As told the newspaper Izvestia, "on Wednesday, representatives of different government agencies made a small theater at the conference at the Higher School of Economics. Namely, the theater! And the fact that it was another performance artists of the crisis, in the bosom of the liberal-democratic reforms, and can be no doubt. Since the "actors" are the same as their role. True, the speech had become somewhat melancholy, without enthusiasm and irrepressible imagination. The crisis in the yard, which is under their watchful guidance and came into existence. Now they all talk about the difficulties holding back the origins of these difficulties and totally forgetting their same searchlights, during the period of high prices for hydrocarbons. German Gref, successfully moved from ministerial office in an armchair manager of the Savings Bank, all insisted that allocated billions for the bankers is clearly not enough to overcome the financial crisis that has intensified in the autumn. "The banking crisis is now in the beginning, and he comes from the real economy" - said in the past, official and now a banker. Especially that received money from the State Savings Bank, as is known, already divided between the top managers. Worries about additional resources for banks, German Gref, supported, and this calmed, the first deputy head of the CBR, and assured all present that "the state will continue to help the banks money." The play ended with dark portents of presidential aide Arkady Dvorkovich. Dvorkovich said that "most existing businesses can not survive until 2020. Will not survive, one must understand not only the company, but many citizens, to a bright future, drawn in the government's development program until 2020, when the average salary bude be 2000 dollars! In this case, the presidential aide modestly silent about his role in these processes, and that they all take to avoid such serious consequences of the crisis, occupying important government positions? It seems that nothing! 04/09/2009, the Topical Archive 2005 The pages of the newspaper "Izvestia" What do you think, dear reader, one issue of the newspaper is enough to understand what is happening in the country? Right! Unequivocal answer, most likely, will not. A little thought, you're quite likely to say that everything depends on two main factors. Firstly, from the newspaper itself, from its objectivity and quality of the material, and secondly, from the readiness of the reader and awake right. But I will not torture you more, and try to do this for the All-Russian newspaper Izvestia », № 58, on April 7, 2005 By the way, the newspaper is sometimes very informative, many of the materials were prepared professionally and with a soul. On first viewing, immediately struck a large amount of material on economic issues. Apparently there is a reason to. Country is not the first day of seething discontent with the activities of government reforms. The opposition is gaining adherents, although it has a very clumsy, with some incredible anguish, as if by necessity, like a boulder uphill pushes. The soil under the feet of the ruling class and their supporters rocked and need to quickly extinguish the fire. Slated for the country, landmarks were a fiction (an increase of GDP is twice). In search of life-saving decisions of the government cabinet members attended the annual conference of the Higher School of Economics. That's where, it turns out the alma mater of reform in Russia. A sort of fashionable tusovka guzzlers tax, former cabinet members, that produced the current system of oligarchic rule in the country. Here are likely to go away and today members of the government, after his retirement. Or bite off funds from the budget pie for the opening of some of his institute, as did Yegor Gaidar, who at this conference proved to be a subject, get smart without merit. "This issue is key, but has no solution," - spoken director of the Institute for Economy in Transition, about the institutional reforms. It is strange that those present, it is quite self-respecting people who do not have a question: why then came to the conference, Yegor Timurovich? To head over to fool? But the presence of all swallow hard and learned that the institutions are not cactuses, they are not easy to grow. Yegor Timurovich raised his institute and he knows it better than others. That would just be fewer of these institutions, having stuck to the budget, perhaps not least, our economy was in a state of deformation, deterioration, rotting and dying. " It is so appreciated our economy, Andrei Illarionov. An interesting situation is obtained. Gathered together former and current members of the government and declare that the economy is in poor condition that is degraded and Dying. And who's to blame? Who brought the country to such a state? Did you not, he wondered, were actively involved in what we have today? Not on whether your prescription, you are our nerd, Yegor Timurovich, lined up today's oligarchic model of the economy? According to your! So it is with you and ask. And do not, gentlemen rulers portray concern the development of the country. People understand that you are concerned about preserving their own sources of income, maintain their power. The farmer in the field, working at a lathe, a teacher at the school today is much more than you do for conservation and development. And you are willing to reconcile the irreconcilable, so that the oligarchs, in league with the top bureaucrats were happy, and the economy developed, its bustle, apply only to damage the country. Harm, as in expressing and defending the interests of bureaucrats and the oligarchs, trying to put themselves defenders of the interests of the people. Launched at the same conference the problem of institutional change, indeed, economic decisions do not matter. It can be solved only in the political transition. In the restructuring of the state, a change in the principles of its formation. What today is on the agenda. And to do this can only organized political force, rather than union officials and scientists that serve them. Moreover, as can be seen from the article "Time to bring reform to the end, the president of the Liberal mission, scientific director of the Higher School of Economics, Yevgeny Yasin, they have nothing new has appeared. They again and again repeated that the reforms should be carried out, and like ten years ago fall into the illusion that society is composed of uniform men, with similar interests, and unwilling to understand that their proposed reforms will be carried out so far as it is interesting and favorably by officials, rather than society as a whole. What is silent Yevgeny Yasin on his participation in the reformist government? Why did he not brought the reforms to the end, with real power? It would have been much more interesting than an empty ranting about the reforms. And the fact that Russia needs a major transformation, one is not going to argue. There were at the conference and without debate the fate of the Stabilization Fund, for control over which agencies are fighting Alexei Kudrin and German Gref. Already a lure became the Stabilization Fund of Russia, for officials of various stripes. But at a conference in the School of Economics, they stand united against the spending Stabilization Fund. Supported them and Andrei Illarionov. And even, as noted Konstantin Frumkin, Andrei Illarionov, "compared with the Stabilization Fund" Trojan horse ": according to his metaphor, let the horse into the city, that is to spend the money inside Russia, the means for its defenders, that is, the inhabitants of our country and defeat." That is so vague wording officials to explain why you can not use the Stabilization Fund in the country. But you can invest in securities of foreign states. They do not respect their fellow citizens and do not consider it necessary to clear and understandable to express their views. What is the damage to citizens and the country's economy will suffer if the Stabilization Fund will be spent on construction of a fourth unit at Beloyarsk, on completion of construction of the Kursk nuclear power plant in Kurchatov, which halted construction on the subway construction in Yekaterinburg, Chelyabinsk, Omsk, or on the roads? Yes no damage will not be! It is tale of cunning officials. Will be provided with jobs, go orders to the factories, the budgets will receive additional revenue from taxes. And no promotion of inflation will not be as long-term investments, the money will be connected, and the economic effect is significant. Nobody is not intended simply to distribute funds to various bureaucratic structures under various specious pretexts. The existence of the Stabilization Fund, in general raises many questions. First, on what basis the funds withdrawn from the budgetary control? And secondly, why the control is carried out by representatives of executive power? Because all funds coming into the treasury from taxes, revenues of public enterprises, as well as natural resource rent and should be subject to fiscal adjustment, that is the lawfully elected MPs should decide the fate of public funds, not the executive branch officials, caught in the government know which way. And here, under a note Konstantin Frumkin's conference at the Higher School of Economics, which was attended by ministers and scientists, the report is printed Theodore Gull, a conference held by representatives of big business, as a reminder to the authorities that it was wrong to try to sit on two chairs. These gentlemen are more specific. They know what they want and do not hide their intentions. "I'm not sure that the state effectively in the economy. It must reduce its presence ", - said Vladimir Potanin. Generally, as noted, Theodore Gull, the main problem for investors lie in state politics. "The overall investment climate in Russia last year was seriously injured because of tax claims, which were not entirely clear and systematic", - notes the view of the head of Interros, Theodore Gull. It turns out that the government, despite all their attempts to scientifically justify their activities, be satisfied only by themselves, but apparently those who appointed them there. In these circumstances, when the state only cares about himself, really right, Andrei Illarionov, who insists on the need to privatize Iraq's oil and gas industry. Let them come private businessmen, develop natural resources and pay taxes. And then the officer sits on the natural resources, ostensibly in the interests of the people, and neither you taxes or revenue to the state treasury, all goes into the bottomless pockets of the top bureaucracy. How many more will come from the depths of Gazprom's billionaires, while he was a state enterprise, God knows. But it would be better to note that the problem is not who owns Gazprom, and who controls the country, what power, whose interests are crucial for decision-making authorities. Statement of the Presidential Adviser Andrei Illarionov, more likely, likely, based on the fact that the president and the government can not cope with the situation in the country, one might even say do not run. Confirmation of this and confusing explanations of high rates of inflation, the head of Finance Minister Alexei Kudrin, Sergey Chereshneva in the article "Inflation is out of control." "Consumer prices in the first quarter of 2005 increased by 5,3%" - leads the data of the Federal State Statistics Service Sergei cherries. Modest, Alexei Kudrin, arguing that the main reason for the rapid growth of consumer prices is the increase in tariffs for housing and communal services. Can neither understand the finance minister, that inflation is redistributive in favor of a monopolist that utility rates have increased because of rising energy prices, that without the participation of state officials such redistribution would not be possible, and that the officials as a result of these manipulations , put a tidy sum in his pocket. And also the fact that inflation is an impediment to industrial development, not raw materials industries, holding back the construction mortgage, lower standard of living of most citizens. But, apparently, for reasons known only to him, Alexei Kudrin, has decided not to speak, promising in the future, to establish control over tariffs for gas and electricity. "In the near future the government will approve the tariffs of natural monopolies in the next year. And in 2006, their growth will be "significantly lower" than current rates. " Again, gentlemen rulers feed the people of the good things, while they themselves get them today. In the same issue of Izvestia noted, and another former statesman Alexander Livshits, who decided to reflect on the capital outflow. And it would be good, and even it would be interesting to know the opinion Livshits, the issue of capital flight from Russia, the causes and nature of this phenomenon, but the author hit a discourse on the process as a whole. And somehow I came to the conclusion that entrepreneurs operate under the laws of business, but the government is behaving poorly. "Yes, capital is pushed. But it is not politics, but business interests "- the author contends. But we must be aware that common, really, has the character of universality and the concrete is the bearer of truth. Therefore, the argument in the general laws of movement of capital does not give rise to specific conclusions. It would be worth noting that if capital outflow goes to countries where cheap labor, where low taxes, that is where there is a higher rate of return, then this one, and here everything is clear. And the solution in this case, lies on the surface. But today, there is capital outflow from Russia to countries with lower profit nomoy, in an effort just to get away from the country, as it often capital obtained by illegal means. As correctly noted author: "With debts, lawsuits and so forth." It is quite another. It is viewed simply desire to preserve capital and to separate from the government, gave rise to it. And in this case, the solution found is not so easy, and sometimes impossible, since it requires a change in the nature of power itself. I would not want to trouble the reader parsing the arguments of Alexander Livshits, but by one statement to pass is not possible. "Do not forget about macroeconomics. For her, the outflow of capital - the benefit. A tributary - a natural disaster. Such as a tsunami. " Pointing to the macroeconomy, the author lost sight of the general public. Capital outflows may indeed be a boon for individual capitals in the country, but a very negative impact on the development of society as a whole. Only the highest density of capital, its free passage from one sphere to another, as well as its accessibility, that is, low interest loan, can gradually and steadily develop the whole society, rather than stagnate. I think it is more important than the satisfaction of the individual entrepreneur. There is also in this issue of Izvestia two articles on the Russian bank, where one of them the head of the Association of Russian Banks, Garegin Tosunyan expressed wishes of the bankers: "Banking community has unanimously supported the idea that the cornerstone of public policy was finally delivered to the development of banking system. " That approach to the state, which must still learning to employees and retirees - ensure development of the banking system and not anyhow, but first and foremost, though, the same Tosunyan notes that "the 7% overall GDP growth in previous years was accompanied by 30-40%-s growth in the banking system. " Presented in a newspaper article ends with the economic block views of the editors, which expressed regret that so far the government failed to offer the public more or less alone plan, replacing it with "a set of slogans" and a lot of intent. A government without a general "business plan" is not bad time. But here it is worth noting that the government probably has a plan, but only aims at "strengthening the personal power, and for society, it is now able to sufficiently and letters of intent. In contrast, the policy is presented in the paper to a much lesser extent, but even here the editors did not betray himself, trying to pull on the surface of public life political troglodytes, has long been annoying repetition of the citizens of their flat, poorly memorized thoughts. Well, pray tell: what can people tell Irina Hakamada, with their student learning? That power must be correct! Who will be correct? Which way to correct? The fact that "freedom and social, normal, decent life compatible. Are not compatible, but only possible. Of all the proposed set of words can be clearly seen that there is no understanding of social processes and interactions. There is no historicity and personal position. All replaced by general arguments and not worth a damn. Bored gentlemen. It seems that the ruling class has exhausted its existing set of ideas and increasingly began to focus on various political technology instead of real politics. Where will this lead time will tell, but the change of the ruling class is inevitable.
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий