Confession

 Part I
Since childhood, I was known as a dissident, when he grew up, I was brought it to the KGB, and when democracy came, the people gave me the nickname "Dr. Soloviev red."
How so? When the Communist Party - a dissident under the Democrats and red! After all, I have not changed their views. It turns out that the whole thing in a single simple question that I asked the age of 14, first teachers of history, civics, and then both professors of political economy, historical materialism, dialectical materialism and scientific communism: "Please tell me why, to move from slavery to feudalism, we need a crisis of slavery and feudal revolution from feudalism to capitalism - a crisis and revolution, from capitalism to socialism - the crisis and revolution, but from socialism to communism - will not be no crisis of socialism or communist revolution? Why not? "" You know, Volodya, - have told me - The old social order were antagonistic, and therefore needed the crisis and revolution, and socialism - communism in this transitional society, so the revolution does not need it. " But I was stubborn, "One of two things - either socialism - it is a natural and logical stage of historical development of mankind, and he must comply with the general historical laws (ie, crisis and revolution), or socialism - it's kind of an anomaly of history that something artificial and impracticable. " "How dare you ..." - I replied. But I was looking for signs of the crisis of socialism, he found them, and carefully monitored.
For example, today no one will remember 1978. But it was the year when for the first time in the history of socialism, the pace of our development are worse than in the U.S.. In America, because of the cyclical development of capitalism had happened, or 10% - 8% per annum, but on average they had 4.5%, and we have in 1978 - 4.3%. That's when Reagan got to the podium and said: "We Bind the socialist camp this arms race, which will force Russian dovooruzhatsya to death!" He climbs to the podium when we were 6, 8, 12, 18 and even 43% per annum (in , 1936). These growth rates, growth rates of industrial production did not even dream of capitalist countries. Even the father of the German "economic miracle" Ludwig Erhard could not achieve higher rates of 9% per annum (by month 12% had happened, but the APR - up to 9%). And that in postwar Germany to the economic recovery, and even with the help of world finance, and even with the support of all plans, all Marshals. And we have - 12, 18 and 43% per annum!
No theirs "economic miracles", including Japanese and Malay, socialism, and a candle to no good until 1978. But since 1979 I have always and everywhere openly declared: "Socialism is in crisis." Oh, how to argue with me! I like to agree with me! And what are the arguments I brought for slaughter, such as: "the crisis of socialism can not be because there can never be!" Until the 1991 - 1993 period. Then all these "pundits" were like sheep before the new democracy with a gate-poluvzdohom polustonom: "And wo Tse Takeo? But this can not be! So, Marx was wrong! "
Guys, the theory of "growing into socialism to communism" - this is your schizophrenia, and Marxism - is the most revolutionary doctrine of the nineteenth, twentieth and twenty first century. For your grandfather Marx schizophrenia can not answer!
Then, a boy of fourteen, I did not know that this was for the most patient of all the corn of the CPSU, I did not know that, in fact, it was the second theory of convergence. The convergence theory (ingrowth) from socialism to communism without a revolution, launched by Khrushchev after Stalin's death, as opposed to Stalinism (read Bolshevism). "The revolution has passed," "working class - not hegemonic," "There is no class struggle!". And since Khrushchev said: "We must!" - Institute of Marxism-Leninism at the CPSU Central Committee stood in a pose as a mother washes the floor and said, "Yes!". Agree that in this posture word revolution is not simply utter the word revolution is not obtained even in syllables. Position to change it! "Long live the convergence of socialism to communism!" "Give second theory of convergence!".
First of all you know, perhaps better than me. It was the theory of convergence of West European social democracy, "Ingrown capitalism to socialism without revolution, evolutionary way, through reform, economic struggle, the trade union movement, the theory of small deeds, etc. etc. "The slow step, timid zigzags" in the fight, which Grandpa Lenin devoted his entire life. And in contrast to which he has created the Bolshevik Party. Well - what were fighting for something and bumped. Dialectic! "Tell me, what is party discipline?" "Oh, this is the greatest achievement of the RSDLP (b) and ACP (B), through which we have achieved brilliant victories: conducted collectivization, industrialization, defeated the Nazis and burst into space!" "Tell me, from to the killing of the CPSU "" As for what? Because of party discipline. When the "stuck in the headquarters of contraception." Dialectic!
And then, a third theory of convergence, the theory of evolution (ingrowth) of socialism in the ass, in capitalism. But even on it and do not want to talk. "Schizophrenia is contagious!"
Thus, the 14-year-old boy Vova was right: "Socialism is a natural, logical stage of historical development of mankind, which is subject to the general laws of historical development, and therefore the transition from socialism to communism, socialism and the crisis needed a proletarian communist revolution!" No convergences Marx, Engels, Lenin and Stalin, you will not find much not looking, because of "convergence" is not there! Only a revolution, only a crisis!
Even now, when she ran her Majesty history face to shit all convergents-evolutionists, he even does not occur to the proletarian communist revolution. None of the former Communist Party, nor the current Communist Party. The left-most player in the field postKPSSovskom, Anpilov, and that: "We want the socialist revolution!" "Victor Ivanovich, why? '" And then to the crisis and revolution without evolution to converge from socialism to communism! "Well, heck, all!
Ask any girl semiklassnitsu what will happen after the crisis of slavery? She replied: "Feudalism!" "What will happen after the crisis of capitalism? '" Socialism! "" And what will happen after the crisis of socialism? Well, more daring! "The girl answered. It will answer! But today's, pardon the expression, "theorists" is unclear.
In January 2007, I was able to attend the seminar entitled "Marxism in the modern sense." The speaker, a former professor at the IML of the Central Committee, still alive and thriving. As before Gorbachev: "We must revise Marxism! No revolutions! Proletariat - not the hegemon! There is no class struggle we do not ... "etc. etc. And suddenly I came up with a simple thought: "But Gorbachev - not humanoid and not an alien from outer space and not even a geek of the human race, Gorbachev - is the best student of the Institute of Marxism-Leninism. The best of his product and the best of his child. Khrushchev to Gorbachev - only my grandfather and father and mother to Gorbachev - IML. That's why he was so confident (cocky) and afraid of nothing. That is why all sorts of accusations Ning Andreevs he did not want to even respond. But why? It, that Nina, then, and without professors and academicians IML so izmazhut shit that will not find it. Authoritative, "scientific", it's all in the hierarchy of party discipline, yes, and his mouth shut up, and place a bucket indicate.
Of course, now and professors, academics and envious: Gorbachev was given the Nobel Prize, but they - no. Who is Gorby, and who they are. It is unfair! But professors are working. Work and work. To all of us to Gorbachev.
Reviziruya Marxism, they have maneuvered themselves into a corner and can not answer the most basic questions of the day. Denying the classes and class struggle, they can not even answer the question: "Who made the current petty-bourgeois-democratic counter-revolution in the USSR?" Although the answer is in question. Class! The class of the petty bourgeoisie! The Soviet intelligentsia!
But let us all in order. If you want to understand the course of history, we must know the laws of historical development. Marx knew them. For example, the ancient Greeks discovered the law of cyclic change of forms of social management: tyranny (dictatorship), oligarchy, democracy, anarchy (ochlocracy), and then tyranny. This cycle, the wheel is spinning a thousand years in all countries on all continents, just at different speeds. Sometimes in this cycle at some of the countries takes 150 - 200 years. This is more of human life. Not all survive. We are accustomed to dealing with short cycles - daily - morning, afternoon, evening, night and morning again, or the annual - spring, summer, autumn, winter and Spring. Everyone knows that. How would you react to someone who'd climbed to the podium and began to promise all the eternal morning or eternal spring? You would provoked psihobrigadu. And what do we do with people who promise us "eternal democracy"? We elect them to the State Duma of the Russian Federation! They all are! There are no others. They are not in school. Because the school teaches: the wheel - tyranny, oligarchy, democracy, anarchy and tyranny again - this cycle, only different with respect to time.
Sometimes, time is compressed, for example, in Russia in 1917. February 17 th - tyranny - the king's father, October 17th - tyranny - the dictatorship of the proletariat. Cycle - tyranny, oligarchy, democracy, anarchy and tyranny again performed in only eight months. Moreover, all four forms can be clearly identified by time and by name. Tyranny - Czar Nicholas, the oligarchy - Guchkov, Miliukov, democracy - Kerensky, anarchy - Kornilov revolt, and again the tyranny - Grandpa Lenin, the dictatorship of the proletariat. It is so easy. If you know. I amused by the spectacle of mourners poor unfortunate fate of Russia. Shed tears, snot pouring - streams, buckets, "Oh, for what Russia is a long-suffering the fate, for that misfortune, for that test?" And ... give the example of China.
All right. Let's take China. In 1907, overthrow of the Emperor of China (both in 1917). The leader of the bourgeois democratic revolution was Sun Yat Sen (also an emigrant, as Lenin). A dream come true idiots - came democracy. The roads are impassable. In each "farm" - its power on every farm - its army. In the south - Chiang Kai-shek, in the east - the Japanese Kwantung Army (1 million soldiers, the Japanese). In the north, in a "special area" sits Mao Zedong, and was afraid to put out his nose. All business communications infringed. The plants are (yes they are almost not there), manufactures are not working, the land is practically not inoculated. Poverty is prohibitive. People did not have the size of a tissue handkerchief to cover her sexual characteristics. People were naked. Girl - "a beauty, an athlete, Komsomol" - could be bartered for a pig. And such a mess lasted from 1907 to 1949. Forty-two years. The triumph of democracy! (Oh, why should Russia such destiny-suffering?) While not come to power of Mao. Forty-two years! The cycle. From the tyranny of the emperor - to the tyranny of dictatorship of the proletariat. Not all have survived.
And now, dear reader, a little problem at the ingenuity. How to call a word here these 42 years, this period of Chinese history? If we know "what" - the emperor, and "the heart of the calm" - Comrade Mao? What is it? In a word? Well, more boldly ... That's right - revolution TION!
In the remarkable work of Marx's "Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte" studied the laws of revolutions in general on the example of the French Revolution. The goals, objectives, stages of development. I recommend. There are these words: "But the revolution is thoroughgoing. She is still on the way to purgatory. It does its work methodically. First ... Then ... And when she has done this second half of his work, Europe will rise from his seat and says triumphantly, "You are well roesh, old mole." What are the functions performed over the Chinese Revolution of '42? What, why and where digging this "old mole"? Compare what happened in 1907 that changed in 1949.
First, the goal - it's socialism.
Second. In 1907, after the overthrow of the emperor in China still remains a powerful class of Chinese landlords, landowners, feudal lords (mandarin). By 1949, they passed away. Are they trying to organize themselves to regain their power? Of course! Marx wrote about it in the Manifesto: "The old aristocracy tried to rouse the people against democracy, waving a miserable sumoy as a banner. The people were, and went after them, but, seeing their old heraldic emblems asses, with irreverent laughter running start. " This "irreverent laughter," we still remember and we, in our time.
Thus, the task of destroying the class of landowners, mandarins were carried out. We emphasize that nothing to do with Mao.
In the third place. The task of the destruction of "independence supporters, nezalezhnikov" in a multicultural China, where there were "Nat. minority "of up to 120 million people (nearly the population of Russia), was also performed. They ate each other. By 1949, the idea of ​​separatism disgraced to finish. "Independence supporters" extinct. Again, nothing to do with Mao. This process went without him and to him. An objective process. Once in power, Mao had practically no trouble with "nezalezhnikami."
In the fourth. The idea of ​​democracy in China, peasant dominated, as it should, but where was dominated, dominated by labor hired. That is, in southern China around ports in the territory of Chiang Kai-shek. To spread democracy throughout the territory of China, he could not for various objective reasons, including because of the separatists, although he had the strongest army in China, had given him our Blucher. For all of '42 and could not. Then all these Democrats fled to Taiwan, but it was an absolute minority of the Chinese people. The very idea of ​​democracy in China, multinational state as completely disgraced, to the end, as the idea of ​​a militarist power of solving social problems. Again, nothing to do with Mao. The Democrats themselves disgraced. Do not worry, they still come back. And again, briefly, to disappear forever. Petty-bourgeois democrats history teaches nothing.
In the fifth place. After the overthrow of the Emperor of China to celebrate the Japanese rushed to occupy the "no man" in China. It seemed - it is easy and profitable. It turned out - and it is not easy and profitable. 42 years is nothing good, but trouble, the invaders, conquerors and not raped (as, indeed, in the Netherlands after the first bourgeois revolution, and only one out there just was not). Today in all of Japan is no longer there idiots who want to conquer China. Itself would survive. Thus, the idea of ​​occupation of China as disgraced to finish and again without Mao.
There were other objective circumstances, but their main task of the revolution carried out objectively, independently of the will and desire of some individuals or groups of individuals or even entire games. That's only after that "Europe rose from his seat," and triumphantly praised the "mole of history." Only after Mao came to power with ease unusual, and only after that, and it was possible to build socialism in China, in a clean place.
Now back to our sheep - the Democrats. Russia today. It is our Russian reality today. What is it?
We know "what" - dictatorship of the proletariat to the 1991 - 1993 period. And we know, "the heart to calm down" - the proletarian communist revolution - a new tyranny - the dictatorship of the proletariat. What is it? Yes, this process! Yes, this process of revolution! What are the aims and objectives of the impending inevitable and unavoidable proletarian communist revolution? The aim - to achieve the highest in the world of the lives of ordinary workers. Simple and clear all purpose. What are the objectives? The last task of the proletariat - the abolition of classes and the creation of a socially homogeneous society harmoniously developed personality. What are the slogans of the coming revolution? All power to the Soviets! The Soviets of Workers' Deputies and army! This is not a reservation. In Russia in 1917, 90% consisting of peasants, Grandpa Lenin was unable to put forward the slogan of another, except for "All Power to the Soviets of Workers, Peasants 'and Soldiers' Deputies!" Did Marx, Lenin law that "the peasantry is a class of reaction is ALWAYS" ? Of course he knew. But otherwise he could not! Today, the right can only be a slogan "All power to the workers and the army of Parliament!".
Plants - It works! The right of teams to decide the size, structure and pay administration, engineers and technicians. Reduced state machine 10 times (as in Japan). And the main slogan for the destruction of the class of the petty bourgeoisie, "to the shops!". The French have a slogan: "To arms, brothers." And we will have: "To the press, Democrats and gentlemen! By the press, the petty bourgeois gentlemen "or by contract or by the verdict, but" to the machine! ". In 1985 - 1990 years in the USSR was 280 million. Of these, 80 million workers, 40 million employees and 11.6 million farmers. Ratio of employees and workers - 1 to 2. For comparison, in Japan - 1 to 13 in Europe - 1 to 11 in the U.S. - 1 to 9 and only Chinese brothers - 1 to 4. That is why it can be argued that the petty-bourgeois democratic counter-revolution in China - is inevitable! They go after us with a difference of 25 - 30 years.
But that means the ratio of employees and workers 1 and 2? This means that one in three able-bodied man in the Soviet Union was removed from the direct production and doing anything but creating wealth: met at the local committee - abused workers, himself distributed the vouchers, carpets, cars, apartments, etc. Parasite on the neck of the working people, blood-sucking louse. Such a large number of parasites (one third) could not stand no economy in the world. Socialism in the USSR was doomed! But that's not all. Absolutely right Nina Andreeva, when he claims: "After the death of Stalin in the Soviet Union resumed the process of class formation." Indeed, approximately 30 - 35 years of a thin layer of "Soviet intelligentsia" among classes of workers and peasants rose up to 40 million, almost 4 times more than the peasant class, conscious of itself as a class, organized as a class, has formulated and put forward their class demands in their own class interests. Wanted to direct the, I wanted to steer. That and they rule.
I remember in 1972 when I was already "all the world knows the students' old worker in a foundry obrubschik Sredneuralsky machine factory in Revda, explained on the fingers of the economy and dialectics. "Here, look. Ten years ago the shop was pouring 120 tons of castings per month. We, the team obrubschikov, 12 people, they cleaned and prepared to 500 rubles a month. Now shop pours 240 tons, and we now have 6 people. How much should we get? '"2000 r." "We pay 230 rubles a month." "Well ... progress is coming. " "Yes, progress is going. But we had three teams (full house) moulders, casters, steel makers and obrubschikov was a foreman, a master of all three teams and one accountant. Today is: foreman, deputy, assistant, three accountant, economist, three masters (each team), senior master, freed secretary, and even the artist put into the office, plus safety engineer. And all this, apart from the fact that the office of the plant already built five-storey. Guest is not there. "
This is not an exception and not an anomaly. This is an absolutely typical example for the whole Union. At any point in the USSR you could tell that during the war, all the factory management was placed in a chopped house, and to show new buildings 5 ​​- or 9-storey buildings of the plant. Could tell how recently their director said: "In our factory the number of engineers exceeded the number of workers." That is a political economy and dialectics were all our workers. No, partpolitrabota, of course, was carried out (see reports), and visual aids were posters and "Glory to the Communist Party!", All as expected, but what the artist is surely his own, free. But the true state of affairs workers knew the hard way. And the numbers speak for themselves. When the king-priest workers were paid 15 cents of every ruble earned, and such-syakom Stalin paid to 43 cents, and for 1985 - 1990 years of the Communist Party was paying workers 7 - 12 cents of every ruble earned. Worse than the king! Glory to the CPSU! Today, Democrats are paying from 0.5 to 1.5 cents. Superekspluatatsiya.
By the way, if we had 80 million workers, 40 million employees and 11.6 million farmers, anyone who knows arithmetic, he may calculate that if all the wealth produced, the work should have been only 5 hours a day! The age-old dream of mankind of a 4-hour day was within reach.
Of course, all these processes of class formation came after Khrushchev's "thaw" that are so fond nostalgia the current Democrats, but who do not want to remember "thaw" the shooting of workers in Novocherkassk. Moreover, democratization, they take credit, but the shot hung on the Communists. Sorry guys, "who first come, sneakers." The shooting of the workers would have been impossible without your "democratic thaw." If workers do not recognize the hegemony, we can already shoot. We will not forget these "execution-democratic thaw." We remember. But there is no cons no pros, just as there are no pros without cons. Dialectic! Harmony!