million poor and the oppressed farmers. Landowners exported corn, and farmers eat carrion and dung ash-bread, which is demonstrated at a meeting of the State Duma. In addition to land reform Stolypin, was featured in the June Third coup, which, apparently, Dmitry Medvedev, and calls to strengthen the Russian state as a whole. June 3, 1907 issued a manifesto to dissolve the Duma and the change in the Electoral Regulations prepared by the Government of Stolypin, which reduces the representation of workers and peasants. Did not like him deputy from the peasants and workers who sought to protect the interests of their constituents. Themselves the drafters of the Electoral called this reform of the electoral law "shameless." But the king, having heard the report of the Stolypin reform of electoral law, adopted it, and smiled and said: "I am also a shameless". As a result of this coup III Duma has become more reactionary and more docile in the hands of the Romanovs and Stolypin, which enabled to carry out agrarian reform in the interests of landlords, got every right to plunder the peasants. Returning to the days of today, you can really note the similarities of the reforms with the reforms of Stolypin. First, the same shameless cuts voting rights of the people, and, secondly, the privatization of state property in the interest of the party and economic nomenklatura, modern landowners. If we compare the reform Stolypin and contemporary transformations of the last fifteen years on the content, the Stolypin reforms seem to be preferred. Stolypin broke the feudal restrictions, clearing the way to the capitalist mode of economic management, and this was their progressiveness. But our reformers, reactionaries entirely, since moved from the developed monopoly capital (monopoly, forced to serve the people - that is socialism), to the wild and unrestrained capitalism, and thus pulled out all the evils of the capitalist economy, not creating anything positive.
Vitaly Glukhov
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий