Respectively, grown and shared the real incomes of the population, keeping in mind that pensions have increased substantially. In the past year - 24%, this is a decent growth, but this year - 44,9%, almost 45% increase in pensions. They have had 5,333 rubles, and now 7800, even more. Also not so hot, not golden rain, but still it is decent. We do not have seniors who live below the poverty line have incomes lower than the poverty line. "A Conversation with Vladimir Putin" -------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- - Who is not thinking and not talking about pensions? Everything! But not everyone can speak. And those who make it possible to broadcast or appear on the pages of newspapers stubbornly silent on the main point:
- Do not say that there are two laws on pensions, with some receiving 30% of salary, while other 70% or more; - Do not say that the pension money inflation eats "Do not say that the pension system itself is closed and corrupt. - Most people who talk of pension reform for the people themselves receive pension under another law. - Do not say that the pension - it is only part of the state policy, ie not considered as part of the position of the whole.
Such as pension reform talks Tatyana Maximova, in his article with the catchy title: "The Russians will achieve pension reform"
Having chosen to write about pension reform, Maksimova immediately tries to impose on readers a view that the problem is not a purely Russian, ie, seek to remove the blame from our liberal reformers.
"However, at this time the problem is neither new nor purely Russian. Due to the demographic crisis, many states are scratching their heads over how to pay pensions in 10-15 years. Today payments to pensioners are financing part of social transfers of employees, but due to the catastrophic decline in fertility in a few years the number of pensioners will exceed the number of working citizens and the state with such a huge pension payments will not cope.
The current Minister of Social Development Tatyana Golikova offers its own version. She decided to push off from the other postulates - reducing the tax burden on business and raising it to the budget and working citizens. The truth in this case, the replacement rate (ratio of average wage to the average pension) must inevitably will fall from 30% in 2010 to 22,9% in 2023.
And where have dropped those receiving 70% or more? "The ministry decided to take a somewhat different way, finding a way to keep this ratio at 30 percent. To this end, the ministry has proposed to increase the load ... and business, and young people, and on budget. In addition, on the sidelines of the Ministry of Finance as has been said about the decision to raise the retirement threshold, although the official voice for the measure as long as no one dares. Authorities are prepared to consider raising the retirement threshold for both sexes up to 62.5 years - half a year, starting in 2015. In many developed countries are also discussing the possibility of raising the retirement age. The only difference is that there is much higher life expectancy. Thus, compared with Americans, Russian men live on less than 16 years, and women - nine ...
In fact, MOF now offers three tax innovations. First - to bring the effective rate of UST to the 2005 level. Then the basic rate of tax was reduced from 35.6 to 26%, while the same was introduced regressive scale at which the rate is reduced to the extent of wage growth: the annual salary of the employee up to 280 thousand rubles, the employer deducts 26% from 280 thousand to 600 thousand rubles - 10%, more than 600 thousand rubles - 2 percent. However, despite the fast growth of salaries, this scale is not indexed. That is, contributions of employees fell under the regression: more and more wages are taxed at lower rates, so the effective rate of social tax is annually reduced by 1-2 percentage points. This leads to a reduction of income allocated to pensions, and the Ministry of Finance proposes in 2010 to collect 26% of annual salary up to 1.1 million rubles, 10% - with a salary of 1.1 million to 2.3 million rubles, and 2% - with a salary of more than 2.3 million rubles (on a scale of 2005, indexed to wage growth. In the future it is proposed to index each year.) Business is a measure not like it, but the Finance Ministry did not consider it to increase the tax burden - it only restores the "fairness . For future pension problems since 2010, will probably have to pay and those born after 1967, ie participants in mandatory funded system. With these citizens are invited to levy an additional 3% tax and send the money in their savings accounts in the Pension Fund (the annual salary of more than 1.1 million rubles. Subject to such contributions will not be). However, this is not enough to solve the pension problem, so as a third measure in 2020 the Finance Ministry wants to raise the base rate of social tax from 26 to 29 percent. Will not go away and cost money. To finance the pensions offered since 2010 to reduce the Reserve Fund with 10% of GDP to 6% of GDP and direct these funds to the National Wealth Fund (NWF). Means there will be an additional source of funding for pensions in 2010. Deductions from FNB will be 0.6% of GDP. This will be used and investment income and fund itself. Gradually, the body of the fund will decline and reset by the Ministry of Finance estimates, by 2027. Decide on the modernization of the pension system the government should have in the fall. Obviously, the debate will be heated. But whatever decision was taken, has long been clear: living in a country so heavily dependent on oil market conditions, future pensioners makes sense to rely on themselves. " As you can see, all the attempts of officials sent to savings on pensioners who Maximova offers hope only for themselves. But in that case, why the working population to contain such a cumbersome and gluttonous state apparatus and its workers, and pay exorbitant taxes, Maksimova not explained.
Even more subtly trying to drive readers to the nose of Natalia Eremin Gazety.ru. "The state can not ensure a dignified old age for its citizens. Even increasing the tax burden and raise the retirement age pension only to the level of 30% of earnings, considered experts. The development of the voluntary pension insurance prevents the fall of the market, lack of confidence of citizens in private companies and the habit of relying on the state "- so begins his article" Poverty of the State "Eremin.
Of course, we agree: This "state can not ensure a dignified old age for its citizens", as it is, first and foremost, seek to ensure high profits of the financial oligarchy and raw magnates, and for that, what remains of this feast, to keep pensioners . Does not work! Too big appetites of big capital. Flat rate taxes, corruption of the entire state apparatus and many other evils of this state can not ensure a decent old age, and life in general.
But there my agreement with Yeryomina and ends, as the rest of the text - it is a lie.
The first proposal of this paper raise many questions:
1. Civil servants, MPs, municipal officials and other leaders who receive a pension in 70% and aching from the salary - it is not Russian citizens?
2. What kind of experts? And to what extent they considered raising the tax burden, and for whom?
In fact, Eremin tries to convince readers that it is impossible to ensure a dignified old age, not even the calculation of these secret experts. Job it is.
3. And unless citizens have no reason not to trust to private companies?
4. Incidentally, Eremin, should understand before talking about the habits of our fellow citizens rely on the state that all pension schemes are approved and guaranteed by public institutions. And in America, and Jamaica.
5. What kind of falling market says Eremin? What is it? Looks like another Fefelov to have a reason to refuse to increase pensions. After all, not every market crash should be recorded and reflected in the pension system. In the United States is raging financial crisis, but there is a pension paid and paid and no calls to cut pensions.
Another sophistic technique shows readers Eremin, talking about pensions - it is like a general consensus and clarity of proposed rule making. "The reasons that the Ministry of Finance calls for unpopular decisions, is clear: the Pension Fund deficit is growing, and the flow of oil and gas revenues, which allows long zytykat this hole, will not last forever." I think that most readers, too, understood the reasons for decisions taken by the Ministry of Finance, but they are not what gives Eremin. Reasons, in my opinion, the following:
1. Pension benefits of the working population can not withstand any criticism of what that cause mass discontent, and all this against the oligarchy and zhireyuschey puhnuschego of the money officials.
2. Ministry of Finance is trying, by order of the President, do something about this problem, but, while not affecting the income of big business oligarchy and higher (ie, oil and gas revenues should reach only to them), and because of that, in this embodiment, the state and failure to ensure a dignified old age.
3. And how will the Pension Fund deficit at such corruption of officials of the fund, and even in conditions where the bank pays 4.5% per annum on pension money with official inflation at 11,9%?
4. Oil and gas revenues - what's this?
After another passage Eremin readers demonstrated their secret experts and their complicated calculations. "By 2020, the MOF plans to reach the replacement rate, ie the ratio of average pension to average wage at 30%. Hence, the average wage in 1000 U.S. pension will be only $ 300.
Persons under 67 year of birth will increase by $ 30, and their pension will be equal to $ 330, calculated Prokopov.
What complicated calculations by experts Yeryomina? S.B! However, according to the requirements of the International Labour Organization to the UN, the replacement rate should be at least 40%. So that the sacrifices that will have to go to employers and workers will be without adequate results. "Once again we discover America," - said Secretary FNPR Igor Shanin. Last time, when the reform did not go, Alexei Kudrin, in an interview, said that it was because he was not taken into account the replacement rate, he recalled. "On the coefficient of substitution recalled two years ago, after the miners have reported it, - he continued. - Did the miners understand more than the financiers? "
And what style! "... The sacrifices which will be forced to go to employers and workers." Mezhuyev those workers are constantly forced to sacrifice, but not for its own sake, but for the increment of capital. But employers are different, and the sacrifices required of them different, and Eremin dumped them all into one pile, nothing to parse it and can not.
Holder for shoe repair and the head of Gazprom's two employers, but my interests, such as taxes and revenues, they are different. And therefore approaches must be different and specific, not general considerations of managers at various levels, as we demonstrated by the author. To sacrifice is prepared, apparently, the organizers of the repair of shoes.
Russian President Dmitry Medvedev has promised that within a week will solve the problem with tax cuts for the oil industry. "Within a week the issue of tax cuts will be solved" - gave journalists the president's words the head of Renova Group, Viktor Vekselberg. ITAR-TASS
"A man who lives under the socialist system, used that for him the state decides everything. Need to change the consciousness that this can not be a need to raise the consciousness that man must take care of myself "- says the director of the Khanty-Mansiysk branch of APF Boris Pastukhov. This duty and an empty phrase, it seems to have been avoided, and no one around, the post-Soviet press, and, as seen live so far. And no one pronounces it, and did not hesitate and did not answer the question: what, in countries with a different system, pensions are not prepared? Do not use the free medicine? Not in school? Do not have social security?
And that means - to take care of yourself? In fact - it means take care to fully and effectively in the interests of working people, operated state, and such figures as Boris and Natasha Shepherd Eremin earned by their labor, rather than sitting on someone else's neck.
- Do not say that there are two laws on pensions, with some receiving 30% of salary, while other 70% or more; - Do not say that the pension money inflation eats "Do not say that the pension system itself is closed and corrupt. - Most people who talk of pension reform for the people themselves receive pension under another law. - Do not say that the pension - it is only part of the state policy, ie not considered as part of the position of the whole.
Such as pension reform talks Tatyana Maximova, in his article with the catchy title: "The Russians will achieve pension reform"
Having chosen to write about pension reform, Maksimova immediately tries to impose on readers a view that the problem is not a purely Russian, ie, seek to remove the blame from our liberal reformers.
"However, at this time the problem is neither new nor purely Russian. Due to the demographic crisis, many states are scratching their heads over how to pay pensions in 10-15 years. Today payments to pensioners are financing part of social transfers of employees, but due to the catastrophic decline in fertility in a few years the number of pensioners will exceed the number of working citizens and the state with such a huge pension payments will not cope.
The current Minister of Social Development Tatyana Golikova offers its own version. She decided to push off from the other postulates - reducing the tax burden on business and raising it to the budget and working citizens. The truth in this case, the replacement rate (ratio of average wage to the average pension) must inevitably will fall from 30% in 2010 to 22,9% in 2023.
And where have dropped those receiving 70% or more? "The ministry decided to take a somewhat different way, finding a way to keep this ratio at 30 percent. To this end, the ministry has proposed to increase the load ... and business, and young people, and on budget. In addition, on the sidelines of the Ministry of Finance as has been said about the decision to raise the retirement threshold, although the official voice for the measure as long as no one dares. Authorities are prepared to consider raising the retirement threshold for both sexes up to 62.5 years - half a year, starting in 2015. In many developed countries are also discussing the possibility of raising the retirement age. The only difference is that there is much higher life expectancy. Thus, compared with Americans, Russian men live on less than 16 years, and women - nine ...
In fact, MOF now offers three tax innovations. First - to bring the effective rate of UST to the 2005 level. Then the basic rate of tax was reduced from 35.6 to 26%, while the same was introduced regressive scale at which the rate is reduced to the extent of wage growth: the annual salary of the employee up to 280 thousand rubles, the employer deducts 26% from 280 thousand to 600 thousand rubles - 10%, more than 600 thousand rubles - 2 percent. However, despite the fast growth of salaries, this scale is not indexed. That is, contributions of employees fell under the regression: more and more wages are taxed at lower rates, so the effective rate of social tax is annually reduced by 1-2 percentage points. This leads to a reduction of income allocated to pensions, and the Ministry of Finance proposes in 2010 to collect 26% of annual salary up to 1.1 million rubles, 10% - with a salary of 1.1 million to 2.3 million rubles, and 2% - with a salary of more than 2.3 million rubles (on a scale of 2005, indexed to wage growth. In the future it is proposed to index each year.) Business is a measure not like it, but the Finance Ministry did not consider it to increase the tax burden - it only restores the "fairness . For future pension problems since 2010, will probably have to pay and those born after 1967, ie participants in mandatory funded system. With these citizens are invited to levy an additional 3% tax and send the money in their savings accounts in the Pension Fund (the annual salary of more than 1.1 million rubles. Subject to such contributions will not be). However, this is not enough to solve the pension problem, so as a third measure in 2020 the Finance Ministry wants to raise the base rate of social tax from 26 to 29 percent. Will not go away and cost money. To finance the pensions offered since 2010 to reduce the Reserve Fund with 10% of GDP to 6% of GDP and direct these funds to the National Wealth Fund (NWF). Means there will be an additional source of funding for pensions in 2010. Deductions from FNB will be 0.6% of GDP. This will be used and investment income and fund itself. Gradually, the body of the fund will decline and reset by the Ministry of Finance estimates, by 2027. Decide on the modernization of the pension system the government should have in the fall. Obviously, the debate will be heated. But whatever decision was taken, has long been clear: living in a country so heavily dependent on oil market conditions, future pensioners makes sense to rely on themselves. " As you can see, all the attempts of officials sent to savings on pensioners who Maximova offers hope only for themselves. But in that case, why the working population to contain such a cumbersome and gluttonous state apparatus and its workers, and pay exorbitant taxes, Maksimova not explained.
Even more subtly trying to drive readers to the nose of Natalia Eremin Gazety.ru. "The state can not ensure a dignified old age for its citizens. Even increasing the tax burden and raise the retirement age pension only to the level of 30% of earnings, considered experts. The development of the voluntary pension insurance prevents the fall of the market, lack of confidence of citizens in private companies and the habit of relying on the state "- so begins his article" Poverty of the State "Eremin.
Of course, we agree: This "state can not ensure a dignified old age for its citizens", as it is, first and foremost, seek to ensure high profits of the financial oligarchy and raw magnates, and for that, what remains of this feast, to keep pensioners . Does not work! Too big appetites of big capital. Flat rate taxes, corruption of the entire state apparatus and many other evils of this state can not ensure a decent old age, and life in general.
But there my agreement with Yeryomina and ends, as the rest of the text - it is a lie.
The first proposal of this paper raise many questions:
1. Civil servants, MPs, municipal officials and other leaders who receive a pension in 70% and aching from the salary - it is not Russian citizens?
2. What kind of experts? And to what extent they considered raising the tax burden, and for whom?
In fact, Eremin tries to convince readers that it is impossible to ensure a dignified old age, not even the calculation of these secret experts. Job it is.
3. And unless citizens have no reason not to trust to private companies?
4. Incidentally, Eremin, should understand before talking about the habits of our fellow citizens rely on the state that all pension schemes are approved and guaranteed by public institutions. And in America, and Jamaica.
5. What kind of falling market says Eremin? What is it? Looks like another Fefelov to have a reason to refuse to increase pensions. After all, not every market crash should be recorded and reflected in the pension system. In the United States is raging financial crisis, but there is a pension paid and paid and no calls to cut pensions.
Another sophistic technique shows readers Eremin, talking about pensions - it is like a general consensus and clarity of proposed rule making. "The reasons that the Ministry of Finance calls for unpopular decisions, is clear: the Pension Fund deficit is growing, and the flow of oil and gas revenues, which allows long zytykat this hole, will not last forever." I think that most readers, too, understood the reasons for decisions taken by the Ministry of Finance, but they are not what gives Eremin. Reasons, in my opinion, the following:
1. Pension benefits of the working population can not withstand any criticism of what that cause mass discontent, and all this against the oligarchy and zhireyuschey puhnuschego of the money officials.
2. Ministry of Finance is trying, by order of the President, do something about this problem, but, while not affecting the income of big business oligarchy and higher (ie, oil and gas revenues should reach only to them), and because of that, in this embodiment, the state and failure to ensure a dignified old age.
3. And how will the Pension Fund deficit at such corruption of officials of the fund, and even in conditions where the bank pays 4.5% per annum on pension money with official inflation at 11,9%?
4. Oil and gas revenues - what's this?
After another passage Eremin readers demonstrated their secret experts and their complicated calculations. "By 2020, the MOF plans to reach the replacement rate, ie the ratio of average pension to average wage at 30%. Hence, the average wage in 1000 U.S. pension will be only $ 300.
Persons under 67 year of birth will increase by $ 30, and their pension will be equal to $ 330, calculated Prokopov.
What complicated calculations by experts Yeryomina? S.B! However, according to the requirements of the International Labour Organization to the UN, the replacement rate should be at least 40%. So that the sacrifices that will have to go to employers and workers will be without adequate results. "Once again we discover America," - said Secretary FNPR Igor Shanin. Last time, when the reform did not go, Alexei Kudrin, in an interview, said that it was because he was not taken into account the replacement rate, he recalled. "On the coefficient of substitution recalled two years ago, after the miners have reported it, - he continued. - Did the miners understand more than the financiers? "
And what style! "... The sacrifices which will be forced to go to employers and workers." Mezhuyev those workers are constantly forced to sacrifice, but not for its own sake, but for the increment of capital. But employers are different, and the sacrifices required of them different, and Eremin dumped them all into one pile, nothing to parse it and can not.
Holder for shoe repair and the head of Gazprom's two employers, but my interests, such as taxes and revenues, they are different. And therefore approaches must be different and specific, not general considerations of managers at various levels, as we demonstrated by the author. To sacrifice is prepared, apparently, the organizers of the repair of shoes.
Russian President Dmitry Medvedev has promised that within a week will solve the problem with tax cuts for the oil industry. "Within a week the issue of tax cuts will be solved" - gave journalists the president's words the head of Renova Group, Viktor Vekselberg. ITAR-TASS
"A man who lives under the socialist system, used that for him the state decides everything. Need to change the consciousness that this can not be a need to raise the consciousness that man must take care of myself "- says the director of the Khanty-Mansiysk branch of APF Boris Pastukhov. This duty and an empty phrase, it seems to have been avoided, and no one around, the post-Soviet press, and, as seen live so far. And no one pronounces it, and did not hesitate and did not answer the question: what, in countries with a different system, pensions are not prepared? Do not use the free medicine? Not in school? Do not have social security?
And that means - to take care of yourself? In fact - it means take care to fully and effectively in the interests of working people, operated state, and such figures as Boris and Natasha Shepherd Eremin earned by their labor, rather than sitting on someone else's neck.
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий