"80 million readers AIF" - is a significant fact, is not it? "- With the rhetorical question of publicity for several months in succession, we meet in each room, a popular weekly magazine. No wonder! Just edition develops the advertising market - one of the principal values of a new civilization in the struggle for which it had put a lot of effort.
What kind of a commodity goes it now? The answer - in the pages of AiFa "though, among other things, offers a product that falls under the rubric of" science "," pedagogy "or simply a derivative of them -" advice to young mothers and fathers ...
Thus, in the March number 9 this year, under the headline "Institute Man", a correspondent for O. Izvekova speaks with Professor A. Matyushkin on "Geeks, genius and talent." Many things can find a young parent from this interview: first, that "great scientific discoveries and works of art come into the world precisely because its author did everything" wrong. " Secondly, that the professor knows for certain ratio of "talented" and "mentally retarded". Third, that talent - it's highly gifted "in one thing, and the genius - genius at once in" several areas ". Moreover, the first - about 15%, while the latter - about 2%.
And much more ... Well, what can I say?
For a start like this: must, of course, reveal the truth to become a Nobel laureate. But even this does not mean that whoever won, sure ... discovered the truth.
As to the reasoning of the interviewee in "AiFe" Professor ... What is a "logical vigilance" dads and moms have to be at every step. Judge for yourself. Of course, who made the great discovery, he naturally went "wrong" as those of his fellow citizens who did not make the opening. So what? We will be following the professor argued that productivity in science and art stems from having to do "all wrong"? There are the people saying: "To spite her husband sit in a puddle." This is also true, on which, however, people laugh. Thus, it is not whether, under the name "Institute for Human and recommend us as a reliable algorithm for creativity in a culture? After all, in politics and public life, such an approach is completely prevailed ...
Logic in this confidence, as we have seen enough. But even the complete lack of logic does not prevent claims that go to the current market "of scientific ideas." Oh, this market! It is, of course, the truth can make the goods, but - not a commodity to turn into truth. However ... If by "mark of the Institute of Man, then - how to say!
Meanwhile, everyone knows that, having entered "not like all", ie making the discovery, genius or talent spawned not his tantrum, and the general rule that followed it. The language of world philosophy and culture, the opening - it's productive rights in general. And not the "productivity" in various "antics" (both personal and public, as "professional" and amateur, as "normal" and cathedral), which, in the same language, were called " a bad personality. "
Take, for example, the famous book by Eckermann, entitled "Conversations with Goethe in the last years of his life" - the handbook of all civilized and educated people. From it we learn that "genius" - a demonic force of man. Moreover, according to Goethe, it does not matter, "what does a man." (Recall that "AiFu, this is what, exactly, and it is important to distinguish genius from talent). It is characterized, first of all, productive. Secondly, it is strictly positive, since excludes Mephistophelean beginning, which, according to the great poet and thinker, "too negative". And, thirdly, the genius has not lost its productive forces, even after death. "We know ... quite significant names for life were considered geniuses, whose impact, however, ended with their lives, and this means that they were not so severe as believed themselves and how others think of them" - said Goethe.
The great German philosopher Hegel, younger contemporary of Goethe, too, believed that genius - it's productive rights in general. As for the differences between the "talent" and "genius", then, logically speaking, the first - is productive in the field "kind" of human activity, and the second - in the "kind". Talent creates a new kind of culture and genius - the culture itself, its "new generation".
And what of it? And from all this that the "geeks, geniuses and talents" are formed not on false statistics to the rules of the Institute of man. " For that kind of "institution", if in their calculations, he does not comply with even basic laws of logic? After all, even around the "premarket" was known to mankind: the laws of logic - is the universal laws of gods and men.
... When a question of talent buried in the ground that Christ uttered on the Mount of Olives, he likened the money to the human faculties, for humanity to them were born two truths. First - the truth that the money in circulation is better than money, buried underground or hidden in the egg capsules. And the second truth: that human abilities - is much better than money. Even if this money were put into a profitable turnover!
Do the same from the Gospel parable of the "conclusion" to the effect that knowledge - is primarily a commodity, and place them on the market - it means not to respect nor Christ, nor the truth. And, moreover, not fearing God himself, to transform science ... in the marketplace.
Valery Molchanov, PhD,
City Council member seminar on Russian, German and Greek philosophy
"Russian Logos.
What kind of a commodity goes it now? The answer - in the pages of AiFa "though, among other things, offers a product that falls under the rubric of" science "," pedagogy "or simply a derivative of them -" advice to young mothers and fathers ...
Thus, in the March number 9 this year, under the headline "Institute Man", a correspondent for O. Izvekova speaks with Professor A. Matyushkin on "Geeks, genius and talent." Many things can find a young parent from this interview: first, that "great scientific discoveries and works of art come into the world precisely because its author did everything" wrong. " Secondly, that the professor knows for certain ratio of "talented" and "mentally retarded". Third, that talent - it's highly gifted "in one thing, and the genius - genius at once in" several areas ". Moreover, the first - about 15%, while the latter - about 2%.
And much more ... Well, what can I say?
For a start like this: must, of course, reveal the truth to become a Nobel laureate. But even this does not mean that whoever won, sure ... discovered the truth.
As to the reasoning of the interviewee in "AiFe" Professor ... What is a "logical vigilance" dads and moms have to be at every step. Judge for yourself. Of course, who made the great discovery, he naturally went "wrong" as those of his fellow citizens who did not make the opening. So what? We will be following the professor argued that productivity in science and art stems from having to do "all wrong"? There are the people saying: "To spite her husband sit in a puddle." This is also true, on which, however, people laugh. Thus, it is not whether, under the name "Institute for Human and recommend us as a reliable algorithm for creativity in a culture? After all, in politics and public life, such an approach is completely prevailed ...
Logic in this confidence, as we have seen enough. But even the complete lack of logic does not prevent claims that go to the current market "of scientific ideas." Oh, this market! It is, of course, the truth can make the goods, but - not a commodity to turn into truth. However ... If by "mark of the Institute of Man, then - how to say!
Meanwhile, everyone knows that, having entered "not like all", ie making the discovery, genius or talent spawned not his tantrum, and the general rule that followed it. The language of world philosophy and culture, the opening - it's productive rights in general. And not the "productivity" in various "antics" (both personal and public, as "professional" and amateur, as "normal" and cathedral), which, in the same language, were called " a bad personality. "
Take, for example, the famous book by Eckermann, entitled "Conversations with Goethe in the last years of his life" - the handbook of all civilized and educated people. From it we learn that "genius" - a demonic force of man. Moreover, according to Goethe, it does not matter, "what does a man." (Recall that "AiFu, this is what, exactly, and it is important to distinguish genius from talent). It is characterized, first of all, productive. Secondly, it is strictly positive, since excludes Mephistophelean beginning, which, according to the great poet and thinker, "too negative". And, thirdly, the genius has not lost its productive forces, even after death. "We know ... quite significant names for life were considered geniuses, whose impact, however, ended with their lives, and this means that they were not so severe as believed themselves and how others think of them" - said Goethe.
The great German philosopher Hegel, younger contemporary of Goethe, too, believed that genius - it's productive rights in general. As for the differences between the "talent" and "genius", then, logically speaking, the first - is productive in the field "kind" of human activity, and the second - in the "kind". Talent creates a new kind of culture and genius - the culture itself, its "new generation".
And what of it? And from all this that the "geeks, geniuses and talents" are formed not on false statistics to the rules of the Institute of man. " For that kind of "institution", if in their calculations, he does not comply with even basic laws of logic? After all, even around the "premarket" was known to mankind: the laws of logic - is the universal laws of gods and men.
... When a question of talent buried in the ground that Christ uttered on the Mount of Olives, he likened the money to the human faculties, for humanity to them were born two truths. First - the truth that the money in circulation is better than money, buried underground or hidden in the egg capsules. And the second truth: that human abilities - is much better than money. Even if this money were put into a profitable turnover!
Do the same from the Gospel parable of the "conclusion" to the effect that knowledge - is primarily a commodity, and place them on the market - it means not to respect nor Christ, nor the truth. And, moreover, not fearing God himself, to transform science ... in the marketplace.
Valery Molchanov, PhD,
City Council member seminar on Russian, German and Greek philosophy
"Russian Logos.
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий