Let's talk about what indecent spoil holiday
September 1 and October 5
In modern times fashionable to swear Knowledge. In particular, it is fashionable to denigrate ....
At the departments of various faculties, such as: "philosophical logic", "humanitarian", "Culture and logical", "political logic", "philosophy", "socio-logical" and others, and others, the paunchy, bearded and bald uncle boy persistently insists one student of a simpleton, but apparently, the most-important thing for them: to know the truth - immodestly, insisting on the universality - a totalitarian, have the authority to observe and respect for him by himself and others - is not humane, observe discipline and Thoughts protect it - soulless, much to question all these commandments Departments - at least democratic.
Who tries, one either "bully", or - "totalitarist!
After all, whatever you say, and "totalitarianism" - the first enemy of "democracy and pluralism." And at a certain perseverance is as much ... (Oh my God, and think something terrible, exactly where He leads!)
Meanwhile, logically educated humanists, psychologists, sociologists and philoso-logs in general, can not but be clear: the fear of God - HOME TRUTHS! In other words, the "total" - this is an intelligent people, only (and first!) Are all-common '. And more than anything.
Looking closely to these characteristics of our time, concludes: Oh, and cunning as the modern "cathedral oracles! Even though you are on them from the standpoint of science, even from the standpoint of the Bible itself to see ...
But telling the whole story, why? And, most importantly, why?
... I must say that even the "teacher of teachers" 25 centuries ago, have laid there all in their places. The name of this hero of truth and knowledge - Socrates. Only non-knowledge leads to lack of virtue in a man - he believes. A boorish disrespect to the "universal knowledge" - continued his pupil Plato - is including ...
Socrates happened to live just at the time when his contemporaries have made the discovery that knowledge, it appears, is even possible to sell ...
So what? - Perhaps, says our contemporary, not amenable to the virus "vaucherizatsii. - If knowledge can be a commodity, because it does not mean that the product should be just knowledge. After all, produces and owns some knowledge as knowledge is a thinker, a wise man, and so does not "seller"!
And it is quite right.
Knowledge is not for sale! - Followed by Socrates, we can say we are.
They - Re-apply. And their transfer from one person to have his "Sophio-genesis, but not for sale. "Not for Sale inspiration, but you can sell a manuscript," - said a long time and very, very clever at this sensitive account ...
So, no, "the buyer and seller, and student and teacher - here is the element of life in which only the knowledge of how knowledge and lives. It can be easily falsified. For example, substitute education - "socialization", training to replace the "education"; education - "adaptation," etc., etc. But in any case her element that can not be replaced!
After all, "product" - all the same: a black bank with shoe polish or white ballet slippers ballerina. Marketability equalize "everything with everything." Consequently, those who "successfully selling knowledge" - that is selling you anything, but just not themselves.
... Professing these principles, Socrates lived more than modestly with his family. Then one day, along with his wife Xanthippe, he came into the market of ancient Athens. Trade stalls laden under the weight of a commodity, awakening new needs and speculative interest. After looking all this abundance is quite coolly, Socrates joyfully exclaimed: "To what the world has a lot of things, without which I could well do!"
And then something happened worldly something familiar and quite modern. The wife of Socrates, apparently, oppressed modesty of their life, as well as irritated his unwillingness to get rich by taking money from students for tuition, flew into a rage. According to contemporaries, she promptly splashed it in buckets. Directly at all. The sources did not specify whether this punishing right hand with a bucket of slop, or just water ...
What to say! Slop on the head of a sage - a thing for the layman more than sweet, and even now. And besides: is not worthy of slops someone who appreciates the work of greedy higher than the difficulty that some have?
A crowd gathered, which zloradstvuya against Socrates, the sage, supported the cut-man nauskivaya punish his wife. At that he good-naturedly replied: "You see? I've always said that the thunder of my Xanthippe be sure to rain! "
And what is morality? It is very simple: to sell knowledge for the money - it is a female approach to the "truth" and most "trade." But you never know which "suddenly" the woman wants to want to? It is unacceptable to deceive any buyers or students! Out next to her and a man to cheat to avoid it ...
However, the "feminine caprice" in circulation with the knowledge outside the home of Socrates practiced the so-called Sophists. Knowledge needed to sell and a buyer can be deceived! - They thought. And not without success ... however, and was named their product is not "knowledge", and sophistry. So he called and still ...
So, what teaches modern school - the current chair? I do not what is that a woman's indulgence to the knowledge of how to trade from Xanthippe - "beautiful", but the men's intransigence in the face of Socrates any haggling - is disgusting?
What fury Xanthippe market = in the society / - and "democratic" and "pluralistic" and "modest" and "humane"? A voluntary and intelligent dushie softness of Socrates in the Company for natural confusion of life itself - "authoritarian" and ... even more than that?
Decide for yourself.
But taught by the current school itself Socrates? Does not the fact, firstly, that the department behaves as if the market Xanthippe ...
That, secondly, the school from its very nature, is not "society", and sofium? And just because it is - a genuine social ...
Is not that, thirdly, that should not be confused woman - with "baba" and "sophistry" to be confused with Sofia?
For those who truly KNOWS what the school is not confusing to the market, do not have neither deceive nor be deceived, nor deceive!
Socrates and now teaches shown the courage in Poznan, to put it simply ...
August - 1996
Published: - "Bargaining", September 1996 (Annex to the Urals Newspaper)
- "The New Chronicle, October 30, 1997 (№ 43 / 147 /)
- "Teacher», № 9, September, 1997
- "Ural University», № 1 (2373), 23 January 1998
O T K L K and Articles:
Note "against the Department of Socrates reminded me of another article by the same author titled" The Demon of Socrates, "published in the newspaper" replaced "in 1984. It Molchanov evidence and promptly warned the public that if the spirit of Socratic thought and the longer the efflorescence of life, nothing good will not have to wait.
Since then, 13 years and predictions of a scientist is fully justified: collapsed official ideology and morality; extinct State exams for "scientific communism" as the last step of the Soviet intelligentsia in the way to the desired diploma of higher education; evaporated city committee, district committees and party committees of the CPSU, as the keepers of the truth in the last instance, has sunk into oblivion is the largest state in the world, turned to dust deposits in the savings book, but prices have risen and fallen scholarships, pensions and salaries ...
If now, after such a hard lesson, the teacher of all teachers will not be finally vindicated, the imminent collapse are expected not only to the department, but the school - a stronghold of the child's soul. So warns the author, and warns again.
So what's the deal?
But the fact is, says scientist Vladimir Molchanov, in pursuit of success in life, people still can come in two ways: either to know the truth, or else to deceive the authorities. First to teach school. And the second is still teaching faculty, despite their recent fiasco.
In this school, more and more looks department in my mouth. And at the same chair pretending that she and only she is fully and exclusively owns the truth and ...
Concealing his close relationship with the past of the Party Committee Chair mimics his intimacy with eternity in the face of old Socrates. The public naively believes that, while maintaining a solid foundation for further life disasters.
What a pity!
Gennady Sergeev, employee
Department
Government Education
Sverdlovsk Region
I confess that I was not surprised by the appearance of this article by Valery Molchanov. In one of his public appearances, he confessed to the audience that over 15 years in the Sverdlovsk medical institute it has not left the state stunned by the complete opening, which he did in the first year of his teaching career. Namely: the graduate student, going to work on the most tremulous branches of modern medicine - pediatrics and psychiatry - went to the patient with the holy conviction that ... Socrates - a schizophrenic!
This holy confidence they adopted from their professors and associate professors, whose authority in medicine is truly undeniable. That the humanitarian consequences of this situation is truly catastrophic, I soon realized it himself.
... Several years ago I, as chairman of the medical-psychological-pedagogical commission (IGPC), attended the teachers' meeting one of the prestige-model schools Ordzhonikidze district. Occasion was this: the commission sent the children to the alleged "abnormal" mental status of the child. A characteristic, composed of teachers, contained a glaring contradiction in the evaluation sofiogeneza abilities. For example, a diagnosed lack of will on the child in the classroom and then - witness the bright display of faith in the game, make a conclusion on reduced intelligence, and immediately - the story of the brilliant logical manifestations of the mind, etc. etc.
Statistics were rich, but a statement of this fact has caused displeasure in the staff room. And to "help" was intended to Deputy Director for Science, a graduate of the Faculty of Philosophy. Word for word, and found the theme of her thesis - "Humanism Plato. Well, maybe. from the standpoint of science of science is not quite the title is undeniable, but for the pedagogy is not it good?
But no! "Philosopher's authority" of local teachers stated categorically that expose the contradictions in the teacher's performance, let alone claim responsibility for the logical absurdity - it is impossible.
- But why? - I asked.
- And because it is inhumane! - I was told.
- How is it that contradicts himself a teacher and a "low intelligence" suspected child? - I did not let up. - What is there to humanism?
Emotions run high and the teacher looked alternately all interested us in the eye: Which will take it!
Finally, as the chief arbitrator, commemorated Plato himself: sincerity should be exercised, but the logic of something in this case violate unacceptable. Is not it so?
And then my vehement opponent just burst out: "Yes I am for humanistic respect for the human soul, even though his daughter loose it to a prostitute to go! Just would not tread on it, even in the name of your logic, "- she said.
In teaching someone gasped. Frankly, at first I was dumbfounded.
- Really?
- Yes, yes, yes!
... To say it was nothing more. Grad notorious diagnoses "mental retardation" in this school has been fully explained. With it swept dissenting students to leave the "elite" stuff - whatever.
My thoughts flowed in the direction of the question: where?
Later I found out that the diploma "Humanism Plato was protected at the Department of the History of Philosophy USU.
As you can see, the pulpit and then "took her." Such is life ...
Vladimir Gookin, Coordinator
Regional pedagogical society.
Main idea of the article Molchanova can reflect something like this: Ancient Xanthippe - a modern "department" pacified Socrates. A modern chair - is the historical "Xanthippe" emerging from the strong man's hands and ended up without a rudder and sail Socratic age-old wisdom.
Announcing the establishment of a "academic" and "platonic" in their intent, the current chair of the society slips dotsentskuyu vanity under the guise of "wisdom."
Why is it extremely dangerous?
And because the Department of uncontrolled delegates its representatives in all the leading sectors of society, economy and state, while not wishing to take responsibility for the situation in general. And this same elite irresponsibility, it infects and high school.
For example, why a teacher today for the most part are without a paycheck? They say that there is no budget. And they are - a victim of circumstances ...
And who will typeset a budget? Why do this to yesterday's students, past "selection" of the department and entered public-private heights of national life.
So it turns out, whatever one may say that a starving teacher ... punish yourself!
But is it possible that a self-critical recognition from the lips of teachers themselves?
The scientist is right: that's when hundreds of thousands of teachers clearly and distinctly, all over the country are not afraid to say so, then that will present the spiritual revival of Russia. Revival, which Molchanov calls "Sophiological revolution."
Vladimir Chuchin, teacher
additional education,
member of the teaching community.
September - 1997
September 1 and October 5
In modern times fashionable to swear Knowledge. In particular, it is fashionable to denigrate ....
At the departments of various faculties, such as: "philosophical logic", "humanitarian", "Culture and logical", "political logic", "philosophy", "socio-logical" and others, and others, the paunchy, bearded and bald uncle boy persistently insists one student of a simpleton, but apparently, the most-important thing for them: to know the truth - immodestly, insisting on the universality - a totalitarian, have the authority to observe and respect for him by himself and others - is not humane, observe discipline and Thoughts protect it - soulless, much to question all these commandments Departments - at least democratic.
Who tries, one either "bully", or - "totalitarist!
After all, whatever you say, and "totalitarianism" - the first enemy of "democracy and pluralism." And at a certain perseverance is as much ... (Oh my God, and think something terrible, exactly where He leads!)
Meanwhile, logically educated humanists, psychologists, sociologists and philoso-logs in general, can not but be clear: the fear of God - HOME TRUTHS! In other words, the "total" - this is an intelligent people, only (and first!) Are all-common '. And more than anything.
Looking closely to these characteristics of our time, concludes: Oh, and cunning as the modern "cathedral oracles! Even though you are on them from the standpoint of science, even from the standpoint of the Bible itself to see ...
But telling the whole story, why? And, most importantly, why?
... I must say that even the "teacher of teachers" 25 centuries ago, have laid there all in their places. The name of this hero of truth and knowledge - Socrates. Only non-knowledge leads to lack of virtue in a man - he believes. A boorish disrespect to the "universal knowledge" - continued his pupil Plato - is including ...
Socrates happened to live just at the time when his contemporaries have made the discovery that knowledge, it appears, is even possible to sell ...
So what? - Perhaps, says our contemporary, not amenable to the virus "vaucherizatsii. - If knowledge can be a commodity, because it does not mean that the product should be just knowledge. After all, produces and owns some knowledge as knowledge is a thinker, a wise man, and so does not "seller"!
And it is quite right.
Knowledge is not for sale! - Followed by Socrates, we can say we are.
They - Re-apply. And their transfer from one person to have his "Sophio-genesis, but not for sale. "Not for Sale inspiration, but you can sell a manuscript," - said a long time and very, very clever at this sensitive account ...
So, no, "the buyer and seller, and student and teacher - here is the element of life in which only the knowledge of how knowledge and lives. It can be easily falsified. For example, substitute education - "socialization", training to replace the "education"; education - "adaptation," etc., etc. But in any case her element that can not be replaced!
After all, "product" - all the same: a black bank with shoe polish or white ballet slippers ballerina. Marketability equalize "everything with everything." Consequently, those who "successfully selling knowledge" - that is selling you anything, but just not themselves.
... Professing these principles, Socrates lived more than modestly with his family. Then one day, along with his wife Xanthippe, he came into the market of ancient Athens. Trade stalls laden under the weight of a commodity, awakening new needs and speculative interest. After looking all this abundance is quite coolly, Socrates joyfully exclaimed: "To what the world has a lot of things, without which I could well do!"
And then something happened worldly something familiar and quite modern. The wife of Socrates, apparently, oppressed modesty of their life, as well as irritated his unwillingness to get rich by taking money from students for tuition, flew into a rage. According to contemporaries, she promptly splashed it in buckets. Directly at all. The sources did not specify whether this punishing right hand with a bucket of slop, or just water ...
What to say! Slop on the head of a sage - a thing for the layman more than sweet, and even now. And besides: is not worthy of slops someone who appreciates the work of greedy higher than the difficulty that some have?
A crowd gathered, which zloradstvuya against Socrates, the sage, supported the cut-man nauskivaya punish his wife. At that he good-naturedly replied: "You see? I've always said that the thunder of my Xanthippe be sure to rain! "
And what is morality? It is very simple: to sell knowledge for the money - it is a female approach to the "truth" and most "trade." But you never know which "suddenly" the woman wants to want to? It is unacceptable to deceive any buyers or students! Out next to her and a man to cheat to avoid it ...
However, the "feminine caprice" in circulation with the knowledge outside the home of Socrates practiced the so-called Sophists. Knowledge needed to sell and a buyer can be deceived! - They thought. And not without success ... however, and was named their product is not "knowledge", and sophistry. So he called and still ...
So, what teaches modern school - the current chair? I do not what is that a woman's indulgence to the knowledge of how to trade from Xanthippe - "beautiful", but the men's intransigence in the face of Socrates any haggling - is disgusting?
What fury Xanthippe market = in the society / - and "democratic" and "pluralistic" and "modest" and "humane"? A voluntary and intelligent dushie softness of Socrates in the Company for natural confusion of life itself - "authoritarian" and ... even more than that?
Decide for yourself.
But taught by the current school itself Socrates? Does not the fact, firstly, that the department behaves as if the market Xanthippe ...
That, secondly, the school from its very nature, is not "society", and sofium? And just because it is - a genuine social ...
Is not that, thirdly, that should not be confused woman - with "baba" and "sophistry" to be confused with Sofia?
For those who truly KNOWS what the school is not confusing to the market, do not have neither deceive nor be deceived, nor deceive!
Socrates and now teaches shown the courage in Poznan, to put it simply ...
August - 1996
Published: - "Bargaining", September 1996 (Annex to the Urals Newspaper)
- "The New Chronicle, October 30, 1997 (№ 43 / 147 /)
- "Teacher», № 9, September, 1997
- "Ural University», № 1 (2373), 23 January 1998
O T K L K and Articles:
Note "against the Department of Socrates reminded me of another article by the same author titled" The Demon of Socrates, "published in the newspaper" replaced "in 1984. It Molchanov evidence and promptly warned the public that if the spirit of Socratic thought and the longer the efflorescence of life, nothing good will not have to wait.
Since then, 13 years and predictions of a scientist is fully justified: collapsed official ideology and morality; extinct State exams for "scientific communism" as the last step of the Soviet intelligentsia in the way to the desired diploma of higher education; evaporated city committee, district committees and party committees of the CPSU, as the keepers of the truth in the last instance, has sunk into oblivion is the largest state in the world, turned to dust deposits in the savings book, but prices have risen and fallen scholarships, pensions and salaries ...
If now, after such a hard lesson, the teacher of all teachers will not be finally vindicated, the imminent collapse are expected not only to the department, but the school - a stronghold of the child's soul. So warns the author, and warns again.
So what's the deal?
But the fact is, says scientist Vladimir Molchanov, in pursuit of success in life, people still can come in two ways: either to know the truth, or else to deceive the authorities. First to teach school. And the second is still teaching faculty, despite their recent fiasco.
In this school, more and more looks department in my mouth. And at the same chair pretending that she and only she is fully and exclusively owns the truth and ...
Concealing his close relationship with the past of the Party Committee Chair mimics his intimacy with eternity in the face of old Socrates. The public naively believes that, while maintaining a solid foundation for further life disasters.
What a pity!
Gennady Sergeev, employee
Department
Government Education
Sverdlovsk Region
I confess that I was not surprised by the appearance of this article by Valery Molchanov. In one of his public appearances, he confessed to the audience that over 15 years in the Sverdlovsk medical institute it has not left the state stunned by the complete opening, which he did in the first year of his teaching career. Namely: the graduate student, going to work on the most tremulous branches of modern medicine - pediatrics and psychiatry - went to the patient with the holy conviction that ... Socrates - a schizophrenic!
This holy confidence they adopted from their professors and associate professors, whose authority in medicine is truly undeniable. That the humanitarian consequences of this situation is truly catastrophic, I soon realized it himself.
... Several years ago I, as chairman of the medical-psychological-pedagogical commission (IGPC), attended the teachers' meeting one of the prestige-model schools Ordzhonikidze district. Occasion was this: the commission sent the children to the alleged "abnormal" mental status of the child. A characteristic, composed of teachers, contained a glaring contradiction in the evaluation sofiogeneza abilities. For example, a diagnosed lack of will on the child in the classroom and then - witness the bright display of faith in the game, make a conclusion on reduced intelligence, and immediately - the story of the brilliant logical manifestations of the mind, etc. etc.
Statistics were rich, but a statement of this fact has caused displeasure in the staff room. And to "help" was intended to Deputy Director for Science, a graduate of the Faculty of Philosophy. Word for word, and found the theme of her thesis - "Humanism Plato. Well, maybe. from the standpoint of science of science is not quite the title is undeniable, but for the pedagogy is not it good?
But no! "Philosopher's authority" of local teachers stated categorically that expose the contradictions in the teacher's performance, let alone claim responsibility for the logical absurdity - it is impossible.
- But why? - I asked.
- And because it is inhumane! - I was told.
- How is it that contradicts himself a teacher and a "low intelligence" suspected child? - I did not let up. - What is there to humanism?
Emotions run high and the teacher looked alternately all interested us in the eye: Which will take it!
Finally, as the chief arbitrator, commemorated Plato himself: sincerity should be exercised, but the logic of something in this case violate unacceptable. Is not it so?
And then my vehement opponent just burst out: "Yes I am for humanistic respect for the human soul, even though his daughter loose it to a prostitute to go! Just would not tread on it, even in the name of your logic, "- she said.
In teaching someone gasped. Frankly, at first I was dumbfounded.
- Really?
- Yes, yes, yes!
... To say it was nothing more. Grad notorious diagnoses "mental retardation" in this school has been fully explained. With it swept dissenting students to leave the "elite" stuff - whatever.
My thoughts flowed in the direction of the question: where?
Later I found out that the diploma "Humanism Plato was protected at the Department of the History of Philosophy USU.
As you can see, the pulpit and then "took her." Such is life ...
Vladimir Gookin, Coordinator
Regional pedagogical society.
Main idea of the article Molchanova can reflect something like this: Ancient Xanthippe - a modern "department" pacified Socrates. A modern chair - is the historical "Xanthippe" emerging from the strong man's hands and ended up without a rudder and sail Socratic age-old wisdom.
Announcing the establishment of a "academic" and "platonic" in their intent, the current chair of the society slips dotsentskuyu vanity under the guise of "wisdom."
Why is it extremely dangerous?
And because the Department of uncontrolled delegates its representatives in all the leading sectors of society, economy and state, while not wishing to take responsibility for the situation in general. And this same elite irresponsibility, it infects and high school.
For example, why a teacher today for the most part are without a paycheck? They say that there is no budget. And they are - a victim of circumstances ...
And who will typeset a budget? Why do this to yesterday's students, past "selection" of the department and entered public-private heights of national life.
So it turns out, whatever one may say that a starving teacher ... punish yourself!
But is it possible that a self-critical recognition from the lips of teachers themselves?
The scientist is right: that's when hundreds of thousands of teachers clearly and distinctly, all over the country are not afraid to say so, then that will present the spiritual revival of Russia. Revival, which Molchanov calls "Sophiological revolution."
Vladimir Chuchin, teacher
additional education,
member of the teaching community.
September - 1997
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий