ON THE NATURE OF "DOUBLE SENSE"

The story of the Uralmash
 Critical Remarks on an articleFounding congress passed the United Front Workers of the RSFSR. Last week, the public tends Sverdlovsk define their positions and their relation to it. Ubiquitous "democratic bohemians" trying to impose on all the hard alternative of either inter-regional group (together with members of the regional meeting of People's Deputies in Sverdlovsk), or the OFT. Or gear, or Yarin, in other words! Say, must condemn the past anyone who for the surgery, for civilization, for progress ...People are looking for a solid compromise.Kind of way to avoid this opposition has demonstrated author "Potholes on the road of association" ("ZTM" from September 27), PhD N. Aronofsky. The position is simple: in the inter-regional group, and GFT well everything that is directed against ... People's Front of the Urals. UNF - it's "Fatherland"! - Constantly reminds the reader of the author. The front of this - a special and "not ours." We ask, they say, do not forget ...

It would be hard to look for in an article explaining the facts. But the ill will of the author to a certain kind of social movement in Sverdlovsk - it's an undeniable fact. What exactly distributes N. Aronofsky its "unifying ill?" Let's see.First. Citing the words of economist with Uralmash B. Nevyantseva: "We do not need a second party, but the Communist Party should be a genuine communist ..." the author observes: "Clarification of this thesis was not followed, so that each (relaxation of the article's author) is free to speculate on your own."
Well, what can I say! Of course, those who forgot or never knew the original meaning of the word "communist" is certainly free to "speculate." Well, those who have not forgotten the basics of communism? For them, I think, of B. Nevyantseva very clear. And it is expected "from each" random guesses at this point - then assume that all readers of the newspaper "for heavy machinery," polls have forgotten the ABC of Communism, and the meaning of the term "Communist" in Uralmash wondering just how some kids are wondering about the meaning of "zebra" or "kangaroo" ...Second. Perplexity on this subject of the article's author explained. For it is related to the position of member of the Communist Party of the working class to his role in the restructuring of just any conscious features of Communist and "democratic man in the street" and the outlandish kangaroo. What does it say on this subject myself N. Aronofsky? In his article, he registered the alert "unreasonable application of journalist Yu Lipatnikova (" Fatherland "- People's Front)," Work powerless in the Urals, especially in the defense industry. "I do not know about the second part of the phrase Yu Lipatnikova (at a defense plant did not work). But did not find the article Aronofsky equal strength and philippic against the "rule of law," I, like any reader has every right to draw the conclusion that the so-called "rule of law," he readily admits, without the workers' struggle for their rights. An amazing position! Especially today, when rapidly and directly in front of the labor movement is unfolding across the country.But perhaps we slander the author, making arbitrary assumptions and findings instead of himself? Judge for yourself. "In recent years, - written by N. Aronofsky - and we have many of the Sverdlovsk noticed that the" Fatherland "- the Popular Front began to apply himself as a" true "spokesmen for the interests of the working class. Moreover, they fully identify their narrow group interests with the needs of all workers and I must say, quite active in the work environment. "The author has not stated what exactly the "narrow group interests" UNF? Therefore, we reserve the right to conclude: suspicious intentions "Fatherland" and UNF is the fact that its members strongly disagree to build a "state of law" without the working class, and at his expense.In short, under the watchful suspicion of the author to get all those shows without permission of his superiors' desperate attempts to attract workers to their side "- a morality must draw the reader of this article.The third. N. Aronofsky - Ph.D. in Economics. This means that at the time he was taking a minimum of candidates, which suggests at least some familiarity with the "Capital" Marx and the "Anti-Duhring," Engels. To remember that we are forced to once again because of Comrade. Aronofsky on the merits with the basics of scientific socialism and economics, and he slyly pretends to argue with ... "Fatherland" and UNF.Judge for yourself. Any unbiased person, looking around, followed by the classics of scientific socialism recognizes the fact that our whole life is based on the social division of labor (between town and country, mental and physical, managerial, and performing, etc.) In short, people in the classes is not in our imagination, but in reality divided ... After all, "the basis for division into classes - Engels wrote, - is the law of division of labor."And what about N. Aronofsky? He says in all seriousness, if any there ideas about class divisions in our society come from ... "Sverdlovsk and Chelyabinsk informals, ... some of Moscow and Leningrad social scientists," etc. Well, can not help but recall the well-forgotten idea of ​​Lenin's who in our time talking about non-class socialism, that should be put in a cage and skip the next Australian kangaroo!On. The classics of scientific socialism consider a class approach as a method of objective study of social phenomena. Why? Yes, because as soon as the different classes of people are divided because they are engaged in different work, then approach them the class - then simply evaluate them for work. And nothing more!But seriously, our author convinces the reader of the newspaper, if a class approach to the community - this repression zhivoderstvo, blood, terror, persecution of intellectuals ... In short, Stalinism! And therefore spare us from Stalinism.Oh, how convenient! Called "Stalinist" anyone who would like to evaluate you on the case, and not by words.And finally, the last one. The idea of ​​dictatorship of the proletariat, Lenin believed in the teachings of Marx's major. The idea that he believed the great philosophical idea, because dictatorship of the proletariat from the standpoint of scientific socialism - this is the way in which humanity, bringing the balance of interests, exercise their great transition from the "realm of necessity" - a "kingdom of freedom." But as soon move on to freedom is possible only by the laws of freedom, the dictatorship of the proletariat - this is nothing like the freedom to transform work - at work. But in art is not for some, but for all.Simply put, if this freedom even enough for an ordinary worker, it is certainly enough room for the candidates of economic sciences - thought so, Lenin, Engels and Marx. N. Aronofsky same again suggests that this idea - "a hook with bait," which, hysterically screaming for disadvantaged workers, informal UNF fill up in the stormy sea of ​​human passions.But enough! Bare assertions of full-length instead of the evidence today, few people believe. As for the position of our author: combine two (OFT and inter-regional group) due to dislike of the third and still conjure up the inadmissibility of splits ... This method is known for a long time ago.P. S. ... To argue with the alphabet of scientific socialism, but to pretend that safeguard our Uralmash from extremists from UNF;... Challenge the right of living people evaluate you not by words but by deeds, and to pretend that you struggle with Stalin dead;... Save the "realm of freedom" of workers, and to pretend that wilt save the workers from the dictatorship of the proletariat ...
Really, there have arisen from what "double sense", in which N. Aronofsky admitted to the reader at the beginning of his article.I will say frankly that this is largely a recognition of his excuses.

V. Molchanov, PhD.