The sergeant said that he whistlesWhistle believes he whistlesThe law says that he whistles ...
Any act of our government is committed to the people and in the name of it. Of course, the competent government should deal with the problem oblagodetelstvovaniya much better. However, the most competent government, deciding for the people, mediates economic ties, impoverishes them, atomizing the proletariat and thus creates maximum anarchy of production. If the state plays the role of government for the people by the monopolies, the anarchy of production shifts to the market. In both cases, the driving position monopoly (oligopoly) in the state inevitably creates a divergence of government actions and statements, and declarations - the inevitable confusion.In any case, in the interests of monopoly (oligopoly) is maintaining its privileged position, which is contrary to the interests of the workers. Since there is opposition, the media, laws. Works of art are mostly focused on those in power layer, the proletariat will explain the inevitability of its subordinate position in society, that is, to calm a slave, that he would be fed.
However, if the workers on the neck instead of incompetent officials sit down competent, it does not mean overcoming the anarchy of production, if only because that part of the proletariat in this case will remain limited.Natural removal of this restriction is the process of replacing the government, coming towards the proletariat, the government of the proletariat. The crucial point in this change is smashing the old state machinery and its replacement with the new: the transfer of power to the Soviets. That is, the destruction of the anarchy of production requires more retraction of the masses in control. This requires that the government was not only competent, much control over them as well as the causes that enable the competent leadership to consolidate its position, removing workers from the state of affairs and thus destroying the government.As the picture adjustment rather fits well duping another campaign, including the distortion of the Marxist-Leninist legacy worth remembering about what exactly causes involved.First, the Soviet government means that government officials are controlled by the proletariat. Government workers, one way or another, involves control. But. Declaration of the Secretary General and his entourage contradict his own prevention workers away from politics. For the "incompetent" We are workers, agricultural workers, doctors, teachers, account for the vast majority of the working population. Nomination of candidates this year gave it a majority of 25.2% of all the candidates. Competent class has certain privileges - a place in the social hierarchy. So its representatives never risk losing steering wheel controls, in contrast to workers who, due to lack of privileges, for the most part never before steering not reach, that is, do not become more competent competent, if only because they do not give it a try to turn. This ensures the right to work the Soviet government as a form of the dictatorship of the proletariat.Second, the Soviet government means modest pay government officials to address the flow of control to the "selfish interests." But Yeltsin scandal clearly showed that the nomenclature is not going to abandon the acquisition by bureaucratic chairs goods. Luxurious outfits and travel Raisa little resemblance to how the principles of the Paris Commune, and wages. Or in a new model of socialism position in society and her husband has a job his wife?Thus, declaring Leninist principles, the management actually a step-by-step deals with them. Instead cancellation of privileges for members of the government, the decree of the Presidium of the USSR Supreme Soviet, which was signed by Gorbachev and Menteshashvili puts MPs in a privileged position, "public insults and defamation ... officials appointed, elected or approved by the Congress of People's Deputies of the USSR Supreme Soviet, or ... shall be punished by imprisonment up to three years or a fine of up to two thousand. "And this is not the first departure from the Soviet principles. The law prohibits the trial of a deputy without the consent of the Council. Even newspapers noted that the law virtually prevents proceedings. It is not even about the Soviet principles in this case, and on the form of democracy such as the tribal times of Yaroslav the Charter. If we are guided en Europe, we need to keep at least formal equality before the law.Note that the range of law-is on the rise: the law, dispose of Art. 50, 51 of the Constitution on freedom of association, meetings, rallies, demonstrations, etc. to the law of uneven and indirect elections, where a vote of the member of the Central Committee is 20 thousand votes of ordinary voters (1). The next step - limiting cooperative publishing. And apotheosis - increased censorship decree of the 11th of April.Obviously, the adoption of decrees of this nature is not due to an economic necessity, and is not, a simple statement of the status quo. Series of statutes is a reaction
Amendment to Art. 100 and Art. 119 has not been approved under the pressure of the Georgian and Baltic organizations as infringing the rights of the union republics.(Recall the reaction of 1907) to the growing struggle for self-government: the national movement and cleaning of the Soviets. The election campaign has shown that the criticism of the nomenclature figures almost without fail they are eliminated. However, an attempt to seize power by constitutional means in Armenia was not a success - the voters had to vote at gunpoint. If we add to this the events in Georgia, which were used not only tear gas, and where the police had to protect the population from the military, have to be doubts about the ability of self-control among the drafters of the Decree: "Article 11 ... deliberate actions aimed at humiliating the national honor ... and dignity, as well as direct or indirect restriction of rights ... shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of three years or a fine of up to two thousand.The same actions with violence ... deception or threats, as well as committed official - is punished by imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years or a fine up to five thousand. " Hard to believe that Gorbachev was not involved in the management of the Georgian operation (later revealed that the organization had a hand in the operation Georgian KGB, auth.), So if the word with deeds, according to the Decree, the Secretary General position, and not only it - in prison. Interestingly, in the jailed not those who humiliated the national dignity, and those who are opposed to his own humiliation. So, for example, were recently convicted "ringleaders" strike "Zvartnots" Airport, although the troops to put down (but in reality - murders and beatings strikers Armenians) no one in Armenia did not call. Left again to ask a rhetorical question: who is handling the introduction of troops in the Federal Republic, and why he is not punished.Curious how SMIP explain public intervention in the internal affairs of Georgia: "Can Georgians themselves provide police itself? No. Therefore, let the suffering. " Fun. They staged a mess, and then, referring to the disorder, the introduction of troops ...Current Secretary General is not only covered by these articles, but also under the article on the state and undermining the existing economic system, for the revolution, which keeps repeating his child, if it is, of course, the revolution, and not the usual verbiage, the first step should be to put The question of power ...Any call to the Soviet power is to deny the party its dignity, because it is the Communist Party has concentrated it in their hands. Consequently, self-promotion is equivalent to "public calls for the overthrow of the social order ... or change his way contrary to the Constitution of the USSR." As you know, Article 6 of the Constitution establishes the leading and guiding role of the Communist Party as a core management structure. Therefore, any talk of a transfer of power to the soviets must necessarily give rise secure the imprisonment of not only Gorbachev and Glavlit, Mosknigu, various ministries, and so on, up to the typesetters printers involved in the dissemination of such sedition as "State and Revolution" "The Proletarian Revolution and the Renegade Kautsky ..."So what to say about the decree? Nechay blame the mirror if your face is crooked ... Mikhail Gorbachev phrase in one of the plenums, accused the Central Committee sins stagnant period, should have led the party leader on trial for "publicly insulting ... supreme bodies of state power and administration of the USSR."Maybe leadership wants to pass the reins to the people through constitutional means? Really. In such a case. Communist Party members did not bother to read, for example, "The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte," or the same work of Lenin, "The Proletarian Revolution and the Renegade Kautsky," to find out the difference between the government, coming to meet the proletariat, from the government of the proletariat? Perhaps they believe that in the interests of the proletariat to put barriers between workers of the Union republics, exposing vassals violence? Pushing the party in the sun (especially the first secretaries of regional committees in the House of Nationalities) has shown how the Communist Party fears that the "power to the people" escape from her cuddle. Working people are angry that the nomenclature of worthy candidates and weeds pushing their (85.3% - members or candidate members of the Communist Party), and the Secretary General on TV says (and Western newspapers support it), that the law on the election proved to be democratic. "If the elephant's cage will read the words" buffalo "not believe your eyes ..."In contrast to the current leadership of Vladimir Ilyich Lenin never confused his home with a stranger. Defending the thesis socialization of production, he realized the need to provide an opportunity to develop their own republics, that is, not to socialize that are not intrinsically require socialization. Gorbachev gave all the power to the idea of socialization of violence (that is, if the check with Lenin against the idea of Soviet power), and he is trying to socialize the Soviet republics.Modern Philology enriched language is not only the "advances". The world learned of the "new thinking." Although such it can never be. Thinking - either there or it is not. The new thinking in the context of word derivation is a law governing public mind with the thoughts of General Secretary. And if social being - God forbid - does not coincide with the individual consciousness of the party leader, you can help to overcome the inertia of thinking in terms or brains, or by typing in Yerevan tanks. Of course, that such a discrepancy will happen, because the consciousness of the party layer is defined by its being, in particular, spetsraspredelitelem, and this sort being certainly not the same as the existence of the proletariat.According to a new way of thinking, we are invited to focus on the experience of our capitalist friends. Neither the article by Lee, placed next to the decree, the appeal to the U.S. law: "The Power of the legal standards set forth in the decree released today ... in the marked effort to protect the legal interests of the state from illegal ways to change its system, undermining its political and economic system . In this sense, the rules of the new decree correspond with the norms of world law, in full compliance with international instruments. "In the paragraph explicitly states that the government and the people - different concepts. Well, let's see what kind of a line with international regulations suggests a G.Ni Lee. To quote the newspaper "Week» (№ 15, 1989), kindly provided (surprisingly?), We can compare the Criminal Section 2385 of the U.S. propaganda to overthrow the government, which is referenced G.Ni Lee. This article contains a clarification: "the use of force or violence," is not in the relevant article of the newfound Decree.As for insulting public officials (which translated into Russian means to call a spade a spade), the G.Ni-li, together with Gorbachev Menteshashvili should know that "in the U.S. for insulting public officials and political figures is not regulated by legislation acts, and common law. This common law rule applies not only to public officials, and to any person who has developed in the decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court. Thus, in 1964 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in the newspaper "New York Times" held that guarantee freedom of speech and the press prevents "official" claim damages for the publication of information discrediting the person, even if such data are false character. The exception is the case where the victim can prove that the publication was made in bad faith, that is, with knowledge that are false or with disdain the truth or falsity publications "(" Week », № 15).Reputation - or it is, or is not, by any decree it did not deserve. "Our institutions - shit - discredited Lenin government agencies - our laws - the shit." "Our institutions - the line below it insulted officials - sit hostile to us humans, and other dignitaries and comrades began working as fools ..." Vladimir Ulyanov was lucky that his time was not born MS Gorbachev, otherwise he can not escape the two thousandth fine, and probably - Lefortovo, given the then partmaksimum. His winged "communist bastard," or "And you yourself whited sepulcher" is clearly a Kaplan left without work.In America mired in ownership popular Reagan won the largest number of cartoons and jokes. For example, the book sold in great quantities Herbert Block "Gerblok in Wonderland", devoted entirely swearing in of the president. Even kings, for example, as a prototype of an alternative party kept jesters. Both worked on the conscience. The Soviet satire, long before the publication of the decree, the Secretary General praises better than Ivan the Terrible or Peter I.You can not get respect or love, but can be made to remain silent. What is law? Legislation as a reason - again, derives from the underlying material production relations. That is, you can not tell the sun to rise early or come back later. Orders must be reasonable, otherwise who meet them? Who comes into my head to perform ordinances that prevent people live? Therefore, Lenin once said, "Socialism is necessary to build arms of mass man, not bureaucratic pieces of paper in our institutions. And I have not lost hope that we would ever rightly a hang ... "
Ikhlov B. Communist League, April 1989.
Any act of our government is committed to the people and in the name of it. Of course, the competent government should deal with the problem oblagodetelstvovaniya much better. However, the most competent government, deciding for the people, mediates economic ties, impoverishes them, atomizing the proletariat and thus creates maximum anarchy of production. If the state plays the role of government for the people by the monopolies, the anarchy of production shifts to the market. In both cases, the driving position monopoly (oligopoly) in the state inevitably creates a divergence of government actions and statements, and declarations - the inevitable confusion.In any case, in the interests of monopoly (oligopoly) is maintaining its privileged position, which is contrary to the interests of the workers. Since there is opposition, the media, laws. Works of art are mostly focused on those in power layer, the proletariat will explain the inevitability of its subordinate position in society, that is, to calm a slave, that he would be fed.
However, if the workers on the neck instead of incompetent officials sit down competent, it does not mean overcoming the anarchy of production, if only because that part of the proletariat in this case will remain limited.Natural removal of this restriction is the process of replacing the government, coming towards the proletariat, the government of the proletariat. The crucial point in this change is smashing the old state machinery and its replacement with the new: the transfer of power to the Soviets. That is, the destruction of the anarchy of production requires more retraction of the masses in control. This requires that the government was not only competent, much control over them as well as the causes that enable the competent leadership to consolidate its position, removing workers from the state of affairs and thus destroying the government.As the picture adjustment rather fits well duping another campaign, including the distortion of the Marxist-Leninist legacy worth remembering about what exactly causes involved.First, the Soviet government means that government officials are controlled by the proletariat. Government workers, one way or another, involves control. But. Declaration of the Secretary General and his entourage contradict his own prevention workers away from politics. For the "incompetent" We are workers, agricultural workers, doctors, teachers, account for the vast majority of the working population. Nomination of candidates this year gave it a majority of 25.2% of all the candidates. Competent class has certain privileges - a place in the social hierarchy. So its representatives never risk losing steering wheel controls, in contrast to workers who, due to lack of privileges, for the most part never before steering not reach, that is, do not become more competent competent, if only because they do not give it a try to turn. This ensures the right to work the Soviet government as a form of the dictatorship of the proletariat.Second, the Soviet government means modest pay government officials to address the flow of control to the "selfish interests." But Yeltsin scandal clearly showed that the nomenclature is not going to abandon the acquisition by bureaucratic chairs goods. Luxurious outfits and travel Raisa little resemblance to how the principles of the Paris Commune, and wages. Or in a new model of socialism position in society and her husband has a job his wife?Thus, declaring Leninist principles, the management actually a step-by-step deals with them. Instead cancellation of privileges for members of the government, the decree of the Presidium of the USSR Supreme Soviet, which was signed by Gorbachev and Menteshashvili puts MPs in a privileged position, "public insults and defamation ... officials appointed, elected or approved by the Congress of People's Deputies of the USSR Supreme Soviet, or ... shall be punished by imprisonment up to three years or a fine of up to two thousand. "And this is not the first departure from the Soviet principles. The law prohibits the trial of a deputy without the consent of the Council. Even newspapers noted that the law virtually prevents proceedings. It is not even about the Soviet principles in this case, and on the form of democracy such as the tribal times of Yaroslav the Charter. If we are guided en Europe, we need to keep at least formal equality before the law.Note that the range of law-is on the rise: the law, dispose of Art. 50, 51 of the Constitution on freedom of association, meetings, rallies, demonstrations, etc. to the law of uneven and indirect elections, where a vote of the member of the Central Committee is 20 thousand votes of ordinary voters (1). The next step - limiting cooperative publishing. And apotheosis - increased censorship decree of the 11th of April.Obviously, the adoption of decrees of this nature is not due to an economic necessity, and is not, a simple statement of the status quo. Series of statutes is a reaction
Amendment to Art. 100 and Art. 119 has not been approved under the pressure of the Georgian and Baltic organizations as infringing the rights of the union republics.(Recall the reaction of 1907) to the growing struggle for self-government: the national movement and cleaning of the Soviets. The election campaign has shown that the criticism of the nomenclature figures almost without fail they are eliminated. However, an attempt to seize power by constitutional means in Armenia was not a success - the voters had to vote at gunpoint. If we add to this the events in Georgia, which were used not only tear gas, and where the police had to protect the population from the military, have to be doubts about the ability of self-control among the drafters of the Decree: "Article 11 ... deliberate actions aimed at humiliating the national honor ... and dignity, as well as direct or indirect restriction of rights ... shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of three years or a fine of up to two thousand.The same actions with violence ... deception or threats, as well as committed official - is punished by imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years or a fine up to five thousand. " Hard to believe that Gorbachev was not involved in the management of the Georgian operation (later revealed that the organization had a hand in the operation Georgian KGB, auth.), So if the word with deeds, according to the Decree, the Secretary General position, and not only it - in prison. Interestingly, in the jailed not those who humiliated the national dignity, and those who are opposed to his own humiliation. So, for example, were recently convicted "ringleaders" strike "Zvartnots" Airport, although the troops to put down (but in reality - murders and beatings strikers Armenians) no one in Armenia did not call. Left again to ask a rhetorical question: who is handling the introduction of troops in the Federal Republic, and why he is not punished.Curious how SMIP explain public intervention in the internal affairs of Georgia: "Can Georgians themselves provide police itself? No. Therefore, let the suffering. " Fun. They staged a mess, and then, referring to the disorder, the introduction of troops ...Current Secretary General is not only covered by these articles, but also under the article on the state and undermining the existing economic system, for the revolution, which keeps repeating his child, if it is, of course, the revolution, and not the usual verbiage, the first step should be to put The question of power ...Any call to the Soviet power is to deny the party its dignity, because it is the Communist Party has concentrated it in their hands. Consequently, self-promotion is equivalent to "public calls for the overthrow of the social order ... or change his way contrary to the Constitution of the USSR." As you know, Article 6 of the Constitution establishes the leading and guiding role of the Communist Party as a core management structure. Therefore, any talk of a transfer of power to the soviets must necessarily give rise secure the imprisonment of not only Gorbachev and Glavlit, Mosknigu, various ministries, and so on, up to the typesetters printers involved in the dissemination of such sedition as "State and Revolution" "The Proletarian Revolution and the Renegade Kautsky ..."So what to say about the decree? Nechay blame the mirror if your face is crooked ... Mikhail Gorbachev phrase in one of the plenums, accused the Central Committee sins stagnant period, should have led the party leader on trial for "publicly insulting ... supreme bodies of state power and administration of the USSR."Maybe leadership wants to pass the reins to the people through constitutional means? Really. In such a case. Communist Party members did not bother to read, for example, "The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte," or the same work of Lenin, "The Proletarian Revolution and the Renegade Kautsky," to find out the difference between the government, coming to meet the proletariat, from the government of the proletariat? Perhaps they believe that in the interests of the proletariat to put barriers between workers of the Union republics, exposing vassals violence? Pushing the party in the sun (especially the first secretaries of regional committees in the House of Nationalities) has shown how the Communist Party fears that the "power to the people" escape from her cuddle. Working people are angry that the nomenclature of worthy candidates and weeds pushing their (85.3% - members or candidate members of the Communist Party), and the Secretary General on TV says (and Western newspapers support it), that the law on the election proved to be democratic. "If the elephant's cage will read the words" buffalo "not believe your eyes ..."In contrast to the current leadership of Vladimir Ilyich Lenin never confused his home with a stranger. Defending the thesis socialization of production, he realized the need to provide an opportunity to develop their own republics, that is, not to socialize that are not intrinsically require socialization. Gorbachev gave all the power to the idea of socialization of violence (that is, if the check with Lenin against the idea of Soviet power), and he is trying to socialize the Soviet republics.Modern Philology enriched language is not only the "advances". The world learned of the "new thinking." Although such it can never be. Thinking - either there or it is not. The new thinking in the context of word derivation is a law governing public mind with the thoughts of General Secretary. And if social being - God forbid - does not coincide with the individual consciousness of the party leader, you can help to overcome the inertia of thinking in terms or brains, or by typing in Yerevan tanks. Of course, that such a discrepancy will happen, because the consciousness of the party layer is defined by its being, in particular, spetsraspredelitelem, and this sort being certainly not the same as the existence of the proletariat.According to a new way of thinking, we are invited to focus on the experience of our capitalist friends. Neither the article by Lee, placed next to the decree, the appeal to the U.S. law: "The Power of the legal standards set forth in the decree released today ... in the marked effort to protect the legal interests of the state from illegal ways to change its system, undermining its political and economic system . In this sense, the rules of the new decree correspond with the norms of world law, in full compliance with international instruments. "In the paragraph explicitly states that the government and the people - different concepts. Well, let's see what kind of a line with international regulations suggests a G.Ni Lee. To quote the newspaper "Week» (№ 15, 1989), kindly provided (surprisingly?), We can compare the Criminal Section 2385 of the U.S. propaganda to overthrow the government, which is referenced G.Ni Lee. This article contains a clarification: "the use of force or violence," is not in the relevant article of the newfound Decree.As for insulting public officials (which translated into Russian means to call a spade a spade), the G.Ni-li, together with Gorbachev Menteshashvili should know that "in the U.S. for insulting public officials and political figures is not regulated by legislation acts, and common law. This common law rule applies not only to public officials, and to any person who has developed in the decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court. Thus, in 1964 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in the newspaper "New York Times" held that guarantee freedom of speech and the press prevents "official" claim damages for the publication of information discrediting the person, even if such data are false character. The exception is the case where the victim can prove that the publication was made in bad faith, that is, with knowledge that are false or with disdain the truth or falsity publications "(" Week », № 15).Reputation - or it is, or is not, by any decree it did not deserve. "Our institutions - shit - discredited Lenin government agencies - our laws - the shit." "Our institutions - the line below it insulted officials - sit hostile to us humans, and other dignitaries and comrades began working as fools ..." Vladimir Ulyanov was lucky that his time was not born MS Gorbachev, otherwise he can not escape the two thousandth fine, and probably - Lefortovo, given the then partmaksimum. His winged "communist bastard," or "And you yourself whited sepulcher" is clearly a Kaplan left without work.In America mired in ownership popular Reagan won the largest number of cartoons and jokes. For example, the book sold in great quantities Herbert Block "Gerblok in Wonderland", devoted entirely swearing in of the president. Even kings, for example, as a prototype of an alternative party kept jesters. Both worked on the conscience. The Soviet satire, long before the publication of the decree, the Secretary General praises better than Ivan the Terrible or Peter I.You can not get respect or love, but can be made to remain silent. What is law? Legislation as a reason - again, derives from the underlying material production relations. That is, you can not tell the sun to rise early or come back later. Orders must be reasonable, otherwise who meet them? Who comes into my head to perform ordinances that prevent people live? Therefore, Lenin once said, "Socialism is necessary to build arms of mass man, not bureaucratic pieces of paper in our institutions. And I have not lost hope that we would ever rightly a hang ... "
Ikhlov B. Communist League, April 1989.
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий