Recently,
I was denied the right to post material in the community politiks.ru,
where I have many productive and post content from his blog and website
"Derbent Wall." And not only the post content, but also make comments, as I found out, trying to comment on some notes.
Refused bluntly and boldly, without any explanation being: you do not like us all.
Moreover, that the community itself, in contrast to the moderators, is positioning itself as a free platform for political expression and lighting events. But, in reality, it is increasingly becoming a mouthpiece for certain political forces. And it is not the best, as you can see the quality.
All this made me pay attention to the materials, which are located in this community and this is what I found: The principles of the new democratic movement, signed by the publishers Learn constant, television, radio and newspapers, Valeria Novodvorskaya and Konstantin Borovoy.
Principles of the new democratic movement
1. We choose freedom. Our priorities are: property rights, rule of law,individualism and humanism are based on it.2. We stand on guard of the Russian Constitution, in its form as it was adopted in 1993, and will fight against any attempts to change it.3. Russia must make choices and build a western capitalisman accelerated method.4. Russia - not Asia, and Europe. Our way lies in the European Union and NATO.5. Russia should abandon its Soviet past and recognize the beneficialreforms 90s.6. Communist and fascist activities in Russia should beprohibited, and the symbols of the Soviet past - are destroyed. Communists andFascists are not allowed to participate in the elected bodies, to work inthe field of Justice of education. The same lustration should be applied toKGB officers and security officers present, stained a crime against humanity.7. Can not be free if it oppresses other nations.8. Russia must withdraw from Chechnya from Georgia, from Transnistria and provide a solution to their fate western world community. For our and your freedom!9. Putin's regime - recurrence of totalitarianism. We will fight politically against Russian rule until until it is guided by European values.10. Maximum political and economic rights and liberties, the bare minimum of social security.11. We do not compromise with the authorities and do not seek his companions among the Communists and the Nazis.
Valeria Novodvorskaya, Konstantin Borovoy
These are the materials seem to be desirable and appropriate for the community and to influence the minds of readers and visitors to social networks, as well as represent the interests of the ruling plutocracy.
But let's not jump ahead and look at everything in order.
Thesis One: We choose freedom. Our priorities are: property rights, rule of law, individualism and humanism are based on it.
Oh, that sweet word - freedom! The authors use it, probably because it was "sweet," the average man caressing his ear, as silent on the freedom of people they are writing. Empty abstraction, and no one came to nothing and obliging anyone or anything not explain.
In this case we see a typical fans of cheap PR approach, when just to be witty and not spare his father.
In the second part of the thesis, the authors stuffed concepts without understanding their true meaning, and even in contradiction with the first part. After all, where the priority placed the property, there is no freedom and individuality, the laws of time and again written to the owners of capital, but because the capitalist freedom turns into bondage work, which he operates inhumane. Or in understanding and Novodvorskaya Borovoy planter, who kills a slave, and is the most that neither is a pure humanist?
Property - solemnly pronounced, Anatoly Chubais, Dvorkovich Novodvorsky, Ryzhkov, bor, and staring eyes, looking at the audience, hoping to see in his eyes awe. But there is no thrill, and no understanding of what the audience wants to bring this subject that the plant utters a screeching halt, as he himself does not understand why he had so solemnly uttered the word.
When after all it comes to the explanation it becomes clear that the speaker just wanted to say all that I grabbed, now no one dares me away.
Another sacred and often used word in the vocabulary of plutocracy - a humanism, which has found its place in the above principles.
No need to guess what data mean "thinkers" by the word humanity, but the protection of property, and presumably not for personal consumption as well as capital, there are anti-humanism, since capital antichelovechen and inhumane, in fact.
And just when you read the eleventh paragraph of these principles, which spoke of "a minimum of social security", it becomes clear that humanism, understanding and Novodvorskaya Borovoy, is the ability of capital owners with impunity plunder the people who should have the bare necessities for physical survival. In their understanding of humanism - this is when repress the communists and the fascists, because they can not stand them, or anyone else who does not like Novodvorskaya.
Not better things from the authors PRINCIPLES and understanding of individualism, which they were proclaimed the pillars of society living on their principles.
"Private property alienates not only the individuality of people and things" - Karl Marx wrote and explained in detail below, this assertion, which is difficult to disagree. (Collected Works, op., T.25 part 1, Art. 431-432.)
But it seems that Novodvorskaya and Borovoy had time and opportunity to get acquainted with the achievements of the world of thought in this area and, therefore, argue at the level of the hero of the comedy Fonvizin DI "Ignoramus."
Further, the signatories claim to spiritual supremacy, as it does not go on television, showing a complete ignorance of the processes which take place in the world, or do not wish to accept them, and called: "Russia must make choices and western capitalism to build an accelerated methods."
The last global crisis of the capitalist mode of production for them a lesson, because the study may be the only one who thinks. Capitalism long ago entered its decaying stage - the imperialist domination of the financial oligarchy, which is detrimental not only acts against the production, but against the man himself, unleashing a war in different parts of the world, but Novodvorskaya and Borovoy urged to build capitalism! In European and American corridors of power are discussing ways to limit financial speculation, that is to strengthen public control over the activities of banks and large companies, and pass laws that restrict the freedom of capital, and half-baked free-market ideologues in Russia read the sermon on the unrestricted freedom of capital, as only people in the world.
But look, the preachers of the free market, capitalism, and so we have built, and built such a conceived his Borovoy, Novodvorskaya, Nemtsov, Burbulis and others of their colleagues, although under the Constitution, the charge that they are willing to stand, no one gave them no right to change the political system. So why and to whom these calls - to build capitalism? And for ourselves and urge to pretend its not happening involvement in the looting. That they have a way to shift the responsibility on its head.
I think that it is not necessary to disassemble the whole nonsense data figures, but at some moments worth staying. For example, paragraph five, which clearly identified the interests of authors, as defenders of plutocracy, robbed people and the country: Russia should abandon its Soviet past and recognize the beneficial reforms 90s.
At the same time, the signatories, as if already forgotten about his first point, where present themselves as defenders of property, as depreciation of deposits and massive robbery of the people - this is an attempt on private property. But for these people's property is nothing but the plutocrats plunder - a sacred cow.
The fact that the reform of the 90s are good for the country and its peoples must recognize Russia. This is how! Instead, to prove this, the authors decided to just say, that does not bother to excessive speculation.
Drove people into poverty, and he must admit that this is good!?
And if the first point, we saw that nonsense at these authors do not hold, then the fifth one can say that the arrogance and they also lack.
Or this item: Russia must withdraw from Chechnya from Georgia, from Transnistria and provide a solution to their fate western world community.
All is good, but we have seen and know as "the Western community," decided the question of Kosovo and Yugoslavia, the problem in general. And therefore it is not clear if we do not take into account that Novodvorskaya Borovoy and Russia wish the same fate that has survived of Yugoslavia, which they both rely on the Western community.
The fact that Novodvorskaya Borovoy and subservient to the financial oligarchy and bureaucracy, can be clearly seen from the eleventh paragraph: Most political and economic rights and liberties, the bare minimum of social security.
Minimum social protection and maximum profits for all kinds of predators - here is the basic urge and wishes that they thrown into the mass, ostensibly as a source of general development. In fact, these signatories do not understand the principles of social development, as a developing controversy. The domination of the representatives of capital, in alliance with the bureaucracy to ensure high profits, it is not the source of the country, and the terms of a robbery and impoverishment of its people. And in the end and the collapse of the country.
And how to understand such a combination: the sixth paragraph - "The communist and fascist activities in Russia should be banned, and the symbols of the Soviet past - are destroyed. Communists and Fascists are not allowed to participate in the elected bodies, to work in the justice sector of education, and eleventh - "maximum political and economic rights and freedoms."
This or symptoms of schizophrenia, the authors have all, or this blatant fascism, wants to pass himself off as democracy, both in their time, they gave themselves for the Communists, Marxists repressiruya authentic. See "Case Morozov» http://rpr.ur.ru/klub/temy/2010/5/30/1226/
Naturally, the Novodvorskaya and Borovoy, and, of course, they grabbed property, try to ban the communist ideology, as its integrity and harmony is completely false and frivolous indictment of chatter lackeys of big business and their true owners. What we are again and again can be sure.
The only thing I have not found a "principle", so that this explanation - why the authors called their scribble "the principles of the new democratic movement", because nothing new, they do not say? Neither kind of democracy in this material, but there is Hitlerism, directed against the workers, against democracy, against Marxism, against humanity and truth, who grew up on the basis of anti-Stalinism and Russophobia, and cannibalistic concoctions that are so liking moderator politiks.ru.
Vitaly Glukhov
Links: Yevgeny Yasin PROGRAM "90-E - a time of hope" ON "Echo of Moscow"PROPERTY AS A CRIME
Refused bluntly and boldly, without any explanation being: you do not like us all.
Moreover, that the community itself, in contrast to the moderators, is positioning itself as a free platform for political expression and lighting events. But, in reality, it is increasingly becoming a mouthpiece for certain political forces. And it is not the best, as you can see the quality.
All this made me pay attention to the materials, which are located in this community and this is what I found: The principles of the new democratic movement, signed by the publishers Learn constant, television, radio and newspapers, Valeria Novodvorskaya and Konstantin Borovoy.
Principles of the new democratic movement
1. We choose freedom. Our priorities are: property rights, rule of law,individualism and humanism are based on it.2. We stand on guard of the Russian Constitution, in its form as it was adopted in 1993, and will fight against any attempts to change it.3. Russia must make choices and build a western capitalisman accelerated method.4. Russia - not Asia, and Europe. Our way lies in the European Union and NATO.5. Russia should abandon its Soviet past and recognize the beneficialreforms 90s.6. Communist and fascist activities in Russia should beprohibited, and the symbols of the Soviet past - are destroyed. Communists andFascists are not allowed to participate in the elected bodies, to work inthe field of Justice of education. The same lustration should be applied toKGB officers and security officers present, stained a crime against humanity.7. Can not be free if it oppresses other nations.8. Russia must withdraw from Chechnya from Georgia, from Transnistria and provide a solution to their fate western world community. For our and your freedom!9. Putin's regime - recurrence of totalitarianism. We will fight politically against Russian rule until until it is guided by European values.10. Maximum political and economic rights and liberties, the bare minimum of social security.11. We do not compromise with the authorities and do not seek his companions among the Communists and the Nazis.
Valeria Novodvorskaya, Konstantin Borovoy
These are the materials seem to be desirable and appropriate for the community and to influence the minds of readers and visitors to social networks, as well as represent the interests of the ruling plutocracy.
But let's not jump ahead and look at everything in order.
Thesis One: We choose freedom. Our priorities are: property rights, rule of law, individualism and humanism are based on it.
Oh, that sweet word - freedom! The authors use it, probably because it was "sweet," the average man caressing his ear, as silent on the freedom of people they are writing. Empty abstraction, and no one came to nothing and obliging anyone or anything not explain.
In this case we see a typical fans of cheap PR approach, when just to be witty and not spare his father.
In the second part of the thesis, the authors stuffed concepts without understanding their true meaning, and even in contradiction with the first part. After all, where the priority placed the property, there is no freedom and individuality, the laws of time and again written to the owners of capital, but because the capitalist freedom turns into bondage work, which he operates inhumane. Or in understanding and Novodvorskaya Borovoy planter, who kills a slave, and is the most that neither is a pure humanist?
Property - solemnly pronounced, Anatoly Chubais, Dvorkovich Novodvorsky, Ryzhkov, bor, and staring eyes, looking at the audience, hoping to see in his eyes awe. But there is no thrill, and no understanding of what the audience wants to bring this subject that the plant utters a screeching halt, as he himself does not understand why he had so solemnly uttered the word.
When after all it comes to the explanation it becomes clear that the speaker just wanted to say all that I grabbed, now no one dares me away.
Another sacred and often used word in the vocabulary of plutocracy - a humanism, which has found its place in the above principles.
No need to guess what data mean "thinkers" by the word humanity, but the protection of property, and presumably not for personal consumption as well as capital, there are anti-humanism, since capital antichelovechen and inhumane, in fact.
And just when you read the eleventh paragraph of these principles, which spoke of "a minimum of social security", it becomes clear that humanism, understanding and Novodvorskaya Borovoy, is the ability of capital owners with impunity plunder the people who should have the bare necessities for physical survival. In their understanding of humanism - this is when repress the communists and the fascists, because they can not stand them, or anyone else who does not like Novodvorskaya.
Not better things from the authors PRINCIPLES and understanding of individualism, which they were proclaimed the pillars of society living on their principles.
"Private property alienates not only the individuality of people and things" - Karl Marx wrote and explained in detail below, this assertion, which is difficult to disagree. (Collected Works, op., T.25 part 1, Art. 431-432.)
But it seems that Novodvorskaya and Borovoy had time and opportunity to get acquainted with the achievements of the world of thought in this area and, therefore, argue at the level of the hero of the comedy Fonvizin DI "Ignoramus."
Further, the signatories claim to spiritual supremacy, as it does not go on television, showing a complete ignorance of the processes which take place in the world, or do not wish to accept them, and called: "Russia must make choices and western capitalism to build an accelerated methods."
The last global crisis of the capitalist mode of production for them a lesson, because the study may be the only one who thinks. Capitalism long ago entered its decaying stage - the imperialist domination of the financial oligarchy, which is detrimental not only acts against the production, but against the man himself, unleashing a war in different parts of the world, but Novodvorskaya and Borovoy urged to build capitalism! In European and American corridors of power are discussing ways to limit financial speculation, that is to strengthen public control over the activities of banks and large companies, and pass laws that restrict the freedom of capital, and half-baked free-market ideologues in Russia read the sermon on the unrestricted freedom of capital, as only people in the world.
But look, the preachers of the free market, capitalism, and so we have built, and built such a conceived his Borovoy, Novodvorskaya, Nemtsov, Burbulis and others of their colleagues, although under the Constitution, the charge that they are willing to stand, no one gave them no right to change the political system. So why and to whom these calls - to build capitalism? And for ourselves and urge to pretend its not happening involvement in the looting. That they have a way to shift the responsibility on its head.
I think that it is not necessary to disassemble the whole nonsense data figures, but at some moments worth staying. For example, paragraph five, which clearly identified the interests of authors, as defenders of plutocracy, robbed people and the country: Russia should abandon its Soviet past and recognize the beneficial reforms 90s.
At the same time, the signatories, as if already forgotten about his first point, where present themselves as defenders of property, as depreciation of deposits and massive robbery of the people - this is an attempt on private property. But for these people's property is nothing but the plutocrats plunder - a sacred cow.
The fact that the reform of the 90s are good for the country and its peoples must recognize Russia. This is how! Instead, to prove this, the authors decided to just say, that does not bother to excessive speculation.
Drove people into poverty, and he must admit that this is good!?
And if the first point, we saw that nonsense at these authors do not hold, then the fifth one can say that the arrogance and they also lack.
Or this item: Russia must withdraw from Chechnya from Georgia, from Transnistria and provide a solution to their fate western world community.
All is good, but we have seen and know as "the Western community," decided the question of Kosovo and Yugoslavia, the problem in general. And therefore it is not clear if we do not take into account that Novodvorskaya Borovoy and Russia wish the same fate that has survived of Yugoslavia, which they both rely on the Western community.
The fact that Novodvorskaya Borovoy and subservient to the financial oligarchy and bureaucracy, can be clearly seen from the eleventh paragraph: Most political and economic rights and liberties, the bare minimum of social security.
Minimum social protection and maximum profits for all kinds of predators - here is the basic urge and wishes that they thrown into the mass, ostensibly as a source of general development. In fact, these signatories do not understand the principles of social development, as a developing controversy. The domination of the representatives of capital, in alliance with the bureaucracy to ensure high profits, it is not the source of the country, and the terms of a robbery and impoverishment of its people. And in the end and the collapse of the country.
And how to understand such a combination: the sixth paragraph - "The communist and fascist activities in Russia should be banned, and the symbols of the Soviet past - are destroyed. Communists and Fascists are not allowed to participate in the elected bodies, to work in the justice sector of education, and eleventh - "maximum political and economic rights and freedoms."
This or symptoms of schizophrenia, the authors have all, or this blatant fascism, wants to pass himself off as democracy, both in their time, they gave themselves for the Communists, Marxists repressiruya authentic. See "Case Morozov» http://rpr.ur.ru/klub/temy/2010/5/30/1226/
Naturally, the Novodvorskaya and Borovoy, and, of course, they grabbed property, try to ban the communist ideology, as its integrity and harmony is completely false and frivolous indictment of chatter lackeys of big business and their true owners. What we are again and again can be sure.
The only thing I have not found a "principle", so that this explanation - why the authors called their scribble "the principles of the new democratic movement", because nothing new, they do not say? Neither kind of democracy in this material, but there is Hitlerism, directed against the workers, against democracy, against Marxism, against humanity and truth, who grew up on the basis of anti-Stalinism and Russophobia, and cannibalistic concoctions that are so liking moderator politiks.ru.
Vitaly Glukhov
Links: Yevgeny Yasin PROGRAM "90-E - a time of hope" ON "Echo of Moscow"PROPERTY AS A CRIME
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий