ACTUAL ARCHIVE - 1995 In anticipation of repentance ...
... On the eve of the third millennium shocked humanity (especially elementary-honest social science, science and journalism) have unexpectedly discovered - the disintegration of the huge state, but ... survived a career. And the same people all the natural essence of which is-and was to state that, even at the cost of their lives, no matter what, protect!
What's the matter? And in that same party committee - that until 1991, after the - keeps the state in its ... cherished dream. In the end, "Party committee" and "party organizers" formally parted with each other, "as ships at sea." But because "party organizer without party committee, (the just remark Viktor Chernomyrdin), by itself, always feels like" nothing ", he instinctively and generates HIM (that did not and neither has made!), Always and everywhere . As a result, the life we are and we have: - Party committee ... no party organizer; - Party organizers ... and instead of "against" the party committee; - "Party ideology" without the party secretariat; - Partisan press ... without "partkomovskogo" leadership; - A "party pool" ... without the HR Department, designed to educate, create and distribute ... All these things - nowhere and no one "recorded". However, it's all sealed with an ineradicable national "instinct of expectations, that's it," forever-party "bosses, stop, finally, it is dangerous and it is unclear to the people ..." kink. "
It is interesting, but "shots", then these people are quite willing to - and by so sick of all these eccentricities (!) - But "Party committee restored" always have "wonderful" and it turns out, namely: a Country ... without Belarus, then people ... without population growth, then the "civil society" ... without children, the children - without a childhood, democracy ... without a State, then the "official" Communist Party ... without a history of the Communist Party, then "press" ... without supervision, then the "error reforms "... without correction; and even personal biography ... without repentance.
Of interest to us with you if we find the elite party of journalists, which catered to this "party grind" before 1991, so serve it now. Even the "surviving" (not "in theory", as they relied on staff, but in reality), an unprecedented public disaster, so they have understood nothing and learned nothing. Namely: the aplomb of an ancient "Myustagoga" In the face of zamorochennnogo people, give your face a "deserted the Party Committee", the "unaffiliated party organizer," that "recruits, the Communist Party, always eager to stay afloat.
On one of these website POLITUCHEBA "had once told (see" better in the good, clap your hands, "ECHO OF THE DAY, January 25, 2002, and" Are the irony here? "ECHO OF THE DAY, March 15, 2002 Author - SV Ryabov, sobkorr "Truth" in the second half of the 80-ies). Today - not late, the story of his colleagues from Pravda Komsomol. And everything - from the same place and same time ... for both of them - "cult figures" all Journalism Middle Urals. Both informal and semi-official. As the party and not the party. As a "youth" and deserved!
-------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- - The editors of the newspaper
"Ekaterinburg week."
Dear Editors,
With the curiosity of watching your newspaper. Who here just come across! And, most importantly, "familiar to all persons ..."
Here read article by SANATINA "Happy start of the presidential race." With Vladimir Sanatinym my old reader's attitude. And you know what? How to read his "problem" story, so sit Sydney and sit, sit ... All I think I think: what, is it written? And that write these things, that mean? And how to live it to me now, reader, that is ... After all, Sanatin something, do not anyhow a journalist, and a local celebrity!
Sometimes it comes right up to irritation, sin on him starting, because the assumptions arise: can he himself really does not know just what we, the readers, trusting and frank, has been written?
And another time again on Sanatina come across in a local newspaper, and he does it about bream, ide, ruff and stuff like that. Yes it is written! I myself in my childhood passion for fishing - from early morning until late at night he sat on the beach. So poetry float me quite understandable and familiar. It was then when Sanatina read, once you see: You know the same person is writing about! Cause it likes. The subject owns. Love and understanding their share unselfishly ready. Shedra shedra-sharing can ...
And here again I will depart from the heart. Again to Sanatinu Volodya mileyu human kindness. Ready to forgive him for all the earlier "journalistic" pieces of music of his "philosophical" teachings and "political-scientific 'predictions.
So there, now, and live with him. From irritation - to the reader's love, and vice versa.
And now, here, want to speculate. Directly in front of you: whether it's going to take me gag, or author your to blame. Look - the ropes.
And in this new article on the upcoming elections ... And in the end! - Let me once again, the author of your, ask. As it is written? And it is written in a tone very, very competent person. This is - no doubt. That "takes" Sanatin Zhirinovsky "by the throat" and eventually gives birth to its electorate, the following sermon: "The east - business thin!" Remember de, Petrushka ...
Well, not really so? So, of course ... And the aplomb with which the author proclaims to us that truth, makes inevitably suggest "something", namely: who is familiar with the truth of th e T, that is, of course, knows the truth and to a to m and by about a y th. That's why our trusting Ural voter has the right to ask our author: "And that, Russia did it - not a subtle thing?" You can, of course, do not ask Sanatina, bearing in mind that the question is superfluous, because he certainly knows that since East is fine, it really something Russia, no less subtle, fragile and transparent. All this, of course, of course, for the mutually trusting people.
Well, I would be pedantic and boring, so in B. Sanatina ask: so with the East, then everything is clear, and with Russia, how?
... In search of the answer again and again look into the text of his article ... and alas! Not discover this by absolutely no-che st. But, at the very end of it, I find the author's warning "masters candidates. And done it in a tone that confidence again arises: knows our journalist and reliably know what to do and when necessary. Knows what to Russia sees sharp corners and potholes on its historical path. And tip his golden pen watchful eye on all sorts of different "candidates" who get up to mischief, as children, and all strive not to obey the "senior" who and experience richer and stronger mind and post abruptly "... Well, nothing. Let the pampered, yet. Cones if nabyut yourself, then all will benefit. Volodya Sanatin they then say: "Well, well, you varmint? Saying because you know where to go right. And you, again, did not listen. Nothing, cones stuffed - wiser. And all before the wedding heal. Here, only the fire in the house is not done. Namely: "try to avoid the finale, in which the frank gaiety of the voter can turn tragic fun and even scary!"
In short, once an old picture of our relations with Volodya: meaningful hints of it on its exclusive, in the affairs of the homeland, the competence in my heart, give birth to a sweet hope, hope that I immediately rush "otovarit" he is. But, in exchange for "hope", has already promised, he immediately, with a grimace the experienced "elder", gives another hint at the future of clarity and understanding of the meaning of things, people, ideas and events ...
Well, just like in the reform, according to Chubais: In exchange for Soviet citizenship - a voucher, in exchange for a voucher - money, in exchange for money - stocks, in exchange for shares - the "new shares", and so longer, until the bottle of vodka or kilo of sausage.
... I see the wording of your response when one of you keep this letter in my hands and in Volodin, shrugs his shoulders, the reason the chin and commercials hand is doing. Say, what can I say, seeing as it is written? Clearly, the "who" wrote ... And the rest at this time, so together, with their heads nod. Mol, clear, clear! What's rassusolivat? More rounded. Strakhov need to Rossel "consecrate" and not stray readers to engage in this nonsense ...
And perhaps, one of which, well, just "zamuhryshka" editorial, which is less than total respect and listen to the accepted, and even take lyapnet: "That's true, great things await us, great people ... And to answer the reader something to ours on the merits, necessary ".
All zavolnuyutsya, zavolnuyutsya and most authoritative of you angrily and exclaims rhetorically: "What he needs something from our Volodya? Tea and he does not know what he wants!
In this case facilitate your task. Let's try to speculate.
... So, Volodya Sanatin today weighty and solid "disapproves" (see his article). Oh, and rightly so. I do not approve of "today" as well. Here, only one vospominanitse me rest does not. I remember that was Sanatin sob.korrom. "Komsomolskaya Pravda". In another quite different, more recent times. Then this "elder" of the Middle Urals was all that "necessary": the car, and apartment and office equipment and fees to solid, and the impact on friends, local journalists is very excellent. And most importantly, he could have "twisted" bonze any local, which makes "the good" and lives "is not so."
As demonstrated recently, a former Komsomol journalist Svetlana Shipunova (see Publicity on blood. Sov.Rossiya, 30/03/1995), all-powerful partons-Democracy had been broken knit journalistic brethren. Broken like a reed. With all the consequences today. The language of science (and it is - the Greek language!), Party-fold changed to Dox-fold.
Doxa - is, in Greek, "opinion" meant. And the views - it's "random thoughts". Remember, Oleg Gazmanov: "My thoughts - my horses? That and jumping thoughts on newspapers, dragging the bloody bodies of human life now.
What happened? And in place of the disciplined, but a dull party "uncle" from the department of press and propaganda came uninhibited young man with a degree in journalism at the USU, but without the "King in the head." However, as grandparents, villagers say, "Bitch do not shochit - the dog did not jump!" ...
Volodya Sanatin-what then? Volodya, instead of batch changes-Democracy at Sophio-fold (in Greek, sophia - wisdom), safely Giroux on "Komsomolskaya Pravda", all their behavior, and blessed to live and to win a rabid "paradox", which is times, and created entirely because she did not love them, Zhirinovsky.
Again, see the round eyes in your editorial. I hear: "What nonsense, how is possible by P on a T otal journalist's claim, how could he? Bollocks! "
Excuse me, friends! Do not want in my thinking and reasoning, so let's from your own oven to dance here. So, take the magazine "Ural» № 4 for the year 1994. Find there a book of your colleagues. This - the Spanish journalist Pilar Bonet. And what did it, she's talking about?
Oh, that the Soviet Union broke the Sverdlovsk Regional Party Committee?
That the parties' brains, while serviced mastermind "Bialowieza collusion" Gennady Burbulis?
What did he pet the Faculty of Philosophy USU. And the darling of the local intelligentsia and the local party officials that the ideological "refueled" from the same faculty?
What Gene-feeding has become (along with dotsentskoy youth USU and the Municipal Committee of the Communist Party) to protect the "internationalism" against the terrible monster - "Russian chauvinism" and honorably defended his native Sverdlovsk?
And now bring-ka of the (hypothetical) "Editorial idiot" that you, instead of me, my questions are asked, and in his presence, Volodya Sanatinu looking into the eyes, read the following: "So what, Volodya, not like you and me zhituha something today? Hence, Gena Burbulis on "The board of national shame" will, as the architect of this "zhituhi" exhibit? No? How did no! Once vremechko you do not like it, then and Gene, too. And if Gene Burbulis you prefer, then it's time lihoe - quite like you will. How else? Otherwise, logically, absolutely not! "
In fact, this issue, you, Vladimir. Back then in 1989 set was needed. He is now also on your conscience.
You, here, all the "elder" ideological and political from a building. Sage, that is. A Gene took your journalists in 1987-89, and led them under the banner of "wisdom" (Ph.D., after all!), As Oleg Gazmanov bequeathed: by ruts, potholes so on to the wind in your ears "Waxwing" yes famously heart was. Today, he does not hide it, and proudly says: equal to me, in deed, no! Human Gene. He just an eccentric, does not understand that had it Volodya Sanatin if all of its institutional strength, "leaned" on the public consciousness of the Middle Urals, then, perhaps, not a pseudo-philosopher gene from a pseudo-philosophical faculty empty brains led to the party, but a real philosopher, any.
What? Where are these sages was then seek ye? And that - simple. Look at the very party-university bosses who Gena something for all personnel rules of the party committee, cherished ... So who are they, at this very time pressured, harassed, oklevetyvali - they, therefore, the replacement of "Genin" was. For their "party-genetic" tampering, therefore ... the method of "contradiction" argue!
I have something I do not remember that "the master of Sanatin" sought these people (on duty, by the way!) And would have stood up for them.
What? Who, after all, they are! Do not you understand? M-m-yes ... Well, it can, in extreme cases, such as Svetlana Shchekin posprashat. She is unable to not know. In the "hell" was staffing.
But Volodya Sanatin something, all this deception of the people and blessed, namely: calmly missed when Gene ... for the "people's guide" persistently betrayed. Hence, Volodya SANATIN - godfather genes Burbulis is ... AND RESPONSIBILITIES Now On B u A I N A is H & X!
But Zhirinovsky ... It's to cover their own "bludilischa in journalism from the eyes of a gullible public. He is, after all, technological waste "their joint cooperation and collaboration. Secondary product. Product of the actual institutional cooperation, which in B. Sanatina with Burbulis in 1987 - 1989 gg began and, as can be seen, in essence, is still ongoing.
With sincere respect for journalistic work,
Alexey Kazakov
member of the working philosophy of the club
them. Joseph Dietzgen.
July 15, 1995
Ekaterinburg.
POST. Scriptum. In our doxa Democratic-time (ie time of social pluralism, and personal irresponsibility) may whatever. It is quite possible that W. Sanatin take a stand, as in the journal Krokodil: I - I did not, and Tshombe, and bombs are not mine!
Well, then all the fish in the reservoirs of the Middle Urals open their mouths and cry .... But the souls of carp that V. Sanatin absorbed in the sour cream, like Erin, rush at him, so to punish more journalists behind ... his little-little conscience!
... On the eve of the third millennium shocked humanity (especially elementary-honest social science, science and journalism) have unexpectedly discovered - the disintegration of the huge state, but ... survived a career. And the same people all the natural essence of which is-and was to state that, even at the cost of their lives, no matter what, protect!
What's the matter? And in that same party committee - that until 1991, after the - keeps the state in its ... cherished dream. In the end, "Party committee" and "party organizers" formally parted with each other, "as ships at sea." But because "party organizer without party committee, (the just remark Viktor Chernomyrdin), by itself, always feels like" nothing ", he instinctively and generates HIM (that did not and neither has made!), Always and everywhere . As a result, the life we are and we have: - Party committee ... no party organizer; - Party organizers ... and instead of "against" the party committee; - "Party ideology" without the party secretariat; - Partisan press ... without "partkomovskogo" leadership; - A "party pool" ... without the HR Department, designed to educate, create and distribute ... All these things - nowhere and no one "recorded". However, it's all sealed with an ineradicable national "instinct of expectations, that's it," forever-party "bosses, stop, finally, it is dangerous and it is unclear to the people ..." kink. "
It is interesting, but "shots", then these people are quite willing to - and by so sick of all these eccentricities (!) - But "Party committee restored" always have "wonderful" and it turns out, namely: a Country ... without Belarus, then people ... without population growth, then the "civil society" ... without children, the children - without a childhood, democracy ... without a State, then the "official" Communist Party ... without a history of the Communist Party, then "press" ... without supervision, then the "error reforms "... without correction; and even personal biography ... without repentance.
Of interest to us with you if we find the elite party of journalists, which catered to this "party grind" before 1991, so serve it now. Even the "surviving" (not "in theory", as they relied on staff, but in reality), an unprecedented public disaster, so they have understood nothing and learned nothing. Namely: the aplomb of an ancient "Myustagoga" In the face of zamorochennnogo people, give your face a "deserted the Party Committee", the "unaffiliated party organizer," that "recruits, the Communist Party, always eager to stay afloat.
On one of these website POLITUCHEBA "had once told (see" better in the good, clap your hands, "ECHO OF THE DAY, January 25, 2002, and" Are the irony here? "ECHO OF THE DAY, March 15, 2002 Author - SV Ryabov, sobkorr "Truth" in the second half of the 80-ies). Today - not late, the story of his colleagues from Pravda Komsomol. And everything - from the same place and same time ... for both of them - "cult figures" all Journalism Middle Urals. Both informal and semi-official. As the party and not the party. As a "youth" and deserved!
-------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- - The editors of the newspaper
"Ekaterinburg week."
Dear Editors,
With the curiosity of watching your newspaper. Who here just come across! And, most importantly, "familiar to all persons ..."
Here read article by SANATINA "Happy start of the presidential race." With Vladimir Sanatinym my old reader's attitude. And you know what? How to read his "problem" story, so sit Sydney and sit, sit ... All I think I think: what, is it written? And that write these things, that mean? And how to live it to me now, reader, that is ... After all, Sanatin something, do not anyhow a journalist, and a local celebrity!
Sometimes it comes right up to irritation, sin on him starting, because the assumptions arise: can he himself really does not know just what we, the readers, trusting and frank, has been written?
And another time again on Sanatina come across in a local newspaper, and he does it about bream, ide, ruff and stuff like that. Yes it is written! I myself in my childhood passion for fishing - from early morning until late at night he sat on the beach. So poetry float me quite understandable and familiar. It was then when Sanatina read, once you see: You know the same person is writing about! Cause it likes. The subject owns. Love and understanding their share unselfishly ready. Shedra shedra-sharing can ...
And here again I will depart from the heart. Again to Sanatinu Volodya mileyu human kindness. Ready to forgive him for all the earlier "journalistic" pieces of music of his "philosophical" teachings and "political-scientific 'predictions.
So there, now, and live with him. From irritation - to the reader's love, and vice versa.
And now, here, want to speculate. Directly in front of you: whether it's going to take me gag, or author your to blame. Look - the ropes.
And in this new article on the upcoming elections ... And in the end! - Let me once again, the author of your, ask. As it is written? And it is written in a tone very, very competent person. This is - no doubt. That "takes" Sanatin Zhirinovsky "by the throat" and eventually gives birth to its electorate, the following sermon: "The east - business thin!" Remember de, Petrushka ...
Well, not really so? So, of course ... And the aplomb with which the author proclaims to us that truth, makes inevitably suggest "something", namely: who is familiar with the truth of th e T, that is, of course, knows the truth and to a to m and by about a y th. That's why our trusting Ural voter has the right to ask our author: "And that, Russia did it - not a subtle thing?" You can, of course, do not ask Sanatina, bearing in mind that the question is superfluous, because he certainly knows that since East is fine, it really something Russia, no less subtle, fragile and transparent. All this, of course, of course, for the mutually trusting people.
Well, I would be pedantic and boring, so in B. Sanatina ask: so with the East, then everything is clear, and with Russia, how?
... In search of the answer again and again look into the text of his article ... and alas! Not discover this by absolutely no-che st. But, at the very end of it, I find the author's warning "masters candidates. And done it in a tone that confidence again arises: knows our journalist and reliably know what to do and when necessary. Knows what to Russia sees sharp corners and potholes on its historical path. And tip his golden pen watchful eye on all sorts of different "candidates" who get up to mischief, as children, and all strive not to obey the "senior" who and experience richer and stronger mind and post abruptly "... Well, nothing. Let the pampered, yet. Cones if nabyut yourself, then all will benefit. Volodya Sanatin they then say: "Well, well, you varmint? Saying because you know where to go right. And you, again, did not listen. Nothing, cones stuffed - wiser. And all before the wedding heal. Here, only the fire in the house is not done. Namely: "try to avoid the finale, in which the frank gaiety of the voter can turn tragic fun and even scary!"
In short, once an old picture of our relations with Volodya: meaningful hints of it on its exclusive, in the affairs of the homeland, the competence in my heart, give birth to a sweet hope, hope that I immediately rush "otovarit" he is. But, in exchange for "hope", has already promised, he immediately, with a grimace the experienced "elder", gives another hint at the future of clarity and understanding of the meaning of things, people, ideas and events ...
Well, just like in the reform, according to Chubais: In exchange for Soviet citizenship - a voucher, in exchange for a voucher - money, in exchange for money - stocks, in exchange for shares - the "new shares", and so longer, until the bottle of vodka or kilo of sausage.
... I see the wording of your response when one of you keep this letter in my hands and in Volodin, shrugs his shoulders, the reason the chin and commercials hand is doing. Say, what can I say, seeing as it is written? Clearly, the "who" wrote ... And the rest at this time, so together, with their heads nod. Mol, clear, clear! What's rassusolivat? More rounded. Strakhov need to Rossel "consecrate" and not stray readers to engage in this nonsense ...
And perhaps, one of which, well, just "zamuhryshka" editorial, which is less than total respect and listen to the accepted, and even take lyapnet: "That's true, great things await us, great people ... And to answer the reader something to ours on the merits, necessary ".
All zavolnuyutsya, zavolnuyutsya and most authoritative of you angrily and exclaims rhetorically: "What he needs something from our Volodya? Tea and he does not know what he wants!
In this case facilitate your task. Let's try to speculate.
... So, Volodya Sanatin today weighty and solid "disapproves" (see his article). Oh, and rightly so. I do not approve of "today" as well. Here, only one vospominanitse me rest does not. I remember that was Sanatin sob.korrom. "Komsomolskaya Pravda". In another quite different, more recent times. Then this "elder" of the Middle Urals was all that "necessary": the car, and apartment and office equipment and fees to solid, and the impact on friends, local journalists is very excellent. And most importantly, he could have "twisted" bonze any local, which makes "the good" and lives "is not so."
As demonstrated recently, a former Komsomol journalist Svetlana Shipunova (see Publicity on blood. Sov.Rossiya, 30/03/1995), all-powerful partons-Democracy had been broken knit journalistic brethren. Broken like a reed. With all the consequences today. The language of science (and it is - the Greek language!), Party-fold changed to Dox-fold.
Doxa - is, in Greek, "opinion" meant. And the views - it's "random thoughts". Remember, Oleg Gazmanov: "My thoughts - my horses? That and jumping thoughts on newspapers, dragging the bloody bodies of human life now.
What happened? And in place of the disciplined, but a dull party "uncle" from the department of press and propaganda came uninhibited young man with a degree in journalism at the USU, but without the "King in the head." However, as grandparents, villagers say, "Bitch do not shochit - the dog did not jump!" ...
Volodya Sanatin-what then? Volodya, instead of batch changes-Democracy at Sophio-fold (in Greek, sophia - wisdom), safely Giroux on "Komsomolskaya Pravda", all their behavior, and blessed to live and to win a rabid "paradox", which is times, and created entirely because she did not love them, Zhirinovsky.
Again, see the round eyes in your editorial. I hear: "What nonsense, how is possible by P on a T otal journalist's claim, how could he? Bollocks! "
Excuse me, friends! Do not want in my thinking and reasoning, so let's from your own oven to dance here. So, take the magazine "Ural» № 4 for the year 1994. Find there a book of your colleagues. This - the Spanish journalist Pilar Bonet. And what did it, she's talking about?
Oh, that the Soviet Union broke the Sverdlovsk Regional Party Committee?
That the parties' brains, while serviced mastermind "Bialowieza collusion" Gennady Burbulis?
What did he pet the Faculty of Philosophy USU. And the darling of the local intelligentsia and the local party officials that the ideological "refueled" from the same faculty?
What Gene-feeding has become (along with dotsentskoy youth USU and the Municipal Committee of the Communist Party) to protect the "internationalism" against the terrible monster - "Russian chauvinism" and honorably defended his native Sverdlovsk?
And now bring-ka of the (hypothetical) "Editorial idiot" that you, instead of me, my questions are asked, and in his presence, Volodya Sanatinu looking into the eyes, read the following: "So what, Volodya, not like you and me zhituha something today? Hence, Gena Burbulis on "The board of national shame" will, as the architect of this "zhituhi" exhibit? No? How did no! Once vremechko you do not like it, then and Gene, too. And if Gene Burbulis you prefer, then it's time lihoe - quite like you will. How else? Otherwise, logically, absolutely not! "
In fact, this issue, you, Vladimir. Back then in 1989 set was needed. He is now also on your conscience.
You, here, all the "elder" ideological and political from a building. Sage, that is. A Gene took your journalists in 1987-89, and led them under the banner of "wisdom" (Ph.D., after all!), As Oleg Gazmanov bequeathed: by ruts, potholes so on to the wind in your ears "Waxwing" yes famously heart was. Today, he does not hide it, and proudly says: equal to me, in deed, no! Human Gene. He just an eccentric, does not understand that had it Volodya Sanatin if all of its institutional strength, "leaned" on the public consciousness of the Middle Urals, then, perhaps, not a pseudo-philosopher gene from a pseudo-philosophical faculty empty brains led to the party, but a real philosopher, any.
What? Where are these sages was then seek ye? And that - simple. Look at the very party-university bosses who Gena something for all personnel rules of the party committee, cherished ... So who are they, at this very time pressured, harassed, oklevetyvali - they, therefore, the replacement of "Genin" was. For their "party-genetic" tampering, therefore ... the method of "contradiction" argue!
I have something I do not remember that "the master of Sanatin" sought these people (on duty, by the way!) And would have stood up for them.
What? Who, after all, they are! Do not you understand? M-m-yes ... Well, it can, in extreme cases, such as Svetlana Shchekin posprashat. She is unable to not know. In the "hell" was staffing.
But Volodya Sanatin something, all this deception of the people and blessed, namely: calmly missed when Gene ... for the "people's guide" persistently betrayed. Hence, Volodya SANATIN - godfather genes Burbulis is ... AND RESPONSIBILITIES Now On B u A I N A is H & X!
But Zhirinovsky ... It's to cover their own "bludilischa in journalism from the eyes of a gullible public. He is, after all, technological waste "their joint cooperation and collaboration. Secondary product. Product of the actual institutional cooperation, which in B. Sanatina with Burbulis in 1987 - 1989 gg began and, as can be seen, in essence, is still ongoing.
With sincere respect for journalistic work,
Alexey Kazakov
member of the working philosophy of the club
them. Joseph Dietzgen.
July 15, 1995
Ekaterinburg.
POST. Scriptum. In our doxa Democratic-time (ie time of social pluralism, and personal irresponsibility) may whatever. It is quite possible that W. Sanatin take a stand, as in the journal Krokodil: I - I did not, and Tshombe, and bombs are not mine!
Well, then all the fish in the reservoirs of the Middle Urals open their mouths and cry .... But the souls of carp that V. Sanatin absorbed in the sour cream, like Erin, rush at him, so to punish more journalists behind ... his little-little conscience!
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий