Russia's next president will make unpopular decisions
02/10/2011 RBC daily
Here is an example of the "necessary" for the introduction to a screeching halt the reader, the names of notes. You have already learned that the acting president, as the previous one took only popular decisions?
What, can not remember what the solution was? Well, nothing, no one can remember, because they simply did not exist.
The business newspaper, saying, should know. Probably should, but their efficiency seems to manifest in procuring funds prisluzhivaniem financial oligarchy, which confirms the subsequent text. But be consistent!
"Russia is on the way, that was Greece, and if time does not reduce the proportion of social spending in the budget, the ending will be tragic. So the president to be elected in 2012, whoever that was, have to make unpopular decisions. This RBC daily said the businessman of the top ten list of Forbes. Until 2013, the budget has been agreed, but then the priority of the authorities will encourage innovation, not social costs, support the government. "
How many oligarchs in Greece, do not tell? A pension, which the Greek citizens? Perhaps, in Greece, as in Russia, citizens propose to live on 80 dollars a month? Yes seems to be no! So why the hell did this with business Maine decided that Russia is on the way of Greece? Just, apparently, he was so anxious. And here also turned up rag.
The business newspaper consulted with the business person from the list Forbes, and this gentleman frankly said that another way to kill half of the country as people from Russia and there. So right and cuts the uterus truth: it is necessary to cut social spending. The team of correspondents, the signatories of this article can be seen from humility, not asked the tycoon: how he amassed a capital. No way, whether robbing the country of which he now so take care of? Or, he put the money he parents for school meals were given, and then their benefits invested. This is for all brackets. How and why in Russia still uses flat rate of taxation, why selectively applies the law, why it is so taken away uncontrollably budget and a host of issues. But reporters have set a goal, denoted seem very tempting sum.
"I think that after 2012 we are waiting for a big cleaning of social spending. So far, we have at the elite level was not such a shake-up, understanding the need for dramatic reductions in the social part. Yes, it was 1991, 1998-D. But then there was the monetization. It is reasonable to sotsrashody accounted for approximately 50% of the expenditure side, not only direct sotsrashody, but also all indirect "- says the businessman.
It seems, and this seeming abstraction, he hangs with aplomb on the ears of the correspondents of the newspaper BUSINESS.
Do you hear ... WE AT ELITE !!!!!!!!!!! The elite are thinking of how else to rob people, but due to the budget profit, which they did not invest. But people have long been thinking, how would the Kolyma region working with his hands to ensure that it is desirable but not common people, and all the business men of the elite innovators and modernizers entirely, considering our nation, just as a source of enrichment.
"At a recent meeting of the government, some colleagues have expressed the opinion that if we go on policies to encourage innovation, we need to move to a new level and budget planning - confirms a top source of RBC daily in the government. - Now the budget is aimed more at providing social guarantees, but it does not fit with the policy of encouraging innovation. "
They provide social guarantees !!!!!!!! Cut pensions, cut pay and benefits, budget and take away with brazenly claim that they provide social guarantees, and not parasitic on the body of the people.
Well, did not joined the Russian pensioners, children, people with disabilities in order by encouraging innovators to budget money, says a senior source from the government, who also wants to be last in the list of Forbes.
In particular, he said, increased financial support for innovative companies can pass through the Russian Foundation for Technological Development since 2014. However, he notes, the sooner you should not expect a change, because up to and including 2013 budget priorities are articulated, and he is in a rather rigid framework. "It makes sense to think about it" - agrees a senior source in the Ministry of Economic Development to RBC daily.
Do you think time correspondents BUSINESS newspaper, it is not capable of: in whose hands are these innovative companies? That's right!! Why give someone else's, when all the relatives very often innovators and modernizers.
"We must be realistic. Indeed, we have to leave in 2015 to zero deficit, - says the chairman of the Duma Committee on Budget and Tax Yuri Vasiliev. - We'll have to solve a dilemma - either seek to reduce costs and increase efficiency (leading to structural changes in the budget, including the obligations of the state), or focus on tax rises. Some experts favor the first option. But it is most difficult, as we see in other countries' experience. Perhaps the best compromise is found between the first and second means. "
Indeed, we must be realistic and it's time to stop believing all of these figures with the parliamentary authorities and the so-called expert community who sit in the servants' quarters of the financial oligarchy and raw magnates. Hundreds of billions of rubles went into the pockets of the Russian oligarchy under the most specious pretexts, and the industry to collapse, social sphere in the corral, agriculture barely ekes out its existence.
How much are you still willing to believe?
The budget problem in terms of social benefits and otyazhelennosti fairly large component of the power unit is very relevant, agrees director of development HSE Natalia Akindinov. Innovative same component (for example, as regards science and education) does not yet have a growing trajectory in the current version of the budget until 2013.The current configuration of the budget is more of a pre-election character - that does not offend the active groups of people. The problem of longer-term strategic development and requires a different cost structure. It is therefore logical to assume that the newly elected president (whoever he was) should be some measures taken to reorient the budget, says Ms. Akindinov.
The budget, of course, have to reorient and in the first place we must stop financing of the budget as the HSE and the HSE, what will be popular and economically.
Now the federal budget directed the huge transfers, which every year will only grow. This situation should be reversed, experts believe TsMAKP Elena Penuhina. There are several options, of which the most obvious - raising the retirement age. "This will change the balance of labor-dependency without reducing the size of pensions," - she said, recalling that innovative activity can be maintained not only through direct fiscal stimulus, but also through various tax incentives, more intense than today.
And Helen Penuhina of TsMAKP not tell the people from the federal budget means for the transfer takes. I can barely tell a few options:
1. Help Americans with money;
2. Federal officials have left salaries abroad and these funds allowed the support of the country;
3. Just because printing money;
4. The government has a sponsor.
Well, I think that's enough! There after, this TsMAKP all tsmaki very competent and conceive themselves. And will this not so much need.
But for all this political will is needed, experts say. "Before, it was easier to shift the responsibility on the government to dismiss the prime minister, dismiss the government. So it was under Yeltsin, Putin is practiced. But if the current model of power to separate the association of these reforms, the president or prime minister it will be difficult - says Deputy Director of the Institute of Social Systems, Dmitry Badovsky. - Power is aware and ready to assume these costs. "
Dmitry Koptyubenko, Peter Kirian, Anastasia Litvinova, Olga Zhermeleva
What are we, the readers, want to convince the team of journalists of the newspaper BUSINESS? Yes, that means everything must be as a result of collective work, give the higher bureaucracy and the financial oligarchy, which will take care of all developing countries.
Do you believe that? Doubt!
What they have done these twenty years, you ask? Yes, the same as now - looted the country, fooling the people by corrupt journalists.
That's it!
And that means at their disposal, had more to increase the retirement age. Or it is better not to pay.
What people are interested in YOU?
It's very simple! Organize and to release all of these innovators and modernizers of such a heavy and burdensome labor, allowing them to earn a living by their labor.
Ivan Tevrizsky
02/10/2011 RBC daily
Here is an example of the "necessary" for the introduction to a screeching halt the reader, the names of notes. You have already learned that the acting president, as the previous one took only popular decisions?
What, can not remember what the solution was? Well, nothing, no one can remember, because they simply did not exist.
The business newspaper, saying, should know. Probably should, but their efficiency seems to manifest in procuring funds prisluzhivaniem financial oligarchy, which confirms the subsequent text. But be consistent!
"Russia is on the way, that was Greece, and if time does not reduce the proportion of social spending in the budget, the ending will be tragic. So the president to be elected in 2012, whoever that was, have to make unpopular decisions. This RBC daily said the businessman of the top ten list of Forbes. Until 2013, the budget has been agreed, but then the priority of the authorities will encourage innovation, not social costs, support the government. "
How many oligarchs in Greece, do not tell? A pension, which the Greek citizens? Perhaps, in Greece, as in Russia, citizens propose to live on 80 dollars a month? Yes seems to be no! So why the hell did this with business Maine decided that Russia is on the way of Greece? Just, apparently, he was so anxious. And here also turned up rag.
The business newspaper consulted with the business person from the list Forbes, and this gentleman frankly said that another way to kill half of the country as people from Russia and there. So right and cuts the uterus truth: it is necessary to cut social spending. The team of correspondents, the signatories of this article can be seen from humility, not asked the tycoon: how he amassed a capital. No way, whether robbing the country of which he now so take care of? Or, he put the money he parents for school meals were given, and then their benefits invested. This is for all brackets. How and why in Russia still uses flat rate of taxation, why selectively applies the law, why it is so taken away uncontrollably budget and a host of issues. But reporters have set a goal, denoted seem very tempting sum.
"I think that after 2012 we are waiting for a big cleaning of social spending. So far, we have at the elite level was not such a shake-up, understanding the need for dramatic reductions in the social part. Yes, it was 1991, 1998-D. But then there was the monetization. It is reasonable to sotsrashody accounted for approximately 50% of the expenditure side, not only direct sotsrashody, but also all indirect "- says the businessman.
It seems, and this seeming abstraction, he hangs with aplomb on the ears of the correspondents of the newspaper BUSINESS.
Do you hear ... WE AT ELITE !!!!!!!!!!! The elite are thinking of how else to rob people, but due to the budget profit, which they did not invest. But people have long been thinking, how would the Kolyma region working with his hands to ensure that it is desirable but not common people, and all the business men of the elite innovators and modernizers entirely, considering our nation, just as a source of enrichment.
"At a recent meeting of the government, some colleagues have expressed the opinion that if we go on policies to encourage innovation, we need to move to a new level and budget planning - confirms a top source of RBC daily in the government. - Now the budget is aimed more at providing social guarantees, but it does not fit with the policy of encouraging innovation. "
They provide social guarantees !!!!!!!! Cut pensions, cut pay and benefits, budget and take away with brazenly claim that they provide social guarantees, and not parasitic on the body of the people.
Well, did not joined the Russian pensioners, children, people with disabilities in order by encouraging innovators to budget money, says a senior source from the government, who also wants to be last in the list of Forbes.
In particular, he said, increased financial support for innovative companies can pass through the Russian Foundation for Technological Development since 2014. However, he notes, the sooner you should not expect a change, because up to and including 2013 budget priorities are articulated, and he is in a rather rigid framework. "It makes sense to think about it" - agrees a senior source in the Ministry of Economic Development to RBC daily.
Do you think time correspondents BUSINESS newspaper, it is not capable of: in whose hands are these innovative companies? That's right!! Why give someone else's, when all the relatives very often innovators and modernizers.
"We must be realistic. Indeed, we have to leave in 2015 to zero deficit, - says the chairman of the Duma Committee on Budget and Tax Yuri Vasiliev. - We'll have to solve a dilemma - either seek to reduce costs and increase efficiency (leading to structural changes in the budget, including the obligations of the state), or focus on tax rises. Some experts favor the first option. But it is most difficult, as we see in other countries' experience. Perhaps the best compromise is found between the first and second means. "
Indeed, we must be realistic and it's time to stop believing all of these figures with the parliamentary authorities and the so-called expert community who sit in the servants' quarters of the financial oligarchy and raw magnates. Hundreds of billions of rubles went into the pockets of the Russian oligarchy under the most specious pretexts, and the industry to collapse, social sphere in the corral, agriculture barely ekes out its existence.
How much are you still willing to believe?
The budget problem in terms of social benefits and otyazhelennosti fairly large component of the power unit is very relevant, agrees director of development HSE Natalia Akindinov. Innovative same component (for example, as regards science and education) does not yet have a growing trajectory in the current version of the budget until 2013.The current configuration of the budget is more of a pre-election character - that does not offend the active groups of people. The problem of longer-term strategic development and requires a different cost structure. It is therefore logical to assume that the newly elected president (whoever he was) should be some measures taken to reorient the budget, says Ms. Akindinov.
The budget, of course, have to reorient and in the first place we must stop financing of the budget as the HSE and the HSE, what will be popular and economically.
Now the federal budget directed the huge transfers, which every year will only grow. This situation should be reversed, experts believe TsMAKP Elena Penuhina. There are several options, of which the most obvious - raising the retirement age. "This will change the balance of labor-dependency without reducing the size of pensions," - she said, recalling that innovative activity can be maintained not only through direct fiscal stimulus, but also through various tax incentives, more intense than today.
And Helen Penuhina of TsMAKP not tell the people from the federal budget means for the transfer takes. I can barely tell a few options:
1. Help Americans with money;
2. Federal officials have left salaries abroad and these funds allowed the support of the country;
3. Just because printing money;
4. The government has a sponsor.
Well, I think that's enough! There after, this TsMAKP all tsmaki very competent and conceive themselves. And will this not so much need.
But for all this political will is needed, experts say. "Before, it was easier to shift the responsibility on the government to dismiss the prime minister, dismiss the government. So it was under Yeltsin, Putin is practiced. But if the current model of power to separate the association of these reforms, the president or prime minister it will be difficult - says Deputy Director of the Institute of Social Systems, Dmitry Badovsky. - Power is aware and ready to assume these costs. "
Dmitry Koptyubenko, Peter Kirian, Anastasia Litvinova, Olga Zhermeleva
What are we, the readers, want to convince the team of journalists of the newspaper BUSINESS? Yes, that means everything must be as a result of collective work, give the higher bureaucracy and the financial oligarchy, which will take care of all developing countries.
Do you believe that? Doubt!
What they have done these twenty years, you ask? Yes, the same as now - looted the country, fooling the people by corrupt journalists.
That's it!
And that means at their disposal, had more to increase the retirement age. Or it is better not to pay.
What people are interested in YOU?
It's very simple! Organize and to release all of these innovators and modernizers of such a heavy and burdensome labor, allowing them to earn a living by their labor.
Ivan Tevrizsky
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий