Поиск по этому блогу

Klark651

Loading...

суббота, 30 января 2016 г.

Ministry of Construction in the service of the parasite

Russian Ministry of Construction said it is impossible to freeze utility tariffs
  
Romain Dzhivarhinyan
 
The deputy head of the Ministry of Construction Andrei Chibis stated that a moratorium on raising fees for utility services is not possible "because of inflation." On Thursday, January 14 reports.According to the ministry, in 2016 growth in total payments for housing and communal services in Russia should not exceed 4 percent.Offer to temporarily freeze utility tariffs, as well as other payments, which are Russian citizens under the law, put forward on January 13 the head of the Duma Committee on Labor, and Veterans Affairs sotspolitike Olga Batalina.


What threatens Russians, owed for communal"This is not the first request for a moratorium on the part of deputies during the election campaign. We always ask - then who will pay? "- Said the official. According to him, indexation of tariffs is necessary at least in relation to inflation. Therefore, he assured the lapwing, a smaller increase in the cost of payment of utility bills is not possible.Representative offices also named the overall amount of debt for utility services in Russia. As of the third quarter of 2015 it amounted to 958 billion rubles. Half of this amount the debts of legal entities. It is the duty of individuals for housing and utility payments equivalent to almost 250 billion rubles. At the same time the most honest taxpayers are the pensioners, said the deputy minister.He also recalled that the citizens can get grants to pay utility bills, if utility costs exceed 17 percent of income. According to government regulation, the maximum share of expenditures on these services should not exceed 22 percent of the total income of a family. "For this purpose, it spent nearly 300 billion rubles from the budget every year, and get the support of 30 million people. No country in the world is not such a percentage of the population (over 20) who receive social assistance for utilities, "- said the lapwing. On April 1, 2016 line costs obschedomovye needs (ODN) The receipt for payment of utility services will disappear, said lapwing."We believe that the problem needs obschedomovyh need to remove the common man. And pay exactly the amount, limited regulations needed to serve a particular house, will go down in housing services. A line of "ARF" of public services, which is constantly changing, will disappear once and for all "- promised the official said.Source: police-russia.info

Current Archive
The benefits of planning and market-based approaches GovernmentConflict of business and government turned the discussion of maximum tariffs for services of natural monopolies at yesterday's cabinet meeting. If last year was mostly a brawler, "Gazprom" disagrees with the cuts in their appetites, then yesterday it successfully replaced the Chairman of the Board of RAO "EES" Anatoly Chubais. For seed Mikhail Fradkov, he promised to double GDP by investing in energy, and then German Gref announced that his economic policies - not that other, as the medieval palmistry.That's really who have no palmistry, and net cash interest, so it is with Mr. Chubais. And thanks to its vigorous activity, for more than fifteen years we are told that Russia is built, though somehow awkward and difficult, the market economy, but presented at a government meeting the basic parameters of the three-year economic forecast, which indicated that in 2006 rates for electricity will grow by 7.5%, tariffs on w / e. transportation to - 8% for gas in - 11%, in 2007 electricity at - 6.5%, in the w / e. transportation to - 7% for gas by - 8% in 2008 in electricity - 5.5%, in the w / e. For transportation 5.5%, gas at -7%, plus inflation from 4 to 8%, according to several of the other.The question is, where is the market economy, the development of which so advocated the current leaders? What develops Economic Development, laying such growth rates? And for Chubais and this is not enough. Maybe they know in advance that it is in such proportion will increase the costs of enterprises producing and supplying electricity and gas, as well as and the railroad? Of course not. But, for the entire economy of the country and for the citizens of this increase in tariffs will result in the growth of real production costs, higher prices for all goods and services, and consequently, slowing development, rising unemployment and declining living standards.Government is the purest demagogy, for which there are explicit plans for the further deterioration of the people's life. And for citizens planned to raise tariffs faster than with enterprises ... people just hang noodles on the ears. They say that a great blessing for him to be, if the tariffs in 2009 will grow by 6 percent rather than 8 as in 2007. The fact that these 6 per cent in 2009 in rubles will be more than 8 percent in 2007 , people no one to explain is not going to. And the prime minister Fradkov such verbal balancing act, seems quite happy.A strange situation where ministers, at a meeting of the government, say that the growth of domestic production falling, like worried about our economy, and then, rather than to propose measures to address the situation, offer even more smother domestic producers increasing tariffs electricity, gas, railway transportation, and even the top cover inflation. To surely.All the more strange to see such a zeal of ministers, in the desire to help our "poor" monopolists, since the growth of these tariffs will not lead to the replenishment of the state budget, but rather the contrary, because the fall profitability of industrial and agricultural producers and, as a consequence, reduce the taxable base.As marketeers pursuing our ministers, putting the growth of tariffs? Naturally, the answer to this question lies in the material interests and the interests of the so-called natural monopolies can be traced very clearly. It is they, the owners of monopolies and benefit from the growth of tariffs. Without spending a penny on an increase in productivity or the conversion of production, or to improve the methods of work or to reduce the administrative apparatus, they receive a significant increase in profits. And they, and there is no need to do it. They, like any monopoly, seeking to increase their profits not by reducing production costs, and by adjusting prices, planning the growth of tariffs. And, in this case, it is not necessary to have seven rocket scientist to figure out that our basic monopolies in the energy and gas industry, as well as, and the railroad, lobbied for their interests and laid myself revenue growth. Prepared by, so to speak, the soil itself, then to explain to the citizens that prices are rising according to the approved plan of the government.But we have something for ordinary citizens and the economy, from this no easier. What a difference to us as we would rob the monopoly? According to the plan of the government or when they want and how they want. Well, probably, our ministers believe that the plan would be more honest.It turns out that when people are asked why prices for food and industrial goods, why unwound inflation, the officials say, that we are not here and, as we have a market economy, and employers set their own prices for their products, and inflation is expressed Alexei Kudrin, in the newspaper "Izvestia", is due to the rapid growth of tariffs for housing and communal services. However, for reasons unclear to us, which is why rising prices for housing and communal services, the finance minister once modestly. And when people are trying to figure out what has caused price increases for electricity and gas, he said that it planned government strategy.Citizens rejoice! Finally, our government came the economic outlook, and not for one year, and the next three years, and now, according to their forecasts, every year we will be more and more to pay for goods and services. However, along the way, we have learned to our ministers who are friends and who are dearer to them. But what are we from that knowledge?Vitaly Glukhov26/03/2006

Комментариев нет:

Отправить комментарий