Поиск по этому блогу

Powered By Blogger

четверг, 21 января 2010 г.

Part Two

From the position of workers can be seen that so far the working class struggle for their liberation was not successful. This fact exploiting classes and their ideologues put forward as evidence that the working class generally can not achieve their liberation. Advocates coming down from the historical arena relations have always been a given situation as an argument in their defense, and proclaimed their eternal. But the fact that employees do not have freedom today, does not mean that they will not do it tomorrow.

In cases where the proletariat and revolutionary actions, to make great strides in improving their situation, he still was not strong enough and organized to consolidate this achievement. In Russia, the revolution took place in an environment where the capitalist mode of production was underdeveloped, dominated by small-scale production. The low level of socialization of production does not create the conditions for transition to direct social production. It's only part of the products of labor and some forms of activity taking commodity form. Exchange value does not become more dominant in public relations, along with personal relationship. Therefore, the transition from an undeveloped commodity production for a given level of development of productive forces, to directly social production, could not but entail the replacement of personal autonomy, on the basis of exchange value, and personal relationship of some of the others.

The possibility of this turn of events predicted by Engels in a letter to Weidemeyer: "I believe that one fine morning our party as a result of helplessness and lethargy all the other parties have to be a power that, ultimately, to all the same, such things that do not directly correspond to our interests and the interests of the general revolutionary petty-bourgeois and specifically, in which case the pressure of the proletarian masses associated with their own, to some extent, wrongly interpreted, and put forward in the heat of party conflict in block statements and plans, we will be forced to make the communist experiments and do jumps, which we ourselves know perfectly well how they are late. In this case we lose the head, hopefully, only in the physical sense - will experience a reaction, and before the world will be able to give a historical evaluation of such events, we will consider not only the monsters on that we would not care, but the fools that been much worse. It is hard to imagine a different perspective.
4

Becoming a monopoly of the State marked the attack is not the best time for the working class, as he fell under the heel of an even more ruthless - monopoly capital. All the properties of capital, as an instrument of exploitation, in these conditions persist, and even strengthened, through the direct expression of his interest in political power. Materialized labor continues to dominate the living, but in the form of state domination over employees. Here the state acts in relation to employees, as the universal capitalist, as the owner and manager of all social wealth. The employee is not having nothing but his ability to work, forced to sell themselves for pennies, which is hardly enough for the necessities. The state not only forces working to sell itself, but also, on behalf of society, forcibly attracted to slave labor.

The state as a monopoly owner of the means of production, and employees, as owners of their labor force, mutually presuppose each other. Employees necessary means of subsistence, state-owned, but the State requires living labor, as well as accumulated wealth in the hands of the state, in whatever amounts it has not been calculated, is dead without animating human labor. Only in the crucible of human labor in capital gains per capita, leaving it even more powerful. But, coming from one of the reproduction process, the capital even more eagerly pounces on labor to turn in the production process, but in expanded form. Monopoly capital is living, growing, dominant and, in the person of its representatives is making plans, and vital product of its existence is the life of workers. He turns into all-devouring machine, stealing all the healthy forces of society and the state of its priests provide necessary food - wage workers. But before you quit working in the grinding millstones of the monopoly capital, the state ideology thoroughly zabyut his head in the absence of our "most humane" society, the exploitation of man by man, something to kind of anesthesia, the patient was not. Government officials and their ideologues persistently exploiting the myth of overcoming, in our socialist society, the exploitation of man by man, while not going beyond a bare denial. This myth has penetrated the consciousness of citizens, accumulates concomitant with lies: the unity of interests of the whole society, the equality of all members of society, on social security, that profit comes from business enterprises, not part of the worker's labor taken away from him without exchange, and so on. Marxists in words, call themselves Communists, in fact, have become advocates of the system of brutal exploitation of employees. But the theory has altered the revolutionary essence of Marxism, turning Marxism into easy-to-power ideology, and the tale for the people.

To understand the essence of exploitation should be determined by what all able-bodied members of society engaged in socially necessary labor, and how the direct producers are the masters of the products of their labor.

To maintain its physical existence of the people, above all, must have food, clothing and shelter, and the only satisfaction is vitally necessary, can address the spiritual needs of the production. Therefore, any kind of activity, in contrast to the labor expended on the production of essential resources - some free time the whole society, which arrogate to themselves the exploiting classes. Deprivation, direct producer of free time - there is deprivation of human development, since it is free time is a prerequisite for human development. For the same monopoly of capital, loss of direct producer, normal conditions of life and free time, moreover, is a means to further exploitation.

All societies are exploiting their base classes producing vital goods, and add "class, liberated from productive labor and those in charge of general affairs, as the management of labor, justice, science, art and so on, make this guide society in exploitation of the masses." (Marx, Engels PSS Izd.2 V.20, p. 293.) Conditions for the existence of the entire superstructure created by the surplus labor of workers, ie, the time of production, which is beyond the required working time. Operation is carried out through this form of state ownership, which gives the possibility of state officials to assign a product of another's labor. And is not the point, how much has arrogated to itself or that sweater personally, but rather - how much taken away from the worker. If in 1908, wage earners are working on a 5 hours, and the class of exploiters total - 6 hours per day (Lenin, v22, p. 35-37), but today - in a 16-20 minutes, taking into account and its share of the defense of the country, and the class of exploiters total - 460 minutes or more per day (calculation made on the basis of statistical data for 1968 -1988 g.)

State apparatus, headed by the party's crushing resistance from civil society, to impose their will all the diversity of public interests, and entangled many of its bureaucratic bodies. All free associations become a state or destroyed. Monopoly state firmly on the path of its development, taking all the means of production into their own hands, it is increasingly in a society under its control, extending the attributes of power and increasing the army officials. With the development of the division of labor, with the emergence of new industries, new social needs, increasing the number of objects of the state, and accordingly superstructural institutions. The desire to gain control of any vital manifestation of society, and most will not be controlled by the desire to be independent of the society and exist at the expense of society - there is the hidden purpose of the state, which determines the direction of its development.

In turn, the state, breaking away from society and becoming over him, begins to disintegrate, falling into all possible evils. The corruption and arbitrariness in relation to society and individuals. Widespread destructive activities, theft of national wealth and natural resources, the most incredible lie in political activities, an aggressive policy toward other nations - that the person who acquires a nation, the monopoly owner of all means of production. In cases where the public face of the parasite reopened state, it immediately begins to work feverishly to rid its ranks. Everything is still possible to hide from society remain secret and not accessible to ordinary citizens. And we see how the newly enacted a comedy in long-developed plan. Fetches the next scapegoat those who shone most in their good works or has wicked power, and they are subject to litigation, which is the essence of their criminal activity is reduced to the moral development and personal qualities condemned, but the state remains on the sidelines. And no one asks: how is this possible?

Accomplishing the remission of sins, as a sacrifice to the state, like a novice thief, after each failure insists that this latest crime and in the future it will lead an honest working life. But the temptations are too great for tiny bureaucratic soul that she could not resist and not fall into corrode its vices.

As life shows, the form of activities, a privileged position and separation from the public interest make government officials too rigid and not able to separate meaningful activity. At most, how they can think of - it is up to the idea of rule of law. Marxists in words constantly appear extreme reactionaries in fact. Fished from the dustbin of history the idea of the rule of law, which put forward the bourgeoisie, against feudal power, even in times of Frederick William! \ /, They are presented with it as the latest achievement of democratic thought, trying to appear in the eyes of society renewed power. They say that so far we have ruled, as we were comfortable, and wrote laws for the people, and now will do only the laws, which would be binding for all. Thinkers, do not obscure the essence of empty phrases, unlike theorists developed socialism, believed that political equality that is rule of law, if not economic equality, is very often an empty phrase. So true communists were fighting for economic equality. The right is always the same legal authorization of the dominant interests, and in our conditions, a reflection of dominant interests of the State monopoly. What kind of care, more recently, on compliance with the law began to show government officials and their ideologues. Is it that society is growing wave of protest against the tyranny of monopoly state machine. Listening to the lawyers who argue about the rule of law, once one realizes that the lawyers - it is thoroughly reactionary people.

What pursue ideology of the state with an all-embracing state-owned, holding forth on the rule of law, the universal authority of the law, which they themselves and the factory? No more and no less than to consolidate its power and the preservation of the status quo that they are satisfied. Only the direct producers of the status quo is no longer satisfied, and therefore the laws do not protect their interests. The direct producers do not need the rule of laws that perpetuate their powerlessness and omnipotence of the state official, but the real economic, social, and therefore political, equality, which is impossible while maintaining comprehensive public property.
5

The nature of this state and standing at the head of his party appears in the deification of society in general, by society, usually refers to the state itself, and at the same time, the depersonalization of the individual citizen. As stated in the charter party: "Party members must the public interest (ie public, because the state had arrogated to itself the right to express the public interest) to put above self." But so far the development of society was going through people's desire to satisfy personal interest. And every man, if he in his right mind would be interested in general only to the extent that this common interest corresponds to his personal development. A recognition that the only worthy goal for a man - a man himself, is a significant achievement of world thought. State as ideologues, often repeating the well-known truth that the person being public, do not go further and do not reach an understanding, that both the private and individual interest, the content and means to address predetermined by society, and does not arise from nowhere. In addition, a common interest - a sum taken private interests . But because in our society that the State is opposed to every citizen, not a representative of the State, with his private interest, and the State in relation to him, spokesman for the public interest, the private interest that does not serve this state, not recognized as socially significant. Here to sacrifice the interests of the state monopoly, the owner of all means of production, were offered immediate interests of producers. And if an individual citizen or group of people who act in defense of their interests, the state sees this as an attack on the public interest, and punishes, as an anti-people activities, while anti-people and criminal activity is the state itself. And a great many examples of this. The whole way the state monopoly, from formation and ending with the day to day, littered with the victims of the people. It is well known and repression, and is constantly at war with huge losses, this is Afghanistan, the Chernobyl and disaster, the truth about which we know with such difficulty, this and many more tragedies, no less in scope. Most often it is the little-known tragedy, as the State can not hide from the people of their consequences and the real perpetrators, intimidating knowledgeable criminal prosecution for disclosing state secrets . But it is precisely in these lesser-known tragedies reflected the real attitude of state towards its people, as there is no need to dissemble. As was the case with bacteriological "explosion" in Sverdlovsk in the spring of 1979, which city residents will know only after eleven years. Here as described by those tragic events correspondent for the Evening Sverdlovsk "Zaitsev:" From Moscow came an authoritative commission, which comprises even the deputy chairman of the KGB. We were informed, they say, as a result of excavations in the burial ground spread of dangerous infections. "And" explosion, or more precisely the release, exhaust, happened, obviously, at night with the southern gust of wind, because before anyone was struck by the night shift at a ceramic factory. More people are killed, mostly in the same direction vector. In the neighborhood, in a factory town in the same two adjacent military posts. A terrible pestilence of death continued in the area Vtorchermet died in a day, seven to ten people ... First of sick and dying there on April 4. But only the 13th "Evening Sverdlovsk" erupted in article eighty stitches doctor gorsanepidstantsii under the headline warning "Beware of infection!". Finally, the 20-th candidate of veterinary sciences effort was followed by yet another warning "Infection can be prevented." Another characteristic feature of all three opuses was mandatory sending readers to the poor, sick, weakened by starvation wintering animals from whom though, and went, walking plague ... Immediately under way to identify, but then carefully concealed grounds decimated the human race is not commonly seen hitherto dangerous pneumonic form rash of infectious pneumonia. But what worked representative Emergency Anti-epidemic commission? Yes, when it is sorted out after dozens of deaths with the source (or rather learn his), was finally interrupted by the tragic number, saved some doomed. But the vow of silence "has acted." Evening Sverdlovsk "on October 25, 1990. In Memory from Ekaterinburg, about those events, it remains a cemetery, where banged up dead, in a special coffin for a two-meter depth, without wreaths and flowers. And only rusted metal plates with numbers, but brown, five-pointed stars, as the original symbol of the era, reminiscent of those events. So the state of its citizens rewarded for their loyalty and dedicated service by giving them places in the cemetery. So what is trying to hide the state representatives of the people? They hid the causes of the tragedy, they conceal the fact that their citizens were victims of biological weapons, which are made in Sverdlovsk. But, hiding it, they showed their identity how the state relates to its people, that in order to preserve their power they are willing to sacrifice any number of people.
6

When the direct producers, protecting their interests, trying to influence the course of events, which stand in the way of political activity, then they are reminded what the role assigned to them under government monopoly capital. They lecture people like schoolteachers nashalivshih children, you are not qualified, your statements are full of emotion and passion, and suffer from a lack of logic, you were doing the bidding of various adventurers and demagogues who play on your feelings. Open your eyes and you will see that we are the only possessors of the truth, but we can be competent, as themselves, and determine the competencies, but we can point the way to a better future. Believe us, adore us, adore us, and you'll be happy. But people are not so naive as to continue to believe your fairy tales, "keepers" are true. He walked up to you and believed for a long time, but his position is not only not improved but deteriorated further.

These "keepers" are true, exhausted its entire stock of various ideological tricks and false promises. Now they are trying to justify its actions by the construction of a new state - legal, and promise to put in the management of a competent official. On the rule of law already stated, once again refute this nonsense. The idea of an enlightened management, the competent official, in essence, is the idea of an enlightened monarch who transformed over the heads of government officials, on the modern stage. Speaking of enlightened management, they are not able to understand that the criterion for recruitment in this system, is not competent, and devotion to the interests of those in power. As seen from the cases that occurred in Sverdlovsk, in the spring of 1979, the competent committee sought not to find out what happened to all the circumstances to avoid loss of life and bring to justice the perpetrators, and to hide the truth from the people. What is surprising is that these meager thoughts outlines seriously, with pretensions to depth, and do not cause laughter in others. Only when the direct producers will actually dispose of the products of their labor and to participate in nation-building, only then they will find the right people, proven competence in practical life.

State ideology, in his Testament of the people, always put emphasis on logic and condemn the emotion and passion of speeches direct producers, while condemning the strike and rallies. In their understanding of logical thinking only those who have studied logic, or rather, one who protects their interests. It turns out the logic of this is not a property inherent in human thinking, but something arriving, what can we learn, listening to our professors. These professors of logic, thinking dry formulas prescribed above, in essence, have nothing to do science. They use science as a weapon to protect their interests. But it would not hurt to know that logic does not teach the way of thinking, it only explains the thinking.

But state officials see the flaw in that statement people are full of emotion and passion, but all these actions and are directed against the existing state system. For the bureaucrat, turned into a cog in the state machine that has lost the human nature and directed toward one goal - how you can climb higher in the hierarchy of power, much more important than dry reasoning without emotion and passion. He, as a Muslim is allowed to fall into only one flaw - the temptation of power, as the state machine does not take into account the expression of the human soul. But do not dry formulas and logical reasoning, do not lead to real action, are the driving force of man, and desire, need, passion. Is the revolution is not the highest point of passions, and is not in the revolutionary period there was racing in the development of society? GV F. Hegel, who is legally considered the father of dialectical logic, said that without the passion has never been and never can be absolutely anything great, and only dead, but very often hypocritical morality, is opposed to the passions as such.

Most of all, government officials and their hangers-on, afraid of such forms of struggle employees for their rights, as a strike. In doing so they invoke the argument that the strike will not produce no bread, no coal, no cars, no other assets and not make people's lives better. They do not consider it necessary to study the history, as all "know" from birth, and, most importantly for them - it is right to execute instructions from above. They are not available the understanding that the revolutionary movement against the fetters of society obsolete relations, helping to free the productive forces, the spread of new modes of production, which in itself implies an increase in social wealth.

But for the most clear understanding of the nature of the state monopoly will return during the formative period, that for the mass of individual, interwoven interests, to follow a common pattern. In the process of becoming a monopoly of the State, for the ruthless suppression of individual interests of the direct producers in the interests of public officials, the necessary and appropriate identity. And when there is a historical necessity, then there is a person, close to meeting the needs of time. Such historical demand and Joseph answered Dzhugashvili, better known as Stalin, who, moreover, understood that in these conditions, all-encompassing state ownership is all about machine control. But even Stalin and his entourage were the people who contributed to the establishment and development of monopoly capital, they are not the main reason for the success of this State. And if they say that they "betrayed" the ideas of Lenin and the interests of the people, it does not explain anything, does not reveal why people are allowed to "change" the ideas of Lenin and "betray" their interests. How could it happen that people went for Stalin and his entourage, and not resisted? Evidently those who stood for Stalin was stronger than their opponents, but the people did not know what he needs.

Equally naive is the idea that the basis for all economic and social hardship is an erroneous theory, which is guided by the government, or at least pretends to be guided, which does not seek to understand the interplay of theoretical ideas and material conditions. Consciousness of man in the street all the places on its head and never reaches the true causes. For him, the rule of things is the rule of ideas, not vice versa. In fact, some individuals, as well as associations in which they are combined, come, in practice, not from theoretical propositions, and its own interests, which are defined by their social position.

Комментариев нет:

Отправить комментарий