Ten questions philosophers

 We can only ask ten questions of our philosophers, grouped at the Philosophical Faculty of the country and in the Institute of Philosophy. This will be issues to FFIF, especially topical in connection with the summing up of domestic philosophical thoughts in the form of the publication "New Philosophical Encyclopedia" Institute of Philosophy and Philosophy Faculty of Moscow State University, in light of the 35 th anniversary of the Faculty of Philosophy of USU graduates who took an active part in the destruction of the USSR and retraction of the new democratic Russia in the era of postmodernity. These questions will be asked in the style of Lenin's "Ten questions referent. Professional philosophers should remember the fifteen pages of text Ilyich sent to Geneva at the critical moment of the party debate on the definition of philosophical principles for a new century. Thus, the correct answer to these questions will return to the philosophy of our heads and into the social reality, negative responses to our test will reliably determine the extent of the fall of the philosophical community in the state FFIF. We call this level FFIF in normalized from 1 to 10. Introduce the unit of reference - from 1 to 10 FFIF (eg, Department of History of Philosophy, Ural State University as of 2003 can be labeled as 1-10, or N FFIF: 1.Priznayut whether FFIF major division of philosophical systems on materialism and idealism? 2.Priznayut whether FFIF that the average fluctuating line between materialism and idealism - agnosticism, and the neo version (including sociology, phenomenological sociology of knowledge) - a kind of agnosticism? 3.Priznayut whether FFIF that the existing external world is reflected in the human head and checked the correctness of this reflection is achieved through social and historical practice? 4.Priznayut whether FFIF that the world is fundamentally knowable to man and mankind, and there are only differences between what is known and what is not yet known? 5.Priznayut whether FFIF that the real unity of the world consists in its materiality and there is something supranaturalisticheskogo? 6.Priznayut whether FFIF that matter without motion so as inconceivable as motion without matter? 7.Priznayut FFIF whether that truth is the conformity of the scientific knowledge of an object by reflection in the mind of the laws of nature and the real world? 8.Priznayut whether FFIF that the social fabric or objective social relations, determines social consciousness of the people? 9.Priznayut whether FFIF that existing classes and class interests shape human cognition and, consequently, the doctrine of pluralism and tolerance is a reactionary character, masking the interests of leaving in the past classes. 10. Do the FFIF that the theory of post-industrialism is conceptually and practically untenable, as they require reducing the world population, sustainable development, income generation from nature and degree of redistribution in favor of rich countries and international financial oligarchy? Dirt "Marquis puddles and purity of philosophical methodology "The sleep of reason produces monsters" - the lack of scientific outlook produces delusional latest reconstruction mysteries of the psyche as a source of history. At the same time carries a theater, a psychoanalytic explanation of the mechanism of peace in the reality itself. But people are already tired of the primitive type of explanation - "Portrait of Dorian Gray" about jealousy homosexuals, "Anna Karenina" - about the dangers of drug abuse and opium, "Queen of Spades" - about sexual cravings to the countess, not the cards. In the same spirit develops and history of the Russian revolution in the spirit of the primitive narrative of the brothers Ulyanov. Thus, G. Gorin (playwright) tells us the Internet that Lenin's mother as a maid of honor gave birth to Alexander's court of Alexander III, it was removed from sight and was married to a homosexual Ilya Ulyanov, was sent to Simbirsk, where she continued to walk - was born there Volodya and three children, whose paternity is difficult to ascertain. Ridicule traumatized Sasha, who decided to kill his father-the Emperor, his mother was adopted by the king, and together with the sovereign de went to Peter and Paul, but his son rejected them, and was not executed, and hidden from public view. Because Volodya, and said that "we will go the other way" (lesbian, or what?). All this fun systematized delusion is an attempt to understand the history of our great revolution, not through Marx, but through the works of Freud: as the picture on the article shows jubilant Jankowski in the rear of the silent Mark Zakharov and G. Gorin. Theatre of the absolute absurdity Lenka - The Theatre of Leninsky Komsomol! 6 "Clear Lenin with money" - wrote once pure soul of a poet. Net Marquis de Sade, honored instinctive killing, as well as the unbridled eroticism in literature would be unpleasantly surprised when they met with mechanized system of social violence, and sodomy. Most monstrous perversion, which invented de Sade, is a text or sadistic eroticism, the system of verbal signs. I could come up with garden? He writes: "He told me that he knew the person who fucked three children he had from his mother, one of whom was female, and he forced her to marry one of his brothers, and, thus, fucking her he fucked his sister, his daughter and his in law, and his son, he is forced to fuck his sister and his mother in law. " The words in this quotation replaced Boris Paramonov in the transfer of "Radio Liberty" from the series "Russian question". Transmission is called "Marquis puddle" and it replaced obscene words on the less obscene. It turns out that sadicheskoe crime exists only in proportion to the number attached to it language from what only language can build it. Garden said: "In order to combine incest, adultery, sodomy and sacrilege, he enters the back of his married daughter with the help of the wafer (wafer here - visitors, participle). As a result of a pure expression of ascertaining the tree grows a crime. Everything happens in the text, and in reality. Who would today was the idol of the Soviet people, VS Vysotsky? LN Yakutin from Dubna dedicates his poetry, the answer to the assumption that we need a W. Nevysotsky. 7 But we need and not as a philosopher Heidegger, and non-Derrida. Neosovremennost not receive these philosophers of postmodernity. We just have to confess as a historian of philosophy, which in the second half of the 80's. coined names otestvennoy philosophy, concepts and ideas of Derrida and Deleuze. Adorno once asked the question - whether the art after Auschwitz, that is, post-modernity? Perhaps only a new poslesadovskoe art (itself a garden is too pure and naive) - postmodern text is generally better at Auschwitz, but this text and prepares global concentration camp of postmodernity, followed by the dawn neosovremennosti. As fond of saying, VI Vernadsky "Noosphere win." He uttered these words at a time when the Wehrmacht occupied tanks Tula. Noosphere win and negentropy movement has resulted from the amoeba to fish, from fish to monkeys to Yeltsin Gaidar, then begins a movement to man, from postmodern to neosovremennosti. Is it worth it to love after the postmodern intellectuals as intellektoidov? Here is another fundamental passage: "To pre-revolutionary intelligentsia, which served as the landlords and capitalists, it came up the old theory about intelligence pointing to the need to distrust it and deal with it. Now this theory has outlived its time and it is no longer suited to our new Soviet intelligentsia. " Where is it? It seems that it is clean, clear, classical in form and content of thought, belongs to the future neosovremennosti. The methodology of classical thinking requires to assume the inevitability of the collapse of postmodernity. Nekrasov S. H