Confession

 Part II
The transition to communism is impossible without a communist labor. Was he in the USSR? Yes, it was! Theoretically, the transition period of socialism can be scheduled. Hired labor, prevailing under capitalism must be replaced by communist labor in the transition to communism. This is the main task of socialism. The sense of transition.

 Labor hired
Labor hired

 Communist labor
Labor communities.
Capitalism

Socialism
Communism

 But this theory. But was it really so in practice? Yes, it was! But not so, not in the form of plavnenko transition line, and the stages, the stages of formation and development.


Labor hired

Team contract

Communist labor

                                                 Model communes Makarenko

                         Socialist competition
Communist Saturdays


Make a reservation immediately. I know that after the release of mankind from the herd appeared 4 forms of labor slave, peasant, and the communist wage (assuming communal work - then 5), which coexist in any society in any country in any century, on every continent. But society is determined by the dominant form of labor. If dominated (ie, bring the greatest benefit, giving the main income) slave labor, then over it (on this basis, the foundation) could only be a slave state. If dominated by peasant labor, the only feudal - the king and the priest-king by the arm, hired labor gave the bourgeoisie, the parliament and the president and communist labor - communism. We consider here only two - basic today - a form of labor: labor and hired labor communist. Our Soviet officials - is, of course, hired labor - have decided that once they have hired labor, therefore, all of our workers - also "hired labor." Consequently, we all need democracy, parliament and president. That's about the illusion and break them and their noses, and their well-fed faces glut oneself.
Analysis of the dynamics of forms of work - a topic so important that the article should begin with her. Grandpa Lenin did. He began his work with the first volume of his complete works, with the work "Development of Capitalism in Russia", which proved that yes, Russia is a peasant country. But among the peasants every day, every hour, every minute there are processes of the peasantry in the poorest who drop everything and leave the workers in the city, and the richest kulaks parasites that are richer, Acquires mills, oil mills and manufactories, becoming capitalists. (Mole of history does the job). Hence Lenin concludes, once capitalism has developed, so the bourgeois of the bourgeois-democratic revolution in the Russian Empire is imminent and inevitable! It will make us free. But our task: to extend the bourgeois-democratic revolution to socialist revolution.
None of the analysis of forms of work and its dynamics in Russia today, NO! Neither the Democrats nor the "communists". In contrast to the current democratic utopian, desired to build a democracy than to know on what basis, Lenin was a pragmatist practitioner, a materialist. He knew the basics. He knew that without a foundation you can build just sand castles in the air or even a house of cards.
As for me, then, at age 14 (in 1963), I certainly could not do the analysis of forms of labor, like Lenin, but was able to address this issue only to the 1980 - 1985. Not being an economist, and to ourselves. But I write my confession, and not someone else's, and with my chronology.
The second diagram shows clearly that communist labor appeared immediately after the socialist revolution in its most simple form. In the form of communist subbotniks, when the peasants, workers on the Kaluga-Ryazan railway together, sighed, scratched their heads and began to repair locomotives. For no reason, no reason at all, and, moreover, nothing. What is barking, howling, and what a blasphemy of them have fallen! Often petty scribblers in the press have questioned the very existence of such a thing as a "class instinct." It is! And what it is. The petty-bourgeois scribblers scribbler, immediately felt that something was wrong. Strange! Stranger! Fetch! And they bark at first Communist Saturdays, and then communist Saturdays at all, then at the Stakhanov, then on Gaganova and "that guy" and bark all 75 years old and barks until now, although socialism is long gone. Strange! Stranger! Fetch! "And the barking dogs to vomit." It would seem, well, what's your damn business? You sit yourself in a tabloid, Wikipedia sling ink, paper deer. What you up to these workers with the Kaluga-Ryazan railway. They do not touch you. No, I must gavknut, shat. You raise the presser foot and leave a mark on the eternal memory: there was a dog-so - "Polkan" there or "Watch" or a more "Old Boy" of the people.
And then even more clearly and do not understand "what is it?", But bark, while Lenin was not banged his fist on the table and said: "A Great Beginning." Did Lenin on this form of communist labor? No, I do not know. The question of the socialist competition of Marx and Engels discussed as an alternative to the competition and was well developed, but they did not know and could not know all forms of communist labor. Lenin could write a "How to organize the socialist competition," but did not know Lenin Communist subbotniks. He found them in the free labor of workers, railroad workers, and it was really a "great initiative!" That for which they were in exile and prison, the things for which they have brought untold sacrifices for the sake of what they made and the Great October Socialist Revolution - has come true! The workers believed in the revolution. They believed in their labor power, and felt themselves masters of the steam locomotives of the railway and the country. A Great Beginning! At the site of Lenin, I would do dinner sunset. Kebabs there, lamb and champagne. A bucket. Or two. But apparently, he was humble me. "Our paper is devoted to the issue of communist labor. And we must emphasize that this question could be put on the agenda only after: (1) the conquest of political power by the proletariat, (2) only after decisive victories in the Civil War, (3) only after the consolidation of power by the proletariat. " (Lenin).
"Communist labor in the narrow sense of the word - it is (1) voluntary work, (2) disciplined labor, (3) labor-conscious, (4) work outside the norm, (5) work in excess of norms, (6) labor without compensation, ( 7) work without expectation of reward, (8) labor force of habit to work for the common good, (9) work as the need for a healthy body. " (Lenin).
As we can see that Lenin identified nine characteristics of communist labor, having before him in nature, yet in reality only the Communist Saturdays. Still to come! The socialist competition with a huge variety of names, ideas, discoveries and achievements of the model municipality Makarenko, a brigadier in a row and one more thing. About this "something" will speak later, separately. But the "great initiative" is already done!
The next stage of formation, stage of development of communist labor was the socialist competition. Note: Two of the nine traits of Lenin gone, sixth and seventh - "work without pay, without expectation of reward." But there was a whole series of new features: transparency (10), the growth of qualifications (11), the transition to the lagging-Brie bastards - mutual aid (12), mutual (13), a sense of the host (14), although it is possible to add on to the 9 already at the stage of the Lenin Communist subbotniks. Highest productivity - work in excess of (5) - so impressive that one can only wonder and admire foresight of our founding fathers. In general the whole of human history - a history of continuous search for the highest productivity. When the slave labor was more productive labor community, the people parted with difficulty and with the community by the community itself. When the peasant labor was more efficient than a slave - slaves disbanded and gave them to another plot of land, turning to the peasants. More efficient labor hired buried peasantry, the Church and the kings of kings and communist labor was effectively hired labor. Socialism is at the stage of socialist competition and the Stakhanovite movement proved it. Every society, every form of labor has its own range of performance and their maximum interest development, and then there are morons or idiots - usually among our deputies of State Duma - which, without batting an eye, earnestly trying to prove that the feudal state may be more dynamic than capitalist. For example, the Russian Empire under Tsar-father. They are not in school. Poor bastards did not know that productivity of slave and peasant gave rise to 4% for every 100 years. Hired labor, even during a "Wonderland" is not exceeding 9% per annum and communist labor has Stakhanovites at up to 43% per annum, while team contract for 200, 300, and 400% per annum! In times! Not in the interest, but at times. In two, three, four times! And all of this increase in productivity "eaten" by our bourgeois parasites. Of course, they tried to hide behind the military spending of the MIC (4.8 million). For doctors and teachers (2 million.), But it was forty! Forty million engineers around the neck of 80 million workers. At this stage, clearly delineated class character of the comm. Labour (15), the greatest impact in the industry (16), self (17), dynamic (18), versatility (19), expanding the coverage of new sectors of the economy (20), teamwork (21), cooperation, communication with other groups (22), enthusiasm, joy of work (23), optimism, faith in the future (24). We emphasize spontaneity (25) and relation (26) of comments. of labor. Marx, Lenin knew that he would develop, but where, when, on what date and what the team - it could not predict one.
Model communes Makarenko also requires careful consideration. First, Makarenko was wrong when he thought to have invented a new system of education. In fact, he went to work, the communist, who had, as we have seen signs of mutual learning (13) and vzaimovospitaniya (27), and much more powerful and effective than traditional teaching systems (collective raising). Internationalism (28). Although still found a Jew who said that his prejudice based on nationality, but the rest (five people) in Makarenko did not support. In the team contract the following question does not arise. Internationalism of communist labor has become a proven fact. Care for children (29) of disabled members of society for the younger generation. Street accepted, washed, dressed, shoes, fed, taught and led out into the world. Humanism (30), is another sign - crunching criminals (31) and offenders. We can also add (this is not widely known) medical in nature (32) working with borderline mental diseases. Comm. work treats of psychopathy, neurosis, neurosis, phobias! That is why we can responsibly declare - in communist prisons will not! In the commune of Makarenko, we already see the beginnings of self-management (33) and government (34), probably here to look for the origins of the abolition of the state apparatus (35), when Makarenko in one day could dismiss (cut) of all teachers of the colony. A topic that has already begun to sound in a loud voice in team contract. The authority of their elected government councils (36) (not extracted under duress authority) of the collective. The confluence of industrial with agricultural work (37). Changing attitudes toward women (38), although perhaps this feature should be attributed by the socialist competition (woman - she, too, man!), The traditions, the emergence of new (39), the beauty, the aesthetics of Labor (40), expansion of individual freedom in the collective (41), the expression of personality in the team (42), "a situation of success" (43), when the whole team is going through that at my friend got. This is not a stick in the wheel and sand in the gears as in the competition. Here I would highlight another feature of the commune Makarenko - the possibility of learning at any age (44), the availability of education for all.
Team contract - the highest level of development of communist labor under socialism, the last step before the community. Gateway to communism. Self-management (34) and cost accounting of the personnel (33). The abolition of the state apparatus as unnecessary (35). Attracting engineers into the workforce (45) as an ordinary and full of its members. The combination of mental work with physical (46). The solution of environmental problems (47) when Vladislav Pahomovich Serikov swearing, even on foreign construction sites saw buried in the ground (disposal) is not used in the construction of reinforced concrete slabs, beams and other details that could easily be used somewhere else. Ecology as a natural sense of ownership! All the environmental movement to encourage a sense of conscience, duty, etc., and communism will solve environmental problems simply and naturally - a sense of the owner. Why do crap where you live, if everything is yours? Here, in the team contract appears ownership of the work community (48) not covered by any law soc. the state. Traktorok taken into ferrous metals from scrap metal that has been repaired and is actively used by a team at the site. Whose is it? Or lodge on the banks of the whole crew repaired and used for recreation at a time. Not someone else's personally, but Brigade House, Brigade tractor. You read about it in our own time, while grabbing polls, like a fairy tale. But it was. It was in fact - and thus will be! And our scum-intellectuals still dare to claim that our workers 'low consciousness'. Another interesting point. Vladislav Pahomych said that "the rate of labor participation, we are the only possible moral evaluation of the employee!". Individual in the team. Think about it. Payroll is not for work, not only for work, but for the fact that "a good man." Principle - the "wage labor" - has already been surpassed. Who? Builders in quilted jackets. Half of which, ex-convicts, but have already passed through the school of communist labor, and which at any point in the Soviet Union proudly declared: "This is before we were Vanka, a team contract made us Ivan Ivanovich!" Users "for the heroic work" order "employment Red Flag, "Gold Star. Self-esteem of the working man (49), pride of the profession, for their work. See how many developments have been in our His Majesty the working class. None of the subsequent stage of the development comments, Labor did not cancel the previous one. On the contrary, each successive could grow only on the shoulders of the previous one, as the continuation of the previous development. Makarenko freely used as needed and comm. Saturdays and socialist competition within the municipality. It was also in the team contract. Of course, all this was possible "only after the conquest of political power by the proletariat" (50), only if the Marxist-Leninist ideology (51), only with the support of the proletariat (51). Compare - Lenin: life at every turn shows us the new shoots in the old, and must be able to see these germs of a new, protect, support them, cultivate, cherish. Stalin - "strongly discourage all attempts to do harm to the administration of Stakhanovite movement ... all attempts to do harm to the administration Stakhanovites - seen as a hostile class." (All ingenious is simple!) Program of the CPSU in 1961 - "dictatorship of the proletariat has fulfilled its historic function in terms of internal development is no longer necessary in the USSR ... (hurry, boys, or rather, have been betrayed, already revise Marxism). Necessary to work so that, attracting the broadest masses of people to participate in public affairs ... to reduce the charge state apparatus in order to work on governance has ceased to be a special profession. " As you can see, marasmus was intense. It is not the proletariat - is "the masses". As a result, workers thrown out of power completely, every single one. The same purpose is served by "taxpayers ponimash Russians ... voters ... etc. etc. "All this verbiage is not disinterested. Especially in the documents. Especially in the policy documents. For each word - someone's interests. Interests of certain classes. Howled the first Chinese comrades, "the Communist Party - the party of the revisionists." But then the Chinese, we do not really respected. We were all waiting for "20 years". But the voices of protest were heard and we have. All newspaper union bypassed the phrase: "Pahomych, you're right - the headquarters of contraception stuck!" Vladislav Pahomovich Serikov - worker, who grew up a revolutionary! Went seventies - eighties.
Was the class struggle under socialism? Yes, was. The front line of the class struggle in the Soviet Union took place on the border between labor and hired labor communist. Where workers passed on comm. work, they always ran into opposition from the most severe of the petty bourgeoisie. Before Khrushchev's Party and the government were on the side of workers, after he is gone. Although there were exceptions. Khrushchev harm to the Party, socialism, and the world communist movement is yet to be evaluated. In the frenzy of Khrushchev's demagoguery and clowning, the CPSU had forgotten to give a working definition of the commune as a compass to determine direction, the yardstick for determining what is and what is still seeking that remains to be done, the golden key to the future. Try to prove that you're doing something that is not. Doing a commune, where no one knows what the municipality. It is in this situation were put Makarenko, Serikov Zlobin, Shubin from Khabarovsk and hundreds and thousands of other leaders of the labor movement.
Someone will say, why do we need these signs comm. work? To see the future. It does not fall from the sky, it grows out of "yesterday" and "today". Monday begins on Saturday. Only then can we answer the question: what, what? What is communism? What is a communist society.
Commune - a dynamic, constantly evolving, expanding and self-supporting self-governing organization of cultivators highly conscientious and highly skilled industrial workers, organized and secured by (morally, financially, politically) proletarian government under the rule and guidance of Marxist-Leninist ideology to erase the distinction between mental and manual labor between industrial and agricultural labor and the creation of a socially homogeneous society by the Association in its ranks of the intelligentsia and the peasantry as a free and full members of society to an unprecedented growth of the previously productive forces and means of production and eventual elimination of contradictions between productive forces and production relations, optimally, with the best effect of using the means of production and natural resources in their territory to achieve the highest in the world and growing living standards and ensure the stable development of crisis-free society, as well as having taken over the care of any disabled members of society (children, elderly, disabled) and for the first time in stories made possible and inevitable transition to a better ideal of humanity - a communist society. Commune - a cell of the future society.
By 1985 - 1990 years we have 80 million workers accounted for 5 million people with higher engineering education. The press still outraged that 5 million engineers went to work (nothing learned?) And another 15 million have secondary technical education. Thus, 20 million people, or one in four workers had a higher or specialized secondary education. It was the most literate working class in the world! The most vanguard of the proletariat of the world! And that he had "had enough of socialism", and heard enough nanyuhalsya "Glory to the CPSU." It was the second cause of death of socialism in the USSR, although it still was the main reason. The first reason - that "the resumption of classes of the process" and "Soviet intelligentsia" in the 40 million people (one third - parasite).
Having reached these lines, any member of the Communist Party immediately exclaim: "Sedition! Opportunism! Working Luddites! "Calm down, KPRFovtsy, it is not sedition. This is Marxism! But not your castrated Marxism, castration and blinded, and our Marxism - Lenin. Marxism-Leninism.
Tom 33rd. The Complete Works. "State and Revolution." Lenin carefully and diligently writes Marx's words: "And at best, an evil which was inherited the victorious proletariat, as long as the generation that grew up in the new economy, will be able to throw the entire lumber of the state" and ascribes to the side "The state trash, rubbish, rags."
Remember, O Lord Communists, the other a blue notebook, which he wrote grandfather on a tree stump, near the hut? Well, not on the stump have been watching, and notebook. Thoughts out there, but not in the stump. Question: "And when will this thing" until "when will" throw out the state? " How to tell? How do you know the date - day, month, year?
How do you imagine that? One can imagine this is so - to bring together Brezhnev, Gorbachev, Yeltsin and Putin, and listen to what they think about it. "INTO we do?" - Mumbled Brezhnev. "We need to start and deepen" - cheerfully answer Gorby. "Uh ... er ... - tell Yeltsin hangover - Uh ... Russians ponimash ... Maybe a referendum? While yet or not? In a state or isho not standing? '"Yes, yes! - Happily support him Putin. - Wet and wet! And for every second - 250 thousand. "
So what? But first, you collect. Secondly, they hold a referendum still would not. And thirdly, Mr. Yeltsin on any referenda at all ... would not care.
So how can that be? How do I know?
Donbass miners zabastkom sat for a month. Slogans was! .. Everyone - his own. We argued until we were hoarse. All quarreled. But a month later carried the general's unanimous: "The factories, mines - It works! Reduction of the state apparatus - 2 times! "Brilliant! Here it is, it's the "yet", here it is - "the state to throw out!" And yet modestly, only 2-fold, fifty-fifty. But "half my kingdom" is not sorry. Compliance with this requirement would lead to the fact that the petty bourgeoisie, which we had 1 to 2, would be 1 to 4 (as in China). And because the processes of class formation were not destroyed, would be re-bred ITRy as lice, almost instantly. It would be to require reductions in state machine 10 times. Down and Out but the trouble started! Our workers are "ripe"! "The generation that grew up in the new economy" is "able to discard the entire lumber of the state whole," even the socialist state (and at best an evil), and begin the transition to communism. Our workers are no longer satisfied the deficiencies of the state in general, and petty demagogues screaming that the defects are unique to the socialist state. Allegedly, the bourgeois-democratic state, they are not. Of course, this is a lie. They came to lie, sit on a lie, and dying, too, will lie until the end. So, we can say that our work had been deceived, but it will not be the whole truth, but only parts of it.
Hegel said: "Everything real is rational, and all the rational is real." What is reasonable in the petty-bourgeois counter-revolution? Imagine that for some reason, for example, under some supreme sky-space direction, we would plavnenko, without upheavals and turmoil, began the transition to communism. What would make our valiant "Soviet intelligentsia"? The doomed and dying class. Can you imagine what howling and barking, which would hit the stink on us. "Not ... not ... syak too early ... It's too late ... I do not have to go, and to the left ... No, right ..." etc. etc. ("One of them was the Right deviators, the other as it turned out nothing to do with." And! And more like!) History wiser than us. She gave our petty bourgeoisie the opportunity disgrace to the end. To them, even listen to nobody wanted, not what to see or smell. In Marx ("The Eighteenth Brumaire of ...") is described as follows: "History throws on the political scene and more new political parties, more and more political leaders seemed to be only in order that they themselves have abandoned their slogans themselves abandoned their programs. "
It is amazing! History has a unique opportunity for the return of the bourgeoisie in Russia. Support of the whole world imperialism. Irrevocable crisis of socialism. Unprecedented gains in oil. Deadlock (though temporary) in the development of the official theory of liberating the working class. The absence of the working press. Betrayal of the workers of the CPSU, the trade unions. The absence of a recognized labor party and labor leaders. None of the mythical "black sheep" of which the Democrats are holding forth since 1917. It would seem that even necessary? You and the cards. Be creative, invent, try, gentlemen Democrats, bourgeois gentlemen. So in fact no, they also steal it! MFN - and they are doomed! Doomed because they can not. Impotence is a political one. Impotence is historical. Doomed because we have had and the "something else", as we mentioned in passing, and what the Democrats did not even know.

 Immediately after the counter-world is facing unprecedented mass phenomenon: working without salary. When our workers have to work on 6 and 15 months 9/8/12 without pay. What is it? Why can not Germans, the Japanese can not, and the Russian workers can operate without money? Why? Only one answer - a communist labor! The most literate in the world vanguard of the world proletariat, the Soviet working class, protected from exploitation, changed the form of labor and moved to communist labor as the only possible form of resistance. Betrayed by all besmirched and robbed, without ideas, without leaders, without regard, His Majesty the Soviet working class found his flair only possible and most effective form of resistance. What's the matter?
For democratizers-kapitalizatolov main task was to crush in the bud any form of organized resistance, and for this it was necessary to crush the working groups, close factories and throw people out, turning to the crowd. And then "Do with it what hosh". The same purpose is served "dual policy": salary constraint on state enterprises, where workers are "squeezed" from the plants, and several times the salary in the private sector, where workers are "stretched", "lured" to private owners. But, I repeat, our workers have found the only possible and most effective form of resistance - transition to communist labor - work without pay - to save the workers' collectives.
The reforms embarked stake. When the world bourgeoisie planned counter-revolution, they had everything. Advisers and anti-Soviet, futurists and analysts, writers and social scientists, accountants and bankers. They knew how much there is one MP apiece, faction, party, or the entire parliament in bulk, how much newspaper or TV station. They knew everything and felt everything. But they and could not imagine that our workers will move to communist labor. It was not anywhere in the world. ("We come to the victory of communist labor!") This is the imperialists could not dream, even in the nightmares. All estimates of burst. Went overruns. Since 1996, all expenses are meaningless. Democratization does not pass, the capitalization of costs.
To approximately 98 - 99, it became finally clear that with these people and the working class can not return to capitalism. (We won!) That's why it was decided to no longer invest, not splurge, but after all the brakes, quietly wait for generational change, and to accelerate the launch direct genocide of Russian people. One million dead per year. Now even the most obtuse do not believe that this "accident", "neglect" or "mistake." This is a carefully prepared and conducted by the Jesuit cynically misanthropic policy. Genocide! In vain blame the Americans. Is it in the tradition of the American people: forty years of driving people to the desert, waiting for two generations die out? Or is it the tradition of some other people?
Look at our government - there is no American. As well as Russian. And most importantly, how it's simple: put away from pharmacies insulin - and millions of diabetics suffer quietly in the cemetery. Apologized to the survivors still diabetic and removed from sale of cardiac equipment - now at a cemetery suffered cores. Found extreme "scapegoat" to transfer to another (more profitable) work, complained and got rid of money, lowering the pressure - now repose in hypertensive patients. And there are no guilty, and three million people, less cost. Well done, guys! Crawlers. Nothing, "cat scratches on his back." Destroy not only the sick and weak. Destroy an entire class of peasants. Without mercy and without pity. No snot and sentimentality. This is the beginning of "democracy," Mikhalkov gentleman sobbed on his shoulder in amazement spacey guy with a balalaika. Then there was the peak of fashion to "tear the child", but transient fashion, fast transient. Today, our complete destruction of the bourgeois class of a Russian peasant. Six million people! (Russia - exactly half of the USSR) Villages depopulated. Dovymirayut village, and in tears when our intellectuals appear, then the only crocodile. Here is the evolution of our democracy crummy "tears of a child to crocodile tears." That is the price of your "democratic humanism." But remember that following the last class will have you dying - bourgeois gentlemen. Small, and therefore malicious and smelly. And then you will be sorry to no one.

 The fact that workers do not have to defend socialism, but the fact and the fact that our working class has not given back to democratizers capitalism, because the workers want to forward to communism. Workers' interests as distinct from the Communist Party and the Democrats.
Another historical law that need to know. There was this Arab Ibn Khaldun, 500 - 600 years ago, he also asked questions. Why? When? When there is the beginning of the destruction of the state? Investigated over a hundred countries. A typical situation. Somewhere reigns of khan-Sultan, but there is a leader-leader who wants to overthrow him. The leader-leader gathers friends and relatives, but not enough for success of the revolution. Then he turns to the other genera, families for help with a promise to pay after the victory. Gathered together, defeated and overthrew. It's time to calculate. And all in all there is never enough. Because of a lot, but just a little. Then the new ruler of the leader-leader has to put his tent near the soldiers to protect the infidels from the enemy is not (defeated enemies), and for the protection of their colleagues! So this is the beginning of the destruction of the state.
Lenin knew the law and respect for the history of Ibn Khaldun, but July 6, 1918 during the rebellion of the "Left Socialist Revolutionaries," there was no orthodox defenders, and only the soldiers of other faiths - Latvian Riflemen regiment saved the Catholics and Lenin and Dzerzhinsky and the entire socialist revolution. Lenin knew this law, and the law is still valid, objective law of historical development. But I would not bother you "legend of old times," if this law did not act in our own time. Question - what soldiers infidels put Yeltsin in his tent? Do not you understand? Then the tips. Who was RI Khasbulatov? For any such "exploits" his lifted out of the mud "to riches" of the Supreme Council of the Russian Federation? Who to contact Boris Yeltsin when he said: "Take all you want sovereignty"? Who E.B.N. Moscow gave at the mercy of the victors? Please note on this subject are silent supporters of the Foundation Gorby, and supporters of EBN. The first - because it's criminal negligence Gorbachev, for which to be judged. Second - because it's treason Yeltsin, which has no statute of limitations.
But that's not all! Sly fox Khasbulatov could push himself ahead Rutskoi, just knowing that at the crucial moment he will be able to skovyrnut as boring spot, and he become the president of Russia. Question: What is compromising and where he was a Muslim chechena Khasbulatov Rutskoi the officer, knowing that Rutskoi was a prisoner of the Muslims in Afghanistan and returned alive, safe and sound?
You see how many questions there, if you know the laws of historical development. Thinking is different.
Another law of Marx. "During the revolution, the people left (radical) political parties, political parties and to the left of (radical) of its leaders." Not leaders of the "muddy water" and drag over a nation, and vice versa - people pushing forward the political parties and their leaders. All the actions of political parties and political leaders during the revolutions of forced! And often, without any choice.
In 1917, the Kornilov scared to death Kerenskys Democrats attempt to restore the monarchy. Terrified Democrats fell at the feet of working to help defeat the Kornilov revolt, cars imported by factories rifles, gave the workers, armed people. Working Kornilov was crushed, but the rifle did not return. That these weapons, and was crushed by the "Provisional Government" and made socialist revolution. The conclusion is that if it were not for the Kornilov revolt, then perhaps there would be no October Revolution. Society must "swing" to the right, it went to the left. This is also the law, and he clearly distinguished himself during the putsch. Swung to one side, then go to the other. Can the Democrats impose martial law and military-fascist dictatorship? Not only can but must try to do it. ("From the revolutionary situation, only two alternatives: either the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie or the dictatorship of the proletariat," Lenin). At this point who wins. In good they will not go away. And do not expect.
Another law of Lenin: "No government will fall if it does not damage!" Democrats are afraid of us fascism, but fascism in fact can only enter their own. Crammed nauseam Democrats want to create a "middle class" - the petty bourgeoisie, as a prop of the regime. But first, she, we already have - 40 million employees. Secondly, there is no petty bourgeoisie without nationalism, as there is no nationalism without the petty bourgeois. The best thing that could give birth to the petty bourgeoisie in the history of mankind - this is Adolf Hitler!
We are afraid of civil war, but who started the civil war after 1917? You, gentlemen Democrats, in an embrace with the monarchists. We are afraid of violence and revolution. Everything, even the Democrats know the words of Marx: "Being determines consciousness." But the consciousness, in turn, defines a new being, otherwise violates the law of cause and effect relationship. This is also a cycle, a spiral, a wheel, which spins a thousand years in history. And that part of the wheel when "being determines consciousness" is called evolution, and that part when the "new consciousness determines being" called revolution - a conscious definition of life. You can like or dislike evolution, praise or hate the revolution, but history does not care. This law is objective and universal. Exactly half of human history - an evolution, and exactly half - a revolution. Fifty-fifty. Fifty-fifty.
Once I had to watch the whole teaching staff (100 people), being able to choose a directory retarded patient (not in the banal, in the medical sense of "imbecile", with a diagnosis of "dementia"). After my intervention, he was removed by quietly. And the next selected a thief, drunkard and libertine. Around the same time and chose MS Gorbachev. A well-known story of how the bishops in the Church of bricked up until they elect a Pope. They chose "dying," the pope, who turns out to be outsmarted everyone, pretending to be dying.
What is it? Why elect a feeble-minded, then Gorbachev, the "dying"? It turns out that it is the law. The law of psychology. Everyone chooses what to whom, as he thinks he can act, will be able to influence. Was also elected a clown and Khrushchev ever fainted Brezhnev. Such a system of elections within a limited band inevitably leads to the selection of the weakest, the most "controlled".
There are 4 types of human character. Choleric (D'Artagnan, Chapayev, Leon Trotsky, Kasparov), Sanguine - totally balanced mediocrity (always satisfied itself, his lunch and his wife.) Phlegmatic (epileptoidy) - Porthos, Mendeleev, Darwin, Peter I, and Melancholic-neurotics , always doubting (Anatoly Karpov, Gorby, Damn Clinton, Athos). In a limited team in peacetime choleric-Chapaeva can not be elected. In wartime, they say, there are other laws, the law of self ("I accept the command of yourself!" - Star choleric moment.). But Stalin did something, too, has been elected! Did the companions of Lenin choice? Chapai - Trotsky, Bukharin talker - a favorite of the party, so neurotic, melancholic Stalin. One, two, and miscalculated. Stalin depict a despot, a tyrant, a dictator. With yellow eyes, a mustache, Caucasian accent (uzhas! Y-M-A-C!), But when you take the type of character - always doubting, insecure neurotic (elevator fall - will not fall, wife is cheating - does not change, an iron off - not turned off, the gas is extinguished - not put out?), then there is something else. Growth with a cap meter, pockmarked face, hand dry, tongue-tied, not a Russian with a coarse accent ... How many of you, dear readers, I would like to have such baggage, such baseline data to dash straight to the dictators, the leaders of the world proletariat? The fact of the matter is that he was the weakest link in all of the Politburo, the most manageable. He held on to majority of the Politburo of the death, with both hands. It was not his fault that Trotsky "voted". He did the majority. And then "voted" those who "voted" Trotsky. He again obeyed. Even when the new people, young and began to make of him a living god, he still remained a melancholic, neurotic. Take his speech after the victory. Fear! He was afraid of the war that he himself "vote." Stalin - this is yet another proof of the objectivity of historical development. "King makes a series."
Speaking of tyrannies. If the ancient Greeks identified four forms of social management, we now have a height of past years can clarify them. In fact, tyrannies were also four. The tyranny of the slave owners, feudal tyranny, the tyranny of the bourgeoisie and tyranny (dictatorship) of the proletariat. But just as we had four oligarchy, democracy, four and four of anarchy (mob rule). They are all different. Unfortunately, this topic has not yet interested historians, but there is something to think about. But we are not professors see that the history gave all a chance to steer, all correct. Slave-owning class and the feudal class, the capitalist class and the proletarian class. But no more classes. What will happen next? End of the World? End of story? Or is it the end of the history of nations? The end of the history of class struggle? End of the Old World! The end of an old story!

 The last task of the proletariat - the abolition of classes and create a socially homogeneous society. But, by abolishing classes, the proletariat destroys itself as a class of employees. We see this in the transition to communist labor. He becomes the master of everything! Today, the proletariat - is everything! Each state - each class in power - had their own science, culture, law, ethics, aesthetics, morality, his art, medicine and education, his family and his religion, his philosophy and its history. My heart rejoices when I see guys looking for a new aesthetic. They will come into communism, although it may do this as long as they do not know. Ask them: "A new aesthetic of what? Slavery, feudalism, capitalism? "Then stand in a queue. There was so much to you that all the cancer to Moscow not to rearrange. Want to be the first? Welcome to communism, proletarian revolution! Want a new science, philosophy - we are waiting for you. Emancipated woman should know that only Communism "is coming matriarchy"; environmentalists inevitably run into the commune of Fourier, who proved that the nature and completely harmless, can recycle the waste products of human settlements in the municipalities, not more than half - two and a half thousand people. Cities are already dying. New history is traced in the works Nosovsky and Fomenko. The new religion is planned in two ways: from the emancipation of women - "God is a woman, not a man" - and from the development environment - the god of the river god grove, the god of spring, the god of the field. Today, any person seeking - it is our people, and enriching all at our expense - the enemy!
All of the revolution, a change of social structure do not occur because the "want", but because the old way is not "can." All the old institutions of the state should come into disrepair, must come to a standstill. The courts and police, education and medicine, science and culture have to stop to meet people - a generation that grew up in the new economy. All parties need to steer and disgrace. All the leaders of the leaders already in your vlezut perch and crow all they should be, but the dawn never comes. Over their appeals and slogans, slogans even stolen, people would just laugh. Just as he was "not respectful, laughing," to correct the face frame, the Gorbachev Tsypko. The laughter was not only the entire television studio, where he performed, but the whole TV audience. Former heroes of bygone days are requested not to worry. Communism will be built "in a clean place." The proletariat came to power last, when all steer, to direct the, but because he comes to power for a long time - forever!
I foresee our skepticism lousy intellectuals: "But we just do not see it," Right, you do not see that! Another Danish prince said: "I see the eye of my mind!" Imagine (again, imagine) that you would have appeared in China in 1920 - 1930 or in 1940. What would you see? Crayfish - monarchists, the feudal lords, swans - Chiang Kai-shek - pulling in the clouds happy capitalist China's future, and pike - the Japanese, pulling China across the sea to Japan. And even independence supporters - nezalezhniki on the broken cart. And each of them plans hulk, gleam in the eye and "confidence in the future." Turn on the TV, open the newspaper - ba, all familiar faces! And if you are told that all their actions in the amount of lead to socialism, as the arithmetic mean action - they would not have believed you, they would have you spit in the face and eyes scratched. They have each other began to brag about who is more communists hung, shot, stabbed, and who has more prisons "communists" clogged. So what? Mole of history is still doing its job. Saw you him? You are his and do not see now.

 I thought that this topic seems to be all clear, but occasionally glanced at the Great Soviet Encyclopedia, and gasped. It says that all the credit belongs to someone Mao, of course, with the help of the Soviet Union. That is so fake story. The Soviet army invaded China in August 1945. Before it processes were 38 years (1907 - 1945). During this time, there have been deep, tectonic changes in Chinese society. When the whole strata of society to raise, lower and disappeared forever. Japan's Kwantung Army was only a threat to the Soviet Far East. It was necessary to prevent an alliance with Germany, Japan, and its entry into the war. Stalin pressed for Mao, forcing him to speak against the Japanese army to bind them in China. But Mao was so extremely small, so weak, that military action against the Japanese were to him like death. Therefore, he shirked the war. Historians still find its agreements with Japan: you do not touch us, we - you. So Stalin was forced to help Chiang Kai-shek with money, weapons, materials. Him as a democrat with an eye to a bright future capitalist helped the Americans. Chiang Kai-shek took the gifts, of course, plundered (perhaps it is the Democrats in the genes. Well, can not they do not steal!) And created the visibility of the struggle with Japan. Just like us. Thus, all the help from all sides was a Chinese democracy! It did not help! Mole of history does the job! History is objective! It happens only what should happen and what should not - that does not happen.
"Mao came to power on the bayonets of the Soviet Army!" I beg your pardon! Americans also landed troops in China, and on the side of the tea-shek. So what? How come and gone already running. And the story went on as usual. Objectively! In China, there were three foreign armies, Japanese, Soviet and American. Why they did not put anybody? Or do you think that the war-devastated USSR was richer than Americans? Maybe you want to war with one billion Chinese? On their territory? Good luck! History knows of cases where the invaders massacred the local population, turning the country into its territory. But the story does not know where we could win the revolutionary people. We are not aware of the conquest of the revolution. This is something there.

 "Aha! - Cry any Democrat - Communists lied! "Guys, do not lie communists - you lied! Only then will you wear in your pocket membership cards, because it was advantageous to wear them. And then you set fire to these membership cards - because it was advantageous to them to burn. Show me a single worker, who would write an article for the Great Soviet Encyclopedia. Then you lied to as well as lying now - for the money!
For example, about a sealed train "German" money to Lenin. The First World War began in 1914. Swiss banks give loans to all the belligerent countries, and it was profitable. But by 1917 the war has ceased to generate income bankers. New loans have become meaningless. Old would pay. The warring countries are ruined. Burden on the economy is daunting. And for Germany, and Austria-Hungary. War time to stop. But in all the countries in power are those who "to the bitter end," they were given money for it. Switzerland, for money, for Swiss money suits in Russian February Revolution. "Stop the war!" It did not help. The inertia of the powers that be - "to the bitter end!" In Geneva, at the time, as in Noah's ark - a pair of every creature. Representatives of all political parties, movements, not only in Europe but also around the world. Russian colony - two hundred people. Monarchists, milyukovtsy, kerentsy, savinkovtsy, Plekhanov, the Mensheviks, the anarchists and bakunintsy to the heap - Grandfather Lenin. They ate at some points catering, bathed in some baths, walk in closets and ... some discussion, debate, debates ... who came from Russia to Geneva for the money? That's it! Even Solzhenitsyn was forced to admit: "The money they took everything!" But if the oligarchs Democrats Guchkov-Kerensky did not justify the money and the Swiss again serve "until victory", then have to look for someone else. Benefit not far to seek - all here, in Geneva, next, next door. "Hey ... how you got there ... Ulyanov, or what? - I Lenin, Lenin! - Yes, we are deeply, you do not care whether or not Lenin Lenin ... The war be stopped? - Immediately! Twenty-fifth, the first day! - Do not be fooled? .. Zabozhis! - Tooth give, says Grandfather Lenin. - Age will not see! - Look ... and then we'll quickly as Putin and Rasputin, the nail! Here's a car with a seal, go to Russia! - Bo made - said Lenin. "
Today, Democrats and replicate repeated tales of the White Guard German money. But their money, was not in Germany or Austria-Hungary. At the time of signing of the Brest-Litovsk peace treaty in the entire Austro-Hungarian Empire had food only for 40 days! After forty days - famine and revolution. And it is not red propaganda. It is white propaganda! Wrote about it in his memoirs, Prime Minister of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. In Germany the situation was no better. Did it Lenin? Of course he knew! Unlike you, gentlemen Democrats. That is why it is perfectly appropriate argued: "Revolution Is Coming!" First European, then - the world. That's why he went to Geneva, but not in Berlin or Vienna.
Does the Swiss bankers believed a socialist revolution? Of course not! They gave money for a specific purpose - to stop the war. Perhaps they thought that with that kind of money, Lenin came to power without a revolution, a parliament (Duma), through the election. Interested in whether their fate of Lenin? No! The Moor has done his job - the Moor can go. The main thing - to stop the war! And where are you then bury it - nobody will care. (He was buried in the Mausoleum!) Moreover, they even took steps in advance to the Bolsheviks in power did not last long. Wagons with money, there were two! That's what Democrats are silent as prostitutes in a frying pan. The second trailer went to Kiev! When Trotsky, Lenin sent to make peace, and saw in Brest-Litovsk, the Ukrainian delegation, it was struck dumb with this audacity. What do you think, on whose pennies got there-independence supporters arrived nezalezhniki? Stupid question. Certainly not for their money. Trotsky slammed the door and wandered distractedly in Petrograd. Lenin berated him, and returned the infamous Brest-Litovsk peace treaty was signed. (Lenin kept his word.) But independence supporters, has already been officially recognized by Germany and Austria (what an honor!) To celebrate, sent them all the food intended for Russia and Petrograd. Wow, how lucky the Germans and Austrians! Forty thousand wagons with food or (according to the present-day Ukraine), one million tons of grain! Or is it that for such "luck" had to pay? There were two trailers!
The revolution in Austria, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Romania, Bulgaria and Yugoslavia to Germany was foiled. A Petrograd choking hunger, down from hunger. Today, we impose independence supporters claim and require us to recognize the genocide and the "famine" in Ukraine in 1931 - 1932, respectively. Did we mind? Let them recognize their "exploits" and we recognize your own. If they are willing to admit their betrayal at the end of World War I, to recognize their Ukrainian "famine" of Russia and Petrograd, and if they are willing to take responsibility for the surplus-appropriation system and policy of war communism, which the Bolsheviks were forced to go, if they are willing to accept responsibility for greatest shame of the Second World War, when 8 million Ukrainians by Kiev and in Kharkov at the beginning of the war, without a fight, surrendered. Well-fed, outfit, armed to the teeth, not smelled gunpowder and visited in any battle just passed the Nazis and their weapons, and all of the strategic reserves of the Soviet Union, the Germans passed to Moscow itself and making our victory in principle can not (and still, and after all. And yet we won!), and then pinned the German form, and send those in policemen who, in the Vlasov who OUNovtsy. Vysluzhivayas the Germans and turned over to them all, and commissioners Muscovites. If they are willing to admit that the main slogan detach Ukraine from the USSR in 1991 - 1993 he was the slogan "Russia starves to death without the Ukrainian lard" (We wanted to repeat the famine in '18. It did not work!) If they accept an alliance with the Chechens and the direct participation of Ukrainians in the fighting in Chechnya against Russia, if they recognize the sanatorium in the Crimea for the treatment and the full service of the Chechen Wahhabis, until seksobsluzhivaniya, (it seems that the enemies of Russia in seksobsluzhivanie independence supporters are always best. And most of them boast that there is nothing.), then Why do not we recognize all that they put us in the claim, and even more? Come on, guys, shanovny Gentlemen, we take the mutual claims of the package.
When I hear about the "eternal and unbreakable friendship between Ukraine and Russia" and the Pereiaslav Rada, I always ask the question: why Pereyaslavskaya rather than Kiev? (I love asking questions!), But because Kiev had never wanted to join Muscovites. The secret of the Ukrainian-Russian relations lies in the fact that the Ukrainians have always dreamed of (even in a dream saw) to merge with Russia on condition that the capital of the united states will be Kiev! "Schizophrenia is contagious!" And with the money wagons had two! Currently more. Who now remembers those independence supporters who were at Brest-Litovsk? Similarly, sink into oblivion, and those present, one-day butterflies, nothingness. Scum!

 But here is one more interesting point that we can not say. Russia has repeatedly surprised the world and Europe by his commanders. We had a choleric Alexander Suvorov, who beat who wanted and where he wanted when he wanted. Instantly, appearing in places where it did not expect when it is not expected, and on the other side, where it is not expected. Kutuzov was phlegmatic Larivonych Michael, who, after the outbreak of hostilities elected chair softer, warmer oven and quietly dozing in an armchair near a warm stove, squinting one eye, as long as his opponents were the most eminent and the "great" captains of the world brought him victory in a silver platter. Bear! And they bowed low in the legs! But the greatest military leader of all time, the pride of the Russian people and the world proletariat, I think Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov-Lenin, who was able (Odin!) stop and win the First World War in the simplest way - sticking a bayonet in the ground! Who, where, when and in what age, what country, which continent was able to repeat this victory? And he could! German generals gasped, "Where is the enemy?" - No! Dumb! - "How no? And what happened? "- Stuck a bayonet into the ground and went home! - "How so? A fight with someone? "" Always come up with these Russian any dirty trick to German generals "(What's the truth!). The exact calculation, in-depth encyclopedic knowledge and completely unexpected, but absolutely logical chess and mathematical solution! All the world's chess grandmasters cry sob with envy! Gnawed fingernails, lips bitten! Just think ... a queen sacrifice for the sake of winning the party, and you try to win the game, where the rate - the victory in World War II! And he could! Already, because he stopped the World War One - it is worthy of canonization and sainted! A way to deal with war and peace is worthy of inclusion in the annals of world history, military talent! Genius! Commander! Winner!
But again we digress. Instead of a confession, I get a brief guide to the history of socialism in Russia and forecast of the future. But what are we all about me but about me. All of the above is enough to any thinking person could be guided in historical processes. What's going on, why, why? Where, when started, and what the outcome. Of course, all this can be found in Marx and Lenin. Much better, more and more justified, but the volume of relevant literature to learn, of course, not everyone. If my work helps to understand the "why, what, where?", So I wrote is not in vain.
It's time to take stock. Why did the socialist state in Russia? Because it had to die, just like any other state, subject to the general laws of historical development. All that is born under the moon, - worthy of death. When was the beginning of the destruction of the socialist state? July 6, 1918. Left SR revolt. What was the immediate cause of death of the socialist state? First, a dissatisfaction with the working generation who grew up in the new economy, the state at all, even a socialist state, where workers have grown socialism and become ready to transition to communism. Secondly - the resumption of classes of processes, where the class of the petty bourgeoisie - the Soviet intelligentsia - has grown to one in three able-bodied member of society, and wanted "to direct the, steer."
What will happen after the crisis of the socialist state? Proletarian Communist Revolution. Socialism is dead, long live Communism! Russia will again become a great country. Great and beautiful. The promised land for the proletariat of the world. Examples, samples, a standard for all who come after us. We were the first. The only pity is that paradise lies at the bottom of hell. History is no other way he can.
The village Dolzhanskaya Yeisk district of Krasnodar region, st. Kalinin, 321.
May 2007, Vladimir Solovyov