Contemporary Archive 1990"My
son, excise, obsessed with the idea of" transparency - frya! "Once his
otschelkali in newspapers for extortion, and that was the reason for his
insanity. He writes almost all the city newspapers, but not to read them. In each room, he received seeks "reprehensible", finding such, he arms himself with a colored pencil and Mara ... "It seems that our society is ripe for Chekhov or Shchedrin brush. Good! Stupidity is better than indifference. Deviances diversify gray existence. Note - Chekhov constantly describes some pathological cases. It
can be useful for the sake of exercise, - said Vladimir Levi - imagine
that street - it psihoklinika without windows and doors.Thus,
the "one night no less fine clerk (steward), Ivan D. Chervyakov ..."
called the workers' representative Union (MS) and asks, "Are you for or
against the union?"RS
representative rummaged among the papers on the table and opened the
"Green Book", "The referendum - said Gaddafi - the falsification of
democracy, those who said" yes "and those who say" no "does not actually
express their will and doomed modern democracy to silence. This is the most brutal and ruthless form of dictatorship. "
People - formulated on Lenin's thought representative of RS - long will the stupid victims of deceit as they learn under the political, moral, religious, and other statements and appeals to distinguish class interests.The choice between "single" Union "sovereign" states and a set of "sovereign" states - dummy. It is a choice between two empty abstractions, have no relation to what they do. It is clear that the sovereignty of the people and the sovereignty of governments is not one the same. For example, the Azerbaijani and Armenian administration actually figure out their own relationship by smashing their heads against the peoples. In this case there is a dirty big brother from Moscow and chooses who it profitable.Massive success with the organization Interfront provocation, the brutal exploitation of the Lithuanian factories, skyrocketing and decline in the authority of the government (did not help the victim Prunskiene) show that Landsbergis branded national revival, defends rather own independence.That is, the dominance of abstract law means that every force fills the empty abstraction of their content. Not have their own political organization, fragmented and powerless because workers stay with empty hands.The question of ownership of the means of production workers in the national movements has not been raised, nor bourgeois Lithuania or "socialist" homeland. The level of understanding of democracy is not lower than the freedom for the entrepreneur. Democratization does without a demos, without the 80-million-strong army of workers. None of the parties does not help the workers organization to become an independent force. You bet! Why create a competitor. Under the guise of fighting for competence management workers push from management.Of competence may be necessary to make two opposite conclusions: either the need to create conditions for the involvement of workers in management, or "every cricket stick to his last." Democrats are quite logical to choose a second, bowing before the "master" workers and saying that he (predstavte!) personality. However, this person will not allow it to management, because by the lack of seats. Here the interests of democracy and bureaucracy are closed.In these terms, the nation is frozen in the elite, the upper layers of the nation. Elite and is identified with the nation, as an opportunity to lower ranks of the struggle for a good stable (better select the host), and chew each other. Therefore, Lenin proposed to support national movements, as they are directed against despotism (exactly what the MS), and to oppose the national movement, when it starts to put barriers between the proletarians.Therefore meaningless to support Democrats in their dreams provide government (Gorbachev advocated for him) states. They make the choice between the workers, who rob, and workers who robbed a little less. As a result, the workers lose.On the other hand, can not be sustained, and the policy of centralization, this really is our Asian spetsifika.16-February 17 took place in Chelyabinsk local conference of the movement "Soviet Russia." Adopted the Charter tells the unifying principle of motion: 1) the socialist path of development, 2) social mainly (?) Ownership and the lack of exploitation of man by man (?) And (?) Capital, and 3) the real (?) Equality of all people of our country in a single state - the USSR.It was found that under Soviet Russia they understand the USSR. It is not clear then, as, for example, with the Soviet Kyrgyzstan. You re going to rape people? - Asked to attend this outrage members of the association "Work." - You want to decide for Lithuanians, how they live? And what does the "socialist road"? It disgusting that happened before? And where is your socialist basis, show us where - and we run we'll see!So far, the means of production manage departments and work is still a cog in the machine, production factor, it does not belong. As in any capitalist country is rich or poor, none of the principles of the Paris Commune is not implemented, the private equity existed in the Soviet Union to the 17th year, and in the form of the state, and more shallow. Nobody had no plan was not implemented. What kind of socialism can be said? We need to understand what they are fighting two bourgeois government at a time when the country for more than half of the workers engaged in gross depersonalized labor, that is, not a hint of socialism! And this war is presented as a struggle between the socialist and capitalist idea. And our democracy believes. Incredible."No one communist - interspersed representative of RS Lenin quote - would not dream of the new economic order socialist." Five years ago, Moscow forced to believe in communism, which means the benefits for themselves. Now she makes us believe in capitalism, which means the benefits for themselves. And those who are not able to regroup, remain aware of their privileges as socialism. The choice between capitalism and socialism - a dummy, under these abstractions should be able to distinguish between the interests of private property owners in the chair. And they themselves abstractions are not related to the fact that the mean. The choice between the empty abstractions reduced to a choice between the chairs.Of course, a monopoly - is good. It provides high wages, stable employment and competitiveness in relation to the external market. Japan - is an example. The only problem is that the unit formed an economic system in such a way as to make it easier to hold on to power. Instead of public property Khabarovsk bolts nuts socialize with the Baltic, and Estonians have not forgotten how to 40th in two weeks spent collectivization. And this is called the concentration of capital and labor?Instead won October's right to self-determination realized Stalinist idea of "mezhdunatsionalnogo state," permeates every nation, equalizing different nation denationalize. Today, society is deprived not only national, but also of class features, if workers in Lithuania can not agree with each other against the employers. A "Soviet Russia" shows a certain unity of the "sovereign" states.(Judging from the Permian officials and many millions of impotent men, the society is deprived not only of class, but also sexual traits. Way, zdravotdelov analysis showed that, in 1991, the death rate exceeds the birth rate in Perm, and the excess will be increased. So in other cities too).That is, the most important result referendumnogo boom is that labor organizations, divided into teams, "ostrokonechnikov" and "big-endian", began as a ping-pong balls, tossing the "sovereignty" and "glasnost" universal values ", looking as though in stores already have everything. Or displayed immediately as soon as ballots will be omitted from the ballot boxes.It follows that express any relation to the referendum - is absurd. Landsbergis is a minor figure in the fight for seats between Gorbachev and Yeltsin, which is used to clarify the relationship with each other. Beat the weak, the strong shall be afraid.If Gorbachev has shifted, instead, "mezhdunatsionalnoe state" implement Yeltsin. That is democracy, before all the required "alternative", and recently Stankevich said that "alternative projects they do not indulge."In a strong market-combined with weak against the strong, mechanics, known since the time of Machiavelli. For example, defeating Gorbachev, Yeltsin, combined with Landsbergis against Bush. Landsbergis or with Bush against Yeltsin. The more the couple old nomenclature? What will work? It's nothing. (It turned out that Yeltsin, Landsbergis and Bush - against Russian workers, bus.)Referendum in principle nothing. The reason for the growth of unemployment, price increases, the gap of international and industrial relations - small commodity market, leaving the interests of workers in the shadows.Confusion in the law, fueled by confusion in the economy, shows a great example of political competition and pluralism of opinions. Multi-party system, and other nonsense, for which clings homegrown democracy. It turned out that neither Yeltsin nor Gorbachev not tolerate (or show the view?). The younger generation will say to both of them, "thank you" for a happy childhood with a card system. Support any of them, to participate in this sort of policy - stupid. In the words of Chekhov, the Russian people have a tendency to all kinds of freaks, when not satisfied with basic needs. Money is something to a referendum - vysvisnuty.It was felt that at the other end, Ivan D. Dashenkinu pondered the thought of Chekhov's "The Wedding", "They hochut his education show and always talk about the incomprehensible.""Good! Excellent! Understood. Are you a vegetarian. But what about the pig, that is, excuse me, how did you - for or against? Yeltsin or Gorbachev? "I am not making this up. Indeed, the conversation took place. Marx in the Manifesto is about this statement: "We must be grateful to capitalism for what he has delivered us from the idiocy of rural life."Oh referendum! Oh, Malinin. Oh, Pele. Oh Kashpirovsky. Oh, Stalin. At a rally in support of Yeltsin in Moscow suddenly heard: "Mo Lod particles! Mo Lod particles ». Bloomed folklore: "Yeltsin - though Yeltsin - yes! Gorbachev - the enemy, Gorbachev - the ravine! "It cried in the packed metro man with bulging eyes, apparently realizing that nowhere else to cry is heard. On Kalinin Avenue, using the case of agitation and propaganda, Krishna and was a crowd, dancing, singing into a megaphone guttural voice: "Hare Krishna, Hare Krishna." Sunk by Barricadnaya demonstrators wave drowned their shouts of "I-ho, go, I-ho, go away!" I asked the woman, who moved forward - someone go? - Yazov go, - said the woman. I turned away. And Gorbachev also go away - zazyvayusche stretched towards me woman. And the whole nomenclature. Like - all? - I was surprised - and Yeltsin, too? No, we are for Yeltsin, said the woman. Manezh Square to two hundred thousandth the river flowed. Mass culture, mass schizophrenia, the source of any form of fascism. In short, the pathology, the theme just for the doctor.They talk about the friendship of the people, and keep in mind that of the central government to other governments. They talk about the sovereignty of the people, while they themselves can not ensure the sovereignty of the Russian in the Baltic region, Abkhazia in Georgia, Gagauzia in Moldova.And you want to participate in the universal lie? Obviously, the Democrats have sexual satisfaction with the word "referendum" and believe that it is the policy. Yes, for policy impotent. Today - a referendum tomorrow - to take people, declare war on the Chinese version of the wheel, the next day everything will run consolidate (still can not figure out who that by this course? With one boss goes to another control?) And at the session - as it? - "Parliament"! - Will explore the question, which end, obtuse or acute, break an egg. Figured as Nizhnetagilsky Council for the day - to take out of the hall bust of Lenin or not. (It later turns out that the overwhelming majority voted to retain the Soviet Union, but the sense of voting, there was no, bus ..)But it would not be an egg problem - would come up with another! It remains to recall Lenin (oh, often commemorate, will get from the Democrats!) Phrase from a letter to Gorky on the contents of democratic goals, which has become almost the main accusation of Bolshevism. Really, if this is - the Democrats, I - not a Democrat. I do not want to participate in this policy instead of quackery. Do not want to boycott, neither for nor against. I declare the strike.
The strike requirement issuedMember of the Board of Deputies of the association "Work"Ikhlov Boris, March 1990, Tel. 65-38-52
People - formulated on Lenin's thought representative of RS - long will the stupid victims of deceit as they learn under the political, moral, religious, and other statements and appeals to distinguish class interests.The choice between "single" Union "sovereign" states and a set of "sovereign" states - dummy. It is a choice between two empty abstractions, have no relation to what they do. It is clear that the sovereignty of the people and the sovereignty of governments is not one the same. For example, the Azerbaijani and Armenian administration actually figure out their own relationship by smashing their heads against the peoples. In this case there is a dirty big brother from Moscow and chooses who it profitable.Massive success with the organization Interfront provocation, the brutal exploitation of the Lithuanian factories, skyrocketing and decline in the authority of the government (did not help the victim Prunskiene) show that Landsbergis branded national revival, defends rather own independence.That is, the dominance of abstract law means that every force fills the empty abstraction of their content. Not have their own political organization, fragmented and powerless because workers stay with empty hands.The question of ownership of the means of production workers in the national movements has not been raised, nor bourgeois Lithuania or "socialist" homeland. The level of understanding of democracy is not lower than the freedom for the entrepreneur. Democratization does without a demos, without the 80-million-strong army of workers. None of the parties does not help the workers organization to become an independent force. You bet! Why create a competitor. Under the guise of fighting for competence management workers push from management.Of competence may be necessary to make two opposite conclusions: either the need to create conditions for the involvement of workers in management, or "every cricket stick to his last." Democrats are quite logical to choose a second, bowing before the "master" workers and saying that he (predstavte!) personality. However, this person will not allow it to management, because by the lack of seats. Here the interests of democracy and bureaucracy are closed.In these terms, the nation is frozen in the elite, the upper layers of the nation. Elite and is identified with the nation, as an opportunity to lower ranks of the struggle for a good stable (better select the host), and chew each other. Therefore, Lenin proposed to support national movements, as they are directed against despotism (exactly what the MS), and to oppose the national movement, when it starts to put barriers between the proletarians.Therefore meaningless to support Democrats in their dreams provide government (Gorbachev advocated for him) states. They make the choice between the workers, who rob, and workers who robbed a little less. As a result, the workers lose.On the other hand, can not be sustained, and the policy of centralization, this really is our Asian spetsifika.16-February 17 took place in Chelyabinsk local conference of the movement "Soviet Russia." Adopted the Charter tells the unifying principle of motion: 1) the socialist path of development, 2) social mainly (?) Ownership and the lack of exploitation of man by man (?) And (?) Capital, and 3) the real (?) Equality of all people of our country in a single state - the USSR.It was found that under Soviet Russia they understand the USSR. It is not clear then, as, for example, with the Soviet Kyrgyzstan. You re going to rape people? - Asked to attend this outrage members of the association "Work." - You want to decide for Lithuanians, how they live? And what does the "socialist road"? It disgusting that happened before? And where is your socialist basis, show us where - and we run we'll see!So far, the means of production manage departments and work is still a cog in the machine, production factor, it does not belong. As in any capitalist country is rich or poor, none of the principles of the Paris Commune is not implemented, the private equity existed in the Soviet Union to the 17th year, and in the form of the state, and more shallow. Nobody had no plan was not implemented. What kind of socialism can be said? We need to understand what they are fighting two bourgeois government at a time when the country for more than half of the workers engaged in gross depersonalized labor, that is, not a hint of socialism! And this war is presented as a struggle between the socialist and capitalist idea. And our democracy believes. Incredible."No one communist - interspersed representative of RS Lenin quote - would not dream of the new economic order socialist." Five years ago, Moscow forced to believe in communism, which means the benefits for themselves. Now she makes us believe in capitalism, which means the benefits for themselves. And those who are not able to regroup, remain aware of their privileges as socialism. The choice between capitalism and socialism - a dummy, under these abstractions should be able to distinguish between the interests of private property owners in the chair. And they themselves abstractions are not related to the fact that the mean. The choice between the empty abstractions reduced to a choice between the chairs.Of course, a monopoly - is good. It provides high wages, stable employment and competitiveness in relation to the external market. Japan - is an example. The only problem is that the unit formed an economic system in such a way as to make it easier to hold on to power. Instead of public property Khabarovsk bolts nuts socialize with the Baltic, and Estonians have not forgotten how to 40th in two weeks spent collectivization. And this is called the concentration of capital and labor?Instead won October's right to self-determination realized Stalinist idea of "mezhdunatsionalnogo state," permeates every nation, equalizing different nation denationalize. Today, society is deprived not only national, but also of class features, if workers in Lithuania can not agree with each other against the employers. A "Soviet Russia" shows a certain unity of the "sovereign" states.(Judging from the Permian officials and many millions of impotent men, the society is deprived not only of class, but also sexual traits. Way, zdravotdelov analysis showed that, in 1991, the death rate exceeds the birth rate in Perm, and the excess will be increased. So in other cities too).That is, the most important result referendumnogo boom is that labor organizations, divided into teams, "ostrokonechnikov" and "big-endian", began as a ping-pong balls, tossing the "sovereignty" and "glasnost" universal values ", looking as though in stores already have everything. Or displayed immediately as soon as ballots will be omitted from the ballot boxes.It follows that express any relation to the referendum - is absurd. Landsbergis is a minor figure in the fight for seats between Gorbachev and Yeltsin, which is used to clarify the relationship with each other. Beat the weak, the strong shall be afraid.If Gorbachev has shifted, instead, "mezhdunatsionalnoe state" implement Yeltsin. That is democracy, before all the required "alternative", and recently Stankevich said that "alternative projects they do not indulge."In a strong market-combined with weak against the strong, mechanics, known since the time of Machiavelli. For example, defeating Gorbachev, Yeltsin, combined with Landsbergis against Bush. Landsbergis or with Bush against Yeltsin. The more the couple old nomenclature? What will work? It's nothing. (It turned out that Yeltsin, Landsbergis and Bush - against Russian workers, bus.)Referendum in principle nothing. The reason for the growth of unemployment, price increases, the gap of international and industrial relations - small commodity market, leaving the interests of workers in the shadows.Confusion in the law, fueled by confusion in the economy, shows a great example of political competition and pluralism of opinions. Multi-party system, and other nonsense, for which clings homegrown democracy. It turned out that neither Yeltsin nor Gorbachev not tolerate (or show the view?). The younger generation will say to both of them, "thank you" for a happy childhood with a card system. Support any of them, to participate in this sort of policy - stupid. In the words of Chekhov, the Russian people have a tendency to all kinds of freaks, when not satisfied with basic needs. Money is something to a referendum - vysvisnuty.It was felt that at the other end, Ivan D. Dashenkinu pondered the thought of Chekhov's "The Wedding", "They hochut his education show and always talk about the incomprehensible.""Good! Excellent! Understood. Are you a vegetarian. But what about the pig, that is, excuse me, how did you - for or against? Yeltsin or Gorbachev? "I am not making this up. Indeed, the conversation took place. Marx in the Manifesto is about this statement: "We must be grateful to capitalism for what he has delivered us from the idiocy of rural life."Oh referendum! Oh, Malinin. Oh, Pele. Oh Kashpirovsky. Oh, Stalin. At a rally in support of Yeltsin in Moscow suddenly heard: "Mo Lod particles! Mo Lod particles ». Bloomed folklore: "Yeltsin - though Yeltsin - yes! Gorbachev - the enemy, Gorbachev - the ravine! "It cried in the packed metro man with bulging eyes, apparently realizing that nowhere else to cry is heard. On Kalinin Avenue, using the case of agitation and propaganda, Krishna and was a crowd, dancing, singing into a megaphone guttural voice: "Hare Krishna, Hare Krishna." Sunk by Barricadnaya demonstrators wave drowned their shouts of "I-ho, go, I-ho, go away!" I asked the woman, who moved forward - someone go? - Yazov go, - said the woman. I turned away. And Gorbachev also go away - zazyvayusche stretched towards me woman. And the whole nomenclature. Like - all? - I was surprised - and Yeltsin, too? No, we are for Yeltsin, said the woman. Manezh Square to two hundred thousandth the river flowed. Mass culture, mass schizophrenia, the source of any form of fascism. In short, the pathology, the theme just for the doctor.They talk about the friendship of the people, and keep in mind that of the central government to other governments. They talk about the sovereignty of the people, while they themselves can not ensure the sovereignty of the Russian in the Baltic region, Abkhazia in Georgia, Gagauzia in Moldova.And you want to participate in the universal lie? Obviously, the Democrats have sexual satisfaction with the word "referendum" and believe that it is the policy. Yes, for policy impotent. Today - a referendum tomorrow - to take people, declare war on the Chinese version of the wheel, the next day everything will run consolidate (still can not figure out who that by this course? With one boss goes to another control?) And at the session - as it? - "Parliament"! - Will explore the question, which end, obtuse or acute, break an egg. Figured as Nizhnetagilsky Council for the day - to take out of the hall bust of Lenin or not. (It later turns out that the overwhelming majority voted to retain the Soviet Union, but the sense of voting, there was no, bus ..)But it would not be an egg problem - would come up with another! It remains to recall Lenin (oh, often commemorate, will get from the Democrats!) Phrase from a letter to Gorky on the contents of democratic goals, which has become almost the main accusation of Bolshevism. Really, if this is - the Democrats, I - not a Democrat. I do not want to participate in this policy instead of quackery. Do not want to boycott, neither for nor against. I declare the strike.
The strike requirement issuedMember of the Board of Deputies of the association "Work"Ikhlov Boris, March 1990, Tel. 65-38-52
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий