If the reader thought, reading the title of the article, which will further explain the expulsion of Adam and Eve from Paradise, he was mistaken. I'm not going to write on religious themes, but I want to join the debate unfolded in the pages of the newspaper Izvestia, the fate of liberalism and the democratic movement in Russia. To join rather than divide the universal wail of individual writers and politicians about dying in a country of democracy, of authoritarianism, the occurrence of red-brown revolution and democracy of our nation. Do not divide, since the last historical period allows people to understand and learn to fight for the truth rather than tinsel, democracy, since it does not share the opinion that our nation does not want democratic changes.
Particularly strong, these groans, were heard after the failure of the bourgeois democratic parties in the last elections to the Duma, after the expulsion of the bourgeois democrats of this paradise, which they themselves have created, with many privileges, with high salaries, with all the trappings of power.
It was paradise, so as to give its contents two million 340 thousand rubles a year, and with many privileges, the deputies of the Duma today are not responsible for what happens in the country, and not even try to gain real power. But some MPs, apparently offended by negligence on the part of the presidential administration and government, do not even consider it necessary to attend meetings of the State Duma. As against the will of the government, according to Duma deputies, it is impossible to conduct any law. You may think that they are elected only for the writing of laws and not to express and protect the interests of the people.
That, at least to some extent, close to the most accurate forecast of the country not to indulge in mindless fantasy, and thoroughly to talk about the fate of liberalism and democracy in Russia, we must look at history. View of a modern society out of Russia, the role played by the Liberal Democrats during their stay in the State Duma and other bodies.
And to the reader to be more clear about what is at stake, it is worth to clarify that the bourgeois, democratic, parties - those parties that favor the development of private capital on the ruins of a monopoly, seasoning their programs of social-democratic rhetoric.
When, in 1991, resulting in economic and political crisis, under pressure from popular protest, not because of liberal democracy, as they are about this solid, collapsed monopoly capital, and the omnipotence of the Communist Party remains in the past, the arena of political life left Liberal Democrats and was widely implement their ideas and interests.
Then, confused and frightened by the bureaucracy has allowed them to take power and start the conversion. Begin to build a new state. But instead, to develop democracy, of which the words are baked, the Liberal Democrats began to divide the property, multiply the oligarchs, to share budget, to build an authoritarian state. Instead of providing real democracy, they dissolved the Soviets, who began to take his face, and it could be an organ of democracy, without the dictates of the Communist Party, and created an authoritarian state with unlimited powers of the President, with a bicameral parliament and many other state agencies not under the control of the people.
Eliminating the Soviets as organs of democracy, yet only becoming to his feet, still trying to become so, the Democrats have created a centralized state, with unlimited presidential powers and took it the main office. And the advice they disbanded, not because it was the basis for the monopoly of the state, totalitarian, as it is expressed, they would never have been established, but because the Soviets formed from the elected representatives of the people could not contribute to the seizure of property, which is prepared to do and did the bourgeois democrats. But, by depriving people of the opportunity to participate in government, they created the conditions for his expulsion from the State Duma. And now, grieve that were outside the executive authority, accusing people of being passive and not democratic.
Crossed, ladies and gentlemen! Take a look at its role in the history of past reforms without illusions, and you'll see that people are human. Who can say what he did wrong, to deny you trust. Did you, your participation in power in the Duma, have improved the situation of the people, have raised the standard of living? Do not you have taken an active part in adventurous projects on withdrawal of money from the pockets of Russians? Is not Vladimir Ryzhkov, today's builder RPR and an ardent Democrat, at one time consisted in the PDR, together with the famous builder of the state of the pyramid (SCG), Viktor Chernomyrdin, has prepared a default in 1998, and Kiriyenko to implement it? Not to mention those who has participated in the division of state property, with a considerable advantage. And these examples are set.
So people should not blame the passivity and not democracy, but rather in repenting before the people, in their dark deeds in his collusion with the bureaucracy.
After all, the people you can rightfully say that it is you have created the basis of an authoritarian state, with uncontrolled bureaucracy, with nevybiraemymi judges, with limitless powers of the President, with a powerless parliament. That you have created the oligarchs and given them the opportunity to enrich themselves at the expense of public property and robbing people, give them money for maintenance. So there is nothing to blame the mirror.
You do not want democracy and autocracy. You thought that came to power on forever, that won seats in the state apparatus for their "beautiful" speech, but not thanks to the support of the people. And so spill the beans and the chance to create a democratic state, selling on every corner. You have entered into an alliance with government officials and thought it was forever. But here's the bureaucracy did not think so. It's wait and build up strength until you uttered a loud voice, and enjoyed the power. Bureaucracy you bought cheaply, and then you slid to the back of the political scene, showing people your ignorance and venality.
You didst trust in support of the representatives of big capital, but officials have lured them to his side that was not so difficult. And many of the oligarchs could not agree more. Why, indeed, give money to some mediator, negotiator, a deputy, if everyone in the country solves the official said. Clerk - an oligarch, and no middlemen, no democracy and politicians. And those who did not agree on their proposed conditions, Zaslav, where Makar calves did not drive.
Democrats do not understand that bureaucracy reared under state monopoly, has never entertained the good sense to them, believing them to be necessary, but casual and temporary companions, as has never had democratic leanings, and never wanted to part with power. She's just hiding behind the Democrats, and waited for the right moment, when the wave subsided rallies and protests. When it consolidated and arranged, the right people in key positions in the state. She decided that her time had come. Then they created their own party - United Russia, and in the last election secured a majority in the Duma. Now they have their party, in the form of "United Russia" vertical of power, controlled by the oligarchs, a pocket parliament, and weak, having lost its credibility, the opposition, as several of the liberal democratic parties. Now they again say about patriotism, meaning love and devotion to him, about the special way of Russia and the "national" democracy.
And it is quite natural result. After all, the Liberal Democrats have given themselves all under the control of uncontrolled bureaucracy, changing people's interests and democracy. Even today, once again agitating the people to stand in their ranks, Democrats are not talking about democracy, because, apparently, were not clear on this lesson of the bureaucracy that without them people in power do not hold back. What is democracy - not when in power are people who call themselves democrats, but when the people governs, through their elected representatives. And today - people are waiting for change, and the Democrats the election.
They have not grasped the essentials. A main result of past historical period - the disclosure of the Liberal Democrats who are always ready to deal, always corrupt and unable to rework the entire state apparatus, on the basis of democracy and popular government.
Second, and equally important result that we have received - this is what the bureaucracy came from behind Democrats and exposed his face. Therefore, all the more important questions of government, the adoption of the budget are settled in the presidential administration and government, and "United Russia" who sit in the Duma, play the role of popular representation. Now we know that the bureaucracy - is the "United Russia", but it had joined the Liberal Democratic Party, as vyrazitelnitsa spiritual aspirations of the bureaucracy. (Read up on the site an article entitled "Body and Soul of the Russian bureaucracy") The party and the Russian bureaucracy united as twins. And also the fact that freedom for the people and democracy can be realized only in the fight against bureaucracy and the expression of her interests - "United Russia".
Vitaly Glukhov
Particularly strong, these groans, were heard after the failure of the bourgeois democratic parties in the last elections to the Duma, after the expulsion of the bourgeois democrats of this paradise, which they themselves have created, with many privileges, with high salaries, with all the trappings of power.
It was paradise, so as to give its contents two million 340 thousand rubles a year, and with many privileges, the deputies of the Duma today are not responsible for what happens in the country, and not even try to gain real power. But some MPs, apparently offended by negligence on the part of the presidential administration and government, do not even consider it necessary to attend meetings of the State Duma. As against the will of the government, according to Duma deputies, it is impossible to conduct any law. You may think that they are elected only for the writing of laws and not to express and protect the interests of the people.
That, at least to some extent, close to the most accurate forecast of the country not to indulge in mindless fantasy, and thoroughly to talk about the fate of liberalism and democracy in Russia, we must look at history. View of a modern society out of Russia, the role played by the Liberal Democrats during their stay in the State Duma and other bodies.
And to the reader to be more clear about what is at stake, it is worth to clarify that the bourgeois, democratic, parties - those parties that favor the development of private capital on the ruins of a monopoly, seasoning their programs of social-democratic rhetoric.
When, in 1991, resulting in economic and political crisis, under pressure from popular protest, not because of liberal democracy, as they are about this solid, collapsed monopoly capital, and the omnipotence of the Communist Party remains in the past, the arena of political life left Liberal Democrats and was widely implement their ideas and interests.
Then, confused and frightened by the bureaucracy has allowed them to take power and start the conversion. Begin to build a new state. But instead, to develop democracy, of which the words are baked, the Liberal Democrats began to divide the property, multiply the oligarchs, to share budget, to build an authoritarian state. Instead of providing real democracy, they dissolved the Soviets, who began to take his face, and it could be an organ of democracy, without the dictates of the Communist Party, and created an authoritarian state with unlimited powers of the President, with a bicameral parliament and many other state agencies not under the control of the people.
Eliminating the Soviets as organs of democracy, yet only becoming to his feet, still trying to become so, the Democrats have created a centralized state, with unlimited presidential powers and took it the main office. And the advice they disbanded, not because it was the basis for the monopoly of the state, totalitarian, as it is expressed, they would never have been established, but because the Soviets formed from the elected representatives of the people could not contribute to the seizure of property, which is prepared to do and did the bourgeois democrats. But, by depriving people of the opportunity to participate in government, they created the conditions for his expulsion from the State Duma. And now, grieve that were outside the executive authority, accusing people of being passive and not democratic.
Crossed, ladies and gentlemen! Take a look at its role in the history of past reforms without illusions, and you'll see that people are human. Who can say what he did wrong, to deny you trust. Did you, your participation in power in the Duma, have improved the situation of the people, have raised the standard of living? Do not you have taken an active part in adventurous projects on withdrawal of money from the pockets of Russians? Is not Vladimir Ryzhkov, today's builder RPR and an ardent Democrat, at one time consisted in the PDR, together with the famous builder of the state of the pyramid (SCG), Viktor Chernomyrdin, has prepared a default in 1998, and Kiriyenko to implement it? Not to mention those who has participated in the division of state property, with a considerable advantage. And these examples are set.
So people should not blame the passivity and not democracy, but rather in repenting before the people, in their dark deeds in his collusion with the bureaucracy.
After all, the people you can rightfully say that it is you have created the basis of an authoritarian state, with uncontrolled bureaucracy, with nevybiraemymi judges, with limitless powers of the President, with a powerless parliament. That you have created the oligarchs and given them the opportunity to enrich themselves at the expense of public property and robbing people, give them money for maintenance. So there is nothing to blame the mirror.
You do not want democracy and autocracy. You thought that came to power on forever, that won seats in the state apparatus for their "beautiful" speech, but not thanks to the support of the people. And so spill the beans and the chance to create a democratic state, selling on every corner. You have entered into an alliance with government officials and thought it was forever. But here's the bureaucracy did not think so. It's wait and build up strength until you uttered a loud voice, and enjoyed the power. Bureaucracy you bought cheaply, and then you slid to the back of the political scene, showing people your ignorance and venality.
You didst trust in support of the representatives of big capital, but officials have lured them to his side that was not so difficult. And many of the oligarchs could not agree more. Why, indeed, give money to some mediator, negotiator, a deputy, if everyone in the country solves the official said. Clerk - an oligarch, and no middlemen, no democracy and politicians. And those who did not agree on their proposed conditions, Zaslav, where Makar calves did not drive.
Democrats do not understand that bureaucracy reared under state monopoly, has never entertained the good sense to them, believing them to be necessary, but casual and temporary companions, as has never had democratic leanings, and never wanted to part with power. She's just hiding behind the Democrats, and waited for the right moment, when the wave subsided rallies and protests. When it consolidated and arranged, the right people in key positions in the state. She decided that her time had come. Then they created their own party - United Russia, and in the last election secured a majority in the Duma. Now they have their party, in the form of "United Russia" vertical of power, controlled by the oligarchs, a pocket parliament, and weak, having lost its credibility, the opposition, as several of the liberal democratic parties. Now they again say about patriotism, meaning love and devotion to him, about the special way of Russia and the "national" democracy.
And it is quite natural result. After all, the Liberal Democrats have given themselves all under the control of uncontrolled bureaucracy, changing people's interests and democracy. Even today, once again agitating the people to stand in their ranks, Democrats are not talking about democracy, because, apparently, were not clear on this lesson of the bureaucracy that without them people in power do not hold back. What is democracy - not when in power are people who call themselves democrats, but when the people governs, through their elected representatives. And today - people are waiting for change, and the Democrats the election.
They have not grasped the essentials. A main result of past historical period - the disclosure of the Liberal Democrats who are always ready to deal, always corrupt and unable to rework the entire state apparatus, on the basis of democracy and popular government.
Second, and equally important result that we have received - this is what the bureaucracy came from behind Democrats and exposed his face. Therefore, all the more important questions of government, the adoption of the budget are settled in the presidential administration and government, and "United Russia" who sit in the Duma, play the role of popular representation. Now we know that the bureaucracy - is the "United Russia", but it had joined the Liberal Democratic Party, as vyrazitelnitsa spiritual aspirations of the bureaucracy. (Read up on the site an article entitled "Body and Soul of the Russian bureaucracy") The party and the Russian bureaucracy united as twins. And also the fact that freedom for the people and democracy can be realized only in the fight against bureaucracy and the expression of her interests - "United Russia".
Vitaly Glukhov
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий