On the website of the Perm CPRF article Alexei sophiology "fiasco of Political Science" caused irritable reaction doctorate in economics VI Loskutov, and especially the part where indicated on the academic looting.
"In terms of academic architectonics of modern Russia, a landmark anatomy of the nationwide" mismanagement "it looks roughly like this: a) political and logical" trap "of Dick Cheney (in essence," political paradox "for the sake of" political gogii! "); b) The Soviet "Communist Party committee," which left us his "precious" and "disciplined" shots in their previous relationships and in their original locations, "invisible" went through in 1991, and c) the post-Soviet WAC, which is "slightly tidied up, all this, supposedly, "not notice", and d) their general all-pervading "ethos", which sounds like a victorious battle cry - "In life there are things more important and logic!"; Finally, the Academic Looting taken, the world (and "domestic" ) public opinion, as not discussing the status quo ... », - says Alexey sophiology. Sensing that the accusation of academic looting refers specifically to it, Loskutov, and rushed to defend the post-Soviet VAK and the entire Russian academic community. This position Loskutova induce me to pay attention to his articles, which are revealed at this same site Perm Communist Party. And that's what we told this scientist in his article, under the screaming title, "A new look at the anti-people government." "The speeches of contemporary politicians, media articles, sometimes even the scientific press and, consequently, in the public consciousness, in the opinions of Russian citizens about the power of market reformers and their policies often apply the term" bourgeois "and" capitalist ". Can not but agree that these epithets, along with even more powerful, such as "predatory," "predatory," "fraudulent", the worldly-speaking, fully justified, but emotionally. In the same policy speeches and articles that claim to an objective assessment of the current government and the scientific explanation of how to further the development of society, they are wrong. Represent the Russian officials and oligarchs as bourgeois and capitalists, then not only be wrong in assessing the objective nature of social groups that are now in power, but, even worse, create the foundation for an equally erroneous conclusions about "other ways of development of the country, how he draws the leaders of Left parties and movements. For a correct understanding of the situation in our society, we must know and bear in mind that Russian government officials are not "bourgeois." They are - ordinary bureaucrats to serve as employing their masters, and therefore necessary in any society, but are hazardous, if for any reason go out of control of their masters. "
Here's a new look has given us Dr. Loskutov! It turns out the phrase "bourgeois" and "capitalist" as applied to modern Russian masters of life are wrong, because our other bourgeois origin. Although these concepts and reflects the essence of these subjects, leading their business capitalist, based on the exploitation of wage labor and capital in order to profit, we should not recognize them by the capitalists. But the fact that the newly minted bourgeoisie came out of the Soviet Communist Party committee did not revoke their true nature, but is a fact of history, explaining only the genesis of modern Russian capitalists. So to say that our capitalists - it's just the bureaucrats, then stir up trouble and mislead the people. So err, Mr. Loskutov, offering to assess the validity is not in how she presented to us, as well as the thought of her Loskutov, not those who call our oligarchs bourgeois. In all this verbiage Loskutov showed lack of understanding the relationship of the ruling class and state. The ruling class forms a government, placing his agents everywhere, but also agents, then there is the bureaucrats, are part of the ruling class and freely migrate from the bureaucrats in the capitalist, but of the capitalists in the bureaucracy. That repeatedly can be seen in our modern reality. Next Loskutov, demonstrating his awareness and quotes Marx, although reduced their quote does not confirm his statements. But this kind of decoration, the ritual of the old Soviet leaders from science, universally Science classics to be. And then her and commented on. "Thus, the bureaucracy is a potential threat and destructive force in any society that is unable to control it. It is regrettable that today it is not known even by those who consider themselves Marxists. Whatever the association may arise when comparing the "oligarchs" with the capitalists, as if their most odious representatives were not willingly and openly bourgeois way of life, themselves more than anyone to believe that they represent the elite of the resurgent bourgeois society, they are objectively economically, and thus essentially are only hired managers of corporations and their top managers, rather than the "bourgeois", not "capitalists" and not even the entrepreneurs in the scientific sense of those terms. Well-known American scientist J. Galbraith calls this social group "technostructure. If not call her "scientifically", but more understandable - "on-the workers and peasants", this is the same officials, therefore, the bureaucrats, not the state, and shopping. "
More regrettable that the PhD, positioning himself as a Marxist, is confused in the elementary things. Marx never said that society must control the bureaucracy, he only held the position of the class and elsewhere argued that the bureaucracy is generated by class contradictions and acts in line with the ruling class. Speaking of the bureaucracy and society in general is to fall into opportunism and distort Marxism. What Loskutov and does. What kind of scientific sense insists Loskutov, and what kind of a bourgeois lifestyle? The point is not in the bourgeois lifestyle, and that these gentlemen have capital and are doing everything to build up this capital through the exploitation of wage labor. From what they ex-party members and bureaucrats are their current activities did not change. And while there Galbraith, who actually talked about the manager, that is about people, which employs a capitalist, the owner of the means of production, to effectively manage their capital and receive a certain salary. And who hired our oligarchs? Who has set the salary. They themselves are the owners of capital, of which a profit and hiring managers themselves. Misunderstanding of the nature of class relations and leads to the fact that Loskutov falls into primitivism, covered up scientific phraseology.
"Legitimate businesses seek to capitalize the company, often risking their personal income. Enterprising same officials aimed at personal gain, risking the need income of the enterprise and by its very existence, since their personal income generated in the form of residual income does not like capitalists and entrepreneurs, and pay for their managerial work. " What a student's reasoning about the authenticity and genuine businessmen? And here the risk? That is, personal qualities representative of a class? This is called the search for the true capitalist. Well, not like our oligarch in European or American capitalist who does not conform to the ideal of doctors of science, but because he understood Loskutov, and not a capitalist. And what of that? "Examples of this behavior of our oligarchs - explains further Loskutov, - as well as managers of smaller corporations, can be found in abundance in modern Russian, and not only the Russian practice. I recall only about the U.S. of Enron, to the readers it was clear that non-capitalist behavior is possible by senior management of corporations, not only Russian but also of the West. And this is proof that the "oligarchs" - only the control of corporations, not the capitalists. Capitalists, in fact, a strictly scientific sense, are the shareholders of the corporation, even the smallest.
Russian legislators should learn from their American colleagues as rigidity and rapid response to the machinations of the senior managers of corporations and citizens as quickly as possible to leave the mistaken belief that the "oligarchs" - it is the bourgeoisie and the capitalists, the privatized corporations in their private property. " Well, if they have already privatized enterprises to private ownership, then what they were? Pointing to the different origins of the capitalists in America and Russia Loskutov did not understand that this is different origins and determines different behavior, but the fact remains. In America, the capitalists have formed a government and keep it under control, but in Russia the state itself, with the bourgeois character, monopoly-capitalist, gave rise to private capitalists. So there owners of capital presumptuous managers close to the prison, and we have former government officials and are the masters of capital, and therefore will never be punished themselves. But doctors such as Loskutov only support so that they continue to head the people fooled.
Here Loskutov and shouted: "They - the bureaucrats, the enterprising employees who need supervision and strict discipline on the part of owners. The owners of the same corporations are shareholders, state - a society which is administering the collective state. It follows an important strategic task, that is not to blame all ills on the "bourgeois" and "capitalists" as "a black cat in a dark room, where there is no" but to seek and find ways to control the real and too impunity current officials, bureaucrats, salaried managers. Special hazard a slogan against the capitalists at this stage consists in the fact that the real capitalists in Russia today are small businesses that need market society and who should not drown, but, rather, save, protect from exploitation by those same government officials and oligarchs. Real capitalists, in accordance with the understanding Loskutova are only representatives of small business, and there seems no matter who and from where came from, and which must be protected from government officials and oligarchs. Marxist in words, was a petty-bourgeois ideology in the case and forgot Marxism. And now the doctor misunderstood science shows dominance of big business over small, as the arbitrariness of managers, calling everywhere to protect the small capitalist. But such passages doctor about public scrutiny: "It is worthwhile to emphasize that the strengthening of public control should be directed not only and not so much on the public, how many business managers posing as private businessmen and, unfortunately, wrongly perceived by Russian citizens," not can not induce a smile. Every thinking person, they say that about a society in Loskutova no scientific presentation and no. How and who in society will strengthen supervision? Apparently it will be as follows: Loskutov come to Abramovich and say: let's manager, show your income and expenses. I immediately decided to strengthen public control. Well, that was answered by Abramovich, I think you can guess. The standard error of all this scientific fraternity - this is what our reality is unfolding on the basis of rational activity, and therefore, they believe that if we have the "right" and "objective" laws, then we shall also live right. That's just why we have these "right" and "objective" laws do not appear, they could not come to mind. After the mass of science-like reasoning, thinking that everything is proved, Dr. Loskutov began issuing recommendations. "For a start anyone who wants to lead a scientifically based and not volyuntaristicheskuyu policy should make clear that an objective, managers of both public institutions and corporations (companies) - not the bourgeoisie and the capitalists do not and can not become them, in spite of some of their tricks and favorable external conditions (except if the citizens themselves voluntarily agree to submit to the will and arbitrariness of their control). First you need to develop a scientific approach and adhere strictly to the logic, we explain the doctor. Any person, even if it is not a former manager and say, a singer or a doctor of economics who has mastered the means of production and who, with the help of hired labor, produces a product, trying to make a profit, is a capitalist. But according to singer Loskutov and remain a singer, as if he had not tried to become a capitalist. Where is the logic? For Loskutova apparently as there are things more important than logic. Doctor of economic sciences would be worth to understand that concept because it exists, that it enshrines the essence of the phenomenon and can give the correct, adequate, assessment of reality. A Loskutov offers not adhere to develop the concept, since this phenomenon is another story. From that one cabbage growing in your garden, and the other on the collective farm field, does not mean that the field is not cabbage. Although the qualitative characteristics of cabbage will be different. The following recommendation Loskutova As already all citizens. "So the first point of the program" another country's development "at this stage should consist in bringing to the citizens of scientific knowledge about the nature and content of modern" market "society." Well, you have finished working that Vekselberg, Smolensky, or someone else is not a capitalist, a hired manager, so what? Work will no longer receive? Or it will cease to operate? And maybe we all disappear capitalist relations? And what was going to scientific knowledge to the masses Dr. Loskutov? Is all this nonsense? Immodest somehow, Herr Doctor. Suggests Dr. Loskutov slogan with which he goes to the masses: "aside, am rubbish!" In conclusion, Dr. Loskutov, as if in passing, made another discovery. "It is impossible to conclude not to point out another fairly well known, but in political debate is often forgotten truth: the bureaucrats, in contrast to the capitalists can not be abolished," to destroy the class. " You can only replace "these" to "those." "Great" loskutovskoe discovery - the bureaucracy has always existed, all at once cleared. It is this bureaucracy Loskutov and protects, not realizing that the bourgeoisie is building a state, a bourgeois state has consistently reproduces the conditions for the rule of capital. And yet, as practice shows, the bourgeois state generates these pseudo-scientists like the scraps that protect this bureaucracy, as the eternal and inevitable social vice of society. As you can see the doctor of economic sciences Loskutov once again proved the truth of all statements sophiology that for them "there are things more important in logic." Loskutov and correctly assessed that the accusation of academic concerns and looting it, as have the status of doctors and have no knowledge, do not follow the logic, that means an academic exercise looting.
Vitaly Glukhov
"In terms of academic architectonics of modern Russia, a landmark anatomy of the nationwide" mismanagement "it looks roughly like this: a) political and logical" trap "of Dick Cheney (in essence," political paradox "for the sake of" political gogii! "); b) The Soviet "Communist Party committee," which left us his "precious" and "disciplined" shots in their previous relationships and in their original locations, "invisible" went through in 1991, and c) the post-Soviet WAC, which is "slightly tidied up, all this, supposedly, "not notice", and d) their general all-pervading "ethos", which sounds like a victorious battle cry - "In life there are things more important and logic!"; Finally, the Academic Looting taken, the world (and "domestic" ) public opinion, as not discussing the status quo ... », - says Alexey sophiology. Sensing that the accusation of academic looting refers specifically to it, Loskutov, and rushed to defend the post-Soviet VAK and the entire Russian academic community. This position Loskutova induce me to pay attention to his articles, which are revealed at this same site Perm Communist Party. And that's what we told this scientist in his article, under the screaming title, "A new look at the anti-people government." "The speeches of contemporary politicians, media articles, sometimes even the scientific press and, consequently, in the public consciousness, in the opinions of Russian citizens about the power of market reformers and their policies often apply the term" bourgeois "and" capitalist ". Can not but agree that these epithets, along with even more powerful, such as "predatory," "predatory," "fraudulent", the worldly-speaking, fully justified, but emotionally. In the same policy speeches and articles that claim to an objective assessment of the current government and the scientific explanation of how to further the development of society, they are wrong. Represent the Russian officials and oligarchs as bourgeois and capitalists, then not only be wrong in assessing the objective nature of social groups that are now in power, but, even worse, create the foundation for an equally erroneous conclusions about "other ways of development of the country, how he draws the leaders of Left parties and movements. For a correct understanding of the situation in our society, we must know and bear in mind that Russian government officials are not "bourgeois." They are - ordinary bureaucrats to serve as employing their masters, and therefore necessary in any society, but are hazardous, if for any reason go out of control of their masters. "
Here's a new look has given us Dr. Loskutov! It turns out the phrase "bourgeois" and "capitalist" as applied to modern Russian masters of life are wrong, because our other bourgeois origin. Although these concepts and reflects the essence of these subjects, leading their business capitalist, based on the exploitation of wage labor and capital in order to profit, we should not recognize them by the capitalists. But the fact that the newly minted bourgeoisie came out of the Soviet Communist Party committee did not revoke their true nature, but is a fact of history, explaining only the genesis of modern Russian capitalists. So to say that our capitalists - it's just the bureaucrats, then stir up trouble and mislead the people. So err, Mr. Loskutov, offering to assess the validity is not in how she presented to us, as well as the thought of her Loskutov, not those who call our oligarchs bourgeois. In all this verbiage Loskutov showed lack of understanding the relationship of the ruling class and state. The ruling class forms a government, placing his agents everywhere, but also agents, then there is the bureaucrats, are part of the ruling class and freely migrate from the bureaucrats in the capitalist, but of the capitalists in the bureaucracy. That repeatedly can be seen in our modern reality. Next Loskutov, demonstrating his awareness and quotes Marx, although reduced their quote does not confirm his statements. But this kind of decoration, the ritual of the old Soviet leaders from science, universally Science classics to be. And then her and commented on. "Thus, the bureaucracy is a potential threat and destructive force in any society that is unable to control it. It is regrettable that today it is not known even by those who consider themselves Marxists. Whatever the association may arise when comparing the "oligarchs" with the capitalists, as if their most odious representatives were not willingly and openly bourgeois way of life, themselves more than anyone to believe that they represent the elite of the resurgent bourgeois society, they are objectively economically, and thus essentially are only hired managers of corporations and their top managers, rather than the "bourgeois", not "capitalists" and not even the entrepreneurs in the scientific sense of those terms. Well-known American scientist J. Galbraith calls this social group "technostructure. If not call her "scientifically", but more understandable - "on-the workers and peasants", this is the same officials, therefore, the bureaucrats, not the state, and shopping. "
More regrettable that the PhD, positioning himself as a Marxist, is confused in the elementary things. Marx never said that society must control the bureaucracy, he only held the position of the class and elsewhere argued that the bureaucracy is generated by class contradictions and acts in line with the ruling class. Speaking of the bureaucracy and society in general is to fall into opportunism and distort Marxism. What Loskutov and does. What kind of scientific sense insists Loskutov, and what kind of a bourgeois lifestyle? The point is not in the bourgeois lifestyle, and that these gentlemen have capital and are doing everything to build up this capital through the exploitation of wage labor. From what they ex-party members and bureaucrats are their current activities did not change. And while there Galbraith, who actually talked about the manager, that is about people, which employs a capitalist, the owner of the means of production, to effectively manage their capital and receive a certain salary. And who hired our oligarchs? Who has set the salary. They themselves are the owners of capital, of which a profit and hiring managers themselves. Misunderstanding of the nature of class relations and leads to the fact that Loskutov falls into primitivism, covered up scientific phraseology.
"Legitimate businesses seek to capitalize the company, often risking their personal income. Enterprising same officials aimed at personal gain, risking the need income of the enterprise and by its very existence, since their personal income generated in the form of residual income does not like capitalists and entrepreneurs, and pay for their managerial work. " What a student's reasoning about the authenticity and genuine businessmen? And here the risk? That is, personal qualities representative of a class? This is called the search for the true capitalist. Well, not like our oligarch in European or American capitalist who does not conform to the ideal of doctors of science, but because he understood Loskutov, and not a capitalist. And what of that? "Examples of this behavior of our oligarchs - explains further Loskutov, - as well as managers of smaller corporations, can be found in abundance in modern Russian, and not only the Russian practice. I recall only about the U.S. of Enron, to the readers it was clear that non-capitalist behavior is possible by senior management of corporations, not only Russian but also of the West. And this is proof that the "oligarchs" - only the control of corporations, not the capitalists. Capitalists, in fact, a strictly scientific sense, are the shareholders of the corporation, even the smallest.
Russian legislators should learn from their American colleagues as rigidity and rapid response to the machinations of the senior managers of corporations and citizens as quickly as possible to leave the mistaken belief that the "oligarchs" - it is the bourgeoisie and the capitalists, the privatized corporations in their private property. " Well, if they have already privatized enterprises to private ownership, then what they were? Pointing to the different origins of the capitalists in America and Russia Loskutov did not understand that this is different origins and determines different behavior, but the fact remains. In America, the capitalists have formed a government and keep it under control, but in Russia the state itself, with the bourgeois character, monopoly-capitalist, gave rise to private capitalists. So there owners of capital presumptuous managers close to the prison, and we have former government officials and are the masters of capital, and therefore will never be punished themselves. But doctors such as Loskutov only support so that they continue to head the people fooled.
Here Loskutov and shouted: "They - the bureaucrats, the enterprising employees who need supervision and strict discipline on the part of owners. The owners of the same corporations are shareholders, state - a society which is administering the collective state. It follows an important strategic task, that is not to blame all ills on the "bourgeois" and "capitalists" as "a black cat in a dark room, where there is no" but to seek and find ways to control the real and too impunity current officials, bureaucrats, salaried managers. Special hazard a slogan against the capitalists at this stage consists in the fact that the real capitalists in Russia today are small businesses that need market society and who should not drown, but, rather, save, protect from exploitation by those same government officials and oligarchs. Real capitalists, in accordance with the understanding Loskutova are only representatives of small business, and there seems no matter who and from where came from, and which must be protected from government officials and oligarchs. Marxist in words, was a petty-bourgeois ideology in the case and forgot Marxism. And now the doctor misunderstood science shows dominance of big business over small, as the arbitrariness of managers, calling everywhere to protect the small capitalist. But such passages doctor about public scrutiny: "It is worthwhile to emphasize that the strengthening of public control should be directed not only and not so much on the public, how many business managers posing as private businessmen and, unfortunately, wrongly perceived by Russian citizens," not can not induce a smile. Every thinking person, they say that about a society in Loskutova no scientific presentation and no. How and who in society will strengthen supervision? Apparently it will be as follows: Loskutov come to Abramovich and say: let's manager, show your income and expenses. I immediately decided to strengthen public control. Well, that was answered by Abramovich, I think you can guess. The standard error of all this scientific fraternity - this is what our reality is unfolding on the basis of rational activity, and therefore, they believe that if we have the "right" and "objective" laws, then we shall also live right. That's just why we have these "right" and "objective" laws do not appear, they could not come to mind. After the mass of science-like reasoning, thinking that everything is proved, Dr. Loskutov began issuing recommendations. "For a start anyone who wants to lead a scientifically based and not volyuntaristicheskuyu policy should make clear that an objective, managers of both public institutions and corporations (companies) - not the bourgeoisie and the capitalists do not and can not become them, in spite of some of their tricks and favorable external conditions (except if the citizens themselves voluntarily agree to submit to the will and arbitrariness of their control). First you need to develop a scientific approach and adhere strictly to the logic, we explain the doctor. Any person, even if it is not a former manager and say, a singer or a doctor of economics who has mastered the means of production and who, with the help of hired labor, produces a product, trying to make a profit, is a capitalist. But according to singer Loskutov and remain a singer, as if he had not tried to become a capitalist. Where is the logic? For Loskutova apparently as there are things more important than logic. Doctor of economic sciences would be worth to understand that concept because it exists, that it enshrines the essence of the phenomenon and can give the correct, adequate, assessment of reality. A Loskutov offers not adhere to develop the concept, since this phenomenon is another story. From that one cabbage growing in your garden, and the other on the collective farm field, does not mean that the field is not cabbage. Although the qualitative characteristics of cabbage will be different. The following recommendation Loskutova As already all citizens. "So the first point of the program" another country's development "at this stage should consist in bringing to the citizens of scientific knowledge about the nature and content of modern" market "society." Well, you have finished working that Vekselberg, Smolensky, or someone else is not a capitalist, a hired manager, so what? Work will no longer receive? Or it will cease to operate? And maybe we all disappear capitalist relations? And what was going to scientific knowledge to the masses Dr. Loskutov? Is all this nonsense? Immodest somehow, Herr Doctor. Suggests Dr. Loskutov slogan with which he goes to the masses: "aside, am rubbish!" In conclusion, Dr. Loskutov, as if in passing, made another discovery. "It is impossible to conclude not to point out another fairly well known, but in political debate is often forgotten truth: the bureaucrats, in contrast to the capitalists can not be abolished," to destroy the class. " You can only replace "these" to "those." "Great" loskutovskoe discovery - the bureaucracy has always existed, all at once cleared. It is this bureaucracy Loskutov and protects, not realizing that the bourgeoisie is building a state, a bourgeois state has consistently reproduces the conditions for the rule of capital. And yet, as practice shows, the bourgeois state generates these pseudo-scientists like the scraps that protect this bureaucracy, as the eternal and inevitable social vice of society. As you can see the doctor of economic sciences Loskutov once again proved the truth of all statements sophiology that for them "there are things more important in logic." Loskutov and correctly assessed that the accusation of academic concerns and looting it, as have the status of doctors and have no knowledge, do not follow the logic, that means an academic exercise looting.
Vitaly Glukhov
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий