In the April issue of the newspaper Pravda published draft new edition of the Communist Party program, which allows every thinker working to get an idea of what is today the Communist Party, and it is far from true Marxism.
Read the very first paragraph: "The present ruling regime by fraud and violence returned to our homeland to capitalism." So fed us the story of the Communist Party. Villains come and spoiled everything. As you can see, the developers of the program, positioning themselves as Marxists, have fallen into an impassable philistinism.
They do not even suggest that such a formulation of the question requires a lot of explanations, rather than just checking. Why do people allow themselves to be deceived? What was socialism, by which the people, so easy to refuse? Where have those villains that deception and trickery "returned to the homeland of capitalism"? Where were the "good" communists allowed to do so with the Fatherland? Etc. etc.
But the developers of the program such issues simply do not arise. And apparently can not arise, since they believe that relations between labor and capital can be antagonistic, as can be, apparently, and friendly, cooperative, as a consequence of the program statement: "antagonistic relationship between purchased by wage labor and capital."
But all these passages seem minor shortcomings when you read the main goal. "Our main objectives: - Popular sovereignty, meaning the power of the working majority, united by the Soviets and other forms of self-government of the people "; Call at least one game, which would in its program of record - the power of the oligarchs and bureaucrats? I think that there are not there. Only the Communist Party, if it truly communist and adhere to the spirit of Marxism, should raise the issue clearly and unambiguously - take the proletariat of all power in the state, ie the establishment of proletarian dictatorship. This is the essence of Marxism.
A Communist Party is taken "together with its allies ensure formation of a government of national confidence and national interests." A sort of an amorphous body with abstract interests, which will be dominated by demagogues, the CPRF. And where, as a promise to train Communists from the Communist Party, will be "expanded control rights of representative bodies in respect of the Government and the entire apparatus of the executive branch." And will "make the fullest possible representation of workers in government and government bodies at various levels, protect the rights of labor collectives, to create conditions for self-organization and initiative of citizens."
Perhaps the authorities would be the same number of representatives of workers, many of today of the Communist Party Central Committee and the deputies from the Communist Party. So what in the program and provides that the labor groups will defend their rights from the government of national trust. And further, the developers of the program of the Communist Party already dreaming, is not defined and not setting yet, what a state would be created, and most importantly for anyone's interests. "Taking into its own hands the natural wealth and strategic industries, the government will establish planning major indicators of economic development, will create a new, many times greater than today, the budget will be the largest customer for the home producers. The people's power by planning and market mechanisms, using the latest information systems that will actively regulate the economy and social sphere. " "The people's power - the People, this is not humor - with the help of planning and market mechanisms" - will create a bigger pie to divide, explain to us "communists" of the Communist Party. And here is what I wrote on this subject, Lenin in his "State and Revolution:
"" In describing the most general phases of development of the proletariat, we traced the more or less veiled civil war within existing society up to the point where it turns into open revolution, the proletariat and founded its domination by the forcible overthrow of the bourgeoisie "... ... "We have seen above that the first step in working-class revolution is the transformation" (literally: increase) of the proletariat as the ruling class, the conquest of democracy. " "The proletariat will use its political supremacy to wrest from the bourgeoisie all capital, to centralize all instruments of production owned by the state, ie, organized as the ruling class, the proletariat, and perhaps more rapidly increase the total productive forces" (p. 31 and 37 on the 7 th him. ed. 1906). Here we see the formulation of one of the most remarkable and important ideas of Marxism on the question of the state, namely the idea of "dictatorship of the proletariat" (as were Marx and Engels said after the Paris Commune), and then an extremely interesting definition of the state-owned, too, among the "forgotten words "of Marxism. "A state that is organized as the ruling class of the proletariat." This definition of the state has never been explained in the prevailing propaganda and campaign literature, the official Social-Democratic parties. Not only that. It was just forgotten, because it is absolutely irreconcilable with reformism, is a slap in the face of common opportunist prejudices and philistine illusions about the "peaceful development of democracy."
The state is a special organization of force, an organization of violence for the suppression of some class. What class must suppress the proletariat? Of course, only the exploiting class, ie, the bourgeoisie. Workers need the state only to suppress the resistance of the exploiters, and direct this suppression, can carry it out in a state of only the proletariat as the only thoroughly revolutionary class, the only class that can unite all the toilers and exploited in the struggle against the bourgeoisie, in its displacing it. The exploiting classes need political rule to maintain exploitation, ie, in the selfish interests of a tiny minority against the vast majority of the people. The exploited classes need political rule to the total elimination of all forms of exploitation, ie, in the interests of the vast majority of the people against the insignificant minority of the modern slave, ie, the landlords and capitalists. Petty-bourgeois democrats, those sham socialists replaced the class struggle by dreams of class harmony, even pictured the socialist transformation in a dreamy way, not as the overthrow of the rule of the exploiting class, but as the peaceful submission of the minority to understand their problems to the majority. This petty-bourgeois utopia, is inextricably linked with the recognition of supra-class state, leads in practice to the betrayal of the interests of the laboring classes, as is shown, for example., The history of the French revolutions of 1848 and 1871, as shown by the experience of the "socialist" participation in bourgeois ministries in England, France, Italy and other countries in the late XIX and early XX century. Marks all his life struggling with this petty-bourgeois socialism, now reborn in Russia Revolutionary Party and the Mensheviks. Marx held the doctrine of class struggle consistently until the exercise of political power of the state. The overthrow of the bourgeoisie can only be part of the proletariat, as a special class, the economic conditions of existence prepare it for such overthrow, give him the opportunity and strength to perform it. While the bourgeoisie breaks up, disperses the peasantry and all the petty-bourgeois strata, it binds, unites, organizes the proletariat. Only the proletariat - by virtue of its economic role in a major production - can be the leader of all the toiling and exploited masses that the bourgeoisie exploits, oppresses, crushes are often not less but more than proletarians, but who are not capable of independent struggle for their liberation . The doctrine of class struggle, applied by Marx to the question of the state and the socialist revolution, leads to a recognition of the political domination of the proletariat, of its dictatorship, ie, the power, not shared with anyone else and relying directly on the armed force of the masses. The overthrow of the bourgeoisie can be achieved only the proletariat to the ruling class, capable of crushing the inevitable and desperate resistance of the bourgeoisie and to arrange for a new way of farming all the toiling and exploited masses. The proletariat needs state power, the centralized organization of force, an organization of violence and to suppress the resistance of the exploiters and to lead the enormous mass of the population, the peasantry, the petty bourgeoisie, the semi-in "build" a socialist economy. Educating the workers' party, Marxism educates the vanguard of the proletariat, capable of assuming power and leading the whole people to socialism, of directing and organizing the new system, to be a teacher, leader, leader of all the toiling and exploited in building up their social life without the bourgeoisie and the bourgeoisie. On the contrary, the now prevailing opportunism raises from a working party to be the representatives of the better-paid workers, "arrange" tolerable under capitalism, selling for a mess of pottage his birthright, ie, refusing the role of the revolutionary leaders of the people against the bourgeoisie. "A state that is organized as the ruling class of the proletariat" - the theory of Marx is inextricably linked with all his teaching about the revolutionary role of the proletariat in history. Completion of this role is the proletarian dictatorship, the political supremacy of the proletariat. But if the proletariat needs state as a special organization of violence against the bourgeoisie, the following conclusion suggests itself, is it conceivable to create an organization without destruction, without destroying the state machine created by the bourgeoisie itself? Straight to this conclusion brings "Communist Manifesto" and of this conclusion Marx says, summing up the experience of the Revolution 1848 - 1851 years ". Everything is clear and understandable, and most importantly reasonable.
And what we read in the program KPRF? - Public ownership of land, natural resources, basic means of production; The classics of Marxism clearly indicate that the proletariat must take political power in order to select the means of production from the exploiters, making it public. And then, in the process of withering away of the state, the means of production will take the form of public, that is of common use. At the same petty-bourgeois dreamers of the Communist Party, it immediately becomes, miraculously, the public, on the basis of which, they start handing out "carrots." Omitting all the demagogic and false historical passages of the program, it is worth noting nominated tasks. "The task of the Communist Party: - To lead the popular resistance forced the restoration of capitalism in the country; " True communists have always placed the mission to organize the workers, to establish a dictatorship of the proletariat, for the victory of the oppressed against the exploiters, but the petty bourgeois opportunists, always ready to lead anything.
Who would be powerful and organized way was made against the ruthless exploitation and plunder, then the Communist Party and appeared in time would be. And then they begin to fret over and led dances, promising to revive the economy, spirituality, statehood, the defense. " And even "support the requirements of workers' control over the executive and representative government." That's how the communists! They "support the demand for workers' control of executive and representative authority"! What in this case, the communist, Marxist?
Marx, Engels, Lenin and all the true supporters of the proletarian revolution have always talked about creating a working state, the type of the Paris Commune and the Soviets, when the workers themselves elected to representative bodies, are both legislators and executives. A Communist Party "supports the demands of workers for control of the executive and representative authority"! That workers could not control the workers, the Communist Party put forward the program at least.
"Minimum program The minimum program provides urgent measures to implement the strategic goals of the party. Communist Party understands that under existing anti-people regime of socio-economic and political stability in society is unattainable. Therefore, it sees its main task is to seek by all means: - Changes in the political and socio-economic policy of the country; Fans create cloudy water and then stir. Instead of a clear and understandable course Leninist party to establish the dictatorship of the proletariat - "change the political and socio-economic policy of the country." This change of socio-economic policy, as is evident from the program will implement the same officials, but apparently only those who accept the program and charter of the Communist Party. - Improve governance, reduce the number of officials, to establish effective control of workers over the production and distribution revenues. If there is a bureaucracy, rather than elected, controlled and responsible representatives of the working class, then what kind of workers' control can be said? Muddleheads and utopians of the Communist Party who want to combine incompatible things, the desire to please everyone, but especially the owners of the modern state at the end entangled. - Return to the public domain resource rent, use it to overcome poverty, improve people's welfare; Advocates of "Marxism" do not understand what the rent. Rent, as is well known and clearly defined by Marxism, have income from property, and not from nature. Therefore, no natural resource rents and does not exist. There is a government annuity, which is now fully assigned to the owners of this State, and will continue to be assigned and the government of national trust, under the leadership of the Communist Party. What can clearly be seen from their program. The worst enemies of Marxism - the opportunists, with desire to be accepted as true Marxists and defenders of the interests of the proletariat. It requires - "stop denigrating the Russian and Soviet history, memory and teachings of Marx, Engels, VI Lenin's work IV Stalin and other leaders of the Communist Party and Soviet State. " Such is the dialectic of modern life in Russia.
Vitaly Glukhov
Read the very first paragraph: "The present ruling regime by fraud and violence returned to our homeland to capitalism." So fed us the story of the Communist Party. Villains come and spoiled everything. As you can see, the developers of the program, positioning themselves as Marxists, have fallen into an impassable philistinism.
They do not even suggest that such a formulation of the question requires a lot of explanations, rather than just checking. Why do people allow themselves to be deceived? What was socialism, by which the people, so easy to refuse? Where have those villains that deception and trickery "returned to the homeland of capitalism"? Where were the "good" communists allowed to do so with the Fatherland? Etc. etc.
But the developers of the program such issues simply do not arise. And apparently can not arise, since they believe that relations between labor and capital can be antagonistic, as can be, apparently, and friendly, cooperative, as a consequence of the program statement: "antagonistic relationship between purchased by wage labor and capital."
But all these passages seem minor shortcomings when you read the main goal. "Our main objectives: - Popular sovereignty, meaning the power of the working majority, united by the Soviets and other forms of self-government of the people "; Call at least one game, which would in its program of record - the power of the oligarchs and bureaucrats? I think that there are not there. Only the Communist Party, if it truly communist and adhere to the spirit of Marxism, should raise the issue clearly and unambiguously - take the proletariat of all power in the state, ie the establishment of proletarian dictatorship. This is the essence of Marxism.
A Communist Party is taken "together with its allies ensure formation of a government of national confidence and national interests." A sort of an amorphous body with abstract interests, which will be dominated by demagogues, the CPRF. And where, as a promise to train Communists from the Communist Party, will be "expanded control rights of representative bodies in respect of the Government and the entire apparatus of the executive branch." And will "make the fullest possible representation of workers in government and government bodies at various levels, protect the rights of labor collectives, to create conditions for self-organization and initiative of citizens."
Perhaps the authorities would be the same number of representatives of workers, many of today of the Communist Party Central Committee and the deputies from the Communist Party. So what in the program and provides that the labor groups will defend their rights from the government of national trust. And further, the developers of the program of the Communist Party already dreaming, is not defined and not setting yet, what a state would be created, and most importantly for anyone's interests. "Taking into its own hands the natural wealth and strategic industries, the government will establish planning major indicators of economic development, will create a new, many times greater than today, the budget will be the largest customer for the home producers. The people's power by planning and market mechanisms, using the latest information systems that will actively regulate the economy and social sphere. " "The people's power - the People, this is not humor - with the help of planning and market mechanisms" - will create a bigger pie to divide, explain to us "communists" of the Communist Party. And here is what I wrote on this subject, Lenin in his "State and Revolution:
"" In describing the most general phases of development of the proletariat, we traced the more or less veiled civil war within existing society up to the point where it turns into open revolution, the proletariat and founded its domination by the forcible overthrow of the bourgeoisie "... ... "We have seen above that the first step in working-class revolution is the transformation" (literally: increase) of the proletariat as the ruling class, the conquest of democracy. " "The proletariat will use its political supremacy to wrest from the bourgeoisie all capital, to centralize all instruments of production owned by the state, ie, organized as the ruling class, the proletariat, and perhaps more rapidly increase the total productive forces" (p. 31 and 37 on the 7 th him. ed. 1906). Here we see the formulation of one of the most remarkable and important ideas of Marxism on the question of the state, namely the idea of "dictatorship of the proletariat" (as were Marx and Engels said after the Paris Commune), and then an extremely interesting definition of the state-owned, too, among the "forgotten words "of Marxism. "A state that is organized as the ruling class of the proletariat." This definition of the state has never been explained in the prevailing propaganda and campaign literature, the official Social-Democratic parties. Not only that. It was just forgotten, because it is absolutely irreconcilable with reformism, is a slap in the face of common opportunist prejudices and philistine illusions about the "peaceful development of democracy."
The state is a special organization of force, an organization of violence for the suppression of some class. What class must suppress the proletariat? Of course, only the exploiting class, ie, the bourgeoisie. Workers need the state only to suppress the resistance of the exploiters, and direct this suppression, can carry it out in a state of only the proletariat as the only thoroughly revolutionary class, the only class that can unite all the toilers and exploited in the struggle against the bourgeoisie, in its displacing it. The exploiting classes need political rule to maintain exploitation, ie, in the selfish interests of a tiny minority against the vast majority of the people. The exploited classes need political rule to the total elimination of all forms of exploitation, ie, in the interests of the vast majority of the people against the insignificant minority of the modern slave, ie, the landlords and capitalists. Petty-bourgeois democrats, those sham socialists replaced the class struggle by dreams of class harmony, even pictured the socialist transformation in a dreamy way, not as the overthrow of the rule of the exploiting class, but as the peaceful submission of the minority to understand their problems to the majority. This petty-bourgeois utopia, is inextricably linked with the recognition of supra-class state, leads in practice to the betrayal of the interests of the laboring classes, as is shown, for example., The history of the French revolutions of 1848 and 1871, as shown by the experience of the "socialist" participation in bourgeois ministries in England, France, Italy and other countries in the late XIX and early XX century. Marks all his life struggling with this petty-bourgeois socialism, now reborn in Russia Revolutionary Party and the Mensheviks. Marx held the doctrine of class struggle consistently until the exercise of political power of the state. The overthrow of the bourgeoisie can only be part of the proletariat, as a special class, the economic conditions of existence prepare it for such overthrow, give him the opportunity and strength to perform it. While the bourgeoisie breaks up, disperses the peasantry and all the petty-bourgeois strata, it binds, unites, organizes the proletariat. Only the proletariat - by virtue of its economic role in a major production - can be the leader of all the toiling and exploited masses that the bourgeoisie exploits, oppresses, crushes are often not less but more than proletarians, but who are not capable of independent struggle for their liberation . The doctrine of class struggle, applied by Marx to the question of the state and the socialist revolution, leads to a recognition of the political domination of the proletariat, of its dictatorship, ie, the power, not shared with anyone else and relying directly on the armed force of the masses. The overthrow of the bourgeoisie can be achieved only the proletariat to the ruling class, capable of crushing the inevitable and desperate resistance of the bourgeoisie and to arrange for a new way of farming all the toiling and exploited masses. The proletariat needs state power, the centralized organization of force, an organization of violence and to suppress the resistance of the exploiters and to lead the enormous mass of the population, the peasantry, the petty bourgeoisie, the semi-in "build" a socialist economy. Educating the workers' party, Marxism educates the vanguard of the proletariat, capable of assuming power and leading the whole people to socialism, of directing and organizing the new system, to be a teacher, leader, leader of all the toiling and exploited in building up their social life without the bourgeoisie and the bourgeoisie. On the contrary, the now prevailing opportunism raises from a working party to be the representatives of the better-paid workers, "arrange" tolerable under capitalism, selling for a mess of pottage his birthright, ie, refusing the role of the revolutionary leaders of the people against the bourgeoisie. "A state that is organized as the ruling class of the proletariat" - the theory of Marx is inextricably linked with all his teaching about the revolutionary role of the proletariat in history. Completion of this role is the proletarian dictatorship, the political supremacy of the proletariat. But if the proletariat needs state as a special organization of violence against the bourgeoisie, the following conclusion suggests itself, is it conceivable to create an organization without destruction, without destroying the state machine created by the bourgeoisie itself? Straight to this conclusion brings "Communist Manifesto" and of this conclusion Marx says, summing up the experience of the Revolution 1848 - 1851 years ". Everything is clear and understandable, and most importantly reasonable.
And what we read in the program KPRF? - Public ownership of land, natural resources, basic means of production; The classics of Marxism clearly indicate that the proletariat must take political power in order to select the means of production from the exploiters, making it public. And then, in the process of withering away of the state, the means of production will take the form of public, that is of common use. At the same petty-bourgeois dreamers of the Communist Party, it immediately becomes, miraculously, the public, on the basis of which, they start handing out "carrots." Omitting all the demagogic and false historical passages of the program, it is worth noting nominated tasks. "The task of the Communist Party: - To lead the popular resistance forced the restoration of capitalism in the country; " True communists have always placed the mission to organize the workers, to establish a dictatorship of the proletariat, for the victory of the oppressed against the exploiters, but the petty bourgeois opportunists, always ready to lead anything.
Who would be powerful and organized way was made against the ruthless exploitation and plunder, then the Communist Party and appeared in time would be. And then they begin to fret over and led dances, promising to revive the economy, spirituality, statehood, the defense. " And even "support the requirements of workers' control over the executive and representative government." That's how the communists! They "support the demand for workers' control of executive and representative authority"! What in this case, the communist, Marxist?
Marx, Engels, Lenin and all the true supporters of the proletarian revolution have always talked about creating a working state, the type of the Paris Commune and the Soviets, when the workers themselves elected to representative bodies, are both legislators and executives. A Communist Party "supports the demands of workers for control of the executive and representative authority"! That workers could not control the workers, the Communist Party put forward the program at least.
"Minimum program The minimum program provides urgent measures to implement the strategic goals of the party. Communist Party understands that under existing anti-people regime of socio-economic and political stability in society is unattainable. Therefore, it sees its main task is to seek by all means: - Changes in the political and socio-economic policy of the country; Fans create cloudy water and then stir. Instead of a clear and understandable course Leninist party to establish the dictatorship of the proletariat - "change the political and socio-economic policy of the country." This change of socio-economic policy, as is evident from the program will implement the same officials, but apparently only those who accept the program and charter of the Communist Party. - Improve governance, reduce the number of officials, to establish effective control of workers over the production and distribution revenues. If there is a bureaucracy, rather than elected, controlled and responsible representatives of the working class, then what kind of workers' control can be said? Muddleheads and utopians of the Communist Party who want to combine incompatible things, the desire to please everyone, but especially the owners of the modern state at the end entangled. - Return to the public domain resource rent, use it to overcome poverty, improve people's welfare; Advocates of "Marxism" do not understand what the rent. Rent, as is well known and clearly defined by Marxism, have income from property, and not from nature. Therefore, no natural resource rents and does not exist. There is a government annuity, which is now fully assigned to the owners of this State, and will continue to be assigned and the government of national trust, under the leadership of the Communist Party. What can clearly be seen from their program. The worst enemies of Marxism - the opportunists, with desire to be accepted as true Marxists and defenders of the interests of the proletariat. It requires - "stop denigrating the Russian and Soviet history, memory and teachings of Marx, Engels, VI Lenin's work IV Stalin and other leaders of the Communist Party and Soviet State. " Such is the dialectic of modern life in Russia.
Vitaly Glukhov
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий