Getting back to basics
Truth - a high concept. According to Hegel, at the sound of that word in every real man should be above the billowing breasts. However, on the notion that people can have either a high or a low opinion. And according to one or another opinion to the truth and they themselves are.
Strictly speaking, those who publicly praises the truth is many more than those who openly raises her hula. However, the most common and scary kind of disrespect is the one that confronts us daily life every day, namely: respect for words and a denial in fact. So is her bitter fate of the world. And the fate that inevitably separates any ideology that claims to be something to bring the light of truth to the people ...
... Can not think of another. Just as, however, should not be allowed and others to think for you. This is the basic rule of the intellectual health of man as a thinker. And therefore able to find the truth of their own way. That's how participants believed workshop on urban Russian philosophy. Not forgetting that if people think, the same way, but if you DO NOT think. ... Then here, each in its own way Gorazd!
City Seminar on Russian, German and Greek philosophy "Russian Logos - a kind of public association of citizens. In Yekaterinburg, it has been two years and consistently attracts all those who possessed a sincere love for philosophy. Who respects this "science of sciences" is not for the opportunity to make a career or to earn their daily bread, but because the only thing that she alone can give a person: to think myself, to think together with others, but ... do not try to "think for others." In short, the seminar involved as enthusiastic amateurs, and many well-known philosophers of the Ural region. Among these candidates Philosophy S. Nekrasov, L. Maple, V. Knyazev, N. Smolnikova, Goncharov, N. Kuznetsov, E. Surovtseva sociologists, W. Kadochnikov, E. Rakhova, Ph.D. V. Kopal, SW . Andreev, BA Emelianov, A. Vetoshkin, doctor of economics Anatoly Ilyshev and others.
Members of the seminar lectures and organize meetings with labor unions on the issues of Russian classical philosophy, stand in the regional and national press. Conduct scientific and philosophical examination at the request of the public, publish collections of scientific papers. In short, develop a modern philosophical science, creating a climate of scientific associations, to reject the forms of corporate and administrative monopoly in the philosophical science of the Urals.
This year's first meeting was held in the small hall of the Central House of Culture of the officers and was devoted to Father Sergius Bulgakov article, which carries the name "Karl Marx as a religious type."
I must say that discussion of this issue was of an acute and rapidly-emotional. There was everything: and unthinkingly-orthodox defense of the holy names, and giddy enthusiasm for the overthrow of the old idols, pseudo-objective stance of a false pluralism: they say, all a little bit wrong (or all wrong), since there is no one truth, many people, so many truths ...
And yet, in my opinion, the tendency has prevailed concrete historicism. Its essence is simple: pluralism is not appropriate in science, and a bazaar. Truth - is one, but it is concrete. In other words, every thing, whether it's outlook is reflected in it, or life, should be assessed logically, that is ... based on her own.
As part of a serious collective analysis of the speakers drew attention to the profound paradox article Bulgakov. In fact: Marx and suddenly ... religious type! Unusually somehow ... If a presumption seriousness of the author as a philosopher, then there should not laugh, not cry, but to understand. What is it exactly?
Judge for yourself. According to its ideological formations Marx is generally considered an atheist. That is a supporter of the negation of God. Mean? .. Hence, the philosopher Bulgakov, no less, says that in principle a religion ... without God. Paradoxically, the fact! For only in this case we can agree with the title of his article.
But we go further.
Times can a religion without God, and God is possible ... without religion. In other words, as an ungodly attitude towards religion, and irreligious attitude toward God ... This is life and history. When, for instance, broke down the old church and deify the new boss. And in the history of philosophy and science happens: God can be denied in the religious, but you can recognize in atheistic. Outside, so to speak, religion. In philosophy, for example.
Atheism is not ... Atheism - Is not this a paradox! And this paradox is not beyond reason, and is entirely within the boundaries of it.
So there must be a godless Marxism? - Such a result of the workshop analysis of emerging issues. And, contrary to his same philosophical pathos, Bulgakov respond to it positively. Look like?
The speakers at the seminar it was noted that for this author of the article have to say this: "Marx himself did not call himself a disciple of Feuerbach, who was in reality, preferring reason to call himself a disciple of Hegel, who was not." What's the subtlety? And in that, if Marx - feyerbahianets, he - an atheist, and if a Hegelian, it is not, because Bulgakov knew that Hegel God knew how exactly m s a l and t b, but not deny. The same ability, which is called the D and A l e a t and a second, he would have to admit, and for Marxism ...
The most temperamental controversy erupted on Bulgakov's thesis that Marxism does not know the person and knows only the lonely society. More precisely, impersonal community of people ... "Like we said, Marx remains inaccessible religious issue, it is not concerned about the fate of individuality, it is entirely absorbed in that it is a b u m and for all individuals, non-personal in them," equating it to zero balance he writes.
However, to refute such an assertion is not difficult. Simply refer to the letter of Marx to Annenkov, December 28, 1846, which reads as follows: "As a society, whatever its form? Product of human interaction. Hence the desired conclusion: the social history people have always just (emphasis added - VM), the history of their individual development, whether they realize it or not. "
Impersonal Marxism derived from its non-religious, believes Bulgakov. So be it. After all, personality - is the image of God in man's soul ... But is Christianity, for example, claiming that all people are equal before God, all credits to the person purely automatically? Not at all! Otherwise it will not differ from the true faith just superstition.
In short, as Marxism does not deny automatically figure in history, and Christianity does not automatically approve a person to God. Both Marx and Christ - both believed that the man doomed to become a person on the sole ground that he - Man. But at the same degree he is doomed and hard work "it become"!
It must be noted that Article Bulgakov on Marx is a strange mixture of philosophical depth and ordinary human bias. That is to say, human, all too human ...
... Once Hegel called a true rose on a cross the universe. Who wants a rose, that he should want, and a cross. And in fact, materialism in the philosophical understanding of human affairs and actions is fraught not only of gratitude people. But if philosophy reveals spikes ingratitude, it is from them and keep us safe ...
The seminar on Russian philosophy continues. The next meeting devoted to "Worldview of Peter Chaadaeva and modernity."
B. SILENT PhD.
"In place", "November 5, 1991, edition of 217.000.
Truth - a high concept. According to Hegel, at the sound of that word in every real man should be above the billowing breasts. However, on the notion that people can have either a high or a low opinion. And according to one or another opinion to the truth and they themselves are.
Strictly speaking, those who publicly praises the truth is many more than those who openly raises her hula. However, the most common and scary kind of disrespect is the one that confronts us daily life every day, namely: respect for words and a denial in fact. So is her bitter fate of the world. And the fate that inevitably separates any ideology that claims to be something to bring the light of truth to the people ...
... Can not think of another. Just as, however, should not be allowed and others to think for you. This is the basic rule of the intellectual health of man as a thinker. And therefore able to find the truth of their own way. That's how participants believed workshop on urban Russian philosophy. Not forgetting that if people think, the same way, but if you DO NOT think. ... Then here, each in its own way Gorazd!
City Seminar on Russian, German and Greek philosophy "Russian Logos - a kind of public association of citizens. In Yekaterinburg, it has been two years and consistently attracts all those who possessed a sincere love for philosophy. Who respects this "science of sciences" is not for the opportunity to make a career or to earn their daily bread, but because the only thing that she alone can give a person: to think myself, to think together with others, but ... do not try to "think for others." In short, the seminar involved as enthusiastic amateurs, and many well-known philosophers of the Ural region. Among these candidates Philosophy S. Nekrasov, L. Maple, V. Knyazev, N. Smolnikova, Goncharov, N. Kuznetsov, E. Surovtseva sociologists, W. Kadochnikov, E. Rakhova, Ph.D. V. Kopal, SW . Andreev, BA Emelianov, A. Vetoshkin, doctor of economics Anatoly Ilyshev and others.
Members of the seminar lectures and organize meetings with labor unions on the issues of Russian classical philosophy, stand in the regional and national press. Conduct scientific and philosophical examination at the request of the public, publish collections of scientific papers. In short, develop a modern philosophical science, creating a climate of scientific associations, to reject the forms of corporate and administrative monopoly in the philosophical science of the Urals.
This year's first meeting was held in the small hall of the Central House of Culture of the officers and was devoted to Father Sergius Bulgakov article, which carries the name "Karl Marx as a religious type."
I must say that discussion of this issue was of an acute and rapidly-emotional. There was everything: and unthinkingly-orthodox defense of the holy names, and giddy enthusiasm for the overthrow of the old idols, pseudo-objective stance of a false pluralism: they say, all a little bit wrong (or all wrong), since there is no one truth, many people, so many truths ...
And yet, in my opinion, the tendency has prevailed concrete historicism. Its essence is simple: pluralism is not appropriate in science, and a bazaar. Truth - is one, but it is concrete. In other words, every thing, whether it's outlook is reflected in it, or life, should be assessed logically, that is ... based on her own.
As part of a serious collective analysis of the speakers drew attention to the profound paradox article Bulgakov. In fact: Marx and suddenly ... religious type! Unusually somehow ... If a presumption seriousness of the author as a philosopher, then there should not laugh, not cry, but to understand. What is it exactly?
Judge for yourself. According to its ideological formations Marx is generally considered an atheist. That is a supporter of the negation of God. Mean? .. Hence, the philosopher Bulgakov, no less, says that in principle a religion ... without God. Paradoxically, the fact! For only in this case we can agree with the title of his article.
But we go further.
Times can a religion without God, and God is possible ... without religion. In other words, as an ungodly attitude towards religion, and irreligious attitude toward God ... This is life and history. When, for instance, broke down the old church and deify the new boss. And in the history of philosophy and science happens: God can be denied in the religious, but you can recognize in atheistic. Outside, so to speak, religion. In philosophy, for example.
Atheism is not ... Atheism - Is not this a paradox! And this paradox is not beyond reason, and is entirely within the boundaries of it.
So there must be a godless Marxism? - Such a result of the workshop analysis of emerging issues. And, contrary to his same philosophical pathos, Bulgakov respond to it positively. Look like?
The speakers at the seminar it was noted that for this author of the article have to say this: "Marx himself did not call himself a disciple of Feuerbach, who was in reality, preferring reason to call himself a disciple of Hegel, who was not." What's the subtlety? And in that, if Marx - feyerbahianets, he - an atheist, and if a Hegelian, it is not, because Bulgakov knew that Hegel God knew how exactly m s a l and t b, but not deny. The same ability, which is called the D and A l e a t and a second, he would have to admit, and for Marxism ...
The most temperamental controversy erupted on Bulgakov's thesis that Marxism does not know the person and knows only the lonely society. More precisely, impersonal community of people ... "Like we said, Marx remains inaccessible religious issue, it is not concerned about the fate of individuality, it is entirely absorbed in that it is a b u m and for all individuals, non-personal in them," equating it to zero balance he writes.
However, to refute such an assertion is not difficult. Simply refer to the letter of Marx to Annenkov, December 28, 1846, which reads as follows: "As a society, whatever its form? Product of human interaction. Hence the desired conclusion: the social history people have always just (emphasis added - VM), the history of their individual development, whether they realize it or not. "
Impersonal Marxism derived from its non-religious, believes Bulgakov. So be it. After all, personality - is the image of God in man's soul ... But is Christianity, for example, claiming that all people are equal before God, all credits to the person purely automatically? Not at all! Otherwise it will not differ from the true faith just superstition.
In short, as Marxism does not deny automatically figure in history, and Christianity does not automatically approve a person to God. Both Marx and Christ - both believed that the man doomed to become a person on the sole ground that he - Man. But at the same degree he is doomed and hard work "it become"!
It must be noted that Article Bulgakov on Marx is a strange mixture of philosophical depth and ordinary human bias. That is to say, human, all too human ...
... Once Hegel called a true rose on a cross the universe. Who wants a rose, that he should want, and a cross. And in fact, materialism in the philosophical understanding of human affairs and actions is fraught not only of gratitude people. But if philosophy reveals spikes ingratitude, it is from them and keep us safe ...
The seminar on Russian philosophy continues. The next meeting devoted to "Worldview of Peter Chaadaeva and modernity."
B. SILENT PhD.
"In place", "November 5, 1991, edition of 217.000.
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий