Enough, finally, appoint each other, "the best philosophers of Russia"

Klark, November 21, 2010 - 20:37.Picture Klark.
Enough, finally, appoint each other, "the best philosophers of Russia."Throughout his life, looking for an easy life. Everywhere - in philosophy, too. A philosophy - it's hard work inspirational. Those who have it, our society has already done - well-known. But just try, try, call them names!Immediately rush to the PR hot assurances that you say, no rights and softly-casually "hint" to the correct names.... Listened to "gift." Again exaggerated. PR again. What a useful explicit cult of the self that is sent "over the" antinomy of Kant (freedom and nature - man as a citizen of two worlds), and "of drive" Gumilev?But they at least bring some individuality in the service of genuine scientific knowledge of world history and the history of world philosophy. And here, as it seems, everything is just the opposite.In short, forget the guys playfully cynical flirt in front of girls "philosophy", incidentally misleading her (= our?) People.Return to the accumulated and proven fund domestic philosophy, say, historical materialism - the "social", the "sacred" and the very "life."You do not like "historical materialism" in partkomovskomu textbook? Well, take, for example, "The Development of the Monist View of History" (1895) after GV Plekhanov ...And what you are not an option: shovels and a party organizer did not go. And your theme raised them all to one. And all this with excellent knowledge of the classics of philosophy, history of domestic, to the truth respect, love for his people, and excellent personal modesty!11/21/2010
CM: http://matveychev-oleg.livejournal.com/90192.html?thread=1908048 # t190804 ...Login or register to post commentsKlark, December 19, 2010 - 12:26. linkPicture Klark.
Again Matveychev ...http://matveychev-oleg.livejournal.com/98675.html?view=2035059 # t2035059
Well, I read an interview to "Nezavisimaya Gazeta". And listened to the interview Kovtar Dionysus.First. Obviously, that our author has inspired a cult interview Heidegger from 1969 is no less clear, however, that O. Matveychev - not Heidegger. A direct contrast to his ... Although the claim to the "Russian Heidegger's" straight-away is available!Second. Now it is quite clear, and why in NY Oleg, with the pathos of "tough professional" manifests his philosophical intividualnost as Philosophy - a kind of sophistry! Say, know our own, Plato!So, WHY?And so, for the government and people to pose as "Expert", who came here from the "outside time and space." That, say, myself, I, in the current in the USSR and Russia catastrophic situation, well, not my fault! - Why? - So, after all, "from eternity" we, sir. Filosofys-c ...... I would like to note that the journalist Dionysus, judging by his voprosvm, and obviously closer to common sense, and the current political situation, and to life itself.(Even being explicitly constrained sense of false delicacy to the "famous philosopher" spin doctors, expert, senior officials and blogger Matveychevu Oleg ...)Well, maybe, to Plato, at the same time?Both x Ellyn, after all!Login or register to post commentsKlark, January 23, 2011 - 17:32. linkPicture Klark.
Well, Oleg, and you, too!
"With Michael Epstein, we're from different generations and different completely along ideological lines. He, for example, anti-Soviet, but I can not ... »http://matveychev-oleg.livejournal.com/
So, Oleg MATVEYCHEV - not anti-advisor! Very nice, but ...But why? And, it turns out, because the anti-Soviet ... - Michael Epstein.No, Oleg, these questions are "easy" is not solved.Of course, you have already announced that sophistry - this is just a form of education, philosophy, and certainly not its antithesis. So in this, so to speak, "the argument" its you, just, and consistent it is. Quite SOFISTICHEN, that is. But this is something effective can only be to deceive the public. And no more.And, if not for another deception, and in essence, it is quite logical to puzzling question arises: it is like - not anti-Soviet, and the "Professor of School of Economics" is ... How can this be? You then, Oleg, so naive, "social scientist" have that "do not know" that the HSE - is typical, ie, highly exemplary anti-Soviet institution?What emerged, and there it was in order, so that the apparent withdrawal of money from the budget of the Russian population to give only a "plausible" excuse. Yes, and for the most money cost the same ...
Remember, in the 92-95 GG on "Radio Russia" all the time song obsessive-compulsively, so cool:Purple haze floats over usAbove the vestibule is burning midnight star.The conductor is in no hurry, the conductor understandsWhat's the girl I Farewell forever ...
This is how every social scientists understand, there was a public process of weaning aesthetic quality of public and state property from the Soviet people, in order to make this process, so to speak, appeared "lyrical" (and tolerasticheskogo!) Character.But to make this same procedure on PRIVATIZATION OF GOVERNMENT REVENUE and socialization of ITS costs and damages, the appearance of "scientific" FORMS and "ECONOMIC" status, and was blinded ("... FROM WHAT WAS") THIS IS YOUR current HSE .
Oleg, and in fact, that is, you do not "know"? If you know, the rank-anti-Soviet, you have yet to earn, and to do it for a long time. And it's hard.
And really if you do not understand ...Well then, though, think of the line, liked you, Timur Shaov song:Where are now the intelligentsia?All the kitchen, all is silent.Save like virginity?And "orgazmu" get?
Well, Oleg, and you, too!http://matveychev-oleg.livejournal.com/
Michael Kazarin, an accountant from Perm.Login or register to post commentsKlark, February 13, 2011 - 20:27. linkPicture Klark.
Mg-Y-yes ...And, as Oleg, it seems, "Philosophy of Right" Hegel's reading ...And why read, you may ask?
http://matveychev-oleg.livejournal.com/113051.html?thread=2236315 # t22363 ...Login or register to post commentsKlark, February 19, 2011 - 14:49. linkPicture Klark.
http://matveychev-oleg.livejournal.com/114680.html
From Rasteryaeva:
Of course, this way the guys have chosen themselves.Yet someone, by God, and they pushed the "Framed":So no work or at home -Only bubbles ryumashki yes.So that, instead of Vasi and Rome -Only cornflowers and daisies.
The whole question - Who? Who pushed and tripped?The answer to this - is the task of real philosopher.And do you think?
... To "do" philosophy and is not responsible - it must be able to!To do this, then is replaced by Philo-SOFIA - sophistry.
By the way, Oleg Matveychev personally knows the CTO.Knows, but is silent."Glamurnichaet", therefore ...http://matveychev-oleg.livejournal.com/114680.htmlLogin or register to post commentsKlark, February 21, 2011 - 08:22. linkPicture Klark.

Wow, cool!
... Socrates said: Sophistry - The hunt for a human cattle.And Oleg - unconditional with drive in the affairs of "recycling" philosophical rhetoric and people's gullibility.
I think that means for this "project" it may take much-much less ...Value of his labor silica O. Matveychev appreciated, it seems, a thousand euros per day. Cl-but, at 365 days x 1ooo. Then, 2 years, yes, Oleg? It turns out 700-800 thousand euros only ...Vaughn, Mau was a few years ago, wrote a 300 thousand for that? After all, not a scientist, not a propagandist, not an apologist, and no economist, and certainly not with drive. Rather, the clear and eloquent argument ballast contra employers Oleg ...
Yes, and some work, mostly already done. Namely, the Soviet people in a "herd of consumers' HAS turned.Moreover, to the extent that even those who do not have a penny, and then in the ideals of consumption persistently and vehemently believe ...
In a word, TZ taxpayer should save at Mau and give Oleg!http://matveychev-oleg.livejournal.com/114899.htmlLogin or register to post commentsKlark, February 28, 2011 - 07:59. linkPicture Klark.
Read and reread Sholem Aleichem!(Wasserman about me and tank tracks http://matveychev-oleg.livejournal.com/116208.html)
To properly understand the question, it is necessary to build up RELATIONS:- Between Oleg and Wasserman;- Between the "opposition" in the wake of that Oleg did a career and what is called a "liberal opposition" today;- Between the opposition and that this, on the one hand, and the Soviet government, which has made the policeman father of Oleg, - from the other;- Finally, what is most important - the tanks on Tiananmen between and those tanks that encourages and supports Wasserman Oleg ...
Why should these relations, for the sake of Understanding, to build? We must carefully and vigorously and persistently read and reread the story by Sholom Aleichem called "Gymnasium."... The author died already in 1906, and presented to the LOOP-Soviet, Soviet and anti-Soviet Russian history to the present day. He is, in fact, explain why Oleg Matveychev reading thick books and clever "in philosophy" for the sake of Russia, and he persistently and stubbornly intermeddle in the sophistry of her grief ...
In short, read and reread. Re-read and read!Login or register to post commentsKlark, April 10, 2011 - 06:38. linkPicture Klark.
In fact, the "logic of history," says that you can not break the logic.That is, we must distinguish where everything usually "knocked into a heap." And, conversely, to identify where ohlos graduate, you know, "do not tell the difference" ...With the air of a connoisseur scholars discussed only "choice" between anti-Soviet and anti-Sovietism. And it does not coincide with the choice between "right and wrong," "good and bad," "state and anti-government", "anti-folk and popular" ...When "vzbludnuvshaya" Soviet intelligentsia torn between several Soviet students, but with continuing the trajectory of his Soviet career, then out of the equation and this psevdopoliticheskoy psevdopolitologicheskoy Vanity is the entire Soviet people (because, in fact, no other we have with you is simply not present).And with him, and all the major social and political issues, and around "about" which alone can arise as a substantive political analysis, and real political life ...http://matveychev-oleg.livejournal.com/127063.html?replyto=2354519Login or register to post commentsKlark, April 16, 2011 - 22:08. linkPicture Klark.
"The logic - it is of the devil, and love it from God!"(See: http://matveychev-oleg.livejournal.com/129368.html)
In fact - this is a classic example of sophistry that tries to take revenge for her merciless exposure of Plato, Aristotle and Hegel ...Since the only historical clarification that it is trying to pulled himself noble toga theo-ogy, disease in the power of the Christian worldview, his intuition and the "philosophy of life" in their opposition to the opposition of being - non-being, as the mutual ootritsaniyu: God - "devilry "all.At the well, namely, the calculation here? The fact that we do not know that:- "Love" - ​​is, first of all, the category of metaphysics, and then he and all the rest;- The logic - the science of the Logos, rather than rhetorical exercises with discursive means "rational" of the human mind;- That, in this case, and the sense of "logic coincides with metaphysics, ie, the science of things grasped in thoughts "(G. Hegel). ;- That the subject of logic, metaphysics as a "whole", and "love" as the logical and metaphysical category, there is, is nothing but a logical observable (and observed!) Ratio of the whole - to himself;- That, therefore, it is logically tuned attitude of certain "parts" of our life to the meaning, the Logos, ie The whole of it - this is the only reliable pass for legitimate (not bootleg, like the "heroes" of our time!) Entry into the palaces of the "divine love" ...
... During the Second World War an enthusiastic Western journalist wrote: "In the great battle of Stalingrad came together two of the Hegelian school." That is to say, "two of metaphysics," two "logic." Well, perhaps it is - right!But, as evidenced by the domestic and world history, one of them was, merely, of sophistry. Although having covered, in the soldiers' buckle, 'theological' slogan "God is with us."It seems from the history we know that her real life, so to say, "metaphysical" content were attitudes and heroes and our time, namely the anti-Stalinism and anti-communism and anti-Sovietism ...Since losing miserably in the field of logic, they are now crying with hysterical enthusiasm ... to our "love."Can you imagine? If GK Zhukov, the fall of 1941, "changed" to logic - to "love," we would have survived, though, to Stalingrad?A?
Michael Kazarinaccountant from Perm.Correspondence student seminar on Russian,German and Greek Philosophy"The Russian Logos."Login or register to post commentsKlark, April 17, 2011 - 18:04. linkPicture Klark.
"First results in logical argument, then says that the logic of the devil. Is that - pluralism in one single head? "(See: http://matveychev-oleg.livejournal.com/129368.html (
Of "Conversations" Epictetus. Book II, 25. "The logic is necessary."Text: "And once one of those present said to him: Convince me that logic is useful.- You want me - he said - that I showed you this?- Yes.- Therefore, I must refer to the argument, which requires proof?He agreed.- Where did you find out if I fooled you sophistical tricks?The man said nothing.- Look, - he said - as you yourself agree with the fact that it is necessary, if without it you can not know itself what is needed if it is needed or not. "Login or register to post commentsKlark, April 24, 2011 - 18:10. linkPicture Klark.
Matveychev Oleg - Contribution to Theo Docks?Well, teodoksiya - is a real step AWAY from Sophistry ...http://matveychev-oleg.livejournal.com/Login or register to post commentsKlark, May 1, 2011 - 7:43. linkPicture Klark.
The figure of default than to cry about Yeltsin?(December 31, 1999).http://matveychev-oleg.livejournal.com/134495.htmlLogin or register to post commentsIgor D., May 2, 2011 - 4:49. linkPicture Igor D..
All too shy to ask. A Matveychev you who?Login or register to post commentsKlark, May 2, 2011 - 6:49. linkPicture Klark.
"Igor D., May 1, 2011 - 13:52All too shy to ask. A Matveychev you who? "
I Matveychev Doxa-fold ...Login or register to post commentsmp_gratchev, May 2, 2011 - 12:36. linkPicture mp_gratchev.
It is clear that Matveychev itself Doxa-fold ...And to you, then, Clark, he "who" - ally, enemy, or just an interesting conversationalist?
-M. GrachevLogin or register to post commentsKlark, May 2, 2011 - 13:32. linkPicture Klark.
mp_gratchev, May 2, 2011 - 12:36. Wrote: "It is clear that Matveychev itself Doxa-fold ...And to you, then, Clark, he "who" - ally, enemy, or simply interesting man? "
Well, Mikhail Petrovich, you me, really, surprise! And as dialectical logics, and as a frequenter of "Photoshop" ...It seems that doksakrat - is not only one who reigns over all of us paradox, but also as a consequence, one who is TOTALLY her subordinate.And the "doxa" ... This is - the same sophistry, only "well-intentioned."So "someone" is, in this case, for example, you have a sophistry? Ally? The enemy? Or simply interesting conversationalist ...?Thus, we obtain: Oleg MATVEYCHEV - this personalized "the object of attack" and "Subject OVERCOME" for the "Philosophers 'Sturm' ...Is it not so?Login or register to post commentsmp_gratchev, May 2, 2011 - 14:44. linkPicture mp_gratchev.

    And the "doxa" ... This is - the same sophistry, only "well-intentioned." ... Is not it?
Not so. Where to get the idea that "doxa" (OPINION ([Greek] doxa)) - this is sophistry?If a Democrat - supporter of people's power, then doksakrat - partisan authority widely held view that has become his own conviction. Oleg believes Matveychev and all available means of mass persuasion to bear on the dangers of nationalism and the historical mission of Russia as a multiethnic state.-Login or register to post commentsKlark, May 2, 2011 - 17:12. linkPicture Klark.
Thank you, Mikhail Petrovich, very definitely for your opinions.However, I admit, downright frightened at the audacity of taking and decisiveness with which you are actually offering RENAME "Philosophical STORM" - in, say, "The philosophical apologetics", making it a spur of the moment.I think your "painting" by Oleg Matveycheva TOTALLY does not contradict your own conception of dialectical logic? Since the most likely "yes", then forced to admit that you do it, in truth, a royal gift!That's just ...Now, if only to be proved (or rather, it is shown) that this is very nice and very representative of the Chartered philosophers of modern Russia ... with ALL RUSSIA Fault ...What, I ask, in what then is the relationship with his "dialectical logic" will get you by yourself? ..Login or register to post commentsmp_gratchev, May 2, 2011 - 18:03. linkPicture mp_gratchev.
And where are the arguments?-Login or register to post commentsKlark, May 3, 2011 - 11:05. linkPicture Klark.
Mikhail Petrovich, dear, well, it is God, with S. Mareeva, Karl Rosenkranz, J. Berman, and H. I. Zhitlovskim you get a much better and more correct than ... O. Matveychevym.The reason is clear: these three samonaimenovanie, ie name and nature, after all the same. Consequently, "the name of the essence" are the "very essence". That's why you so easily, it's nice (and fittingly) their state.And here at Matveycheva - PROBLEM. Here the name and nature - do not coincide. Moreover, antinomic contradict each other, making, in passing, his hostage, and the whole of Russia. Therefore, there must THINK. To think in simple words ..."Propaganda" INSTEAD logic logic here is not relevant and even harmful.So, maybe you should (for the sake of order in the national philosophy and on the "Philosophy of the storm") cited no logician, but say "logograph." Or "doxography" even better ...A?Believe me, nothing is said of "personal," just a theory of knowledge golimaya ...Login or register to post commentsmp_gratchev, May 3, 2011 - 13:48. linkPicture mp_gratchev.
Got it. Arguments you will not.-Login or register to post commentsKlark, May 8, 2011 - 19:23. linkPicture Klark.
mp_gratchev, May 3, 2011 - 13:48 wrote: "I see. Arguments you will not. "
And you willingly, Mikhail Petrovich, to use words instead of the concept!After all, the dialectical logic says if there is a concept, then there is the "word". But now, if you "used the" word, it is not the fact that there is any idea to look for ...This, unfortunately, and refers to, as used by you, the word "argument". You, then, all of us want to get the "Martyshkino work" to perform?What such "arguments" you require?1, What OS Matveychev doksakrat - do you recognize it themselves. (It is clear that Matveychev itself Doxa-fold ... mp_gratchev, May 2, 2011 - 12:36)2 And that Matveychev - sophist, is himself and Oleg says. And does it strongly, strongly and repeatedly. Calling ALL thinking Russia does not agree with Plato that sophistry - the enemy of philosophy, but agree with Matveychevym that philosophy only, so to speak, "immature sophistry ..."At least in the person of Oleg Matveycheva, therefore, "doxa" Sophistry something completely and equal.And what did you then all of us of extorting when boasted asks: "How do get the idea that" doxa "(OPINION ([Greek] doxa)) - this is sophistry?» Mp_gratchev, May 2, 2011 - 14:44 )?Yes, that and "took" that you yourself is it required. And, not so much his "words" as their BEHAVIOR. How? A Welcoming His Hero (= your) "dialectical logic" AS herald "the historical mission of Russia as a multiethnic state."FROM THE POINT sophistry has to be ... So, Welcome and sophistry, at the same time.... All this is quite even in terms of the usual (= no complaints), formal logic is clear and understandable. Michael Petrovich, well, tighten the same too, although it used!By the way, the dialectical logic of "no claims", says thus: THE CONCEPT OF TIME for words are important than the words - for the concept, it is quite reliable and authoritative and can be thought of, quite simply, ... after a pause.Login or register to post commentsKlark, May 23, 2011 - 6:13. linkPicture Klark.
Poor Ben Bernanke and good Matveychev Oleg!(Http://matveychev-oleg.livejournal.com/140845.html)There is, somehow, tried to introduce oneself O. Matveycheva as a herald "the historical mission of Russia as a multi-national state ..."
The same text in his blog, rather, "exonerates" him as a sober observer and "apologist" national state "selfishness" that can only, with no hostile, ideological, chuzhe-rage and pseudo-humanist, "lisping" to public, to submit historical (= modern) Russia has enough adequate view of herself ...True, the text, with all its pretty basic pathos, yet I suffer from a certain flavor of "Malthusianism," in the order of argument, that the blogger, Oleg and his visitors actually offered.
Well, first of all, no need to "soar" so high and wide, in order to explain the strongest price increase in world food markets in recent years. The main reason is obvious: it is the unrestrained printing of dollars of cash, initiated by the U.S. Federal Reserve and its "Ph.D.," Bernanke said. (The so-called "Ising kvontiti").Crazy paper liquidity rushed from the "unreal economy," the printing press - in the real assets of the world economy, the least of which is subject to depreciation, (as a result of trans-national manipulation of market-makers), it is food.So, the rise in food prices in the world - it's only Triumph law of value, simply put ...
Secondly, the adherent, disciple, with the party and the principal assistant in the violence over reality (ie, "the law of value") from the World plutocracy, and is our "own" anti-Soviet bureaucracy of the Russian Federation, which has long and tightly tied "ruble" to the dollar, helping Bernanke, not from fear but from conscience, justify to the American society, its, hot, "to red", the printing press.In particular, this leads to a completely "sophistical" surreal effect as the more expensive foods in the world market, the cheaper labor of our agro-worker, anywhere in the Urals village ...
And, thirdly, that this "consensus" between himself and Bernanke keep and maintain, the employers of our wonderful Matveycheva Oleg, have designed an effective social and (pseudo) economic and political - (pseudo) democratic machine outside-economic coercion in the "market" working Russian forces, which have long and reliable, "semen" his talented PR Oleg our wonderful ...About that, for example, as our "national" Agro-BUREAUCRACY reins of our national peasant, yearning for the heights of higher education, high culture and advanced to the / x of science, see: "The elections are coming UrGSHA the new rector of the Academy of the Peasant."http://ura.ru/content/svrd/16-11-2010/news/1052122049.html)Login or register to post commentsKlark, June 28, 2011 - 11:25. linkPicture Klark.
Matveychev in Volgograd - a great ... Subjectivism.http://matveychev-oleg.livejournal.com/148338.htmlLogin or register to post commentsKlark, November 14, 2011 - 08:11. linkPicture Klark.
Type about the problems of China November 13, 2011 http://matveychev-oleg.livejournal.com/179966.html?mode=reply # add_commen ...
The author writes: "The fact is that China's economy is experiencing some very serious problems, the main ones are: ...3 - productivity growth above the growth rate of wages;4 - increasing inflation, particularly in the food sector; "
From the standpoint of the law of value - one contradicts the other. Productivity, overtaking wages leads to lower prices, as under Stalin in the USSR and L. Erhard in West Germany. A decline in prices leads to a suppression of inflation, with the most reasonable way, of all economic ways of the world made possible by the division of labor.The author applies the methodology of analysis confusing. Namely, the object of his analysis is the product of intelligent historical subject (CCP), used in its activities by the "Capital" Marx and the criteria for the review - prejudice "economics", which unite into one reference group Burbulis, Yegor Gaidar , Viktor Chernomyrdin, Chubais, Kudrin and Gref ...Another "trouble" he saw in China "item 1 - big savings among the population."Meanwhile, Soviet and Communist-seminarian, Stalin and German anti-Communist, Professor Erhard antisovetist - both seen savings of the country as a stable foundation of the banking system and guarantee the stability of the monetary system of their countries.Both of them, not saying a word, would disqualify above mentioned financial and economic "authorities" of the author of this article. And at the same time and those "philosophers," which ended with them philosophical faculty believe sophistry "serious occupation," and now, you see whether you have taught us to "love the motherland" ...
Michael Kazarin, an accountant from Perm.